[00:41] <telexl> hello folks.
[00:42] <telexl> this probably isn't a bug, but it is mostly a lack of information: in GNOME Vinagre, there is no description in the manual of how to use the ssh forwarding feature.
[00:43] <telexl> Would this be a gnome.org thing, or under Ubuntu because GNOME is part of Ubuntu?
[00:43] <micahg> telexl: what manual?
[00:44] <telexl> micahg: In the Help manual for Vinagre - sorry, I didn't mention that.
[00:44] <telexl> i.e. Help/Contents.
[00:44] <micahg> telexl: inside the program?
[00:44] <telexl> micahg: yes.
[00:44] <micahg> telexl: upstream them
[00:44] <micahg> *then
[00:45] <telexl> micahg: erm.. I haven't been here before and I'm sorry, but I have no idea what 'upstream' means. :)
[00:45] <micahg> telexl: gnome.org
[00:45] <micahg> telexl: bugzilla.gnome.org
[00:45] <telexl> micahg: right; understood.  I'll go there.
[00:46] <micahg> telexl: you can file a bug on Launchpad, but they'll just ask that you file the bug upstream as well
[00:47] <telexl> micahg: .. and I've got a few more to add to the list of GNOME issues.  Yes, I reported a bug before and they passed it along to GNOME, I remember.
[00:48] <micahg> telexl: make sure you file 1 bug per issue, if you're not sure if it's a gnome issue or not, you should probably file on launchpad
[00:48] <telexl> micahg: Understood.. ach!  GNOME Bugzilla is full of reports of this issue..
[00:49] <micahg> telexl: ah, so, just find the most recent and subscribe
[00:49] <telexl> micahg: doing that now.
[00:53] <telexl> micahg: is incomplete documentation regarded as a bug?
[00:53] <micahg> telexl: enhancement request
[00:54] <telexl> micahg: ah, you know all the lingo - i'm probably going to have to ask you a few more questions.
[00:54] <micahg> telexl: np, anytime
[01:03] <telexl> micahg: 'tis done: GNOME Bugzilla bug #622673, it is.  Cheers!
[01:03] <ubot2> telexl: Error: Bug #622673 not found.
[01:03] <micahg> gnome 622673
[01:03] <ubot2> Gnome bug 622673 in SSH "Enhancement request: Vinagre manual should show how to setup ssh tunnelling" [Normal,Unconfirmed] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622673
[01:04] <telexl> that is smart.
[01:04] <micahg> telexl: importance should be enhancement
[01:04] <telexl> micahg: should I modify it?
[01:05]  * micahg is not a privileged user of gnome's bugzilla yet
[01:05] <micahg> telexl: yes, please
[01:05] <telexl> okay
[01:05] <telexl> I didn't see that.  I'm new at this.
[01:05] <telexl> Done
[01:06] <micahg> telexl: np, thanks
[01:06] <telexl> micahg: is the priority 'normal' okay btw?
[01:06] <micahg> telexl: yes
[01:07] <telexl> it sort-of ranks below 'normal', falling into the realm of something that is difficult to use, rather than being a showstopper.  oh. ok
[01:07] <micahg> telexl: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html#importance
[01:08] <telexl> micahg: neat - wish I'd seen that before.
[01:08] <telexl> thanks and g'night!
[01:08] <micahg> telexl: importance should be a link on the bug submission page
[01:10] <telexl> micahg: ah.. i probably missed it - no probs
[03:58] <nigelb> vish: gah, I didn't know if you were asking about "copy"!
[06:02] <yofel_> bug 596463, would that be gdm? I'm not sure how dbus works
[06:02] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 596463 in ubuntu (and 1 other project) ""Switch From xxx..." option does not work in 10.4, dbus bug??? (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/596463
[06:18] <simar> Hey I'm a triager .. How can I access Upstream bug reports ??
[06:23] <trinikrono> simar: you can check this wiki page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream
[06:23] <trinikrono> simar: which package are you trying to get the upstream reports for?
[06:28] <simar> trinikrono, i want to look at upstream bug reports for xserver-xorg-input-synaptics
[06:31] <trinikrono> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=xserver-xorg-input-synaptics
[06:31] <trinikrono> try that :D
[06:40] <simar> trinikrono, Thanks ,Could you also guide me about bugs.freedesktop.org site .. I mean is it ubuntu specific website .. and why upstream bugs are forwarded here ???
[06:41] <trinikrono> simar: i think you need to read the wiki page i sent you first
[06:42] <simar> trinikrono, ok thanks .. I will now read it .
[06:47] <nigelb> vish: I'm going to have to remove my commitment for metoring till my laptop comes back
[06:48] <vish> nigelb: doesnt seem like saby is coming here often either ;)
[06:49] <nigelb> oh well, that too
[06:53] <trinikrono> anyone wants old bugs hunted down in package
[06:53] <trinikrono> i am getting good at that lol
[07:01] <trinikrono> any firefox guys on?
[07:02] <trinikrono> bug 598214, it seems like something is broken in the flash package
[07:02] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 598214 in flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu) "package flashplugin-installer (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/598214
[07:03] <simar> Thanks trinikrono I think i got some important stuff about upstream and downstream ...
[07:03] <trinikrono> simar: okie np
[07:04] <simar> trinikrono, I dinn't get it really by seems to be ok ... lol
[07:04] <rmrfslash> I just got a asus k42jv and it has both Intel and Nvidia graphics (supposed to be "switchable"... but I'm assuming that won't work in Ubuntu). When I install the Nvidia restricted driver though and reboot, I and confronted with a blank/black screen when X tries to start up. I can't get to recovery mode either oddly because it eventually reaches a point where it too goes blank/black
[07:04] <rmrfslash> not entirely sure what to do
[07:05] <rmrfslash> nouveau seems to work.
[07:05] <trinikrono> recovery mode and check #ubuntu :D
[07:05] <rmrfslash> (but I know dual displays work better w/ the restricted driver)
[07:06] <simar> rmrfslash, I got the same error ... I used some patch related to sony .. some sonyedid.bin in xorg.conf ... probably you too has to use edid ..
[07:07] <rmrfslash> simar: hmm... well I'm not on a sony so that likely won't work
[07:08] <simar> ya but every laptop has a edid that is related to display ... probably you have to get one that is particular to your ...
[10:36] <xteejx> Morning all!
[10:37] <trinikrono> mornings
[10:37] <xteejx> :)
[10:38] <xteejx> bug 559532, anyone able to reproduce? I'm starting to think my laptop has it in for me! :P
[10:38] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 559532 in empathy (Ubuntu) "empathy does not make any sounds when set to (affects: 5) (heat: 24)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/559532
[10:44] <trinikrono> i use pidgin :D
[16:39] <bdmurray> seb128: did you uncheck the patch tag for the attachments in bug 598050 on purpose?
[16:39] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 598050 in libsoup2.4 (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 1 other project) "2.30.2 stable update (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Wishlist,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/598050
[16:39] <seb128> bdmurray, yes, those are debdiff to review for the sru team of things uploaded
[16:40] <seb128> bdmurray, I don't want them to show on any "need to review for upload" since they are uploaded
[16:40] <bdmurray> seb128: okay, I supsected as much and just wanted to make sure
[16:40] <seb128> ok
[16:40] <seb128> thanks for checking
[16:41] <bdmurray> seb128: it was weird because there was an email to the ubuntu-bugs mailing list saying "Patch added" for those and then I looked and it wasn't.
[17:42] <DrKenobi> Hi! I've installed Test Drive, but I also need to download Virtual Box. I don't understand what is Test Drive for. Only downloads the last ubuntu version?
[17:43] <xteejx> DrKenobi: Test Drive afaik is an iso testing tool
[17:45] <DrKenobi> xteejx: now test drive is downloading a maverick iso. I think that i could have downloaded the iso and installed virtualbox, without test drive
[17:46] <xteejx> DrKenobi: Yeah it would have the same results
[17:47] <DrKenobi> xteejx: do u know another tool to test bugs?
[17:47] <xteejx> DrKenobi: How do you mean 'test bugs'?
[17:48] <DrKenobi> xteejx: tools that will make things easy when I'm triaging bugs
[17:49] <xteejx> DrKenobi: Most stuff these days is in the ubuntu-qa-tools package
[17:49] <DrKenobi> xteejx: thanks, I'll download then later!
[17:59] <vish> anyone using ubuntu 10.10?
[17:59] <xteejx> YUP
[17:59] <xteejx> oops
[18:00] <vish> could you test Bug #598478
[18:00] <vish> gah! ubot2
[18:00] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 598478 in artha (Ubuntu) "artha doesn't do anything (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/598478
[18:00] <vish> better!
[18:01] <vish> oddly it works correctly in my install , but when i try it in a fresh Lucid VM it does *not* work!
[18:02] <xteejx> vish: Just getting a quick car insurance quote :) Will check in half hour or so
[18:02] <vish> np.. ;)
[18:03] <vish> if i select a word and crl+alt+w in my install i get the synonyms and stuff , so might be a missing dep or something
[18:06]  * vish bbiab , re-booting to test a different bug
[18:44] <bdmurray> bug 296028 might be fixed if someone can test it
[18:44] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 296028 in metacity (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "AisleRiot FreeCell Soltaire Fullscreen bug (affects: 8) (dups: 7) (heat: 71)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/296028
[18:50] <arand> bdmurray: bdmurray Hmm, is the issue that one cannot get out of F11, that F11 remains after switching back to windowed, exiting and restartin, or that F11 remains when you ext with alt+F4 and then restart? Of those, I only see the last behaviour, which I would almost guess being intentional and appropriate.
[20:40] <jcastro> om26er: was it you who linked up appmenu bugs for ooo, firefox, and chromium earlier today?
[20:41] <om26er> jcastro, I did for chromium
[20:42] <jcastro> do you have that link handy?
[20:42] <jcastro> I totally can't find it. :-/
[20:42] <om26er> that was  on chromium-une blueprint
[20:42] <om26er> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-maverick-chromium
[20:42] <jcastro> aha, that's where I saw it
[20:42] <jcastro> cheers!