| dholbach | good morning | 07:20 |
|---|---|---|
| * nigelb waves to ajmitch | 07:34 | |
| dholbach | nigelb: http://daniel.holba.ch/blog/?p=709 | 10:49 |
| * nigelb hugs dholbach :) | 10:57 | |
| dholbach | :) | 10:58 |
| nigelb | you changed themes | 10:58 |
| dholbach | that was with wp3.0 | 11:00 |
| dholbach | they have a new theme, so I thought I'd try it :) | 11:00 |
| nigelb | It looks good. Add you picture too from one of the trips you took, should look good | 11:01 |
| nigelb | *your | 11:02 |
| dholbach | maybe I'll do it after this year's holidays, let's see :) | 11:03 |
| bdrung | nigelb: what do you think of the idea to use this channel for ubuntu-sponsors, too? | 12:45 |
| nigelb | bdrung: for reviewing branches? I have no problem :) | 12:45 |
| nigelb | It would be nice to have a channel for that and some noise :) | 12:46 |
| bdrung | nigelb: ubuntu-sponsors is for getting debdiffs sponsored. | 12:46 |
| bdrung | nigelb: there are overlaps (e.g. if the debdiff fixes a bug and that patchs needs to be forwarded to upstream), but there are unrelated sponsorings (e.g. sync requests, merge requests, or SRUs) | 12:47 |
| nigelb | bdrung: I understand and I don't have a problem with it. Please go ahead :) | 12:47 |
| bdrung | nigelb: should i write a mail to ubuntu-devel? | 12:48 |
| nigelb | bdrung: I don't think so https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/CodeReviews | 12:49 |
| nigelb | bdrung: look at the sponsoring heading | 12:50 |
| bdrung | nigelb: this is a mix of ubuntu-reviewers and ubuntu-sponsors | 12:53 |
| nigelb | bdrung: yeah, the page is almost overwritted with review docs | 12:54 |
| nigelb | but the essential thing is #ubuntu-reviews is for code reviews, any form heter its patch or debdiff doesn't matter | 12:54 |
| === cyphermox_ is now known as cyphermox | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!