[03:37] <ddecator> we ignore it until enough people complain? if you want to package it yourself, you're more than welcome to help out..
[04:12] <micahg> ddecator: around?
[04:12] <ddecator> micahg: yup
[04:12] <micahg> ddecator: merge looks good :0
[04:12] <ddecator> micahg: good to hear :)
[04:15] <micahg> ddecator: I added the changelog entry for you this time since we're short on time
[04:15] <ddecator> micahg: when should and shouldn't i add to the changelog?
[04:16] <micahg> ddecator: don't add if it's not released yet, add if it is :)
[04:16]  * micahg needs to remember to include all the changelogs in the merge :(
[04:16] <ddecator> micahg: well ft-a said we don't always add rebasing of patches because it happens too often
[04:19] <micahg> ddecator: ah, well, I add it the first time I change the patch so that there's a note at least, idk, I'll have to discuss with him later :)
[04:20] <ddecator> micahg: ok, i was just confused on that part. i'll make sure to follow the right format for patches and everything in the future. do i need to re-do that with sb or just do it later if they need to be updated?
[04:20] <micahg> ddecator: no, SB doesn't need it since it hasn't been released yet
[04:20] <ddecator> micahg: the patches having more context right?
[04:20] <micahg> ddecator: ?
[04:21] <ddecator> micahg: what i meant was should i re-do the patches for songbird so they have more context like with firefox, just wanted to make sure we were talking about the same thing :p
[04:21] <micahg> ddecator: ah, yeah, next time you refresh them, don't worry about it right now
[04:22] <ddecator> micahg: ok, sounds good :)
[04:22] <ddecator> i was gonna look at tb 3.1, but i couldn't figure out what the build log was pointing to when it failed...
[04:23] <micahg> ddecator: you can take care of it after I fix it, we need an extra patch IIRC
[04:23] <micahg> ddecator: here's what I did for your merge: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.7.head/revision/544
[04:23] <ddecator> micahg: yah, that's what it looked like, i just didn't have any idea where i would begin to look (something was missing and upsetting dh_install)
[04:25] <ddecator> micahg: ah, so i can remove previous entries for the patch in that grouping and put them under my name if i'm the last one to fix it?
[04:25]  * micahg has to push Thunderbird 3.0.5 to the stable channel PPA...
[04:25] <micahg> ddecator: yeah
[04:25] <ddecator> micahg: good deal, thanks for merging that. i'm starting to get a good feel for how all of this works :)
[04:25] <micahg> ddecator: only if it's a rebase, if actual changes to the patch are made, you can just add it to your entry
[04:26] <micahg> ddecator: thank you for your work :)
[04:26] <ddecator> micahg: glad to help, i'm looking forward to doing more :D
[04:28] <ddecator> you and chris are busy taking care of the big things like backporting, i might as well help take care of the little things like maintaining patches
[04:30] <ddecator> to start ;)
[05:39] <micahg> jdstrand: Firefox 3.6.6 was just released which fixes the crash plugin timeout :(
[05:41] <ddecator> and tb 3.1 was just released. they're moving quick o.o
[05:41] <micahg> ddecator: well, I knew about that, 3.6.6 was a fire drill release :)
[05:41] <ddecator> micahg: fire drill release?
[05:42] <micahg> ddecator: rapid release due to a bad situation (either security vulnerability or in this case, mistake in the last release
[05:42] <ddecator> micahg: ah, gotcha :)
[06:17]  * micahg is going to try to add whatever's left for alpha2
[07:23] <micahg> hi ddecator
[07:23] <ddecator> hi micahg
[07:23] <micahg> ddecator: do you have the multiple language issue in firefox-maverick?
[07:23] <micahg> *dictionary
[07:24] <ddecator> micahg: i'm on lucid
[07:24] <micahg> ddecator: ah, I thought you were on maverick for some reason :(, ok
[07:24] <ddecator> micahg: i'll probably upgrade at a2 :)
[07:26] <ddecator> not that it helps right now :/
[07:26] <micahg> ddecator: nah, it's ok
[07:27] <micahg> ddecator: I'm going to push the commit to fix it in the morning, going to spin a maverick version in my PPA
[07:28] <ddecator> micahg: if you need a tester, i can upgrade a little early (i've been debating doing it anyway since lucid is getting kinda boring :p)
[07:28] <micahg> ddecator: nah, that's ok, I can get gnomefreak to test
[07:29] <ddecator> micahg: sounds good
[07:29] <micahg> ddecator: I probably won't upgrade until beta 1
[07:35] <micahg> ddecator: I manage to keep most of what I use every day up to date, so no real need for me to rush into the next release
[07:37] <ddecator> micahg: i like bleeding edge, even if it breaks here and there. i'd wait longer if i was at school, but i'm at home so i don't have to worry as much about potential data loss
[07:38] <micahg> ddecator: k, I only have 1 desktop (laptop) ATM, so I have to be kinda conservative, by beta, nothing major should break, I can handle minor breakage
[07:38] <ddecator> micahg: good point and very understandable
[07:38] <micahg> also, once again, my desktop isn't changing (xfce 4.8 delayed), so I'm less worried
[08:16] <ddecator> huh, the bookmarks item is showing up for me in FF 3.7 and i can't move it o.o
[08:17] <micahg> ddecator: idk, maybe wait for today's build
[08:18] <ddecator> micahg: it's the one that built a few hours ago, haha. not a big deal, just really random
[08:29] <micahg> ddecator: I get a bunch of old bookmarks in firefox-3.7
[08:29] <ddecator> micahg: old bookmarks?
[08:29] <micahg> ddecator: outdated links
[08:29]  * micahg thought we fixed those
[08:29] <ddecator> that's weird..
[08:30] <ddecator> my bookmarks looks right, i just have the icon on there for some reason
[12:35] <BUGabundo> morning
[12:36] <fta> at 1:30pm?
[12:36] <fta> :)
[12:43] <BUGabundo> going to lunch NOW
[12:43] <BUGabundo> so its still morning
[12:43] <BUGabundo> 12:43
[13:19] <fta> asac, could you please have a look at bug 570812
[13:19] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 570812 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) "Use the ubuntu startpage by default (affects: 2) (heat: 22)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/570812
[13:20] <fta> hm, micah and chris are not there
[13:21] <ripps> fta: I have an idea for drobotik, some way of implementing distro specific patches. As in, only patch the source for hardy/jaunty but no other release.
[13:22] <fta> ripps, what do you mean by patch?
[13:23] <ripps> fta: y'know like with quilt
[13:23] <fta> ripps, this isn't controlled by the bot, it's the buildd thing, so conditional patching must be in d/rules
[13:24] <ripps> I meant that the we could manipulate the series using drobotik
[13:25] <fta> ripps, the bot can tweak some stuff (like it already does for the Build-deps).. but for patches, i think it's best to do that in d/rules like by passing different QUILT_PATCHES values
[13:25] <ripps> right now I'm trying to use a compilicated set of rules to modify debian/patches/series based on what distro is being built, but this method won't work very well with source-3.0 format. Because it patches before upload.
[13:25] <fta> oh
[13:26] <fta> i haven't played with source-3.0 yet
[13:27] <ripps> it designed to have everything patched and ready before uploading. messing with quilt values in rules is useless since dpkg-source will run the patches anyway.
[13:27] <ripps> so I was hoping that drobotik could mess around with the patch series before running dpkg-source
[13:30] <fta> ripps, it's probably doable, but the bot doesn't know what patch system it has to deal with (if any). i need to think about it
[13:32] <BUGabundo> o/
[14:48] <jdstrand> fta: re libpng> ack
[14:49] <fta> jdstrand, good
[14:50] <fta> jdstrand, btw, i have 5.0.375.86~r49890 ready but it's another mix of security + regular fixes
[14:53] <jdstrand> fta: ok, it'll be the same process again. I can upload it tomorrow first thing, if you make a lucid-proposed package for me (I am about to head out)
[14:55] <fta> jdstrand, sure i can do that. l-proposed or l-security? (maverick will include that: http://paste.ubuntu.com/455937/)
[14:56] <jdstrand> fta: if it also has bug fixes, put lucid-proposed, but we'll build it in ubuntu-security-proposed so it will eventually land in -updtes and -security
[14:56] <fta> ok
[15:16] <mdeslaur> fta: has that version been released yet?
[15:17] <fta> mdeslaur, i've built it in the stable ppa, but it's not in maverick yet
[15:17] <mdeslaur> fta: I mean, did google push that out as an update? or is it just pulled from the git repo?
[15:17] <fta> i'm browsing the bugs to see if it needs something else urgent
[15:18] <fta> yep http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2010/06/stable-channel-update_24.html
[15:18] <mdeslaur> oh! I was looking at the "Google Chrome Blog" and not the "Google Chrome Releases Blog"
[15:18] <mdeslaur> my bad :)
[17:32] <micahg> asac: the title A Web Browser for abrowser is part of the branding, right?
[17:53] <jcastro> hi fta
[17:53] <jcastro> I assume we're going to need to have someone talk to the ambiance theme person so I'm going to send kwwii to go check it out
[17:56] <BUGabundo> fta: getting SNAPs at https://caixadirecta.cgd.pt/
[17:57] <BUGabundo> running a CLEAN profile in gdb
[17:57] <BUGabundo> how can I get anything out of it?
[17:57] <BUGabundo> *** NSPlugin Viewer  *** WARNING: unhandled variable 18 (<unknown variable>) in NPN_GetValue()
[17:57] <BUGabundo> is all I have
[18:32] <fta> most probably flash
[18:32] <BUGabundo> on a clean profile?
[18:32] <BUGabundo> works fine in ff 3.6
[18:33] <BUGabundo> isn't there some kind of debug in browser I can see?
[18:33] <BUGabundo> gdb is silent
[18:35] <fta> jcastro, hi. right, i never used those extensions so i don't know if they work or not. I'm trying to activate the new system pref policies but it currently doesn't work at all. i need to discuss with upstream tomorrow
[19:19] <fta> BUGabundo, try with --disable-plugins --disable-extensions
[19:21] <BUGabundo> fta: http://paste.ubuntu.com/456022/
[19:21] <BUGabundo> its a brand new profile
[19:21] <BUGabundo> with all plugins in about:plugins disabled
[19:21] <BUGabundo> 6.0.451.0 (50940) Ubuntu 10.10
[19:22] <fta> SIGTERM, it's not a crash
[19:22] <BUGabundo> I know
[19:23] <BUGabundo> I CRASHED it so I could get a trace
[19:23] <BUGabundo> (2010-06-27 19:22:16) rubenbb: BUGabundo: old glib?  don't know
[19:23] <fta> i doubt it
[19:23] <BUGabundo> ii  libglib2.0-0                                          2.25.10-1ubuntu1                                  The GLib library of C routines
[19:24] <BUGabundo> its maverick after all
[19:24] <fta> do you see something with --log-level=0 --enable-logging=stderr ?
[19:24] <BUGabundo> $ chromium-browser  --log-level=0 --enable-logging=stderr -g --disable-plugins --disable-extensions  --user-data-dir=$chromiumdatadir --disk-cache-dir=$chromiumdiskcache
[19:24] <BUGabundo> like this ?
[19:25] <BUGabundo> eerrrrkkkk
[19:25] <BUGabundo> -g needs to come first
[19:25] <fta> -g mush be 1szt
[19:25] <BUGabundo> I know
[19:25] <BUGabundo> can't you fix that?
[19:25] <fta> lol, weird keyboard
[19:26] <BUGabundo> ok, got it
[19:26] <BUGabundo> now what?
[19:26] <fta> do you see something more?
[19:26] <BUGabundo> [25120.265061] chromium-browse[11224]: segfault at 31 ip 0000000001223f4c sp 00007fff6e946a70 error 4 in chromium-browser[400000+2873000]
[19:26] <BUGabundo> eeewwww
[19:26] <fta> add --single-process
[19:27] <BUGabundo> http://paste.ubuntu.com/456026/
[19:27] <BUGabundo>  chromium-browser -g --single-process --log-level=0 --enable-logging=stderr  --disable-plugins --disable-extensions  --user-data-dir=$chromiumdatadir --disk-cache-dir=$chromiumdiskcache
[19:27] <fta> and use my --temp-profile instead of your last two flags
[19:27] <BUGabundo> well
[19:27] <BUGabundo> right now I'm reusing the 1st temp profile
[19:28] <BUGabundo> so it kinda makes sense
[19:28] <BUGabundo> I get an warning
[19:28] <BUGabundo> saying
[19:28] <BUGabundo> unsuported comand line
[19:28] <BUGabundo> --single process
[19:29] <fta> single-process
[19:29] <fta> with a dash
[19:29] <BUGabundo> yep
[19:29] <BUGabundo> that's what I use
[19:29] <BUGabundo>  chromium-browser -g --single-process --log-level=0 --enable-logging=stderr  --disable-plugins --disable-extensions  --user-data-dir=$chromiumdatadir --disk-cache-dir=$chromiumdiskcache
[19:29] <fta> and  --temp-profile mush be at the beginning
[19:29] <fta> must
[19:29] <fta> grrr
[19:29] <BUGabundo> ahaah
[19:30] <BUGabundo> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[19:30] <BUGabundo> [Switching to Thread 0x7fffe1e91710 (LWP 11516)]
[19:30] <BUGabundo> WebCore::Position::getInlineBoxAndOffset (this=0x7fffe1e90600, affinity=WebCore::DOWNSTREAM, primaryDirection=WebCore::LTR, inlineBox=@0x7fffe1e90638,
[19:30] <BUGabundo>     caretOffset=@0x7fffe1e90644) at third_party/WebKit/WebCore/dom/Position.cpp:1014
[19:30] <BUGabundo> 1014	third_party/WebKit/WebCore/dom/Position.cpp: No such file or directory.
[19:30] <BUGabundo> 	in third_party/WebKit/WebCore/dom/Position.cpp
[19:31] <BUGabundo> fta: is that it?
[19:31] <fta> looks better.. but unknown to me.
[19:31] <fta> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=47439
[19:35] <fta> mdeslaur, fyi, CVE-2010-1205 doesn't impact chromium (i use system libpng)
[19:35] <ubot2> fta: ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem.  When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-1205)
[19:35] <BUGabundo> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=47688
[19:44] <BUGabundo> fta: anyone reported probs with captcha??? for a few days I can't enter any site that has captchas
[19:44] <fta> not that i know of
[19:45] <BUGabundo> well yesterday I couldn't enter icheckmovies.com
[19:45] <BUGabundo> in FF worked fine
[19:45] <BUGabundo> now I can't use this http://www.vodafone.pt/Vodafone/FTTH/FTTHEligibilityHome.aspx?NRMODE=Published&NRORIGINALURL=/main/Particulares/vodafonecasa/Cobertura/cobertura&NRNODEGUID={7E824B88-FAFB-49CE-9099-3C0E2D3AE535}&NRCACHEHINT=Guest
[19:46] <BUGabundo> WORKS Fine in FF
[19:46] <BUGabundo> so its chromium
[19:46] <BUGabundo> WTF
[19:48] <fta> maybe you can't read properly ;)
[19:48]  * BUGabundo slaps fta
[19:48] <fta> hm, chromium has 270 flags..
[20:41] <micahg> gnomefreak: can you test my maverick Firefox 3.6.6 to see if you only have 1 copy of each dictionary?
[20:42] <gnomefreak> not the daily?
[20:43] <gnomefreak> be right back. drop a link and ill look at it
[20:47] <gnomefreak> k
[20:55] <gnomefreak> i go away for 1 1/2 days and firefox released 3.6.6
[20:56] <ddecator> it was an emergency release that changed 3 lines of code, haha
[20:57] <gnomefreak> that sucks. seems people can leave you messages when pidgin is not running.  i just spent a few minstalking to someone who was not here
[20:57] <gnomefreak> ddecator: makes sense
[20:58] <ddecator> gnomefreak: yah, it was just to extend the timeout time for plugin crashes. i guess people on older systems were having it say plugins had crashed when it was just taking a long time to load
[20:58] <gnomefreak> oh that cant be good
[20:59] <ddecator> exactly, hence the rush to push out an update that extended the time to 45sec (i think)
[21:01] <gnomefreak> what was the timeout set to?
[21:01] <ddecator> 10sec (i think that's what the article said, i read it earlier so i can't remember for sure)
[21:03] <gnomefreak> hell it takes firefox longer than 10secs. to load a page
[21:04] <ddecator> not for me o.o
[21:05] <gnomefreak> for me it takes a while but im guessing that has to do with memory on the system
[21:06] <gnomefreak> still loading and its been ~1minute r so
[21:06] <ddecator> wow..
[21:06] <gnomefreak> 1.3ghz proc. and 256 memory
[21:07] <ddecator> oh..
[21:07] <ddecator> 2.5ghz duo-core, 3gig memory..
[21:09] <micahg> gnomefreak: so can you test for me.
[21:10] <gnomefreak> micahg: i dont see why not but im not real sure where your build is
[21:10] <micahg> gnomefreak: ppa:micahg/mozilla-test
[21:11] <gnomefreak> ok looking than i will test. i just need a little bit to finsh what i started
[21:13]  * gnomefreak cant help but to think its LP that is extreamly slow not firefox
[21:15] <ddecator> i have more trouble with LP loading than any other site
[21:16] <gnomefreak> bugs are the worst since they attach so many damn files
[21:23] <gnomefreak> ok installing now
[21:25] <BUGabundo> fta: stupid question, I know, but, how does one start 	-ProfileManager	in OSX?
[21:26] <micahg> BUGabundo: OS X has a terminal :)
[21:26] <BUGabundo> nvm /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin -profilemanager
[21:26] <fta> no idea, never used OSX
[21:26] <BUGabundo> me neither
[21:26] <BUGabundo> but a collegue is saying google groups is looping for him
[21:26] <BUGabundo> so I wanted him to make a new profile
[21:27] <BUGabundo> micahg: true, but $ firefox would say  "command not found"
[21:28] <gnomefreak> micahg: ok what am i looking for and where?
[21:28]  * gnomefreak doesnt do more than 1 lang, so i havent had to look for it before
[21:29] <micahg> go to a text box, right click and see what dictionaries you have
[21:30] <micahg> gnomefreak: ^^^\
[21:32] <gnomefreak> micahg: i have 6 but only 1 is enabled
[21:33] <micahg> gnomefreak: right, but any duplicates, if you fire up firefox-3.7, you should see duplicates
[21:34] <gnomefreak> micahg: australia has 2
[21:34] <micahg> gnomefreak: in 3.6?
[21:35] <gnomefreak> micahg: yes
[21:35] <micahg> gnomefreak: ugh
[21:35] <gnomefreak> Installed: 3.6.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~maverick~ppa2
[21:35] <micahg> gnomefreak: what is /usr/lib/firefox-3.6.6/dictionaries symlinked to?
[21:35] <gnomefreak> is it just me or other people
[21:36] <gnomefreak> micahg: how do i check a symlink
[21:36] <micahg> gnomefreak: ls -l
[21:36] <gnomefreak> k
[21:36] <gnomefreak> gnomefreak@development:~$ ls -l /usr/lib/firefox-3.6.6/dictionaries
[21:36] <gnomefreak> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Jun 27 16:26 /usr/lib/firefox-3.6.6/dictionaries -> ../../share/hunspell
[21:36] <micahg> \o/ at least something works :)
[21:37] <gnomefreak> :)
[21:37] <gnomefreak> can i go back to normal or do you need more testing?
[21:37] <micahg> gnomefreak: do you have 2 copies in /usr/share/hunspell for en-AU?
[21:38] <gnomefreak> en-AU.aff  en_AU.aff  en_CA.aff  en_GB.aff  en_US.aff  en_ZA.aff
[21:38] <gnomefreak> en-AU.dic  en_AU.dic  en_CA.dic  en_GB.dic  en_US.dic  en_ZA.dic
[21:38] <gnomefreak> i see a few
[21:39] <micahg> gnomefreak: weird, I thought that was going to be fixed in maverick :(
[21:39] <micahg> en-AU.dic  en_AU.dic
[21:39]  * micahg will file a bug
[21:39] <micahg> gnomefreak: thanks, that'll do it
[21:39] <gnomefreak> micahg: np
[22:01] <fta> micahg, how come the daily doesn't have the dict symlink?
[22:03] <fta> n-m, it's there
[22:14] <micahg> fta: I didn't commit to .head yet
[22:26] <mbana> how do i install 3.6.4?
[22:26] <mbana> from a repo
[22:27] <mbana> cause the official ff stuff has crappy hinting
[22:31] <micahg> mbana: ppa:ubuntu-mozilla-security/ppa
[22:31] <mbana> huh?
[22:31] <micahg> mbana: that's where 3.6.4 is ATM
[22:31] <micahg> chrisccoulson: did you hear about FF3.6.6
[22:32] <mbana> % lsb_release -a
[22:32] <mbana> No LSB modules are available.
[22:32] <mbana> Distributor ID: Ubuntu
[22:32] <mbana> Description:    Ubuntu 9.10
[22:32] <mbana> Release:        9.10
[22:32] <mbana> Codename:       karmic
[22:32] <mbana> will that be a probl;em
[22:32] <micahg> mbana: nope, it's there :)
[22:32] <mbana> i see it on their site
[22:32] <chrisccoulson> micahg - no, how come? i've only just got online for the first time since friday
[22:32] <mbana> 3.6.6
[22:33] <micahg> chrisccoulson: ah, they had to increase the timeout for plugin-container to 45 seconds and did a fire drill release
[22:33] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I wasn't sure if you wanted to push 3.6.6, so I have the changes locally
[22:33] <mbana> so given that im on 9.10
[22:33] <mbana> can i stil install 3.6.4
[22:33] <micahg> mbana: no, 3.6.4 ATM and yes, it's in the security PPA
[22:33] <mbana> god damn
[22:34] <chrisccoulson> micahg - ah, ok. that's not too big a deal. we'll probably just push 3.6.6 if it's only small changes
[22:34] <mbana> im running the FF official release
[22:34] <mbana> it's definitely faster
[22:34] <mbana> :)
[22:34] <mbana> about god damn time
[22:34] <chrisccoulson> heh, busy week this week ;)
[22:34] <mbana> micahg: thanks
[22:34] <micahg> chrisccoulson: so, I can commit to .head?
[22:34] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, feel free
[22:35] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I'm adding the symlink change to hunspell as well for maverick only
[22:35] <chrisccoulson> thanks
[22:35] <mbana> so, i just enable the security ppa on 9.10 and install 3.6.4?
[22:35] <chrisccoulson> i wonder how long i can avoid asac for ;)
[22:35] <micahg> mbana: yep
[22:36] <fta> grrr. couchdb is a pig, worse cumulative cpu time ever
[22:37] <micahg> chrisccoulson: do you understand the abrowser branding?
[22:37] <chrisccoulson> micahg - a little. how come?
[22:37] <mbana> micahg: is this the official ubuntu repo or this channel's ppa?
[22:37] <micahg> chrisccoulson: well, I'm trying to figure out about the russian translation
[22:37] <mbana> cause i can't find 3.6.4 in the official one
[22:38] <micahg> mbana: it will go to the repo soon, there's a lot of work since we're pushing it to the previous stable released
[22:38] <micahg> *releases
[22:38] <mbana> so it's in the channel's ppa theb?
[22:39] <micahg> chrisccoulson: well, he said that A Web Browser is not appropriate in Russian, I was wondering if it's part of the branding
[22:39] <micahg> mbana: yes, that's the prerelease PPA
[22:41] <mbana> what's 3.7?
[22:41] <micahg> mbana: 4.0
[22:42] <micahg> mbana: we throw releases in the security PPA once they're tagged so we can get testing before release, with 3.6.4 it's just taking a little longer than normal to push out
[22:44] <chrisccoulson> micahg - good point, i'm not sure how we translate the abrowser branding
[22:45] <micahg> chrisccoulson: well, the other translations have the A, I was hoping to discuss with asac, but I think he's enjoying the World Cup :)
[22:45] <chrisccoulson> do we even translate the branding strings?
[22:45] <micahg> chrisccoulson: well, it's for the .desktop file
[22:47] <chrisccoulson> micahg - in that case, we just need to edit debian/abrowser.desktop don't we?
[22:48] <micahg> chrisccoulson: yeah, one of the russian tranlsators proposed a merge, I was looking it over and had this question
[22:48] <mbana> is this just perception or is 3.6.6 slighty faster than 3.6.4?
[22:48] <chrisccoulson> we don't even strip the translations from the firefox desktop files like we do with everything else :)
[22:49] <micahg> mbana: should be no difference in speed
[22:49] <micahg> chrisccoulson: right
[22:50] <mbana> thanks again
[22:53] <micahg> mbana: if you notice some difference between the official build and ours, please let us know
[23:07] <mbana> what are the major differences between the 3.6.4 and 3.6.6.
[23:07] <micahg> mbana: just 1, the crash timeout
[23:09] <fta> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIZUdZdFzOo
[23:09] <mbana> is FF4 3.6.6?
[23:11] <micahg> mbana: no
[23:11] <mbana> is this gpu stuff available on linux?
[23:12] <micahg> mbana: for flash? no
[23:12] <mbana> no rendering on the gpu
[23:12] <mbana> in reference to the link just posted
[23:14] <micahg> mbana: idk what technology they're using
[23:14] <micahg> oh, HTML5...idk
[23:15] <mbana> idk?
[23:15] <micahg> I don't know
[23:24] <Dimmuxx> it's not available yet but it will hopefully be in 4.0 for linux
[23:28] <fta> chromium doesn't use it.. yet. http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=33521
[23:30] <Dimmuxx> that's a different thing though
[23:31] <fta> that bug, yes. but it gives a reason why it's not there yet (multi-process and sandbox)
[23:31] <fta> i have several bugs on that topic, just pasted one
[23:32] <Dimmuxx> ah