[00:11] <blueyed> nobody using amarok with beta ppa?
[00:18] <CIA-99> [muon] jmthomas * 1145722 * trunk/playground/sysadmin/muon/src/MainWindow.cpp Only check the undo stack emptiness to determine revert-all enabledness. If there's nothing to be undone, there is nothing to revert
[00:59] <JontheEchidna> apachelogger: haha, that code is even broken for the case of a package depending on a virtual package: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=217081
[01:01] <JontheEchidna> They make the toplevel if statement handle virtual packages in its "else" statement, but then try to handle virtual packages in the main "if" part, where packages are gauranteed to be non-virtual :P
[01:03] <JontheEchidna> they might as well port it to mindfsck, place it in an extern {}, and make it totally unmaintainable
[01:04] <JontheEchidna> this is going to be my attempt that this madness: http://paste.ubuntu.com/458934/
[01:05] <JontheEchidna> (Not fully implemented, as notable by the empty else statements in places)
[01:07] <JontheEchidna> the datatype I have to return is pretty crazy, though. :P typedefs aside, it's really returing a "QHash<int, QHash<QString, QMap<QString, QVariant> > >"
[01:08] <JontheEchidna> but any function that returns a variable named failTrain is awesome. :P
[02:57] <JontheEchidna> "This change will break things" dialog: http://simplest-image-hosting.net/i0-plasma-desktopzj1560-jpg.jpg
[02:58] <JontheEchidna> luckily the mono stack appears to be broken in maverick, so I have something easy to test :P
[03:04] <CIA-99> [libqapt] jmthomas * 1145740 * trunk/playground/libs/libqapt/ (TODO src/globals.h src/package.cpp src/package.h) Add a showBroken() method to return why a package is currently in the broken state. All aboard the failTrain!
[03:05] <CIA-99> [muon] jmthomas * 1145741 * trunk/playground/sysadmin/muon/src/DetailsTabs/ (MainTab.cpp MainTab.h) Use the new QApt::Package brokenReason() method to get a hash of things that could be wrong with a package. Then parse it and give an explanation to the user of why they can't do that
[03:06] <CIA-99> [muon] jmthomas * 1145742 * trunk/playground/sysadmin/muon/src/DetailsTabs/MainTab.cpp If somebody tries to keep a package that is currently being removed due to a dependency being removed, we don't really need to give them the whole explanation of why they can't do that
[03:09] <CIA-99> [muon] jmthomas * 1145754 * trunk/playground/sysadmin/muon/src/MainWindow.cpp Make pressing the upgrade buttons be an undoable action
[03:12] <CIA-99> [muon] jmthomas * 1145761 * trunk/playground/sysadmin/muon/src/MainWindow.cpp Terminology consistency++
[03:29] <CIA-99> [libqapt] jmthomas * 1145762 * trunk/playground/libs/libqapt/src/backend.cpp (log message trimmed)
[03:29] <CIA-99> Re-merge xapian search code from synaptic. A mismerge made searching for "lib"
[03:29] <CIA-99> hang muon indefinitely. It's still slow, and I should probably thread the search
[03:39] <CIA-99> [libqapt] jmthomas * 1145765 * trunk/playground/libs/libqapt/TODO ++TODO
[05:20] <CIA-99> [muon] jmthomas * 1145773 * trunk/playground/sysadmin/muon/CMakeLists.txt Add a check for libdebconf-kde now that libdebconf-kde can be found via cmake
[09:32] <apachelogger> JontheEchidna: more readable already your approach is, but I would start naming variables according to the variable naming rules :P
[09:32] <apachelogger> i.e. lower case :P
[09:34] <apachelogger> JontheEchidna: also the == false|true stuff makes it IMHO difficult to read
[09:38] <valorie> " more readable already your approach is "
[09:38] <valorie> yoda speak!
[09:46] <valorie> kubotu: np
[09:46] <kubotu> valorie hasn't played anything recently
[09:46] <valorie> !
[09:46]  * valorie is listening to Bottle of Smoke by The Pogues on If I Should Fall From Grace With God [Amarok]
[14:07] <coz_> hey guys.. ubuntu maverick here with  lde 4.5rc1... I notice with an    application open     if I click and hold left click I get a move cursor...any way to disable that?
[14:08] <mfraz74> oxygen-settings
[14:09] <coz_> mfraz74,  yeah  where exactly are the  "oxygen settings" ?
[14:09] <mfraz74> hold alt-f2 and type oxygen-settings
[14:09] <coz_> ah
[14:10] <mfraz74> I think this should be disabled by default, it is going to annoy a lot of users.
[14:11] <coz_> mfraz74,  this is for sure  let me see if this worked
[14:11] <coz_> mm 
[14:12] <coz_> ok that seems to have worked  :)  thanks
[14:13] <mfraz74> would it be considered a bug?
[14:14] <coz_> mfraz74,  well I dont know for sure... I installed this via upgrade from karmic to lucid to maverick  so  I wouldnt go by my experience with this  .. i will clean install later this week to be sure
[14:15] <coz_> it is definitly a nusiance though :)
[14:15] <mfraz74> i'm on lucid with the kde 4.5 beta ppa
[14:16] <mfraz74> it annoyed me too
[14:16] <coz_> mfraz74,  was it a clean install of lucid?
[14:16] <mfraz74> yes
[14:17] <coz_> mfraz74,  oh!! ok then  still I dont think this should be enabled by default... it doesnt fit   with my experience with window management
[14:17] <coz_> sorry about that
[14:20] <coz_> mfraz74,  thanks again guy......... this is much better  :)
[14:21] <mfraz74> coz_: no probs, i was getting really annoyed with it too
[14:21] <coz_> :)
[14:22] <coz_> mfraz74,  I am trying to make my way over to kde from gnome... but both are have irritating "features"  that I dont like
[14:22] <coz_> I do like this beta kde however  but still a few issues for me :)
[14:23] <mfraz74> it is better now that it is in RC than it was when i first started using it in beta 2.
[14:23] <coz_> mfraz74,  for sure... i am impressed and I am a long time kde hater :)
[14:24] <mfraz74> i still prefer kde to gnome except for netbook use, but i may have to change to kde for that too
[14:24] <coz_> mfraz74,  mm I was impressed with the kde netbook as well... it looks and feels much cleaner than   gnome's ...at least to me  :)
[14:25] <mfraz74> at least with kubuntu you only have to download one ISO for both desktop and netbook now
[14:25] <coz_> mfraz74,  yeah  ... that surprised me 
[14:26] <CIA-99> [muon] jmthomas * 1145884 * trunk/playground/sysadmin/muon/src/ (MainWindow.cpp MainWindow.h) Ssshhhhh!
[14:26] <JontheEchidna> <.<
[14:26] <JontheEchidna> >.>
[14:26] <JontheEchidna> ^.^
[14:37] <CIA-99> [muon] jmthomas * 1145886 * trunk/playground/sysadmin/muon/src/MainWindow.cpp Better shortcut
[14:44] <Adityab> I've installed Ubuntu (The GNOMEic version). I need to get a dev environment set up ASAP. I don't have KDE installed from the repos yet. Do I need to install it to get trunk to compile?
[14:48] <Riddell> Adityab: sudo apt-get build-dep kde4libs
[14:49] <Adityab> Riddell: ok thanks
[15:02] <jussi> good morning world...
[15:02] <jussi> errr... afternoon :P
[15:49] <CIA-99> [libqapt] jmthomas * 1145906 * trunk/playground/libs/libqapt/src/package.cpp Acutally make Package::dependencyList() useful
[15:52] <keepitsimple> I have switched to KDE 4.5 RC1 packages from Kubuntu PPA Beta and I see the following problems, 1) when I click on the top right plasma settings I see this: http://db.tt/wR7qeG , and 2) I can only work on one workspace from 4, all other 3 are black see this: http://db.tt/pUrZe0
[16:13] <JontheEchidna> keepitsimple: those are probably related. I'd recommend filing a bug at bugs.kde.org against plasma
[16:16] <CIA-99> [muon] jmthomas * 1145914 * trunk/playground/sysadmin/muon/src/ (6 files in 2 dirs) Initial bits for the depends tab. Will expand with the option to show Provides. (And reverse-depends, once QApt supports it)
[16:22] <keepitsimple> JontheEchidna: ok, I'll try to do just that
[16:50] <CIA-99> [muon] jmthomas * 1145923 * trunk/playground/sysadmin/muon/src/DetailsTabs/ (DependsTab.cpp DependsTab.h) Add support for listing the packages that a package provides in the Dependencies tab. Also, allow differentiation in the depends of the currently-installed package and the latest available package
[17:01] <CIA-99> [muon] jmthomas * 1145926 * trunk/playground/sysadmin/muon/src/DetailsTabs/DependsTab.cpp Give a little explanatory text if any of the depend types are empty
[17:34] <CIA-99> [libqapt] jmthomas * 1145932 * trunk/playground/libs/libqapt/CMakeLists.txt Version bump for first alpha release
[17:37] <shadeslayer> any idea where i should put usr/lib/libincidenceeditors.so.4 in kdepim?
[17:37] <shadeslayer> list of install files http://pastebin.com/QM2KUcxu
[17:40] <jussi> hrm, dolphin keep crashing on me - I open it, then open a file, wait a minute or so, then http://paste.ubuntu.com/459162/
[17:41] <shadeslayer> jussi: kde 4.5 ?
[17:41] <jussi> shadeslayer: yes
[17:41] <shadeslayer> well... i havent had alot of experience with backtraces,but looks like a problem in  Qt
[17:42] <shadeslayer> and/or dbus
[17:42] <shadeslayer> jussi: what dbus version?
[17:43] <shadeslayer> jussi: package is  libqt4-dbus
[17:43] <jussi> shadeslayer: jussi@Galaxy:~$ apt-cache policy libqt4-dbus
[17:43] <jussi> libqt4-dbus:
[17:43] <jussi>   Installed: 4:4.7.0~beta1+git20100522-0ubuntu1~lucid1~ppa1
[17:44] <shadeslayer> hmm... i have 4:4.7.0~beta1+git20100522-0ubuntu5 ,which means ( i think ) we should update the ppa with a maverick backport
[17:50] <shadeslayer> jussi: you should poke lex about this :)
[17:50] <jussi> right, thanks!
[17:50] <shadeslayer> or agateau
[17:50] <shadeslayer> since agateau seems to be handling the patches for this
[17:51] <shadeslayer> omg
[17:51] <jussi> ?
[17:51]  * shadeslayer rolls over and doies
[17:51] <shadeslayer> *dies
[17:51] <shadeslayer> kdepim _*finally*_ completes building
[17:51] <shadeslayer> been working on this for a day and a half 
[17:52] <shadeslayer> seems blogilo has been removec
[17:52] <shadeslayer> *removed
[17:52] <shadeslayer> also kjots
[18:03] <shadeslayer> Riddell: poke
[18:03] <shadeslayer> Riddell: kubuntu dev week says my session is on 7th , Ubuntu Dev week says its on 13th,what do i do? :P
[18:05] <tsimpson> you have to do it twice :)
[18:06] <shadeslayer> tsimpson: :o
[18:06] <shadeslayer> ok then :()
[18:06] <shadeslayer> :)
[18:28] <shadeslayer> anyone free?
[18:30] <shadeslayer> issue with KDE PIM : kjots wants libgrantlee-dev which is in universe,without it , kjots will not build
[18:30] <shadeslayer> so,we either do a MIR for this or dont build kjots
[18:31] <shadeslayer> please advise :D
[18:39] <neversfelde> shadeslayer: I'd say a MIR, if possible, would be preferred
[18:40] <shadeslayer> neversfelde: hmm.. can you do it? im all backed up with KDE pim and then the kubuntu dev week stuff 
[18:40] <neversfelde> shadeslayer: not before next weekend
[18:40] <shadeslayer> hmm..
[18:41] <neversfelde> I'm busy with koffice this evening
[18:41] <shadeslayer> well... anyone else who can do it,please post the bug number here and highlight me
[18:41] <shadeslayer> neversfelde: :)
[18:42] <shadeslayer> im building it with libgrantlee-dev till then from universe
[18:43] <shadeslayer> neversfelde: will debuild -nc do after adding a build dep?
[18:43] <shadeslayer> or do i compile from scratch
[18:44] <neversfelde> shadeslayer: no idea
[18:45] <shadeslayer> hmm
[18:52] <tsimpson> shadeslayer: did you get your ubuntu.com address yet?
[18:52] <shadeslayer> tsimpson: nope :(
[18:52] <shadeslayer> still says user unknown in alias table
[18:53] <tsimpson> I guess you should send a mail to rt@ubuntu.com
[18:53] <tsimpson> mine took a few days iirc, but not not that long
[18:53] <shadeslayer> ok..
[18:54] <shadeslayer> tsimpson: ill wait till tommorow .. 
[18:54] <shadeslayer> its been 6 days tho.. :P
[18:54] <tsimpson> I doubt anyone would see it until tomorrow anyway
[18:54] <tsimpson> the email, that is
[18:54] <shadeslayer> neversfelde: yeah had to use debuild .... now have to wait for an hour
[18:54] <shadeslayer> tsimpson: ok..
[18:59] <shadeslayer> tsimpson: mail sent
[18:59]  * shadeslayer waits for kdepim to compile ...
[19:08] <shadeslayer> lex79: poke
[19:09] <lex79> hi
[19:09] <shadeslayer> lex79: free?
[19:10] <lex79> yes and no, but tell me
[19:10] <shadeslayer> lex79: can you do a MIR for libgrantlee-dev ? :)
[19:10] <shadeslayer> we need it for kjots
[19:11] <lex79> wont build without it?
[19:11] <shadeslayer> kjots goes into a black hole without it
[19:11] <shadeslayer> it builds fine.. no binary tho
[19:12] <lex79> and cmake what says?
[19:12] <shadeslayer> lex79: it says that grantlee is a optional package
[19:12] <lex79> ok
[19:13] <shadeslayer> ive consulted this with kde-devs
[19:13] <lex79> kk
[19:14] <shadeslayer> kdepim sources are small .. but take up an hour to build :P
[19:15] <lex79> eheh :)
[19:18] <lex79> shadeslayer: did you still have your conversation with kde-devs? to paste in the bug report...
[19:18] <shadeslayer> lex79: sure.. ill pastebin it
[19:18] <lex79> thx
[19:19] <shadeslayer> lex79: http://pastebin.com/wfJNYRHY
[19:20] <lex79> what about blogilo?
[19:21] <shadeslayer> lex79: hmm
[19:21] <shadeslayer> lex79: i think its gone
[19:21] <shadeslayer> well...
[19:21] <lex79> where? :)
[19:21] <shadeslayer> i compiled without grantlee
[19:21] <shadeslayer> so maybe thats why i had no blogilo
[19:22] <lex79> ok, are there other missing build-deps in your cmake log?
[19:22] <shadeslayer> one more.. leeme see backlog
[19:24] <shadeslayer> lex79:  yeah libassuan-dev ... its in main tho
[19:25] <lex79> add it then :)
[19:25] <shadeslayer> done ;(
[19:25] <shadeslayer> ;)
[19:25] <shadeslayer> my keyboard is all sorts of weird
[19:26] <shadeslayer> lex79: weird.. i have it installed and added in build deps,but it isnt picked up
[19:28] <lex79> :(
[19:28]  * shadeslayer pokes Cmake files
[19:30] <shadeslayer> lex79: any ideas on this...
[19:31] <shadeslayer> omg
[19:31] <shadeslayer> we can almost haz apturl support in rekonq
[19:31] <lex79> nope, or cmake buggy or we have a too old version of libassuan, I think the first one :)
[19:32] <shadeslayer> just need to pass the url to apturl and were done
[19:32] <shadeslayer> lex79: hmm
[19:32] <shadeslayer> lex79: theres a seprate cmake file for libassuan
[19:33] <lex79> MIR report done, I'm out for a bit
[19:35] <shadeslayer> lex79: thanks :D
[19:45] <shadeslayer> w00t .. we can haz apturl support in rekonq
[19:52] <jussi> lex79: shadeslayer said to ask you about this dolphin crash... http://paste.ubuntu.com/459162/
[20:02] <shadeslayer> jussi: can you test out a rekonq patch ?
[20:02] <shadeslayer> it has apturl support ...
[20:02] <jussi> shadeslayer: if you build a deb...
[20:02] <shadeslayer> jussi: of course :)
[20:03] <shadeslayer> jussi: ill be building a git package
[20:05] <shadeslayer> jussi: your on lucid right?
[20:05] <jussi> yes
[20:05] <jussi> with the beta ppa
[20:05] <shadeslayer> ok :)
[20:09] <shadeslayer> lex79: all is fine with libassuan
[20:18] <shadeslayer> jussi: uh..do you have a amd64 machine?
[20:18] <shadeslayer> ppa will take too long
[20:18] <shadeslayer> build queue is huge...
[20:19] <shadeslayer> jussi: package will appear https://edge.launchpad.net/~rohangarg/+archive/kde-extra
[20:19] <shadeslayer> but might take days to build :(
[20:21] <JontheEchidna> even a simple 5 minute build is backed up 2 hours in the PPAs :(
[20:21] <JontheEchidna> on i386 (amd64 is 20 minutes behind)
[20:21] <shadeslayer> jussi: :(
[20:21] <shadeslayer> JontheEchidna: :(
[20:22] <shadeslayer> JontheEchidna: please help in rekonq + apturl testing
[20:22] <JontheEchidna> shadeslayer: got patch?
[20:22] <shadeslayer> sure
[20:23] <shadeslayer> lemme just upload
[20:24] <shadeslayer> JontheEchidna: http://people.ubuntu.com/~rohangarg/kubuntu_01_apturl.patch
[20:25] <JontheEchidna> shadeslayer: fails to apply on 0.4.95
[20:26] <shadeslayer> hmm
[20:26] <shadeslayer> what does it say?
[20:26] <JontheEchidna> all hunks failed to applyh
[20:26] <JontheEchidna> -h
[20:27] <JontheEchidna> fails to apply against git master too
[20:27] <shadeslayer> uh.. seems to be working in git
[20:27] <shadeslayer> JontheEchidna: your applying with p1 right?
[20:28] <JontheEchidna> oh, I was doing with p0
[20:28] <JontheEchidna> works with p1
[20:28] <shadeslayer> :P
[20:28] <shadeslayer> :)
[20:28] <shadeslayer> JontheEchidna: kool :D
[20:28] <shadeslayer> JontheEchidna: 2 things to test,directly typing apt://foo should list apt://foo as the top most option and the normal apturl links work 
[20:29] <lex79> jussi: dunno about that crash, dolphin crash sometimes also in maverick, it's normal :D
[20:30] <shadeslayer> lex79: he has lucid 
[20:30] <shadeslayer> also dolphin seems to be working fine
[20:30] <shadeslayer> here... but dragon crashes multiple times :P
[20:30] <lex79> I know, I said "also" in maverick
[20:30] <JontheEchidna> how precise... "Start in 4 seconds (2505)"
[20:31] <lex79> but also in lucid, in karmic, in jaunty... :D
[20:31] <JontheEchidna> of course, it's still saying it'll start in 4 seconds :P
[20:31] <shadeslayer> JontheEchidna: hehe :D
[20:31] <JontheEchidna> ..and it's still saying that ... and still saying that
[20:31] <shadeslayer> lex79: got it :)
[20:31] <shadeslayer> well ... amd64 build started
[20:32] <shadeslayer> i wonder if this has anything to do with me having high karma or something :P
[20:33] <lex79> the only difference about qt in lucid and in maverick is the patch for app menu, not related to dolphin
[20:33] <JontheEchidna> shadeslayer: works for me (tm)
[20:33] <shadeslayer> since the build queue is huge...
[20:33] <shadeslayer> JontheEchidna: w00t
[20:33] <JontheEchidna> both typing apt:/amor, and clicking an apt link
[20:33] <shadeslayer> awesome ... 
[20:33] <shadeslayer> JontheEchidna: also,should i call apturl or apturl-kde ?
[20:33] <shadeslayer> calling apturl atm
[20:34] <JontheEchidna> apturl, apturl will figure out what to call
[20:34] <shadeslayer> means i did it right  :P
[20:35] <JontheEchidna> that way it'd work for a gnomie using apturl-gtk, in theory
[20:35] <shadeslayer> yeah.. i thought so :)
[20:36] <shadeslayer> another feature on http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/rekonq/Roadmap complete
[20:39]  * JontheEchidna sighs at the lack of i386 builds https://launchpad.net/~echidnaman/+archive/qapt/+packages
[20:39] <shadeslayer> oohh
[20:39] <shadeslayer> muon coming to town
[20:40] <JontheEchidna> yep yep, alpha1, whenever LP feels like buildings its build-deps 
[20:40] <shadeslayer> :D
[20:40] <shadeslayer> JontheEchidna: poke me for testing on maverick ;)
[20:42] <CIA-99> [muon] jmthomas * 1145969 * trunk/playground/sysadmin/muon/src/StatusWidget.cpp Disable this for the moment, not ready
[20:43] <CIA-99> [muon] jmthomas * 1145970 * trunk/playground/sysadmin/muon/ (ChangeLog src/main.cpp) Version bump for alpha 1
[20:44] <CIA-99> [muon] jmthomas * 1145971 * trunk/playground/sysadmin/muon/src/StatusWidget.cpp Add a space char here
[20:54] <shadeslayer> hahaha http://www.googlubuntu.com/
[20:54] <shadeslayer> this is awesome
[20:59] <shadeslayer> btw does anyone want google bookmarks sync in rekonq?
[20:59] <shadeslayer> im thinking of working on it
[21:07] <neversfelde> Riddell: koffice for maverick in bzr and ninjas. A Lucid backport is ready, I am wating for this build to finish and will upload after it.
[21:11] <neversfelde> the Lucid package could need a bit more testing, I cannot do it atm
[21:15] <shadeslayer> Riddell: kdepim needs more work and grantlee needs to be moved to main
[21:27] <_Groo_> hi/2 all
[21:27] <shadeslayer> _Groo_: o/
[21:28] <shadeslayer> im off to sleep anyways 
[21:28] <_Groo_> hey shadeslayer
[21:30] <_Groo_> can the next kde 4.5 rc be compiled with 4.6 in the ppa? cause 4.7 is giving me a lot of headaques
[21:59] <JontheEchidna> O.o http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51382560/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-amd64.muon_0.2-0ubuntu1~lucid1~ppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[21:59] <JontheEchidna> same package with no changes builds just fine in a maverick ppa
[22:00] <lex79> cmake issue I think
[22:01] <JontheEchidna> Any idea how to fix?
[22:02] <lex79> maybe you need the same cmake version that is in maverick
[22:03] <lex79> just a thought anyway :)
[22:03] <JontheEchidna> or maybe pkg-kde-tools
[22:03] <JontheEchidna> but that would be a pain, since it would require new dpkg
[22:04] <JontheEchidna> but it really shouldn't be doing that. It's a normal kde build with a normal cmake file :(
[22:04] <lex79> yes :) or cmake or pkg-kde-tools, but try with cmake before
[22:05] <lex79> I had backport cmake in lucid to backport KDE 4.5 to lucid
[22:05] <JontheEchidna> oh, I'll just copy from the lucid kde ppa then
[22:06] <lex79> yes, there is also pkg-kde-tools 0.8 in that ppa
[22:06] <lex79> https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/beta/+packages
[22:33] <JontheEchidna> 386	15	 15386 jobs (four days)
[22:33] <JontheEchidna> 15 builders, 15386 jobs, estimates 4 days :s
[22:33] <JontheEchidna> that's backed up
[22:36] <JontheEchidna> lex79: no luck with both new cmake and pkg-kde-tools, still the same :(
[22:37] <lex79> oh :(
[22:38] <JontheEchidna> I'll try using old kde.mk
[23:38] <JontheEchidna> oh oh
[23:39] <JontheEchidna> maybe it's the kubuntu translations stuff overzealously deleting stuff
[23:39] <JontheEchidna> since my messages.sh is in src/ instead of toplevel