[03:14] <dipankar> hello dfarning_ ,
[03:15] <dfarning_> dipankar, good morning
[03:17] <dipankar> dfarning_, :  Sorry I couldn't keep up last night.
[03:17] <dipankar> I tried patching offline though
[03:17] <dfarning_> dipankar, how did it go?
[03:18] <dipankar> not very well.
[03:19] <dipankar> dfarning_: I think I am making the patch file in incorrect manner
[03:20] <dfarning_> dipankar, did you see the discussion this patch started at  http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2010-June/025059.html
[03:20] <dfarning_> dipankar, let's ping lfaraone with any questions about patching.... I think he is around for a while this evening
[03:21] <dipankar> lfaraone, around?
[03:22] <lfaraone> dipankar: yep?
[03:22] <lfaraone> dfarning_: sorry, I'm just working my way through the Tasks & Skills portion of the Debian New Maintainer process.
[03:23] <dipankar> lfaraone: I need just a little help in patching.
[03:23] <lfaraone> dipankar: how are you attemping to make the patchfile? where are you putting it? is it a premade patch or are you attempting to generate a new one?
[03:24] <dipankar> lfaraone: I am making a new file. with contents copied from here : http://pastebin.ca/1890441
[03:26] <lfaraone> dipankar: okay. where are you putting the patch file, and did you modify debian/patches/series to include it? are you getting an error?
[03:27] <dipankar> lfaraone: I have made a file named : fix_freeze_DCON.patch
[03:27] <dipankar> and added its name in the series file at the end
[03:27] <dipankar> But this time I am running debuild -S -sa
[03:27] <dipankar> not git
[03:28] <dipankar> *git-buildpackage
[03:28] <lfaraone> dipankar: okay. is the package folder you're in a git repository?
[03:29] <lfaraone> dipankar: patches are not applied upon performing a source build, only on binary builds.
[03:30] <dipankar> lfaraone: ohk.. But PPA accepts only if I run source build. (it asks for running a command debuild -S or equivalent)
[03:30] <lfaraone> dipankar: yes. the PPA build system will take the source package and do a binary build. during that stage the source will be patched.
[03:31] <lfaraone> dipankar: from what are you determining that the patch is non-functional?
[03:31] <dipankar> let me tell you the exact error in a minute
[03:34] <dipankar> lfaraone: I have pasted it here : http://paste.ubuntu.com/456170/
[03:34] <lfaraone> dipankar: okay. which lines contain warnings you think might be relevant to your problem?
[03:35] <lfaraone> *to your patch
[03:36] <dipankar> I think it is the line 35
[03:36] <dfarning_> dipankar, I just want to introduce you to bernie he is the CTO of Activity Central and just joined the channel.
[03:36] <dipankar> hello bernie,
[03:37] <dipankar> bernie: how are you?
[03:37] <dfarning_> bernie, is currently working from Paraguay leading a team to create a distrobution for the XO based on sugar .88 and fedora 11
[03:37] <lfaraone> dipankar: good. so that says that dpkg-source expected the patch to be longer than it turned out to be.
[03:37] <dfarning_> so we won't see much of him for a couple of months until their release is complete:)
[03:38] <lfaraone> dipankar: looking at your patch at http://pastebin.ca/1890441 , does anything look off to you?
[03:38] <lfaraone> dipankar: the error we're looking at suggested something irregular about the patch itself.
[03:40] <dfarning_> lfaraone, I thought the */main/bin/sugar-session path looked weird
[03:40] <dipankar> lfaraone: Actually I went through some other patches in the debian/patches folder. They all did not contain any 'diff ...' line
[03:40] <dipankar> lfaraone: I think the diff line should not be there
[03:40] <lfaraone> dipankar: good guess, but that's ignored by dpkg-source actually, so it's not the problem.
[03:40] <dipankar> as it might be for different patch system
[03:41] <lfaraone> dipankar: the first two lines just tell you how the patch was generated, and aren't really used by anything. they're harmless.
[03:42] <dipankar> lfaraone: I think I got it.
[03:42] <lfaraone> dipankar: okay, what is it, then?
[03:42] <dipankar> lfaraone: See line no. 5 in the patch file
[03:42] <dipankar> most patch files contain @@...@@ nothing after that
[03:42] <lfaraone> dipankar: exactly!
[03:42] <dipankar> but here an addition of def main():
[03:42] <dipankar> is there
[03:43] <lfaraone> dipankar: yes. I think a newline was somehow lost.
[03:43] <bernie> dipankar: Hello! I'm not very well... I've been chasing two nasty bugs in F11-0.88 that are blocking the beta release :-/
[03:43] <dipankar> its some code of python
[03:44] <dipankar> bernie: from dfarning_'s description, I think you will be handle them pretty good :)
[03:44] <lfaraone> dipankar: try it replacing the space in between the @@ and the "def main():" with a newline.
[03:45] <bernie> dipankar: well, I hope you're well instead. I'll lurk around in this channel even though I have no spare cycles to participate in other projects now.
[03:45] <dipankar> lfaraone: should I remove the 'def main():'? I don't remember having that code in the concerned file (I actually went through the file in which patch has to be applied)
[03:46] <lfaraone> dipankar: sure.
[03:49] <dipankar> lfaraon: Same output again :(
[03:51] <lfaraone> dipankar: the exact same output?
[03:51] <dipankar> bernie: Best of luck with your project. [There is some much development going on in the world :), can't wait to see these releases]]
[03:52] <lfaraone> dipankar: try removing the "main/" from the path in the "---" and "+++" lines.
[03:52] <dipankar> lfaraone: ohk
[03:53] <dipankar> lfaraone: Done
[03:53] <lfaraone> dipankar: let me know how that works.
[03:53] <dipankar> lfaraone: Thanks for taking sometime out from your schedule :)
[03:54] <lfaraone> dipankar: no worries, my VAC isn't until the first week of July, and I'll still be around then.
[03:54] <dipankar> :)
[03:55] <dipankar> lfaraone: you said the patch will be applied during upload..
[03:55] <lfaraone> dipankar: I think so. I could be wrong, don't quote me :)
[03:55] <dipankar> lfaraone: Ohk.. :) I just thought of checking it :P
[03:57] <dipankar> dfarning_,: Patched and uploaded!
[03:58] <dfarning_> dipankar, great
[03:59] <bernie> dipankar: if USR becomes rock solid, maybe one day we could think of a version for the XO.
[04:00] <dipankar> bernie: Sure, that will be awesome! XO running on USR!
[04:01] <dipankar> dfarning_, strange, it is not accepted at PPA yet
[04:02] <dipankar> dfarning_: Oh no. Neeraj uploaded a new version this morning only.. :( Should have seen that.
[04:02] <lfaraone> dipankar: no worries. this is one reason it's nice to keep things in sync using git :)
[04:03] <lfaraone> dipankar: just merge in the changes Neeraj made.
[04:03] <dipankar> lfaraone: can we do that?
[04:03] <lfaraone> dipankar: which? just download the new packages, and apply your changes on top of that.
[04:04] <lfaraone> dipankar: if we were using git, you'd just have to do a "git merge", which is a reason we should be moving towards that.
[04:04] <dipankar> lfaraone: So we need to have a git 'account' first.. I guess
[04:05] <lfaraone> dipankar: an account on alioth, and be members of the collab-maint group.
[04:06] <lfaraone> dipankar: ideally you should all have alioth accounts like you do at launchpad, along with membership in debian-olpc and collab-maint. I can approve you for debian-olpc, but you'll all have to apply for collab-maint.
[04:06] <dipankar> collab-maint?
[04:07] <lfaraone> dipankar: the group that "owns" the sugar packages in git. you need to be part of this to be able to upload to collab-maint packages.
[04:08] <dipankar> lfaraone: ohk.. I guess PPA has some drawbacks afterall
[04:11] <dipankar> dfarning_: I think it should be accepted now
[04:12] <dipankar> lfaraone: What actually is VAC? sorry for my ignorance
[04:12] <lfaraone> dipankar: debian jargon for "vacation"
[04:12] <lfaraone> dipankar: when I mean collab-maint packages, I mean the git repositories which contain the source directories for those packages.
[04:13] <dfarning_> dipankar, great.
[04:15] <dfarning_> dipankar, hmm there is no change in the build status yet
[04:15] <dipankar> lfaraone: Ok, I guess thats why we never have to bother for the source of a package while working with git (if that is already maintained)
[04:15] <lfaraone> dipankar: using a technology called pristine-tar, it keeps the information on how to recreate the upstream source tarball in git, so yes.
[04:15] <dipankar> dfarning_: I don't know... PPA is working very slow
[04:16] <dipankar> dfarning_: Package is accepted
[04:16] <dfarning_> dipankar, just started so you are set:)
[04:17] <dfarning_>  dipankar walter bender is on #sugar do you wnat to ask him for help with why analyze is crashing?
[04:17] <dipankar> lfaraone: thats a good way. Very useful thing
[04:17] <dipankar> dfarning_: Right on
[04:25] <dfarning_> dipankar do you get any usefull output from any of the log files after a crash?
[04:26] <dipankar> dfarning_: Yes sometimes they refer to a function call which raises the error, and sometimes they mention the exit status
[04:27] <dfarning_> dipankar the error log you posted is good.  Now we just wait.
[04:28] <dipankar> dfarning_: Who is walter bender? Like you told me about Bernie
[04:29] <bernie> dipankar: he's the original designer of Sugar
[04:29] <dipankar> dfarning_: WWOW! I mean I will be talking to him. :)
[04:30] <bernie> dipankar: also author of many activities (Abacus, Visual Match, XoEdit...)
[04:30] <dfarning_> dipankar yes, he is outstanding at mentoring new developers
[04:30] <bernie> dipankar: and current maintainer of many core sugar activities: Turtle Art, Measure...
[04:32] <dipankar> :)
[04:32] <bernie> dipankar: when he's not traveling, he's usually hanging on #sugar. he's quite a helpful person
[04:34] <dfarning_> dipankar I think this is related to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584717
[04:35] <dipankar> dfarning_,: Ok, I will have a look
[04:36]  * lfaraone is out for the night. 
[04:36] <dipankar> lfaraone: Good night
[04:37] <dipankar> dfarning_: I think Ankur is working on this bug
[04:37] <dipankar> dfarning_: The date and time setting crash
[04:38] <dfarning_> dipankar ok I wasn't sure was working on it
[04:38] <dipankar> dfarning_: He told me he would work on it. So I think I should not solve it till the end.
[04:40] <dfarning_> dipankaris ankur working on the sugar-draw-round-corner bug or the date time crash?
[04:41] <dipankar> dfarning_: Analyze activity and Date-time (settings) both crash due to sugar-draw-round-corner bug
[04:42] <dipankard> ERROR:sugar-drawing.c:390:sugar_draw_rounded_arrow: code should not be reached
[04:42] <dfarning_> dipankar that makes things easy.
[04:42] <dipankard> same for both
[04:42] <dfarning_> dipankar will he be around today?
[04:43] <dipankar> I guess he would be joining us soon
[04:44] <dipankar> dfarning_: If not, then I will have the solution ready and let him patch the package as required
[04:45] <dfarning_> dipankar yes, please start working on it.  Then when he gets here you can discuss approaches.... Debugging is as much an art as a science.
[04:46] <dipankar> dfarning_: Let me check api.sugar.org.. There may be some link to the .c file in concern
[04:51] <dfarning_> neeraj, do you have any thing to work on now that you fixed you dependancy bug?
[04:52] <dipankar> dfarning_: Can you please check the sugar-0.88 package by downloading it, whether it fixes the bug or not.
[04:52] <dipankar> ?
[04:53] <dfarning_> dipankar sure.
[04:53] <neeraj> right now I am not working on anything.. but I will be in office in 40 min or so..
[04:53] <DrKenobi> hello! I'm runnig Sugar+Ubuntu10.04. Two issues: first 'Sugar' from the Ubuntu repositories has no activities (nothing), and after installing 'Browse Activity [112]' this activity is not working. Any idea?
[04:53] <dfarning_> neeraj, when you get in can you look at #11
[04:54] <neeraj> I can start.. but will be able to resume work only after 8PM IST
[04:54] <neeraj> k
[04:54] <dfarning_> neeraj, thanks
[04:55] <dfarning_> DrKenobi, the best way to get sugar on ubuntu 10.04 is through the ppa at https://launchpad.net/~sugarteam/+archive/ppa
[04:58] <DrKenobi> dfarning_, thank you
[04:59] <dfarning_> DrKenobi, you are welcome.  If any thing breaks please let us know.  we are trying to get the packages in shape for inclusion in 10.01:)
[05:00] <neeraj> dfarning_, can you please remind me #11.. I am unable to find it
[05:01] <DrKenobi> dfarning_, the actual package in the ubuntu repositories is doing somthing weird and i lost my mouse buttons. there are bugs in launchpad. I will try this new things! thanks
[05:02] <dfarning_> DrKenobi, have you tried in the last couple of days?
[05:02] <dfarning_> DrKenobi, as of the end of last week we have a team of 4 full time developers on the project.
[05:03] <dfarning_> dipankar looks good, the error is gone.
[05:03] <dfarning_> neeraj, 11. 1277640794.639546 ERROR root: No gsm connection was set in GConf.
[05:03] <DrKenobi> dfarning_, i downloades yesterday
[05:04] <dfarning_> neeraj, we get that error when ever sugar starts.  I don't think it is harmful in which case it should be downgraded to a warning.
[05:05] <dipankar> dfarning_: Stupid power-cut, got d/c Did I miss out something?
[05:06] <dfarning_> bernie, just suggested that you help DrKenobi get started with Sugar on ubuntu from the ppa:)
[05:06] <neeraj_> hmm.. did i miss something after *downgraded to warning* msg?
[05:08] <dipankar> DrKenobi: I would be glad to help you set-up USR on your ubuntu
[05:08] <dipankar> DrKenobi: USR -> Ubuntu Sugar Remix (Run Sugar on your existing Ubuntu OS)
[05:09] <dfarning_> neeraj_, no that was the whole message:)  I think we are getting a false positive error message that should only be a warning message.
[05:09] <DrKenobi> dipankar PPA it's a software repository?
[05:09] <dipankar> Yes.
[05:10] <dfarning_> neeraj_  errors mean oops something really bad just happened.  Warnings just bring something to your attention
[05:10] <neeraj_> dfarning_, ok..
[05:10] <dipankar> DrKenobi: You can set in ubuntu to search for latest packages on PPA
[05:11] <DrKenobi> dipankar great
[05:11] <dipankar> DrKenobi: Please go through this page, It will guide you through setting up USR on your Ubuntu
[05:11] <bernie> dfarning_: I did, but he doesn't feel confident doing it
[05:11] <bernie> dfarning_: and m_stone is trying to push him to build it from sources :-)))
[05:12] <DrKenobi> haha
[05:12] <dipankar> DrKenobi: If you face any problem you can send in the query here
[05:12] <DrKenobi> I'll come back tomorrow!
[05:12] <dfarning_> bernie, :)
[05:12] <dipankar> DrKenobi: :) Good night
[05:12] <DrKenobi> thank you dipankar, bernie, dfarning_
[05:13] <dipankar> bernie: :)
[05:13] <dipankar> dfarning_/ bernie : I think I have found the sugar-draw.c file
[05:14] <dfarning_> DrKenobi, you are welcome I hope we have something useful and _useable_ for you soon:)
[05:14] <dipankar> its in the package 'sugar-artwork-0.88'
[05:15] <dfarning_> dipankar, Ok I got it now
[05:16] <dipankar> dfarning_: Where to get the patch?
[05:22] <ankur> hello all
[05:22] <dipankar> hi ankur
[05:23] <ankur> if you people are working right now, can i pitch in with my questions?
[05:23] <ankur> is dfarning_  around?
[05:23] <dipankar> yup
[05:24] <dipankar> I am working to the same issue: sugar-draw.c
[05:24] <dfarning_> dipankar, from the discussion on http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584717 it looks like jonas pushed a new version of artwork on friday the 26 which is more recent than our last release.
[05:24] <dfarning_> ankur, good morning
[05:24] <dipankar> dfarning_: Oh that explains then.
[05:25] <dfarning_> ankur, dipankar is looking at the corner redraw issue you were looking at yesterday:)
[05:25] <dipankar> dfarning_: I guess we just have to keep ourselves more updated now on packages
[05:25] <ankur> i was just going to ask about that question.
[05:26] <ankur> last night that was the question
[05:26] <dfarning_> dipankar, yes. this is the issue that lfaraone was talking about last with reguard to git.
[05:26] <ankur> which was bothering me.as per the discussion, the bug was marked close and it was fixed in latest release
[05:26] <dipankar> ankur, you were correct that the issue is closed now
[05:26] <dfarning_> ankur, dipankar it looks like the solution is to rebuild the package from debian.....
[05:27] <dipankar> dfarning_: This time Ankur will repackages
[05:27] <dipankar> *repackage
[05:27] <ankur> okay
[05:27] <ankur> i am on it
[05:27] <dfarning_> ankur, dipankar but now it get a little tricky becase we are maintaining separate changes and modifications in our tree.
[05:27] <dipankar> ankur: I am sending you the required documentation.
[05:28] <dipankar> dfarning_: I think I get what you are trying to say.
[05:28] <ankur> dipankar,  i am waiting for it.
[05:29] <neeraj_> cool :).. one more bug solved(hopefully)..
[05:29] <ankur> dfarning_, well i suppose even if it is tricky, you will help in in pointing me out to right direction
[05:29] <dfarning_> ankur, dipankar this is why it is critial to maintain the changelog file.  we need to be able to quickly see what changes we made to the ubuntu pacakge
[05:31] <dipankar> dfarning_: Thanks for that tip. I was going some other way.. :)
[05:31] <dipankar> ankur
[05:31] <dfarning_> ankur, +1 the first step will be to download the existing ubuntu package and check what we have changed.
[05:31] <ankur> dipankar,  can you see me?
[05:32] <dipankar> find the documentation in email
[05:32] <ankur> i think i lost my internet conn.
[05:32] <ankur> okay now
[05:32] <ankur> i am online
[05:32] <dfarning_> ankur,  if and only if we have changed something we need to carry those changes forward.
[05:32] <ankur> ya checking my mails
[05:33] <dfarning_> ankur, dipankar that is why _all_changes are in the /debian dir rather than spread around the entire package.
[05:33] <dipankar> dfarning_, you want us not to miss any updates on the packaging from both sides :)
[05:34] <dfarning_> dipankar, yes.  I'll shut up and let you guys work:)
[05:34] <ankur> okay , dipankar  dfarning_  i was going through documentation, and will get back to you after i am done with it
[05:35] <dipankar> dfarning_: Its not that. Ankur will have to go through the documentation before starting
[05:35] <dfarning_> :) good luck
[05:36] <dipankar> dfarning_, After that what will be next task?
[05:38] <dfarning_> dipankar, I think the next thing should be setting up a debian test system like kandarp is doing.
[05:38] <dipankar> dfarning_: ok..
[05:41] <dipankar> dfarning_: I guess the debian system is for checking if debian requires any updates or not?
[05:41] <dipankar> if required we will push the packages after patching there
[05:42] <ankur> while my git clone repository is being setup, dipankar  can you explain dput command?
[05:42] <ankur> why do we use it
[05:42] <ankur> ?
[05:42] <ankur> rather than normal method
[05:43] <dipankar> ankur: as you know dput is for uploading the packages using the .changes file generated
[05:43] <ankur> right
[05:43] <kandarpk> ankur, please forward me the documentation
[05:43] <dipankar> kandarpk, I have sent it to all :)
[05:43] <kandarpk> ok thanks
[05:43] <dipankar> np
[05:43] <dipankar> :)
[05:44] <dipankar> ankur: When we use the normal way, we just hand over the packages to ppa software
[05:44] <dipankar> which decides which series to add it to
[05:45] <dipankar> in the changelog if you notice, most ppa packages have 'lucid' in their first line
[05:45] <dipankar> When we download an unmodified package from debian, it does not have the same line
[05:45] <dipankar> it has 'unstable'
[05:46] <dipankar> in place of 'lucid'
[05:46] <dipankar> to get that we generally used to bump the debian version no. (the one after '-' sign)
[05:46] <dipankar> ankur : clear till now??
[05:46] <ankur> yes
[05:47] <ankur> but my git-buildpackage command failed
[05:47] <dipankar> what is the error?
[05:47] <ankur> i am looking into it, while here is the log http://paste.ubuntu.com/456221/
[05:48] <dipankar> Yup that is fine
[05:48] <ankur> it seems
[05:48] <dipankar> you have to sign them manually
[05:48] <ankur> gpg key of jonas was
[05:48] <ankur> not available
[05:48] <dipankar> as mentioned in the documentation
[05:49] <dipankar> in point no. 4
[05:50] <dipankar> dfarning_: you there?
[05:51] <dipankar> done ankur with signing?
[05:52] <ankur> no
[05:52] <ankur> getting some problem, will get back to you in two min
[05:52] <dipankar> ok.. take your time
[05:52] <dipankar> no problem
[05:54] <dfarning_> dipankar, yes?
[05:56] <dipankar> dfarning_: is there any bug to attend to.. I was thinking of giving a look at it while Ankur does the packaging
[05:58] <dfarning_> dipankar, feel free to get started on 11. 1277640794.639546 ERROR root: No gsm connection was set in GConf.
[05:59] <dipankar> dfarning_: Out of curiosity, where in the numbering coming from
[05:59] <dipankar> :)
[05:59] <dipankar> like 11. in above
[06:01] <dfarning_> I am just starting sugar and poking around until something breaks:) which usually takes less than 30 seconds.  Every thing the breaks get a number and a spot in the list:)
[06:02] <dipankar> ohk.. testing:)
[06:12] <dipankar> dfarning_: Manu Sir sent me an e-mail regarding the dependency problem : The fix is to remove ', $(call session_expand_activities)' from the
[06:12] <dipankar> end of of line 131 in sugar-0.88-0.88.1/debian/rules .
[06:13] <dipankar> I guess the problem is solved by neeraj.
[06:15] <dfarning_> dipankar, neeraj allready fixed that problem this a couple of hours ago:)
[06:23] <ankur> done uploading the package
[06:24] <ankur> hope i haven't done something wrong
[06:26] <ankur> it was rejected :( , looking into the matter
[12:03] <neeraj> dfarning_, aroung?
[12:03] <neeraj> *around
[12:32] <dfarning_> neeraj, hello
[12:58] <neeraj> dfarning_, I was thinking of running the build script now?
[13:01] <dfarning_> neeraj, sure it should work.
[13:10] <dipankar> Hi dfarning_
[13:10] <dipankar> good morning
[13:11] <dfarning_> dipankar, how are you?
[13:13] <dipankar> dfarning_,: I am doing great. Thank you
[13:13] <dipankar> You have started working so early
[13:13] <dipankar> :)
[13:14] <dipankar> Ok.. So I went through the bug regarding speech activity
[13:14] <dipankar> dfarning_: I am facing the bug in emulator only, not in any session (sugar.desktop/usr.desktop)
[13:15] <dipankar> dfarning_: I think the problem is with emulator size. I can see a part of text box if I hide all the panels in Ubuntu
[13:16] <dfarning_> dipankar, ok that make sense.  Screen size is a big problem  Much of sugar was hard coded for the xo screen
[13:19] <dipankar> dfarning_: So you are suggesting tweaking the resolutions now. Interesting..
[13:20] <dfarning_> dipankar, No, I don't have a suggestion:)  Just noting that it is a common problem.
[13:21] <dipankar> dfarning_: hmm.. But would have liked that. :)
[13:22] <dfarning_>  dipankar I would suggest that you ping tomeu in #sugar, describe the problem and ask who would be the best person to help with this issue.
[13:47] <dipankar> dfarning_: seems like tomeu wants to solve the problem
[13:53] <dfarning_> dipankar, great.
[13:59] <dfarning_> neeraj, how did the build work?
[14:06] <neeraj_> dfarning_, got dc.. Will give it a try when I will reach home.. Also will try to use gnu screen method(or it was something else) :))
[14:09] <dfarning_> neeraj_, yes it gnu screen.   it is very handy.   multiply users can be logged into the same screen so you can work together.
[14:16] <dipankar> dfarning_: I guess the problem is something else
[14:16] <dfarning_> dipankar, I don't under stand the issues well enough
[14:18] <dipankar> Please see the image links below:
[14:18] <dipankar> http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/7969/screenshot1ep.png
[14:19] <dipankar> it is the screen-shot in ubuntu
[14:19] <dipankar> http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/8264/screenshot2gj.png
[14:21] <dipankar> it is the screen-shot in session
[14:22] <dipankar> dfarning_: :) I hope you got it now
[14:26] <dipankar> dfarning_: ?
[14:26] <dipankar> lfaraone: you, around?
[14:26] <lfaraone> dipankar: who, me? :)
[14:27] <dipankar> lfaraone: yup.. had a problem regarding PPA to ask about
[14:27] <lfaraone> dipankar: okay, go ahead.
[14:27] <dipankar> lfaraone: Ankur deleted a package.
[14:28] <dipankar> sugar-artwork
[14:28] <dipankar> lfaraone: then he tried uploading the same package but Jonas one (after downloding it from Debian)
[14:29] <dipankar> he got the error msg: The version number trying to upload already exists
[14:30] <lfaraone> dipankar: according to those who I've asked in #launchpad, that should work. How long did he wait before the deletion and the reupload?
[14:31] <dipankar> 5 minutes or so.. then he got frustrated and left :)
[14:32] <lfaraone> dipankar: okay. deletions may take a little while to propegate.
[14:32] <lfaraone> dipankar: have him try again, then ask in #launchpad if it continues to fail
[14:33] <dipankar> ohk.. but Ankur is not present right now
[14:33] <ankur> dipankar, i am here
[14:33] <ankur> and it failed again
[14:33] <ankur> i just came
[14:33] <ankur> now
[14:33] <dipankar> great ankur
[14:34] <dipankar> lfaraone: Please guide ankur on this :)
[14:34] <ankur> lfaraone, http://paste.ubuntu.com/456389/
[14:34] <ankur> this is rejection mail i got
[14:34] <dipankar> lfaraone: He knows the git packaging and patching :)
[14:35] <ankur> i will try to tell the exact procedure here which i followed, kindly guide me where i failed
[14:35] <ankur> lfaraone, dipankar  should i continue
[14:35] <ankur> ?
[14:36] <dipankar> ankur, you can contact lfaraone directly now. His guidance is always excellent :)
[14:37] <lfaraone> ankur: can you try the upload again?
[14:37] <ankur> okay , right then. I downloaded the sugar artwork package using debcheckout
[14:37] <ankur> lfaraone,  i will try again
[14:37] <ankur> :)
[14:38] <ankur> lfaraone,  dipankar  uploaded again, waiting for the reply.let us see if it is uploaded .
[14:38] <dipankar> sure
[14:38] <dipankar> :)
[14:40] <ankur> also lfaraone  i will like to make sure i followed right step. so i am telling them once again.will it be okay with you to point it out if there is any mistake
[14:40] <lfaraone> ankur: sure.
[14:40] <ankur> i downloaded sugar-artwork package using debcheckout sugar-artwork-0.88
[14:41] <ankur> 2.then i deleted the artwork package from launchpad ppa
[14:41] <ankur> 3. i went to the source tree of the artwork package i downloaded from debian
[14:42] <ankur> 4.Built the package using git-buildpackage -S -sa --git-ignore-new
[14:42] <ankur> signed it using my key
[14:43] <ankur> 5.uploaded using dput sugarteam-lucid sugar-artwork-0.88_0.88.1-1_source.changes
[14:43] <ankur> lfaraone, dipankar the package has been rejected again. :(
[14:44] <lfaraone> ankur: okay, ask in #launchpad about your issue, they can help you with it.
[14:44] <dipankar> forward the e-mail
[14:44] <ankur> dipankar,  here are the contents
[14:44] <ankur> http://paste.ubuntu.com/456389/
[14:45] <ankur> lfaraone,  are you sure that there is no mistake from my side as per the procedure explained by me?
[14:45] <lfaraone> ankur: not AFAICT
[15:34] <ankurkhurana_> lfaraone,  i did some research on net  and found this http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/06/28/%23launchpad.html and this https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/Deleting
[15:34] <ankurkhurana_> they say you cant upload same version no even if you have deleted it
[15:35] <ankurkhurana_> am i assuming it right
[15:35] <ankurkhurana_> ?
[15:35] <lfaraone> ankurkhurana_: so bump the version slightly, add a new changelog entry with +ppa1 at the end I guess.
[15:35] <ankurkhurana_> i should use dch -i command for this , just confirming or do it manually ?
[15:37] <lfaraone> ankurkhurana_: dch -i and edit the resulting changelog entry so the number matches what I described.
[16:34] <neeraj> dfarning_, I think build process is working now.. :)
[16:35] <neeraj> now should I build a new ISO by removing the comments lines in chroot.sh file... for adding updates/proposed packages//
[16:54] <DrKenobi> Hi! I'm trying to install 'sugar-activities' from 'ppa:sugarteam/ppa' but every time i try to do it the computer freezes. Can I download the .deb from somewhere else?
[17:10] <dfarning_> neeraj, yes I think that is a good idea
[17:11] <dfarning_> DrKenobi, you can download the deb from https://launchpad.net/~sugarteam/+archive/ppa/+files/sugar-activities_0.1ubuntu6_all.deb
[17:12] <dfarning_> DrKenobi, do you have a slow internet connection?  That file is almost 100MB.
[17:12] <DrKenobi> dfarning_, I have a very good internet connection, it's not going to be a problem
[17:13] <dfarning_> ok, good.
[17:13] <DrKenobi> dfarning_, thank you! downloading!
[17:21] <dfarning_> DrKenobi, you are welcome.  Another note. the ppa works best if lucid-updates and lucid proposed software source (repositories) are enabled in your update manager.  Ubuntu has recently fixed a bug in GDM that was causing us trouble.
[17:41] <lfaraone> dfarning_: I'm on my way out to lunch, but when I get back I can make a spreadsheet of the activities we have in debian/ubuntu and the activities we want to have per the soas list. Sound good?
[17:42] <dfarning_> lfaraone,   :) I was just starting that same list.
[17:56] <DrKenobi> dfarning_: OK, so've to enable lucid proposed
[17:58] <dfarning_> DrKenobi, after updating you should be able to run sugar a session from the login screen or from the education menu.
[17:59] <DrKenobi> dfarning_, I can run sugar, but the problem was installing the activities
[18:00] <dfarning_> DrKenobi, great so now it is (mostly) working for you?
[18:01] <DrKenobi> dfarning_, I'll try now. If I disconnect it's because I still have the problem. Lets see
[18:12] <DrKenobi> dfarming_, after downloading the .deb I installed the activities. But after the installation the laptop freeze. There is still a problem there.
[18:14] <dfarning_> DrKenobi, does you laptop freeze durning the install process or when you restart?
[18:16] <DrKenobi> dfarning_, after installing the .deb there was a windows with something like "Package Installation Completed" (something like this). After a few second the laptop freeze. It was at the end of the install process.
[18:17] <dfarning_> DrKenobi,   strange, how much memory does you computer have?
[18:19] <DrKenobi> dfarning_: 749.6
[18:21] <dfarning_> DrKenobi, how did you install sugar without the activities package?  activities is supposed to be a dependancy -- but we might have made a mistake.
[18:41] <lfaraone> dfarning_: do you want to continue working on it, or should I handle it? Should it be on the SL wiki, the Debian wiki, or the Ubuntu wiki?
[19:21] <neeraj> dfarning_, the build seems to be successful. Please check it whenever you get time. In the latest build I have included proposed, backports updates.
[19:29] <manusheel> neeraj: Neat work.
[19:29] <manusheel> Keep it up.
[19:41] <manusheel> neeraj; around?
[19:59] <DrKenobi> dfarning_, I open the 'Ubuntu Software Center' and install 'sugar-emulator-0.88' with no activities. Now that I install the activities I still don't find the Browser
[22:13] <DrKenobi_Sugar> Hi, I've installed 'sugar-emulator-0.88' and 'sugar-activities'. Some work fine, and some don't start. The Browse activity is not installed, could that be possible?