[12:05] <gnomefreak> apt is broken :(
[12:06] <gnomefreak> hm that was odd, its working
[12:33] <gnomefreak> !info smart
[12:33] <ubot2> gnomefreak: Package smart does not exist in lucid
[12:34] <gnomefreak> !info smartpm
[12:34] <gnomefreak> !info pulseaudio
[12:34] <ubot2> gnomefreak: smartpm (source: smart): An alternative package manager that works with dpkg/rpm. In component universe, is optional. Version 1.2-5 (lucid), package size 57 kB, installed size 364 kB
[12:34] <ubot2> gnomefreak: pulseaudio (source: pulseaudio): PulseAudio sound server. In component main, is optional. Version 1:0.9.22~0.9.21+stable-queue-32-g8478-0ubuntu14 (lucid), package size 623 kB, installed size 4460 kB
[12:34] <gnomefreak> !info pulseaudio maverick
[12:34] <ubot2> gnomefreak: 'maverick' is not a valid distribution: hardy, jaunty, karmic, lucid
[12:37] <gnomefreak> damnit changed bot again
[13:19] <gnomefreak> @whoami
[13:19] <ubot2> gnomefreak: I don't recognize you.
[13:19] <gnomefreak> of course not
[13:20] <gnomefreak> !snack
[13:20] <ubot2> Factoid 'snack' not found
[13:20] <gnomefreak> damn this onei is dumber than ubot4
[15:35] <chrisccoulson> hi micahg
[15:35] <chrisccoulson> what time is the DMB meeting?
[15:35] <micahg> hi chrisccoulson, in 25 minutes
[15:35] <chrisccoulson> cool
[15:42] <micahg> mdeslaur: should I file a blacklist bug for flashplugin-nonfree (since we seem to be permanently forked from Debian)?
[15:42] <mdeslaur> micahg: oh, please do
[15:42] <mdeslaur> micahg: thanks
[15:43] <micahg> mdeslaur: np
[15:56] <micahg> chrisccoulson: doko says I need a week to set up for the openjdk test to run the TCK
[16:00] <chrisccoulson> micahg - that's quite a long time ;)
[16:00] <chrisccoulson> fortunately that doesn't hold up hardy
[16:00] <micahg> chrisccoulson: he said it's a one time cost
[16:00] <micahg> chrisccoulson: hardy doesn't need it :)
[16:01] <chrisccoulson> yeah, this only applied to jaunty and karmic, which still probably need another full week of testing anyway
[16:02] <micahg> chrisccoulson: k, so, should I do it then?  I can't realistically probably start until the weekend though
[16:03] <chrisccoulson> micahg - i'm not sure. i'm not familiar with everything that's involved for it atm
[16:11] <micahg> chrisccoulson: well, there's quite a bit of setup time, that's the issue
[16:11] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I can give you the doc on it if you want
[16:13] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, i can take a look at that
[16:13] <micahg> chrisccoulson: http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/JCKDistilled <-- requires multiple machines, I was going to try w/VMs
[16:13] <chrisccoulson> heh. i'd probably struggle with that a bit ;)
[16:14] <chrisccoulson> i need some meatier hardware really
[16:14] <micahg> chrisccoulson: k, well if there's no rush, I can do it, just not till the weekend
[16:14]  * micahg knows there's a rush :)
[16:16] <chrisccoulson> yeah, i'm just not sure i'd be able to do it any quicker. i really need to invest in some more capable hardware ;)
[16:35] <chrisccoulson> woooh \o/
[16:35] <chrisccoulson> we have packageset
[16:36] <micahg> chrisccoulson: k, I know you have other items as well (#ubuntu-desktop), so I can do it
[16:37] <micahg> chrisccoulson: and you now have upload rights to xulrunner :)
[16:37] <gnomefreak> !firefox
[16:37] <chrisccoulson> yeah, that's cool :)
[16:37] <ubot2> firefox is the default web-browser on Ubuntu. To install the latest version, see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FirefoxNewVersion Installing plugins: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FirefoxPlugins - See also !firefox-3.5
[16:37] <gnomefreak> !info firefox
[16:37] <ubot2> gnomefreak: firefox (source: firefox): safe and easy web browser from Mozilla. In component main, is optional. Version 3.6.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu4 (lucid), package size 10601 kB, installed size 28668 kB
[16:37] <gnomefreak> !info firefox maverick
[16:37] <ubot2> gnomefreak: 'maverick' is not a valid distribution: hardy, jaunty, karmic, lucid
[16:38] <micahg> gnomefreak: 3.6.3
[16:38] <gnomefreak> micahg: yeah working on a few things atm but that is for the releases we havent pushed to if you mean the !firefox command i gave
[16:39]  * gnomefreak wants my media buttons to work but i dont do magic :(
[16:39] <micahg> gnomefreak: lucid and Maverick have 3.6.3, karmic has 3.5.10, hardy and jaunty 3.0.19
[16:39] <gnomefreak> bdrung: welcome
[16:39] <bdrung> gnomefreak: hi
[16:40] <gnomefreak> !info firefox karmic
[16:41] <ubot2> gnomefreak: firefox (source: firefox-3.5): meta package for the popular mozilla web browser. In component main, is optional. Version 3.5.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.10.1 (karmic), package size 71 kB, installed size 128 kB
[16:42] <gnomefreak> the factoid !firefox is for everyone at this time. the !info is run from the server. i will try to get it updated when i get maveric info to work
[16:42] <micahg> oops
[16:42] <micahg> yeah 3.5.10
[16:42] <micahg> gnomefreak: firefox should link to the help pages
[16:42] <micahg> *3.5.9
[16:43] <gnomefreak> pick a help page. i will than change that
[16:43] <gnomefreak> /nhttps://help.ubuntu.com/community/FirefoxNewVersion << not right?
[16:43] <gnomefreak> - the /n
[16:44] <gnomefreak> that looks like the right page but if you have another let me know
[16:45] <micahg> gnomefreak: I have to look at the other wiki page
[16:45] <gnomefreak> k
[16:45] <gnomefreak> how are the builds comming for <Lucid?
[16:46] <micahg> gnomefreak: everything's staged in security PPA
[16:46] <micahg> for 3.6.4
[16:46] <gnomefreak> k
[16:46] <gnomefreak> ok thats right 3.6.5 was skipped
[16:47]  * gnomefreak forgot why i had 3.6.6
[16:48]  * gnomefreak forgot i hve to fix a slow as script
[16:48] <gnomefreak> s/as/ass
[16:50] <gnomefreak> be back need reboot
[16:58] <asac> micahg: whats up with your being removed from the -uploaders?
[16:59] <micahg> asac: I did that so the team could be made as uploaders for the package set, my application still needs to be approved
[16:59] <asac> ah
[16:59] <asac> micahg: is that on topic for todays meeting?
[16:59] <asac> or covered elesewhere?
[16:59] <micahg> asac: well, we're 1 hr in already, depends how fast the rest of the applications go
[16:59] <asac> ok but you are on the list?
[16:59] <asac> kk
[17:01] <gnomefreak> crimsun_: anything i can do with the muted when logging in? it is not muted if i unmute and change from xfce to gnome or anything else
[17:13] <gnomefreak> oh oh oh
[17:13] <gnomefreak> ha
[17:13] <gnomefreak> can someone please translate bug 596293
[17:13] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 596293 in grub2 (Ubuntu) "package linux-image-2.6.32-23-generic-pae 2.6.32-23.37 failed to install/upgrade: podproces instalovaný post-installation skript vrátil chybový status 127 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/596293
[17:14] <gnomefreak> is it linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic2.6.32-22.36 failed toinstall/upgrade: subprocessinstalledpost-installation scriptreturned error exit status 127
[18:02] <micahg> asac: so, my app will be addressed at the beginning of the next meeting
[18:03] <asac> micahg: ok ... when is that?
[18:03] <micahg> asac: 2 weeks :)
[18:04] <asac> -> do a couple of more uploads until then ... to save the lock
[18:04] <gnomefreak> jaunty EOL?
[18:04] <micahg> asac: save the lock?
[18:04] <micahg> gnomefreak: no
[18:04] <asac> micahg: save the base ;)
[18:04] <gnomefreak> micahg: after this release
[18:04] <micahg> gnomefreak: yes
[18:04] <gnomefreak> thanks
[18:04] <micahg> asac: k, I need to finish the 2 packages I took for the hardy backport
[18:05] <micahg> asac: I'm not worried, there's still work to do for the backports
[18:26] <gnomefreak> its 100F outside and feels like 103F from what the weather said on tv after 100F it all feels the same
[18:30] <kylehuff> i wish it were 100+ here
[18:31] <gnomefreak> way too damn hot. im happy with ~50F
[18:32]  * gnomefreak should never have moved down here
[18:32]  * kylehuff should never have moved up here....
[18:37] <chrisccoulson> micahg - what happened in the DMB? did they run out of time?
[18:53] <micahg> chrisccoulson: yep :), so 2 more weeks, but I'm second on the agenda next time :)
[18:53] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I've got plenty to do w/out uploading
[18:56] <micahg> chrisccoulson: if I get through all my mozilla tasks this cycle, I can try to help you w/-desktop tasks
[19:00] <BUGabundo_IsBack> HIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
[19:21] <gnomefreak> hi
[19:22] <BUGabundo_IsBack> hey hey gnomefreak
[19:22] <BUGabundo_IsBack> how have you been?
[19:23] <BUGabundo_IsBack> did you guys miss me a lot ?
[19:24] <gnomefreak> im ok just in a bad mood, i didnt notice you were gone i just thought you were here after i left
[19:24] <gnomefreak> sorry
[19:25] <BUGabundo_IsBack> :(
[19:30] <gnomefreak> be back in a few
[19:47]  * gnomefreak getting really sick of the bugs that sit around for 6+ months with not comment. so i am closing all my reported bugs that will not be fixed. like any wishlist gwibber bugs
[19:49] <BUGabundo_IsBack> ahaahah
[19:49] <BUGabundo_IsBack> I got 700 unread bug mails from gwibber
[19:50] <BUGabundo_IsBack> don't even dare looking at it this week
[19:51]  * gnomefreak thinking of changing to something else. gwibber devs will not even concider wishlist bugs so im giving up. If you ask me it should never been default but that is just me
[19:52] <gnomefreak> closed ~7 or 8 of the bugs i reported
[19:52] <gnomefreak> be back need o do something for a fe wminutes
[20:26] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: curious what the status is for adjusting epiphany to not use 1.9.2?
[20:26] <chrisccoulson_> jdstrand - it's on my list for tonight :)
[20:27] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_, micahg: what is the status for karmic/openjdk-6? have you tested openjdk-6 on jaunty? I imagine it will need it too
[20:27] <chrisccoulson_> i'm working through the list of xulrunner rdepends on jaunty, and was going to do it when i get to epiphany in jaunty, and do them both at the same time
[20:27] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: k, thanks
[20:27] <micahg> jdstrand: supposedly it takes a week to get TCK set up for testing openjdk
[20:28] <micahg> jdstrand: I hope to start this weekend
[20:28] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: it seems like quite a bit of jaunty is already uploaded. what is left?
[20:28] <jdstrand> micahg: perhaps we can upload it to the ppa so it is built, since it takes so long to build
[20:29] <micahg> jdstrand: that's up to chrisccoulson_
[20:29] <micahg> jdstrand: it's built in my PPA
[20:29] <jdstrand> micahg: maybe doko can run the tests himself?
[20:29] <micahg> jdstrand: I was afraid to ask since I know he's so busy
[20:30] <jdstrand> micahg: well, I assume that he already has the infrastructure and would just need to download it and run it
[20:30] <micahg> jdstrand: right, I guess there's no harm in asking, right?
[20:31] <jdstrand> micahg: let me see if kees has it setup
[20:31] <micahg> jdstrand: k, thanks
[20:42] <jdstrand> micahg: I'll be sending an email to doko and others regarding the TCK
[20:42] <jdstrand> micahg: I'll CC
[20:42] <jdstrand> you
[20:42] <micahg> jdstrand: thanks
[21:21] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: a lot of jaunty seems to be uploaded. what is left? I'm starting to test now. when will the call for testing go ouot?
[21:25] <micahg> jdstrand: chrisccoulson_: ugh, FF3.6.4 released
[21:25] <jdstrand> whee
[21:25] <jdstrand> http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/ isn't updated yet
[21:26] <micahg> http://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2010/06/22/firefox-3-6-4-with-crash-protection-now-available/
[21:26] <jdstrand> I'll keep an eye on it
[21:29] <micahg> jdstrand: is 1 week too long to wait to patch TB2 if it's vulnerable to anything?
[21:29] <jdstrand> micahg: depends no what the vuln is
[21:30] <jdstrand> micahg: based on past experience, 1 week is just fine since most TB issues are in the javascript engine that is disabled by default
[21:30] <micahg> jdstrand: ugh, ok, can you let me know if there are any major non-JS CVEs this time around?  I'll try to backport this weekend the non-JS issues
[21:30] <jdstrand> (or similar)
[21:30] <jdstrand> micahg: yes. I will be keeping an eye on the page
[21:30] <micahg> or I can just look later
[21:34] <chrisccoulson_> jdstrand / micahg - pressure's on now then ;)
[21:34] <chrisccoulson_> (with the 3.6.4 release)
[21:34] <micahg> chrisccoulson_: not a good week for me :(
[21:35] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: can we go over what is pending? on my list I have:
[21:35] <jdstrand> 1. epiphany/hardy/no 1.9.2 2. karmic openjdk 3. jaunty testing
[21:35] <jdstrand> I imagine openjdk will be needed on jaunty
[21:35] <chrisccoulson_> jdstrand - yeah, it will be
[21:36] <chrisccoulson_> there are also still things on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Lucid/FirefoxNewSupportModel/xulrunner-list to port
[21:37] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: for which release?
[21:37] <micahg> All 3 :(
[21:37] <chrisccoulson_> well, mostly jaunty and karmic
[21:38] <chrisccoulson_> for hardy, the remaining ones are all xulrunner 1.8 applications (with the exception of midbrowser)
[21:39] <chrisccoulson_> and those all still work with 1.9.2 installed on the system
[21:39] <chrisccoulson_> and 1.8 hasn't been updated for a long  time
[21:39] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: is the TODO list "xulrunner reverse depends with insecure content exposure" ?
[21:40] <chrisccoulson_> jdstrand - yeah, that's it
[21:40] <micahg> chrisccoulson_: fennec and google-gadgets should get the lucid versions
[21:40] <fta> how long will the lang packs stay in the ums ppa?
[21:40] <micahg> chrisccoulson_: I can upload those to transition PPA tonight
[21:41] <chrisccoulson_> fta - until they've been copied in to the archive
[21:41] <chrisccoulson_> micahg - we don't need those for hardy do we?
[21:41] <fta> chrisccoulson_, yep, but when is that?
[21:41] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: so, hmmm, is the idea that that whole list needs to be done before publication?
[21:41] <micahg> chrisccoulson_: no
[21:41] <micahg> chrisccoulson_: for jaunty
[21:41] <chrisccoulson_> fta - in the next few days probably
[21:42] <fta> ok, good
[21:42] <chrisccoulson_> micahg - cool, that's ok
[21:42] <chrisccoulson_> jdstrand, i'm not sure we have to do the whole list, but we have to ensure that all of the applications still work when 1.9.2 is on the system
[21:42] <chrisccoulson_> so, we need to copy everything at once really
[21:43] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: sure. so that table doesn't convey the 'it still work with 1.9.2 on the system, but should eventually be updated' scenario
[21:43] <chrisccoulson_> so, far hardy, it is just midbrowser, kazehakase, gnome-web-photo, galeon and bfilter
[21:43] <micahg> chrisccoulson_: also, w/openjdk, it depends on xulrunner-1.9.2
[21:43] <micahg> chrisccoulson_: for karmic
[21:44] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: or the "it's horribly right now, so it shouldn't block publication" scenario (eg, midbrowser)
[21:45] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: would it be possible to update that list in someway-- eg, an asterisk next to all the packages that are blockers for publication?
[21:45] <chrisccoulson_> jdstrand - possibly. i might be able to look at that after i've got epiphany working
[21:47] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: k. I'm going to have to make a judgement call weighing the severity of the CVEs fixed in 3.6.4 vs waiting on that list wrt hardy/lucid
[21:47] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: and understanding what is blocking would be helpful (and obviously, blockers would be worked on first :)
[21:53] <chrisccoulson_> jdstrand - what was the error message you got when trying to start epiphany?
[21:54] <chrisccoulson_> rickspencer3, http://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2010/06/22/firefox-3-6-4-with-crash-protection-now-available/ ;)
[21:55] <chrisccoulson_> jdstrand - IMO, the only remaining blocker for hardy is epiphany
[21:55] <chrisccoulson_> the other remaining apps to port still work, so they can be ported later on
[21:55] <chrisccoulson_> and the other issue is the font configuration issue, but i'm still waiting on my patch to be reviewed
[21:56] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: 'EphyBrowser initialization failed for...'
[21:56] <rickspencer3> chrisccoulson_, what are your plans for tomorrow?
[21:56] <rickspencer3> hehe
[21:56] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: is that for hardy or all 3?
[21:57] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: ie, is epiphany the only blocker for all the releases?
[21:57] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: on that list. I still consider openjdk a blocker
[21:57] <chrisccoulson_> jdstrand, that's only for hardy right now. i'm still porting applications for jaunty and karmic, and need to test the ones we're not porting
[21:58] <chrisccoulson_> openjdk is only a blocker for jaunty and karmic
[21:58] <chrisccoulson_> rickspencer3, busy day tomorrow i think ;)
[21:58] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: ok excellent. so is it accurate to say that openjdk is the only blocker for karmic and epiphany is the only blocker for hardy?
[21:58] <jdstrand> meh
[21:58] <jdstrand> let me rephrase
[21:58] <chrisccoulson_> jdstrand - epiphany is also a blocker for jaunty
[21:59] <jdstrand> right
[21:59] <jdstrand> ok
[21:59] <jdstrand> so epiphany blocks hardy and jaunty
[21:59] <jdstrand> openjdk blocks jaunty and karmic
[21:59] <chrisccoulson_> and the applications i'm still porting are blockers, until i've tested them to verify they're ok
[21:59] <chrisccoulson_> (for karmic and jaunty)
[21:59] <jdstrand> k
[21:59] <chrisccoulson_> so, hardy is pretty close really
[21:59] <jdstrand> yes
[22:00] <jdstrand> but I'd very much rather publish all 4 at once
[22:00] <jdstrand> I looked at the CVEs and I feel we have some time for that
[22:00] <jdstrand> micahg: waiting a week for TB is fine
[22:01] <chrisccoulson_> what are we doing about openjdk? (sorry, i've not checked the whole scrollback yet)
[22:01] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: wrt openjdk, I think we probably need to get it building in the ppa, since it takes a long time. I will be sending out an email asking doko if TCK testing is required for karmic and jaunty
[22:01] <chrisccoulson_> ok, i can get that in to the PPA once i've done with epiphany
[22:02] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: if it is required, I'll ask doko to do the TCK tests on what is in the ppa
[22:02] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: great thanks
[22:02] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: I'm going through my jaunty testing now
[22:02] <chrisccoulson_> jdstrand - so, the CVE's aren't serious enough to need to release this week? after tomorrow, we are getting quite close to the weekend again ;)
[22:03] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: well, for TB, no. for firefox, sooner is better
[22:03] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: I don't see end of the world CVEs in there even for ff
[22:04] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: but I think we need to get the known blockers building and test for the other blockers
[22:04] <jdstrand> I'd really like to get it out on Thursday if possible
[22:04] <jdstrand> but, we'll see-- that may not be feasible
[22:10] <micahg> chrisccoulson_: you still have the link for my PPA with openjdk for karmic?
[22:11] <micahg> chrisccoulson_: I can try to have jaunty up there tonight
[22:17] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_, micahg: not that you need it, but it is confirmed that openjdk backport is needed on jaunty
[22:20] <micahg> jdstrand: k, I'll try to get a working version uploaded then
[22:28] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson_: fyi, my non-extension ff jaunty testing shows that jaunty ff is ok (excepting openjdk, the only regression)
[22:29] <chrisccoulson_> jdstrand - thanks. that seems consistent with what i've found too, jaunty feels pretty good :)
[22:29] <jdstrand> cool
[22:30] <jdstrand> I've got a mess of nss testing to do next, though I imagine it'll be fine since hardy was
[22:33] <chrisccoulson_> that's good. i'm glad you're testing all of these :)
[22:33] <chrisccoulson_> i haven't had much time to test the nss changes really
[22:36] <micahg> mozilla-2.0 transition to happen soon, so dailies will break :(
[22:40] <micahg> chrisccoulson_: you might want to read this: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/2010-06-22
[22:40] <micahg> chrisccoulson_: can be later, jsut at some point
[22:42] <micahg> chrisccoulson_: jdstrand: do either of you see the white on white menu issue in the backports testing?
[22:44] <chrisccoulson_> micahg - i've not seen any issues with menus
[22:44] <jdstrand> micahg: I'm unaware of the issue you are referring to. can you be more specific?
[22:44] <chrisccoulson_> is this with the default theme?
[22:45] <micahg> chrisccoulson_: yes
[22:45] <micahg> mozilla 316780
[22:45] <ubot2> Mozilla bug 316780 in Menus "opening modal dialog from menu leaves menu name white" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316780
[22:46] <micahg> it's on my list of things I want to fix upstream at some point
[22:47] <jdstrand> micahg: I don't see this witht he default theme on jaunty
[22:47] <micahg> jdstrand: I'm guessing you don't see it on Lucid, either, right?
[22:48] <chrisccoulson_> hmmm, i've never seen that before either
[22:48] <chrisccoulson_> (or just never noticed it)
[22:48] <micahg> maybe it's my Intel graphics chipset
[22:49] <jdstrand> micahg: would this occur in 3.6.3 or is it 3.6.4 only?
[22:49] <micahg> jdstrand: since 3.6 beta
[22:49] <jdstrand> micahg: I have 3.6.3 here on am64, default lucid theme, intel graphics and do not see it
[22:49]  * micahg has a GMA4500
[22:50]  * micahg is also running Xfce
[22:50] <jdstrand> well, that there is your problem :P
[22:50] <micahg> should I run Kubuntu instead :D
[22:51] <jdstrand> hehe
[22:51]  * micahg is thinking about Lubuntu actually 
[22:52] <jdstrand> mine is i915, fwiw
[22:52] <micahg> jdstrand: ah, that could be why you don't see it
[22:52] <jdstrand> and I am not using compiz
[22:52]  * micahg is also not using compiz
[22:52] <chrisccoulson_> i think i'm starting to dislike epiphany
[22:53] <chrisccoulson_> it's given me way too much hassle ;)
[23:02] <esau> hello !
[23:23] <chrisccoulson_> jdstrand - seems i'm not
[23:23] <chrisccoulson_> oops
[23:23] <chrisccoulson_> seems i'm not the fiorst person to experience these issues with epiphany
[23:23] <chrisccoulson_> http://git.gnome.org/browse/epiphany/tree/plugins/desktop-file/plugin.cpp?h=gnome-2-26#n538
[23:23] <chrisccoulson_> heh ;)
[23:24] <jdstrand> haha
[23:24] <jdstrand> nice
[23:32] <micahg> wow
[23:44] <BUGabundo_IsBack> is anyone packaing googleCli?
[23:47] <micahg> BUGabundo_IsBack: debian 585935
[23:47] <ubot2> Debian bug 585935 in wnpp "ITP: googlecl -- command-line access to (some) Google services" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/585935
[23:47] <BUGabundo_IsBack> thanks