[04:20] <micahg> andreserl: I made the patch for testdrive in Lucid to support Vbox 3.2
[04:21] <andreserl> micahg, I saw it but haven't had the time to SRU it, and I might be SRUing (or probably backporting) a new upstream release with fixes
[04:21] <andreserl> that I'd like to see in Luicd
[04:22] <micahg> andreserl: stuff that you could backport into -updates?
[04:22] <andreserl> micahg, yeah just backport from maverick to lucid
[04:22] <andreserl> micahg, I'm going to upload a new upstream this week
[04:23] <micahg> andreserl: that probably won't work as they're totally different versions, but crazier things have happened
[04:23] <andreserl> that I'll probably request to backport, I just need to add one more feature to it
[04:23] <andreserl> micahg, all the new changes to testdrive work in Lucid, since I'm coding in Lucid
[04:23] <micahg> andreserl: oh, for -backports it would be fine :)
[04:23] <andreserl> yeah backports :)
[04:24] <micahg> andreserl: k, well, if you don't SRU anything, can you upload my fix or subscribe sponsors if you don't have the time
[05:38] <EzraR> anyone seen Persia?
[05:38] <EzraR> ;)
[05:44] <nigelb> EzraR: yeah, he's back from vacation, but still busy apparently
[05:44] <nigelb> he'll be back online in a few days
[05:45] <EzraR> thank you
[07:01] <dholbach> good morning
[08:37] <geser> good morning
[09:15] <huats> morning
[10:17] <BlackZ> StevenK: are you working on the opal merge?
[11:51] <BlackZ> didrocks: thanks for your fix in e-d-s
[11:51] <didrocks> BlackZ: you're welcome :)
[13:14] <asac> if that doesnt help i will just review etc
[13:14] <asac> oops
[13:15] <asac> would someone be available to review http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/render-bench
[13:15] <asac> ?
[13:15] <asac> :-P
[13:22] <alf__> Hi all! Does anyone have some time for reviewing render-bench (XRender benchmark): http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/render-bench ?
[13:28] <asac> persia: can you help alf__ ?
[13:28] <asac> (getting connnected)
[15:23] <rsajdok> I try to execute this command:
[15:23] <rsajdok> debdiff fsniper_1.3.1-0ubuntu3.dsc fsniper_1.3.1-0ubuntu4.dsc > fsniper.debdiff
[15:23] <rsajdok> I get error:
[15:23] <rsajdok> http://paste.ubuntu.com/456410/
[15:23] <rsajdok> Why? I made my gpgkey
[15:24] <StevenK> rsajdok: That isn't a error, it's warning you it can't check other peoples public keys
[15:29] <rsajdok> StevenK: but if a file, which I did, "fsniper_1.3.1-0ubuntu4.dsc" should not be properly checked?
[15:32] <StevenK> rsajdok: If you signed that file, you shouldn't get that notice for it, yes
[15:52] <Daviey> rsajdok: What are you doing with fsniper?
[15:53] <rsajdok> Daviey: reading https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/devweek1001/FixSmallBugs
[15:54]  * Daviey looks
[15:54] <rsajdok> StevenK: I added line: 'export GPGKEY=62D51E30' to ~/.bashrc
[15:54] <rsajdok> Do I have to do more something else?
[15:56] <arand> rsajdok: Do you have DEBFULLNAME and DEBEMAIL set the same as your key? And does debuild -S finish without errors?
[15:57] <carstenh> rsajdok: | Warning: You do not seem to have interdiff (in the patchutils package)
[15:57] <carstenh> rsajdok: you should install this
[15:58] <arand> That should be in ubuntu-dev tools I assume..
[15:58] <arand> *ubuntu-dev-tools (package)
[15:59] <rsajdok> arand: yes, these values are the same
[15:59] <carstenh> I hope not
[15:59] <persia> arand: patchutils actually
[15:59] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: could you use a syncpackage script for sponsorship?
[15:59] <ari-tczew> oh, persia come back
[15:59] <rsajdok> arand: ubuntu-dev-tools is already the newest version.
[16:01] <arand> Well supposedly ubuntu-dev-tools Depends: devscripts Recommeds: patchutils, but yea, if you don't have patchutils install it...
[16:04] <arand> rsajdok: Your DEB vars should be setup like so (in ~/.bashrc): http://paste.ubuntu.com/456431/
[16:05] <arand> Oh, and you should have quotation marks around the space-separated vaulues as well ↑↑
[16:05] <rsajdok> ok, I do not have installed patchutils
[16:06] <rsajdok> thanks all  of you
[16:10] <rsajdok> In this guide, the lack of information about the package "patchutils" https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/devweek1001/GetStarted/
[16:11] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: what's this in relation to?
[16:12] <carstenh> rsajdok: what's the output of the following command?
[16:12] <carstenh> grep -i recommends /etc/apt/apt.conf /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/*
[16:12] <rsajdok> carstenh: sorry, i must go home :) bye
[16:13] <carstenh> nevermind ...
[16:13] <carstenh> dholbachs fault ...
[16:14] <carstenh> apt-get install --no-install-recommends ubuntu-dev-tools ... does of course not install patchutils
[16:15] <carstenh> hmm, on the other side debdiff is not mentioned on this page, so it was not missed by him ( sorry dholbach )
[16:15] <dholbach> carstenh: what are you talking about?
[16:17] <carstenh> dholbach: rsajdok complained that a missed package on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/devweek1001/GetStarted/. this was missed due using --no-install-recommends, but since debdiff is not mentioned on this page there is not an error
[16:17] <dholbach> oh, I see
[16:17] <dholbach> thanks for that
[16:17] <dholbach> must have missed it
[16:18] <carstenh> how could you miss it if debdiff is not mentioned on this page?
[16:19] <dholbach> this was a live session
[16:19] <dholbach> it's very easy to make that kind of mistake
[16:19] <dholbach> and luckily people usually have command-not-found installed
[16:19] <dholbach> which will give them a hint
[16:21] <carstenh> dholbach: the reason to highlight you was not to accuse you but to point you to this in case you want to fix it, but looks like there i nothing to fix
[16:22] <dholbach> carstenh: in the session afterwards: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/devweek1001/FixSmallBugs
[16:23] <dholbach> 17:28	dholbach	debdiff fsniper_1.3.1-0ubuntu2.dsc fsniper_1.3.1-0ubuntu3.dsc > fsniper.debdiff
[16:23] <dholbach> 17:30	dholbach	you might also need the patchutils package, so please install that too
[16:23] <dholbach> but I'll make sure to get it right for the session I give this time :)
[16:23] <carstenh> looks like you though of everything :)
[16:23] <carstenh> +t
[16:24] <dholbach> carstenh: no, I guess the mistake really happened during the session
[16:24] <dholbach> carstenh: but it was brought up in #ubuntu-classroom-chat so I corrected myself in #ubuntu-classroom
[16:24] <dholbach> I'll test it this time in a chroot beforehand :)
[16:24] <dholbach> thanks for bringing it up carstenh
[16:25] <Daviey> dholbach: Next time, please don't fix a bug it seems i may have introduced pls :)
[16:25] <dholbach> Daviey: what? :)
[16:25] <Daviey> dholbach: I think that fsniper doc fix you did in that session was my oops.. :)
[16:26] <dholbach> oh, ok :)
[16:26] <Daviey> not certain.. it was a package i originally debianzed.. but someone else took it over.. so it was either me or him
[16:26] <Daviey> quite exciting having a bazillion people loom at your mistake :P
[17:10] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: relation?
[17:12] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: i.e. what are you referring to
[17:13] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: then you should ask which bug.
[17:13] <ari-tczew> this is a bug 599002
[17:14] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: oh, so you are saying I should use syncpackage rather than wait for archive admins to sync?
[17:14] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: would be nice
[17:15] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: effect is the same
[17:15] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: ok
[17:16] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: you should set -n UPLOADER_NAME (me) and -b BUG
[17:27] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: thanks! and as you see, we don't need waiting for archive admins :)
[17:28] <ari-tczew> I encourage you to use it for other sponsorships done by you tumbleweed
[17:28] <tumbleweed> ari-tczew: yeah, probably will, thanks
[17:28] <ari-tczew> tumbleweed: no, it's me thanks for you - quick response!
[20:31] <arand> It'd be great to get Bug #198724  fixed for 1010, but what is it that actually needs doing to make it happen? It seems likel it's currently just blocked for no reason (I've used a rebuilt amd64 version just fine..)