=== barry` is now known as barry_
[16:42] <lamont> ScottK: postfix 2.7.1-1 uploaded to debian, btw
[16:43] <ScottK> lamont: Thanks.
[17:49] <slangasek> lamont: are clementine and acorn still the right machines for armel livefs builds?  I'm noticing a lot of failed livefs build attempts with no corresponding logs at all
[17:49] <lamont> clementine iz dead.  or should be.
[17:50] <lamont> acorn is your happiness, or should be.
[17:54] <lamont> though with acorn, try again...
[18:14] <slangasek> erm, so we're down to one again?
[18:15] <slangasek> lamont: why did clementine go away?
[18:16] <lamont> pegatron bad.
[18:16] <lamont> must kill all pegatron
[18:16] <slangasek> is it being *replaced* with something?
[18:16] <lamont> slangasek: did you want a second one?
[18:16] <slangasek> yes!
[18:16] <lamont> slangasek: and do you have the ability to put a buildd on manual?
[18:16] <slangasek> no
[18:17] <lamont> that is a sadness
[18:17] <lamont> so basically, if you want a second one, I need to (a) steal a buildd, or (b) we dual-load it sometimes
[18:17] <lamont> what's your pleasure?
[18:18] <lamont> slangasek: oh and hey, bind9 1:9.7.1.dfsg-1 wants to come over from debian once it gets out of incoming, kthx
[18:18] <slangasek> well, I don't understand why clementine was killed in the first place; I was thoroughly expecting acorn to be supplementing clementine, not replacing it
[18:19] <lamont> all of the pegatron machines were temporary until we got in usable boards.  you really don't want the full details behind the pain that they were
[18:19] <slangasek> bind9> can do
[18:19] <slangasek> hmm
[18:19] <lamont> so once all the current hardware was online, we shot the pegatroids in the head
[18:20] <slangasek> I don't have stats on arm buildd capacity to say that a buildd should be stolen to be a livefs builder, but being back down to one livefs buildd will be painful
[18:21] <lamont> it's been doing well with 8.  though atm, 2 of them have faceplanted and will be down until someone goes to powercycle them
[18:21] <lamont> 7 did pretty OK when we had that many... so stealing a second one to be dedicated livecd cruncher shouldn't be too bad, I expect
[18:22] <slangasek> what about when it comes time to do a rebuild of all of main again on armel next month? :)
[18:25] <lamont> that, we could use $MOAR machines for
[18:25]  * slangasek nods
[18:27] <lamont> and we could always temporarily drop you to 1 or 0 livefs builders for that. :-p
[18:28] <slangasek> heh
[18:29] <lamont> once it's back online, I'll make sycamore your other livecd builder
[18:31] <slangasek> cheers :)
[21:20] <lamont> slangasek: my test build to confirm things is running on sycamore now
[21:20] <lamont> (and will give you a lucid ubuntu armel livecd fs if that's of any use to you
[21:35] <slangasek> don't think I need one at the moment, thanks :)