[01:06] <gmiernicki_> anyone able to help me with ssh key management?
[01:06] <gmiernicki_> LP is not identifying code commits as me anymore
[01:06] <gmiernicki_> https://code.launchpad.net/~sahanaphp-committers/sahana-agasti/1.0
[01:07] <gmiernicki_> the last 6 commits all went in as gmiernicki@hostname
[01:07] <wgrant> gmiernicki_: That's nothing to do with SSH keys -- run 'bzr whoami "First Last <email@address>"'
[01:08] <gmiernicki_> will previous commits be credited to me or only future ones?
[01:08] <wgrant> Only future ones, unfortunately.
[01:08] <gmiernicki_> ahh, well... at least its fixed :)
[01:08] <gmiernicki_> thanks for the help in sorting me
[03:51] <vadi2> How can I fix this problem: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/229663/ ?
[03:54] <spiv> vadi2: upgrade lp:~mudlet-makers/mudlet/main to the current repository format
[03:55] <spiv> vadi2: there will be a link on its Launchpad page to do that
[03:55] <vadi2> Okay. I pushed the upgrade button on LP.
[07:23] <poolie> wgrant: i can't help thinking of a Sarah Palin app now :)
[07:25] <wgrant> poolie: Heh
[07:25] <poolie> rogue applications only one heart attack away from the nuclear football :)
[07:26]  * nigelb blinks
[07:26] <nigelb> what was that about?
[07:26] <poolie> nigelb: wgrant's post about "rogue applications" vs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Going_Rogue
[07:29] <nigelb> wgrant: wats your blog address?
[07:29] <wgrant> I have no blog.
[07:29] <nigelb> apparently its not on planet (or I can't find your name there)
[07:29] <wgrant> This was on launchpad-dev.
[07:29] <nigelb> ooooh
[07:30] <nigelb> address/
[07:31] <nigelb> meh, I'm missing something
[07:31] <wgrant> https://lists.launchpad.net/launchpad-dev/msg03659.html
[07:32] <nigelb> aha, now I see :)
[07:35] <wgrant> poolie: Hm, your email doesn't seem to have made it to the list.
[07:35] <wgrant> Just saw it in my inbox now, along with didrocks', but only his made it onto the list.
[07:40] <poolie> wgrant: it might be moderation delay :/
[07:40] <poolie> :(
[07:41] <wgrant> poolie: Why would your posts be moderated?
[07:41] <poolie> to annoy me
[07:42] <poolie> wgrant i think there is a theoretical
[07:42] <poolie> or a conceptual problem in trying to limit what can be done by an application run directly by the user on their own machine
[07:42] <wgrant> poolie: Well, UNIX is broken.
[07:43] <wgrant> But not all LP clients are going to be running on the client's machine.
[07:45] <poolie> this is regardless of unix being broken
[07:45] <poolie> if the user specifically wants to add a new gpg key
[07:45] <poolie> there is no point trying to insist on them doing this only through a particular blesséd client codebase
[07:46] <poolie> as if it is any safer for them to do this through chromium than through an api client
[07:48] <wgrant> poolie: I think there should be a separate access flag on the token.
[07:49] <wgrant> Quickly should be able to say that it wants access to other auth tokens.
[07:49] <wgrant> And the confirmation page will get the user to agree with that.
[07:49] <wgrant> And then Quickly can happily go around and add backdoors into the user's account, if desired.
[07:51] <poolie> +
[07:51] <poolie> +
[07:51] <poolie> +1
[07:52] <poolie> typos, not emphasis :)
[07:52] <lifeless> so thats 3 right ?
[07:52] <poolie> three rights make one wrong
[07:54] <mneptok> three rights make a left
[07:54] <poolie> also i wish it was closer to "the app requests access X, do you agree?" rather than "what access to you want to give"
[07:54] <poolie> maybe there's a way for this
[07:55] <wgrant> poolie: +1
[07:55] <wgrant> Definitely a good idea.
[07:55] <wgrant> Particularly if we do this extra flag thing.
[07:55] <poolie> then if it's prepared to work in either trusted or untrusted mode they can ask you that first
[08:14] <james_w> poolie: it's possible, but not well documented that you can do that now I believe
[08:15] <james_w> (request particular access which will restrict the choices the user sees)
[08:25] <poolie> ah ok
[08:36] <FC34> hi
[08:40] <FC34> if i want enterprise support with ubuntu and fiber channel, does canonical give a compatibility matrix with storage and fiber controler and switches ?
[08:43] <tsimpson> you should probably contact canonical about that
[08:43] <tsimpson> http://www.canonical.com/about-canonical/contact
[08:45] <spiv> Specifically, use the link there for contacting the sales team: https://forms.canonical.com/sales/
[08:46] <FC34> thank you all
[10:52] <lyhana8> hi, is there a channel for french translator ?
[12:06] <dpm> lyhana8, you can try asking on #ubuntu-translators or looking at https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-l10n-fr or https://launchpad.net/~lp-l10n-fr
[12:33] <ojwb> hi, I'm wanting to create a PPA and rebuild some packages against a newer version of another package which is in hardy-backports
[12:33] <ojwb> but I can't figure out how to copy a package from hardy-backports - is that possible?
[12:33] <bigjools> not easily with the UI, but it's possible with the API
[12:33] <bigjools> but can't you set your PPA dependencies to use hardy-backports?
[12:34] <bigjools> then you don't need to copy
[12:35] <ojwb> um, that might end up building against newer versions of other things though, which seems undesirable
[12:36]  * ojwb looks at the api
[12:38] <bigjools> fair enough - look for syncSource
[12:39] <ojwb> is the API in some sort of restricted beta?
[12:39] <ojwb> or did I just misread this page...
[12:39] <bigjools> nope, it's released
[12:39] <bigjools> if something says it's beta, can you let me know and we'll fix that
[12:39] <ojwb> last bullet of https://help.launchpad.net/API/
[12:40] <bigjools> ah!
[12:40] <bigjools> thanks
[12:40] <ojwb> sure
[12:41] <ojwb> it's all too easy to end up with lingering references like that
[12:41] <bigjools> well if the wiki would let me log in, I'd fix it ...
[12:47] <ojwb> bigjools: also, the 3rd paragraph on that page
[12:47] <ojwb> "The Launchpad web service is currently in a limited beta, open to Launchpad's beta testers. "
[13:04] <nigelb> jml: poke
[13:04] <jml> nigelb, yes?
[13:04] <nigelb> when can you do that session at dev week? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDeveloperWeek/Prep
[13:05]  * jml blinks
[13:05] <nigelb> heh
[13:05] <jml> nigelb, I'm in the middle of something right now, I'll get back to you in a bit.
[13:05] <nigelb> sure, just update the wiki
[13:05] <nigelb> I'll hunt you down tomorrow if you've forgotten :)
[13:11] <geser> A package (ubuntu-dev-tools) which is actively developed and maintained in Ubuntu got a bug filed in the Debian BTS and I'd like to have it also in LP. Do I need to file the bug manually (and link it to the Debian bug) or can it be "imported" from the Debian BTS?
[13:14] <wgrant> geser: You'll have to file it manually.
[13:15] <james_w> geser: http://people.canonical.com/~jamesw/import-bug-from-debian.py
[13:15] <james_w> should probably still work
[13:17] <BlackZ> hi, I seen bug #5292 but I see a lot of people that use their @ubuntu.com email address as primary/contact address in launchpad, how they can do that? I thought that will not work as described in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuEmail
[13:19] <nigelb> BlackZ: are you sure they're doing that or adding @ubuntu as a secondary addresss?
[13:20] <BlackZ> nigelb: I'd say the first
[13:20]  * nigelb is cluless
[13:20] <micahg> BlackZ: legacy usually
[13:25] <geser> james_w: thanks, still works
[13:28] <geser> james_w: should that script get added to ubuntu-dev-tools?
[14:29] <dholbach> hiya
[14:29] <dholbach> semi-last-call: UDW sessions up for grabs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDeveloperWeek/Prep
[15:19] <soren> Is it possible to change the name of a project once it's been registereD?
[15:19] <soren> Not just the display name, but url and everything.
[15:19]  * dholbach tries to rename ubuntu back to no-name-yet
[15:20] <soren> Heheh :)
[15:29] <lfaraone> If I have GNU hello 2.0-4 in the PPA, and mistakenly upload hello 2.1-5, then delete it from the PPA since it was a mistaken, can I then upload 2.0-4?
[15:29] <lfaraone> * cah I thehn upload 2.0-5
[15:32] <davidfraser> lfaraone: yes
[15:37] <lfaraone> Is the PPA service down again? "ftp ppa.launchpad.net" returns a 111: Conn. Refused on several systems on different networks.
[15:37] <cody-somerville> bigjools, ^^
[15:39] <lfaraone> cody-somerville: good luck with that, he's "#REDIRECT pagename" :)
[15:39] <lfaraone> * "away     : Drinking heavily"
[15:39] <cody-somerville> lol
[15:39] <lfaraone> he may also be a MoinMoin redirect, but that's his business.
[15:41] <cody-somerville> lfaraone, try now?
[15:42] <lfaraone> cody-somerville: ... annnd we're back! thanks.
[15:42] <bigjools> there's an sftp service as well now
[15:42] <bigjools> if ftp goes down, try it
[15:59] <james_w> geser: I'd be fine with that
[16:01] <jml> soren, I think you need admin intervention.
[16:01] <geser> bigjools: is there a dput.cf snippet for it somewhere?
[16:01] <soren> jml: That's ok, as long as it's doable.
[16:01] <soren> jml: I don't need it now, I just want to know how set in stone it is once I create the project.
[16:01] <bigjools> geser: no but it's trivial, just set the user to your LP name and method to sftp
[16:01] <bigjools> everything else is the same
[16:01] <geser> ok
[16:04] <geser> does this work for PPA too or only the main archive?
[16:04] <bigjools> both
[21:29] <zooko> Dear people of #launchpad: there are two bugtracker instances which point to the same remote bug tracker and should be merged.
[21:29] <zooko> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/bugtrackers/tahoe-lafs.org-tahoe-lafs
[21:29] <zooko> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/bugtrackers/tahoe-trac
[21:29] <zooko> Also, I couldn't figure out how to open a new "Question" as a way to bring this to your attention. Maybe I should open a new bug against launchpad?? (That sounds wrong.)
[21:37] <lifeless> 06:29 < zooko> Also, I couldn't figure out how to open a new "Question" as a way to bring this to your attention. Maybe I should open a new bug against launchpad?? (That sounds wrong.)
[21:37] <lifeless> 06:35 < lifeless> zooko: answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[21:37] <lifeless> 06:36 < lifeless> zooko: its like a bug tracker but different