[11:51] is it just me or uploads to ppa are down? [11:54] Hmm... getting this error when attempting to login to REVU ... http://pastebin.com/Amr74ZTP any ideas ? [11:58] VK7HSE: REVU has little to do with Launchpad. Try #ubuntu-motu or perhaps #ubuntuwire. [11:58] wgrant: OK thought it may have had something to do with the open-ID ... [12:17] wgrant: do you by concidence know if uploading with SFTP to the main archive really works? I tried it yesterday and got an "open failed" error from dput. Uploading to PPA with SFTP worked. [12:20] geser: It's running on both, but I've not personally tried either. [12:20] ok, will ask on monday when the person who can look at it are here again [20:58] Hi folks, I'm looking for some help with regards to getting a package into my PPA [20:59] More specifically, it's being rejected, and I'm not entirely sure why [21:01] what does it say the issue is? [21:02] lifeless: the e-mail says, "Files specified in DSC are broken or missing, skipping package unpack verification." [21:02] I've uploaded the same package for karmic successfully, but the lucid one fails [21:02] ok, please file a bug about that first, its not informative enough. [21:03] on launchpad.net/soyuz [21:03] OK [21:03] before that, it says, "File openlp_1.9.2.orig.tar.gz already exists in Release Packages, but uploaded version has different contents." [21:04] lifeless: if you want, I can pastebin the whole e-mail [21:05] lifeless: http://pastebin.com/MTC1VcDY [21:21] superfly: hi [21:22] superfly: so it sounds like you've got a different tarball for the lucid version, which won't work. [21:22] superfly: the earlier line should be changed to say "Error: ..." or something [21:22] anyway, thats whats going wrong. [21:23] well, it shouldn't... it's exactly the same build process for both the karmic and the lucid packages [21:23] lifeless: did you get the link to the pastebin of my e-mail? [21:26] superfly: if your build process creates the tarball, it will create a new tarball, and that won't work. [21:26] orig tarballs have to have the same byte-for-byte content if they have the same name. [21:27] lifeless: would the timestamp on the tarball make a difference? [21:27] in the directory ? no. Inside the tarball? yes. [21:28] as does the timestamp in gzip, file ordering etc. [21:28] You *cannot* make a new tar file as part of the build and have it work. [21:28] [you can use pristine tar, but thats not strictly a new tar file, so ignore it for now] [21:28] ah, ok [21:29] thanks for the help, lifeless, I need to get to bed... I'll see if my friend who helped me set that all up can help me tomorrow [21:29] ok, good luck. [21:29] ta