| poolie | sinzui, so did bug expiry actually get reenabled? | 02:23 |
|---|---|---|
| poolie | post bug 333521 | 02:23 |
| _mup_ | Bug #333521: Enable bugs expiration for Ubuntu <qa-ok> <Launchpad Bugs:Fix Released by adeuring> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/333521> | 02:23 |
| wgrant | poolie: There has been no screaming, so I doubt it. | 02:46 |
| wgrant | The plan fortunately seems to have vanished. | 02:46 |
| * thumper needs more coffee | 02:47 | |
| lifeless | wgrant: what, you don't like bug expiration? | 02:49 |
| wgrant | lifeless: Not the latest proposal. | 02:49 |
| wgrant | of switching it on without unsetting the flag globally. | 02:50 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| adeuring | good morning | 08:07 |
| === henninge changed the topic of #launchpad-dev to: Launchpad Development Channel | Week 4 of 10.06 | PQM is open | https://dev.launchpad.net/ | Get the code: https://dev.launchpad.net/Getting | On-call review in irc://irc.freenode.net/#launchpad-reviews | Use http://paste.ubuntu.com/ for pastes | ||
| mrevell | Morning | 09:08 |
| jml | good morning | 10:25 |
| === jtv1 is now known as jtv | ||
| deryck | Morning, all. | 11:02 |
| adeuring | morning deryck | 11:12 |
| bigjools | zope.configuration.config.ConfigurationExecutionError: <type 'exceptions.ValueError'>: /var/tmp/launchpad_mailqueue is not a Maildir folder | 11:21 |
| bigjools | wtf | 11:21 |
| bigjools | sigh, why does /var/tmp/launchpad_mailqueue get created with root ownership, yet "make" wants to remove it etc. | 11:33 |
| bigjools | (as my local user) | 11:33 |
| === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | ||
| === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| wgrant | It would be interesting and not too difficult to calculate the actual buildd utilisation at times like this. | 14:05 |
| wgrant | I suspect it's well under half of the 100% that it appears to be. | 14:06 |
| wgrant | It's a bit concerning that one can actually watch buildd-manager's progress through a single cycle over several minutes by refreshing /builders. | 14:16 |
| bigjools | We know. It's getting fixed. | 14:22 |
| bigjools | wgrant: so still 261k where date_started is null and status != 0; | 14:37 |
| bigjools | mmm | 14:37 |
| wgrant | bigjools: Er, really? | 14:38 |
| bigjools | really | 14:38 |
| wgrant | But that is the same as the number you quoted without the filte. | 14:38 |
| wgrant | And there are somewhere around 20k builds pending. | 14:38 |
| wgrant | And probably tens of thousands more suspended. | 14:38 |
| wgrant | So it does not compute. | 14:39 |
| bigjools | well I am using staging's DB | 14:39 |
| bigjools | which is a little out of date but near enough | 14:39 |
| bigjools | oh, meh | 14:39 |
| bigjools | we blitz all pending jobs on staging now | 14:39 |
| bigjools | it has a buildd-manager | 14:39 |
| * bigjools dodges the bird that just flew into the office | 14:40 | |
| wgrant | What if you say status NOT IN (0, 5)? | 14:40 |
| wgrant | (5 being superseded) | 14:40 |
| wgrant | staging has a build farm now? Handy. | 14:40 |
| bigjools | 120k | 14:41 |
| bigjools | well if you count one machine with two builders on it as a farm ... | 14:41 |
| wgrant | Aha. | 14:42 |
| wgrant | OH~! | 14:43 |
| wgrant | gina. | 14:43 |
| wgrant | 22:14 < wgrant> No date_started but successfully built is fine. | 14:44 |
| wgrant | 22:14 < wgrant> No date_started, but successfully built *and with date_finished or builder* is not. | 14:44 |
| wgrant | I got my issues from that day mixed up :/ | 14:44 |
| wgrant | There were 9 builds in this state at that time. | 14:44 |
| wgrant | It should be the same now. | 14:44 |
| bigjools | gror | 14:46 |
| bigjools | hardware failures....awesome | 14:48 |
| wgrant | Bird-related? :P | 14:48 |
| bigjools | no, the machine I was just running queries on :/ | 14:52 |
| wgrant | Oh, excellent. | 14:53 |
| bigjools | not exactly | 14:53 |
| bigjools | wgrant: can you clarify that clause again? | 15:06 |
| bigjools | oh nm | 15:07 |
| jml | little bit distracted today, going to see what breaks when I run the tests with no branch sample data. | 15:07 |
| bigjools | wgrant: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/456906/ | 15:09 |
| bigjools | gnargh | 15:09 |
| bigjools | oh nm there's only 9, stray clause table | 15:11 |
| wgrant | Ah, good. | 15:11 |
| wgrant | I was WTFing a bit there. | 15:11 |
| bigjools | def just 9 | 15:12 |
| bigjools | ok, now, what shall I poke in the start date | 15:12 |
| * bigjools ponders | 15:12 | |
| wgrant | The 'builder IS NOT NULL' disjunct was only required when there may have still been incomplete builds. | 15:12 |
| wgrant | You could poke in something just around the rollout time. | 15:12 |
| bigjools | yeah | 15:13 |
| wgrant | Or if you're feeling adventurous actually grab the start time from the logs. | 15:13 |
| wgrant | But that's probably pointless. | 15:13 |
| EdwinGrubbs | henninge_: did you see my email about caching the message count? | 15:23 |
| bigjools | wgrant: have you got any idea why someone would write that first line of code in IArchive.checkArchivePermission() | 15:24 |
| bigjools | maybe they were on a low IQ day | 15:24 |
| wgrant | bigjools: Ah, that's why it's OOPSing? | 15:25 |
| bigjools | yes | 15:26 |
| bigjools | words fail me | 15:26 |
| wgrant | Well, it's not terribly unreasonable if one assumes it's only used for checking upload permissions. | 15:26 |
| bigjools | it should just return False FFS | 15:27 |
| wgrant | Well, if you're checking whether a source should be accepted into a copy archive, you probably want to crash. | 15:27 |
| wgrant | But this method is used elsewhere, so... | 15:27 |
| === henninge_ is now known as henninge | ||
| bigjools | no I never want to crash | 15:27 |
| bigjools | returning False is entirely appropriate | 15:27 |
| wgrant | If you get to the stage where you are verifying permissions for a copy archive, you probably want to let someone know. | 15:28 |
| wgrant | Because something is seriously broken. | 15:28 |
| === Chex_ is now known as Chex | ||
| bigjools | there's too much of that paranoia in Soyuz | 15:28 |
| henninge | EdwinGrubbs: yes I saw it but have not read it yet. | 15:28 |
| henninge | sorry ;) | 15:28 |
| wgrant | bigjools: I think it's a handy defensive tactic, given how badly things can go wrong. | 15:29 |
| wgrant | Just... not when applied incorrectly. | 15:29 |
| bigjools | the latter is my beef | 15:29 |
| wgrant | That line has been there for a while. | 15:30 |
| wgrant | i wonder why it hasn't been problematic before. | 15:30 |
| wgrant | I guess maybe canUpload wasn't actually used for that before :/ | 15:31 |
| wgrant | It is a reasonably novel method. | 15:32 |
| bigjools | it's used when ascertaining retry availability | 15:38 |
| bigjools | if you can upload you can retry | 15:38 |
| wgrant | I know why it's used now. | 15:38 |
| wgrant | I'm just wondering why it never appeared before, when that code has been there for ages. | 15:39 |
| wgrant | And those pages worked a few months ago. | 15:39 |
| === Ursinha_ is now known as Ursinha | ||
| bigjools | you have to hit the build in a certain state | 15:46 |
| maxb | <bigjools> if you can upload you can retry <--- I can upload to ~launchpad/+archive/ppa but I can't retry | 15:47 |
| bigjools | maxb: it only applies to the main archive :) | 15:47 |
| maxb | consistency? What's that? :-) | 15:47 |
| bigjools | maybe it should not | 15:47 |
| wgrant | I've been meaning to fix that for copy archives for a while. | 15:48 |
| wgrant | I didn't realise it affected PPAs too. | 15:48 |
| bigjools | well for copy archives it should only let the owner and admins | 15:49 |
| wgrant | Or custom uploaders, if they are added. | 15:49 |
| wgrant | No reason to forbid it, and it's handy. | 15:49 |
| bigjools | custom uploaders are sorta evil at the moment | 15:49 |
| wgrant | eg. MOTU should be able to retry builds in the rebuild archive, without having to poke doko. | 15:49 |
| bigjools | I want to move all upload permissions to explicit ArchivePermissions rather than relying on the ownership of the PPA | 15:50 |
| wgrant | Yes yes yes. | 15:50 |
| wgrant | All this implicit permission stuff is silly. | 15:50 |
| wgrant | Although I guess we won't see those ACLs for a while now. | 15:51 |
| cakofony | Does the launchpad api have a sleep type thing built in, or am I going to get banned from the site for using the api too much? | 15:51 |
| bigjools | cakofony: not unless we can see it grossly affecting performance | 15:52 |
| cakofony | bigjools: I'm working on an opensource project that collects as much data as possible from forge sites -- we pull a lot of data :-s | 15:53 |
| bigjools | cakofony: is that a one-off or ongoing? | 15:53 |
| cakofony | bigjools: we do a run every month or so (it probably takes a day or two) | 15:54 |
| cakofony | bigjools: before I found the api, I was downloading about 100,000 html pages per run, this should speed things up quite nicely | 15:54 |
| bigjools | okay - I might put you on to someone else like, errr, mrevell perhaps | 15:55 |
| bigjools | and jml might be interested too | 15:55 |
| jml | what | 15:55 |
| jml | cakofony, there's no built in sleep | 15:56 |
| jml | cakofony, if you become a problem, we'll let you know :) | 15:56 |
| jml | cakofony, what's the website? | 15:56 |
| cakofony | jml: flossmole.org | 15:56 |
| jml | cakofony, thanks. | 15:56 |
| cakofony | jml: thank you! I'm calling the client in my program "python-flossmole" | 15:57 |
| jml | cakofony, are you syncing bug data, or just projects & developers? | 15:58 |
| cakofony | jml: only projects teams and developers | 15:58 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-lunch | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
| === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
| Z-RAY_ | after amateur tries to update MLT to 0.5.6 i have left without ffmpeg modules and even ffpmeg is installed, kdenlive says that some not installed at all. also it says that some sound module is not installed. i spent all day to make "lines and dots" bug dissappear (white lines and dots - was promised to be fixed in MLT 0.5.5) and i couldn't make it, even worse - now modules "avformat module", "Quimage module", "Title module" are missing and reinstallin | 19:27 |
| Z-RAY_ | g of the program and ffmpeg does not helping. | 19:27 |
| Z-RAY_ | help me please to make this thing work correctly. my skype is "woanerges", or write me here. please, bro's, come on, i need some support here! | 19:27 |
| Z-RAY_ | white dots and lines examples: | 19:27 |
| Z-RAY_ | http://kdenlive.org/sites/default/files/shot1_0.png | 19:27 |
| Z-RAY_ | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrFXr_bx2a0 | 19:28 |
| === EdwinGrubbs is now known as Edwin-lunch | ||
| rockstar | abentley, would you object if I factored out the sourcepackagerecipebuild views in browser sourcepackagerecipebuild.py ? | 21:26 |
| abentley | rockstar, I don't understand. | 21:27 |
| rockstar | abentley, so lp.code.browser.sourcepackagerecipe has views for sourcepackagerecipebuilds in them. I want to move them out. | 21:28 |
| abentley | rockstar, alright. | 21:28 |
| rockstar | abentley, cool, thanks. | 21:29 |
| === zyga_ is now known as zyga | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
| thumper | morning | 22:14 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
| lifeless | hiya thumper | 23:02 |
| thumper | hi lifeless | 23:02 |
| === beuno_ is now known as beuno | ||
| === Edwin-lunch is now known as EdwinGrubbs | ||
| === krkhan_ is now known as krkhan | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
