| xnox | is it just me or uploads to ppa are down? | 11:51 |
|---|---|---|
| VK7HSE | Hmm... getting this error when attempting to login to REVU ... http://pastebin.com/Amr74ZTP any ideas ? | 11:54 |
| wgrant | VK7HSE: REVU has little to do with Launchpad. Try #ubuntu-motu or perhaps #ubuntuwire. | 11:58 |
| VK7HSE | wgrant: OK thought it may have had something to do with the open-ID ... | 11:58 |
| geser | wgrant: do you by concidence know if uploading with SFTP to the main archive really works? I tried it yesterday and got an "open failed" error from dput. Uploading to PPA with SFTP worked. | 12:17 |
| wgrant | geser: It's running on both, but I've not personally tried either. | 12:20 |
| geser | ok, will ask on monday when the person who can look at it are here again | 12:20 |
| superfly | Hi folks, I'm looking for some help with regards to getting a package into my PPA | 20:58 |
| superfly | More specifically, it's being rejected, and I'm not entirely sure why | 20:59 |
| lifeless | what does it say the issue is? | 21:01 |
| superfly | lifeless: the e-mail says, "Files specified in DSC are broken or missing, skipping package unpack verification." | 21:02 |
| superfly | I've uploaded the same package for karmic successfully, but the lucid one fails | 21:02 |
| lifeless | ok, please file a bug about that first, its not informative enough. | 21:02 |
| lifeless | on launchpad.net/soyuz | 21:03 |
| superfly | OK | 21:03 |
| superfly | before that, it says, "File openlp_1.9.2.orig.tar.gz already exists in Release Packages, but uploaded version has different contents." | 21:03 |
| superfly | lifeless: if you want, I can pastebin the whole e-mail | 21:04 |
| superfly | lifeless: http://pastebin.com/MTC1VcDY | 21:05 |
| lifeless | superfly: hi | 21:21 |
| lifeless | superfly: so it sounds like you've got a different tarball for the lucid version, which won't work. | 21:22 |
| lifeless | superfly: the earlier line should be changed to say "Error: ..." or something | 21:22 |
| lifeless | anyway, thats whats going wrong. | 21:22 |
| superfly | well, it shouldn't... it's exactly the same build process for both the karmic and the lucid packages | 21:23 |
| superfly | lifeless: did you get the link to the pastebin of my e-mail? | 21:23 |
| lifeless | superfly: if your build process creates the tarball, it will create a new tarball, and that won't work. | 21:26 |
| lifeless | orig tarballs have to have the same byte-for-byte content if they have the same name. | 21:26 |
| superfly | lifeless: would the timestamp on the tarball make a difference? | 21:27 |
| lifeless | in the directory ? no. Inside the tarball? yes. | 21:27 |
| lifeless | as does the timestamp in gzip, file ordering etc. | 21:28 |
| lifeless | You *cannot* make a new tar file as part of the build and have it work. | 21:28 |
| lifeless | [you can use pristine tar, but thats not strictly a new tar file, so ignore it for now] | 21:28 |
| superfly | ah, ok | 21:28 |
| superfly | thanks for the help, lifeless, I need to get to bed... I'll see if my friend who helped me set that all up can help me tomorrow | 21:29 |
| lifeless | ok, good luck. | 21:29 |
| superfly | ta | 21:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!