[01:54] <_Elbachaco> Some warm girl for sex with a Latin person
[01:55] <micahg> !ops
[01:56] <micahg> thanks gnomefreak
[01:56] <gnomefreak> micahg: np
[04:20] <EzraR> persia: you around?
[08:29] <sfkofe> hello
[08:31] <sfkofe> Can check if the package "motion" is installed by default on his distrib ?
[08:34] <sfkofe> @motu members   :   I think that the package "motion" souldn't been include in the default package list...
[11:06] <braiamp> I need some help with the package creation: squid-prefetch only are available for squid, leaving squid3 users out. My question are:
[11:06] <braiamp> If I modify the package to only works for squid3, what version it should have?
[11:08] <braiamp> Second: The original maintainer should be who modify/create the package?
[12:48] <Laney> geser: I fixed that bug in Debian btw, awaits sponsoring now
[12:48] <shadeslayer> m
[12:49] <geser> Laney: thanks; do you know if some haskell package need a longer time out on armel or is it a real bug? e.g. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51127163/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-armel.haskell-src-exts_1.8.2-3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[12:50] <Laney> geser: It's a problem, arguably, in GHC. We've been applying a fix/workaround in Debian for some of them, but haven't gotten around to doing all of them so far
[12:51] <Laney> for src-exts you can look at syncing the new version
[12:51] <Laney> but yeah it's a known problem that slow arches have trouble building big packages unfortunately
[12:57] <Laney> I'll probably blitz the Haskell stuff in the next couple of weeks btw
[13:44] <Rhonda> Laney: sponsoring in Debian, or in ubuntu?
[13:45] <Rhonda> I don't understand the last response in bug #556148
[13:46] <Rhonda> Though, I guess I can safely ignore it as it's marked invalid anyway.
[13:48] <JontheEchidna> I think he thinks that purging a package should do what he wants. (But it only removes config stuff from /etc)
[13:48] <Rhonda> Right, but that was already answered.
[13:49] <Rhonda> I even have troubles parsing the sentence properly.
[13:49] <JontheEchidna> I think he wants to know which files purge would remove, if they don't remove the ones in ~/
[13:50] <JontheEchidna> I do not get his last sentence, no matter how I look at it
[13:52] <Rhonda> I don't like to get user questions unanswered, especially not in "my" packages.  %-)
[13:59] <arand> Rhonda: I guess it's just a continuation: "What does purge remove? Where is the stuff purge removes?" And last just a statement "I thought purge removed ~/.config"
[13:59] <Rhonda> Right. I hope my response is helpful and gets through.
[14:00] <arand> Rhonda: User Kangarooo is present in #ubuntu-bugs btw
[14:08] <Rhonda> arand: You told me that, guided me there, then send me "bummer"? I don't get it …
[14:32] <tdev> hi everyone :)
[14:34] <tdev> could i someone possibly motivate to be package maintainer for our software?
[19:37] <lfaraone> There is an upstream group that makes a series of predicatable, six-month stable releases with a number of bugfix releases in between. These updates do not introduce any new features. Would it be possible to work out something with the Ubuntu release team to ease the update proceedure for these packages?