[00:41] <KIAaze> hi
[00:42] <KIAaze> what is the name of the program/script to test install/uninstall/upgrade/etc of a package?
[00:42] <KIAaze> I remember reading about something like that, but I can't find it anymore
[00:49] <ScottK> puiparts?
[00:53] <KIAaze> yes, that looks like it. Thanks. :)
[00:53] <KIAaze> piuparts*
[01:05] <KIAaze> I get "chroot: cannot run command `umount': No such file or directory" when trying to use piuparts.
[03:30] <psusi> cjwatson, you around for a little guidance?  I'm looking into the os-prober scripts because I'd like to add an option to chain load the other grub.cfg instead of parsing all of the entries it contains and adding them to this grub.cfg
[04:03] <ansgar> kees: The kernel changes to not allow hardlinks in some cases does indeed break (at least) atd: LP #598824
[04:15] <ansgar> kees: Also, does the patch work with (POSIX) ACLs and on file systems that use different means to check permissions (such as OpenAFS)?
[11:08] <lool> Hmm mercurial failed to upload on some arches with:
[11:08] <lool> 2010-06-26 19:10:51 WARNING Unhandled exception processing upload: permission denied for relation emailaddress
[11:08] <lool> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50960018/upload_1810533_log.txt
[11:12] <geser> lool: bug #589073
[11:14] <lool> thanks
[11:24] <ari-tczew> lool: did you review the patch?
[12:09] <lool> ari-tczew: Sorry, no, not yet
[18:47] <kees> ansgar: ah-ha, thanks for the atd bug.  I will find a solution.  the hardlink patch doesn't check extended ACLs, only standard DAC ACL.
[19:29] <echo6> need some advice on compiling splashutils for fbcondecor in 10.04, getting ar: jcapimin.o: No such file or directory
[19:30] <echo6> it is related to jpeg-6b libraries libjpg62-dev which are present and also in source tree of splashutils
[19:39] <kees> ansgar: btw, I'm looking through Fedora's patches for atd, http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/at/  some of these looks like they should be upstreamed (especially "nitpicks")
[20:19] <kees> ansgar: I've attached a patch to the bug report; does that look okay to you?
[23:06] <ebroder> Can anybody on Lucid reproduce bug #579044? I just grabbed the 2.30.2-0ubuntu1 .deb from Launchpad and I can't reproduce it (with the same gconf setting and custom.conf file). I'm wondering if it's a 32-bit only thing or something
[23:09] <ebroder> Oh, scratch that - I just managed to get it
[23:10] <ebroder> I think I just wasn't kicking gdm hard enough