=== mnepton is now known as mneptok === Ursinha-lunch is now known as Ursinha [02:02] OOPS-1643B1230 [02:02] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1643B1230 [02:04] what controls whether people are allowed to set the priority etc when filingL [02:05] I'm not sure [02:05] 'driver' perhaps [02:05] it seems to be inconsistent with the set of people that can set it later [02:08] :/ [04:38] I made a mistake... [04:39] Does anyone know how to remove the "acpi" project (the 1st one) from bug #552880 [04:39] Launchpad bug 552880 in acpi-support (Ubuntu) "thinkpad edge - detected unsupported model (affected: 3, heat: 18)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/552880 [05:13] rcx just redirect it to project 'null' [05:16] poolie: thanks === Xerora^ is now known as Xerora_^ [05:27] losa ping: Hi, pear:~importd/.bazaar/subversion.conf has managed to corrupt itself again. [05:27] maxb, spm, it'd be useful to save that for vila [05:27] perhaps [05:27] there's an upstream bzr bug about locking on them [05:27] theres a sample already [05:28] by which I mean - good thought, but we've got plenty of data [05:30] maxb: ta [05:30] line 600 ftr [05:31] it'll be the last ones, ish. 20cent bet down. ;-) [05:32] maxb: should be fine now. the [blah] bit was corrupted. missing the opening '[' and maybe half that field. [05:32] thanks === fta_ is now known as fta [06:51] maxb, spm: please attach the corrupted subversion.conf to bug #525571 [06:51] Launchpad bug 525571 in Bazaar "No locking when updating files in ~/.bazaar (affected: 6, heat: 51)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/525571 [06:51] I'll check it when I'll come online (rsn) [06:52] vila: sure, fiwiw, the corruption is pretty trivial: 52-e9e23c5afa6a] [06:53] vila: and updated. [07:00] are ppa packages really waiting 18 hours to build? :-( [07:00] https://edge.launchpad.net/~bzr-beta-ppa/+archive/ppa/+build/1850070 [07:01] poolie: Yes. buildd-manager sucks. [07:01] But it's being rewritten. [07:01] the estimate's accurate? [07:01] (it's due to the rebuild archive -- even though it's scored below everything else) [07:01] Yes. Possibly even slightly optimistic. [07:02] Actually, yeah, probably quite optimistic indeed. [07:15] spm: thanks ! trivial, yes, but this one makes sense, the one in the bug description wasn't. Can I ask for the *full* subversion.conf ? Just to check the offset where the error occurred ? [07:15] vila: that's easy - it's always the same place - the very last entry. [07:15] offset in bytes [07:16] it may be a line buffered file [07:16] Ahh. fair enough. sure. [07:16] spm: does the corruption occur midline ? [07:17] lifeless: good question. I don't recall having ever seen that. it's been per that example- just gets chopped somewhere. [07:17] the code is a single write() if the offset is some power of 2 multiple I'll feel better [07:17] heh [07:18] vila: line buffered file - we can write() but it serialises; possibly. [07:18] the proposed fix should protect against concurrent writers anyway, but since the theory implies that the bug should be very hard to reproduce I don't want to waste an occasion to investigate an occurrence [07:18] vila: anyhow, its all academic, we know the issue :) [07:18] * vila nods [07:19] lifeless: by the way, is it too late for you to review https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~vila/bzr/525571-lock-bazaar-conf-files/+merge/28898 ? [07:19] I mean, we could just change it to use transport.put_bytes and the crashes in production would go away. [07:20] vila: I don't see why you say its hard to know what happened [07:20] vila: file attached to the bug report [07:21] we know enough to be pretty sure its the write-in-place-with-no-lock breaking things [07:21] lifeless: true, except for the one reported in the bug description :) [07:22] lifeless: I don't have an explanation for a file ending with only a section header and no content [07:22] lifeless: a second writer truncating the first writer output ? [07:22] vila: didn't the content appear twice [07:23] lifeless: no, only the header is duplicated but there is *no* content after that [07:23] anyway [07:23] review [07:23] so - you really don [07:23] 't need to guard against concurrent readers [07:23] you *do* need to make the writer guard against FileInUse [07:24] because thats what a reader will show up as, on Windows [07:24] but that is a problem today [07:24] so don't put it in this patch. [07:24] keep it small and auditable for launchpad to cherrypick. [07:24] -> #bzr [07:52] spm can you increase the priority of the builds in https://edge.launchpad.net/~bzr/+archive/2.1-proposed/+builds?build_state=pending [07:52] pretty please [07:52] with sugar on top? [07:53] poolie: all done [07:55] thanks [08:01] oh spm can you make them all succeed for me too? :) [08:02] * spm gets out the magic wand, aka small-lart, and waves in the direction of the buildds.... === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless [09:55] spm: what bzr version version is in use for the code importer (and bzr-svn too, since the fix will need to be applied there too) [09:55] ? [09:55] vila: check sourcedeps.conf [09:55] IIRC [09:56] hmm, never saw that filename :) Where is this file ? [09:57] launchpad code base [09:58] * vila updates its lp branch [09:59] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/db-devel/annotate/head:/versions.cfg [09:59] but http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/devel/annotate/head:/versions.cfg is probably the deployed on on the machines in question [09:59] oh, also, #launchpad-dev [10:02] hmpf. 2.1.0 :( [10:03] we should get lp running 2.2 releases === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless === BlackZ_ is now known as BlackZ [10:59] is the cause of OOPS-1644EC2039 already filed as a bug? it OOPSes everytime for me when I try to access a +build page for the current test-rebuild [10:59] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1644EC2039 [11:03] geser: Bug #599824 [11:03] Launchpad bug 599824 in Soyuz "OOPS when viewing a copy archive build that can be retried (affected: 1, heat: 89)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/599824 [11:11] hm fun [11:11] I wonder how the bug matching is done [11:16] lifeless: Which? [11:17] the oops knows the bug number [11:18] lifeless: The bug references an OOPS number. oops-tools guesses at similarities between OOPSes. [11:18] * bigjools is going to start fixing that right now [11:19] lifeless, hi. I want to respond to your "trunk can be broken" email. But I'm not sure how just yet. What do you mean by "broken?" [11:19] a few things [11:20] most of them summarise as 'not fit for purpose', I think [11:20] (should we -> launchpad-dev?) [11:21] lifeless, yeah, probably so. I'll ask there and we can continue. === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless === yofel_ is now known as yofel === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara [13:04] any chance of getting "Also Notified" to be collapsed to speed up Launchpad bugs. Right now it is really slow with any of my browsers [13:08] gnomefreak, we could possibly take that on as part of our better subscriptions/notifications work in progress now. [13:09] gnomefreak, can you make sure there's a bug for that request and ping me with the bug #? [13:09] deryck: ok that sounds good to me [13:09] deryck: yes [13:15] deryck: under launchpad bug or under launchpad itself [13:15] gnomefreak, under malone. That's the launchpad bugs app name. [13:15] deryck: ok thanks i will look in a few minutes [13:16] gnomefreak, thank you. [13:16] deryck: np === matsubara changed the topic of #launchpad to: http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: -- | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ [13:26] deryck: ill be back but here is the bug 601007 [13:26] Launchpad bug 601007 in Launchpad Bugs "Please collapse "Subscribers" and "also Notified" (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/601007 [13:27] gnomefreak, got it, thanks! [13:32] deryck: would condensing the "apport-collect" attachments into one comment be related to that bug? [13:33] gnomefreak, that work has already been. Should be released in the coming rollout. [13:33] s/been/been done/ [13:33] deryck: ok thanks === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless === rinze is now known as ctrlsoft === henninge_ is now known as henninge === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk [15:11] hello if bug is reported to ubuntu (package) then how to make that also project is also beeing affected? i tryd also affects project and distribution and cant make to projectname be also affected [15:25] my launchpad account is disabled or something === ctrlsoft is now known as jelmer_ === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch [15:50] Jonathan_R: or something? [15:50] yeah [15:50] i dont know exactly what happened [15:51] i just cant log in anymore [15:52] Kangarooo, If the project is in Launchpad, "also affects project" should work [16:05] ok so I am testing the daily builds and my recipe worked and all that good stuff, does anyone have power to cancel lp builds? I iinadvertantly sent them to the wrong ppa. [16:06] jcastro: it's not something we can do via the UI, it needs SQL hackery. Is it bad if the build ends up in the wrong PPA? [16:06] no it's not bad, just didn't want to waste resources. [16:06] I'll file a bug for a confirmation screen or something for the UI [16:06] what package is it? [16:06] actually, that happened to me too [16:06] shotwell [16:06] https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jorge/+recipe/shotwell-daily/+build/163 [16:06] ok [16:06] and https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jorge/+recipe/shotwell-daily/+build/162 [16:07] confirmations would be good [16:07] other than me overclicking, everything else was pretty awesome! [16:07] file it on codehosting - chees [16:07] /1 [16:07] cheers, even [16:07] great! we're looking forward to a bit more use of it to get those bumps smoothed [16:08] bigjools: dholbach and I will be testing today, monday, and tuesday for you [16:08] rawk [16:10] jelmer_: lp:601095 [16:11] oops, lp# 601095 [16:11] man, what a day I am having [16:11] * jelmer_ hits "Affects me too" [16:11] jcastro, thanks :-) === fta_ is now known as fta [16:23] bigjools: do you have any insight on the hardware behind daily builds? At UDS someone mentioned that there would be seperate machines [16:23] jcastro: not separate, but more builders were on order for the general pool [16:24] ok [16:31] https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa/+build/1849914 "created 13 hours ago" "Start in 18 hours (2505)" :( [16:34] fta: I've scored it up [16:34] the rebuild is hogging too many builders :/ === jamesh_ is now known as jamesh [16:49] how to move from sourceforge to launchpad? === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-sad [18:01] hello i have some questions i hope to get statistical info on. how often LP has problems? loading freezes, ooops, maintaince ... And overall LP zealots ? === fta__ is now known as fta === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara [18:06] back again.. got pidgin crash.. any answer? :) === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson === Ursinha changed the topic of #launchpad to: http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: Ursinha | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ [19:45] in https://launchpad.net/bugs/bugtrackers theres 62.166.198.202/ http://62.166.198.202/ My Project, xAccount Mantis 1 ant my project links to Lost Something page https://launchpad.net/eagle === rinze is now known as jelmer_ === MTecknology is now known as MTeck-rcider === MTeck-rcider is now known as MTecknology [20:41] sinzui: hello if u read that bug till end ull see that bug is all about LP and in it im not talking about ubuntu.. one of LP non-users quote has mentioned LP and ubuntu somehow [20:44] What is the bug in the code? [20:44] I think you described a behavioural issue [20:48] sinzui: yes on that i can agree.. so whats there about ubuntu? nothing. about LP? a lot.. and this is big bug [20:48] so why then its incomplete? [20:50] behavior that ppl managing projects described there dont use LP becouse of problems described there.. so thats LP problem making less projects to be on LP so thats a LP bug [20:53] ah ok i need to assign it to myself and then it wont be incomplete? i just need answers to Q posted there. sinzui [21:02] So I'm trying to use the API. How do I get the list of series off of the distribution object? [21:06] sinzui: Problem 1 in that bug can be solved if problem 2 and/or 3 is solved. so for problem 3 to know is it problem i need info where else i could ask for LP related info then in LP bugs? [21:13] Kangarooo, there are to many problems, that is not a bug, it may be several bugs, but I think the issues described are social. I do not see an error in the code that an engineer can fix. I think talking on launchpad-users will help clarify issues. If there are bugs that engineers can fix, then we can report them. The ones about performance are already reported and have a team of engineers working on them [21:15] Can I give a team's PPA to a project? [21:15] Muscovy, no :( [21:16] Muscovy, many of us add a line at the end of the project description pointing to official or test PPAs. [21:16] Ah. Thanks. === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson [21:50] can somebody tell me why ubuntu bug links not clickable in one comment ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/587528/comments/6 [21:50] Launchpad bug 587528 in xorg-server (Ubuntu) "vlc crashed with SIGSEGV in exit() (affected: 1, heat: 105)" [Undecided,Confirmed] [21:54] Kangarooo: what are you referring to? [21:55] micahg: in that commend LP Janitor coment bug numbers- some are clickable most not [21:55] Kangarooo: a bug :) [21:56] micahg: is it report? im writing now so.. is it? [21:56] Kangarooo: it's fine here: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/1.1.0-1ubuntu1, so file a bug against malone if one doesn't exist === Ursinha changed the topic of #launchpad to: http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: -- | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-dinner [22:59] after update to latest kernel last numbers 32-23 got xorg crash and it asked about getting gdb and i said yes and then it gave The problem cannot be reported: This is not a genuine Ubuntu package === Adri2000 is now known as Guest51139 === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk