Muscovy | Could someone explain how publishing code in projects works? From what I've read, it only sounds like a database, and not an actual repository. | 03:36 |
---|---|---|
lifeless | Muscovy: what do you mean? | 03:38 |
Muscovy | Is the code in a Launchpad project accessible like a PPA? | 03:39 |
lifeless | do you mean source code or executable code? PPA's store executable code, bzr branches store source code, and a project in LP can have both bzr branches and PPAs for it. | 03:40 |
Muscovy | Executable code. | 03:42 |
lifeless | For that you want a PPA | 03:45 |
Muscovy | So the bzr branches are basically a sharing system for the source code specifically? | 03:47 |
lifeless | yes | 03:49 |
lifeless | bzr is a source code versioning system | 03:49 |
Muscovy | Ok, thanks! | 03:50 |
fale | hi | 11:50 |
lifeless_ | hai | 11:50 |
fale | I'm looking for soyuz source... but I can't find it... is it close source? | 11:50 |
lifeless_ | bzr branch lp:launchpad | 11:51 |
lifeless_ | will get it | 11:51 |
lifeless_ | its part of launchpad | 11:51 |
poolie_ | hi lifeless_ | 11:51 |
lifeless_ | the wiki dev.launchpad.net has much more info | 11:51 |
lifeless_ | including a HOWTO for getting up and going with a development environment | 11:51 |
lifeless_ | hi poolie_ | 11:51 |
fale | uh, thankyou :) I was looging at lp:soyuz :) | 11:51 |
=== lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
lifeless | poolie_: how is your weekend ? | 11:54 |
poolie_ | good, i rode around the south end of the blue mountains today | 11:54 |
poolie_ | it was cold but fun | 11:54 |
lifeless | awesome | 11:54 |
* Ng hrms at the translation export branch feature - can I not set it to export to a team branch? trunk for my project is owned by the project team | 12:28 | |
Ng | (it's happy to import from the team trunk branch, fwiw) | 12:29 |
lifeless | uhm | 12:30 |
lifeless | I'm not sure, but perhaps its because it is a conceptual user | 12:30 |
lifeless | or | 12:30 |
lifeless | possibly you don't own the team or something? | 12:30 |
lifeless | Perhaps ask a question on rosetta? | 12:30 |
Ng | yeah I'll do that, I'm definitely the team admin | 12:31 |
lifeless | admin != owner | 12:31 |
lifeless | not that owner should be needed for this IMNSHO | 12:31 |
Ng | I set it to a test branch overnight and it's done exactly the right thing with its automated commit, and the build recipe test I did also appears to be full of win, so I was hoping that I was one local cron trigger away from daily builds with fresh translations :) | 12:31 |
Ng | a good point, but I'm the owner too | 12:32 |
wgrant | I believe you can only se the export branch to one that you own. | 12:33 |
lifeless | you could change ownership to you | 12:33 |
lifeless | set it | 12:33 |
lifeless | and change it back | 12:33 |
wgrant | It doesn't complain, however, if you temporarily change the ownership, configure the branch, then change it back. | 12:33 |
wgrant | Right, that works. | 12:33 |
lifeless | is there a bug on that? | 12:33 |
Ng | cute :) | 12:34 |
wgrant | Bug #407260 | 12:34 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 407260 in Launchpad Translations "Translations export branch can't be team-owned (affected: 8, heat: 27)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/407260 | 12:34 |
Ng | awesome, thanks guys :) | 12:35 |
Lord_Devi | I have a real newbie question. Kind of embarrassing really. I've just subscribed to my first Launchpad mailing list. But I do not recognize things I am used from old MajorDomo lists.. I made a post to a team list, and upon receiving a reply to my post I noticed that the From field has the private address of the actual sender to the list rather than the email of the list itself. Ok.. So if I reply to that email it should go to th | 16:05 |
Lord_Devi | e sender and not back to the list I thought. Unless.. I opened the Email details and tried to search for a Reply-To: field that perhaps is not visible in the main header.. And no! So there is no Reply-To: field inside the email, and the sender is the actual sender, not the list! So HOW do I reply to the email via the mailing list then? | 16:05 |
Lord_Devi | I MUST be missing something INCREDIBLY obvious.. | 16:06 |
Lord_Devi | Ok.. I think I found the answer pouring through help.launchpad.net, at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/33649 it seems to be instructing me to use "Reply to All" in my email client. Sorry to bother you guys. | 16:12 |
Kangarooo | im registrant of https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu-drupal-theme/+spec/orange-ud-theme but this blueprint doesnt show in https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/~kangarooo/+specs?role=registrant | 16:53 |
mwhudson | Kangarooo: probably because it's obsolete | 16:55 |
Kangarooo | mwhudson: ah maybe couse its made that its Completed ? | 16:58 |
mwhudson | something like that yeah | 16:58 |
Kangarooo | ah now i see where that obsolete can be changed.. whats use of obsolete? when to use that? | 16:59 |
=== jenkins is now known as jenkins_ | ||
=== jenkins_ is now known as jenkins | ||
=== jenkins is now known as jenkins_ | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
LaserJock | does anybody happen to know how often LP retries a PPA package that is in dep wait? | 20:55 |
geser | LaserJock: it should happen once the dep is there, but I don't know how often the script for is run | 20:57 |
LaserJock | geser: any rough idea? like daily or more often? | 20:58 |
geser | more often, several times an hour I guess | 20:59 |
mwhudson | LaserJock: looks like hourly, but don't quote me on that | 21:00 |
geser | why? does it work for you? | 21:00 |
geser | s/does/doesn't/ | 21:00 |
LaserJock | well, I've been waiting for Unity packages for over a day | 21:00 |
LaserJock | finally unity got built but of course it was built last | 21:00 |
LaserJock | so 2 dependent packages are in dep wait | 21:01 |
LaserJock | just a "OMG, I want the latest crack" question :-) | 21:01 |
geser | have you the link to that PPA? | 21:02 |
LaserJock | https://launchpad.net/~canonical-dx-team/+archive/une/+packages | 21:03 |
geser | interesting, I assumed it should have been picked up by now | 21:26 |
LaserJock | geser: it is now, now waiting for a build | 22:42 |
LaserJock | the i386 builds must have been really backed up | 22:42 |
LaserJock | it took 30+ hrs I think for the unity package to get a build | 22:42 |
geser | LaserJock: not anymore (only 175 jobs in queue), but there was an archive test-rebuild in the recent days | 23:04 |
=== lifeless_ is now known as lifeless |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!