[04:20] andreserl: I made the patch for testdrive in Lucid to support Vbox 3.2 [04:21] micahg, I saw it but haven't had the time to SRU it, and I might be SRUing (or probably backporting) a new upstream release with fixes [04:21] that I'd like to see in Luicd [04:22] andreserl: stuff that you could backport into -updates? [04:22] micahg, yeah just backport from maverick to lucid [04:22] micahg, I'm going to upload a new upstream this week [04:23] andreserl: that probably won't work as they're totally different versions, but crazier things have happened [04:23] that I'll probably request to backport, I just need to add one more feature to it [04:23] micahg, all the new changes to testdrive work in Lucid, since I'm coding in Lucid [04:23] andreserl: oh, for -backports it would be fine :) [04:23] yeah backports :) [04:24] andreserl: k, well, if you don't SRU anything, can you upload my fix or subscribe sponsors if you don't have the time === EzraR_ is now known as EzraR [05:38] anyone seen Persia? [05:38] ;) [05:44] EzraR: yeah, he's back from vacation, but still busy apparently [05:44] he'll be back online in a few days [05:45] thank you [07:01] good morning === Amto`Off is now known as Amto_res [08:37] good morning [09:15] morning [10:17] StevenK: are you working on the opal merge? [11:51] didrocks: thanks for your fix in e-d-s [11:51] BlackZ: you're welcome :) [13:14] if that doesnt help i will just review etc [13:14] oops [13:15] would someone be available to review http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/render-bench [13:15] ? [13:15] :-P [13:22] Hi all! Does anyone have some time for reviewing render-bench (XRender benchmark): http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/render-bench ? [13:28] persia: can you help alf__ ? [13:28] (getting connnected) === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless [15:23] I try to execute this command: [15:23] debdiff fsniper_1.3.1-0ubuntu3.dsc fsniper_1.3.1-0ubuntu4.dsc > fsniper.debdiff [15:23] I get error: [15:23] http://paste.ubuntu.com/456410/ [15:23] Why? I made my gpgkey [15:24] rsajdok: That isn't a error, it's warning you it can't check other peoples public keys [15:29] StevenK: but if a file, which I did, "fsniper_1.3.1-0ubuntu4.dsc" should not be properly checked? [15:32] rsajdok: If you signed that file, you shouldn't get that notice for it, yes === jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna === echidnaman is now known as JontheEchidna [15:52] rsajdok: What are you doing with fsniper? [15:53] Daviey: reading https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/devweek1001/FixSmallBugs [15:54] * Daviey looks [15:54] StevenK: I added line: 'export GPGKEY=62D51E30' to ~/.bashrc [15:54] Do I have to do more something else? [15:56] rsajdok: Do you have DEBFULLNAME and DEBEMAIL set the same as your key? And does debuild -S finish without errors? [15:57] rsajdok: | Warning: You do not seem to have interdiff (in the patchutils package) [15:57] rsajdok: you should install this [15:58] That should be in ubuntu-dev tools I assume.. [15:58] *ubuntu-dev-tools (package) [15:59] arand: yes, these values are the same [15:59] I hope not [15:59] arand: patchutils actually [15:59] tumbleweed: could you use a syncpackage script for sponsorship? [15:59] oh, persia come back [15:59] arand: ubuntu-dev-tools is already the newest version. [16:01] Well supposedly ubuntu-dev-tools Depends: devscripts Recommeds: patchutils, but yea, if you don't have patchutils install it... [16:04] rsajdok: Your DEB vars should be setup like so (in ~/.bashrc): http://paste.ubuntu.com/456431/ [16:05] Oh, and you should have quotation marks around the space-separated vaulues as well ↑↑ [16:05] ok, I do not have installed patchutils [16:06] thanks all of you [16:10] In this guide, the lack of information about the package "patchutils" https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/devweek1001/GetStarted/ [16:11] ari-tczew: what's this in relation to? [16:12] rsajdok: what's the output of the following command? [16:12] grep -i recommends /etc/apt/apt.conf /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/* [16:12] carstenh: sorry, i must go home :) bye [16:13] nevermind ... [16:13] dholbachs fault ... [16:14] apt-get install --no-install-recommends ubuntu-dev-tools ... does of course not install patchutils [16:15] hmm, on the other side debdiff is not mentioned on this page, so it was not missed by him ( sorry dholbach ) [16:15] carstenh: what are you talking about? [16:17] dholbach: rsajdok complained that a missed package on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/devweek1001/GetStarted/. this was missed due using --no-install-recommends, but since debdiff is not mentioned on this page there is not an error [16:17] oh, I see [16:17] thanks for that [16:17] must have missed it [16:18] how could you miss it if debdiff is not mentioned on this page? [16:19] this was a live session [16:19] it's very easy to make that kind of mistake [16:19] and luckily people usually have command-not-found installed [16:19] which will give them a hint [16:21] dholbach: the reason to highlight you was not to accuse you but to point you to this in case you want to fix it, but looks like there i nothing to fix [16:22] carstenh: in the session afterwards: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/devweek1001/FixSmallBugs [16:23] 17:28 dholbach debdiff fsniper_1.3.1-0ubuntu2.dsc fsniper_1.3.1-0ubuntu3.dsc > fsniper.debdiff [16:23] 17:30 dholbach you might also need the patchutils package, so please install that too [16:23] but I'll make sure to get it right for the session I give this time :) [16:23] looks like you though of everything :) [16:23] +t [16:24] carstenh: no, I guess the mistake really happened during the session [16:24] carstenh: but it was brought up in #ubuntu-classroom-chat so I corrected myself in #ubuntu-classroom [16:24] I'll test it this time in a chroot beforehand :) [16:24] thanks for bringing it up carstenh [16:25] dholbach: Next time, please don't fix a bug it seems i may have introduced pls :) [16:25] Daviey: what? :) [16:25] dholbach: I think that fsniper doc fix you did in that session was my oops.. :) [16:26] oh, ok :) [16:26] not certain.. it was a package i originally debianzed.. but someone else took it over.. so it was either me or him [16:26] quite exciting having a bazillion people loom at your mistake :P [17:10] tumbleweed: relation? [17:12] ari-tczew: i.e. what are you referring to [17:13] tumbleweed: then you should ask which bug. [17:13] this is a bug 599002 [17:13] Launchpad bug 599002 in gnu-fdisk (Ubuntu) "Sync gnu-fdisk 1.2.4-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/599002 [17:14] ari-tczew: oh, so you are saying I should use syncpackage rather than wait for archive admins to sync? [17:14] tumbleweed: would be nice [17:15] tumbleweed: effect is the same [17:15] ari-tczew: ok [17:16] tumbleweed: you should set -n UPLOADER_NAME (me) and -b BUG [17:27] tumbleweed: thanks! and as you see, we don't need waiting for archive admins :) [17:28] I encourage you to use it for other sponsorships done by you tumbleweed [17:28] ari-tczew: yeah, probably will, thanks [17:28] tumbleweed: no, it's me thanks for you - quick response! === jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna === maco2 is now known as maco === ubott2 is now known as ubottu === asac_ is now known as asac === emma_ is now known as emma === SpamapS_ is now known as SpamapS === Rh0nda is now known as Rhonda [20:31] It'd be great to get Bug #198724 fixed for 1010, but what is it that actually needs doing to make it happen? It seems likel it's currently just blocked for no reason (I've used a rebuilt amd64 version just fine..) [20:31] Launchpad bug 198724 in partimage (Ubuntu) "[amd64] partimage not synced or build" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/198724 === yofel_ is now known as yofel === Bachstel1e is now known as Bachstelze === soren_ is now known as soren