[04:08] Hi guys.. Are you planning on pushing tbird 3.1 and 3.2 to the PPA anytime soon? [04:09] 3.1 is high on the list after the firefox backport is fully complete (not sure if all of the kinks have been worked out yet) [04:09] not sure about 3.2 [04:10] we still have to get the Firefox daily up to 4.0 [04:10] Isn't 3.7=4.0? [04:10] I installed it in a hurry to see all the UI love and "Oh ... Not linux" Crap! [04:12] I would offer to help, but I'm pretty sure I'm not smart enough. [04:12] yah, it's basically the same so far, they just bumped the version up, but now it won't build until we get the ppa updated (it's almost done, just need to figure a couple of minor things out) [05:17] packaging and patching is definitely growing on me (in a good way) [05:18] ddecator: cool [05:38] [reed]: ping === fta_ is now known as fta [07:23] <[reed]> micahg: pong [07:23] <[reed]> micahg: sorry, was detached from freenode for a few days due to a laptop restart ;) [07:24] [reed]: how do I backport the fixes for TB2 when I can't see the CVE bugs? [07:24] <[reed]> silly iwlagn driver [07:24] [reed]: heh, np [07:24] <[reed]> you should not be backporting stuff yourself [07:24] <[reed]> oh [07:24] <[reed]> TB2 [07:24] <[reed]> hum [07:24] <[reed]> why can't you all upgrade them? [07:24] [reed]: right :), we were only going to backport the non JS fixes [07:25] [reed]: the theory is that there are only 1 or 2 bugs per release that need backporting, the experience is really different between 2.x and 3.x [07:26] <[reed]> eh, I don't think your theory is right [07:26] * micahg goes to look at the CVEs for 3.0.5 [07:31] [reed]: sorry, my ISP seems to have an issue with mozilla.org :( [07:32] <[reed]> it's mzima, right? [07:32] [reed]: ? [07:32] <[reed]> run an mtr report [07:32] [reed]: can't find the ip [07:32] <[reed]> mtr -r ns1.mozilla.org [07:33] <[reed]> mtr -r 63.245.208.161 [07:33] [reed]: gets to the end of RCNs network and stops [07:35] <[reed]> can you pastebin? [07:35] [reed]: there's nothing after the RCN border router [07:35] <[reed]> hmm [07:36] [reed]: I think it's an issue with my ISP [07:36] or rather with one of their peers [07:36] <[reed]> yes, probably mzima [07:38] [reed]: I think you're right...it looks like almost all of the CVEs this time are for the rendering engine [07:39] <[reed]> TB2 is 1.9.0, right? [07:39] <[reed]> or is it 1.8.1? [07:39] [reed]: how stable has 3.1 been? [07:39] [reed]: 1.8.1 [07:39] <[reed]> yeah, that's not going to happen [07:39] <[reed]> check crash-stats [07:39] [reed]: not asking you to do it :)( [07:40] <[reed]> I know, but I can tell how likely you are to be able to do backports [07:40] <[reed]> :) [07:40] it would make updates easier if all 5 releases were on 3.1 :) [07:40] [reed]: ah, ok [07:40] <[reed]> 3.1 is on 1.9.2? [07:40] <[reed]> or 1.9.1 [07:40] [reed]: yes [07:40] <[reed]> yes to which [07:40] * micahg is blocked from all mozilla sites :( will check tomorrow [07:40] [reed]: 1.9.2 [07:40] <[reed]> yeah, it's being owrked on [07:40] <[reed]> worked [07:41] <[reed]> our network engineer is rerouting [07:41] [reed]: k [07:41] <[reed]> ah, try now? [07:41] \o/ [07:43] [reed]: still more crashes than 3.0.5 [07:43] <[reed]> well, that's relative [07:43] <[reed]> why don't you contact the TB drivers? [07:43] <[reed]> tb-drivers@mozilla.org [07:43] <[reed]> ask them what you should do [07:43] <[reed]> they would know the best [07:44] [reed]: k, I'll discuss with chrisccoulson_ in the morning and probably do that then [07:44] <[reed]> ok [07:44] [reed]: thanks [07:46] [reed]: at least the FF major update in hardy seems to be going mostly well [07:46] <[reed]> cool [09:19] jcastro: there? [09:37] hi! is this the right place to ask about problems with firefox sync? [09:38] (in particular, a problem that showed up around the time i upgraded to lucid) === yofel_ is now known as yofel [13:34] yay launchpad speed up :) [14:29] asac: here [14:31] jcastro, started new thread re firefox bookmarks. http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1522006 === asac_ is now known as asac === fta_ is now known as fta [17:23] chrisccoulson: it's Friday, should we push out TB3.0.5? [17:24] micahg - for maverick? [17:24] chrisccoulson: eh, I was thinking Lucid [17:24] Maverick if you have time :) [17:24] oh, ok. i didn't get round to uploading it to maverick last night [17:24] i can do that now though [17:25] chrisccoulson: it doesn't look like it'll be easy to backport fixes to TB2 as most of the CVEs this time look applicable [17:25] chrisccoulson: reed suggesting e-mailing the tb-drivers for advice, should I do that? [17:25] yeah, please do [17:26] chrisccoulson: k, I'll CC you [17:26] thanks [17:28] ok, tb uploading now [17:29] chrisccoulson: should I cc asac too? [17:29] yeah, if you like [17:35] chrisccoulson: what about lucid should I ping the security team? [17:36] micahg - could do, but i'm not sure releasing to lucid on friday evening is such a good idea ;) [17:38] chrisccoulson: I know, I was thinking the same thing, especially before a holiday weekend, there's one major crash that's fixed, but there's a note to use the security PPA in it, so I guess we can wait for Monday? [17:38] chrisccoulson: is the security team off on MOnday too? [17:38] i shall be here on monday, there's no holiday in the UK [17:39] chrisccoulson: right, but aren't all the security people in the US? [17:39] possibly ;) [17:40] chrisccoulson: k [17:40] chrisccoulson: BTW, the next release was tagged upstream for SM, TB, and FF :) [17:41] cool, i'll get those in over the weekend [17:43] chrisccoulson: where? [17:44] micahg - i'll update the branches over the weekend [17:44] that's what i meant to say ;) [17:44] chrisccoulson: ah, k, I should have upload rights on Tuesday, so I can hopefully take care of Maverick :) === fta__ is now known as fta [18:03] mdeslaur: does this look right for Seamonkey changelog? http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/458400/ [18:34] micahg: sure, looks okay to me [18:35] mdeslaur: thanks, does that changelog need to/should it go in the development release [18:35] micahg: yeah, if possible [18:35] mdeslaur: k, will do, thanks [19:18] mdeslaur, i'm not sure how busy you are, but we could do with a sun-java6 update for hardy to fix a problem with the FF3.6 rollout (bug 600642) [19:18] Launchpad bug 600642 in sun-java6 (Ubuntu Hardy) (and 1 other project) "[Hardy] Firefox upgrade to 3.6.6 breaks Java plugin (affects: 3) (dups: 1) (heat: 22)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/600642 [19:18] the updated package is already in the PPA [19:20] chrisccoulson: sure, let me take a look [19:20] thanks [20:01] chrisccoulson: SM2.0.5 changelogs with CVEs are in the Lucid/head branches