[03:36] <Muscovy> Could someone explain how publishing code in projects works? From what I've read, it only sounds like a database, and not an actual repository.
[03:38] <lifeless> Muscovy: what do you mean?
[03:39] <Muscovy> Is the code in a Launchpad project accessible like a PPA?
[03:40] <lifeless> do you mean source code or executable code? PPA's store executable code, bzr branches store source code, and a project in LP can have both bzr branches and PPAs for it.
[03:42] <Muscovy> Executable code.
[03:45] <lifeless> For that you want a PPA
[03:47] <Muscovy> So the bzr branches are basically a sharing system for the source code specifically?
[03:49] <lifeless> yes
[03:49] <lifeless> bzr is a source code versioning system
[03:50] <Muscovy> Ok, thanks!
[11:50] <fale> hi
[11:50] <lifeless_> hai
[11:50] <fale> I'm looking for soyuz source... but I can't find it... is it close source?
[11:51] <lifeless_> bzr branch lp:launchpad
[11:51] <lifeless_> will get it
[11:51] <lifeless_> its part of launchpad
[11:51] <poolie_> hi lifeless_
[11:51] <lifeless_> the wiki dev.launchpad.net has much more info
[11:51] <lifeless_> including a HOWTO for getting up and going with a development environment
[11:51] <lifeless_> hi poolie_
[11:51] <fale> uh, thankyou :) I was looging at lp:soyuz :)
[11:54] <lifeless> poolie_: how is your weekend ?
[11:54] <poolie_> good, i rode around the south end of the blue mountains today
[11:54] <poolie_> it was cold but fun
[11:54] <lifeless> awesome
[12:28]  * Ng hrms at the translation export branch feature - can I not set it to export to a team branch? trunk for my project is owned by the project team
[12:29] <Ng> (it's happy to import from the team trunk branch, fwiw)
[12:30] <lifeless> uhm
[12:30] <lifeless> I'm not sure, but perhaps its because it is a conceptual user
[12:30] <lifeless> or
[12:30] <lifeless> possibly you don't own the team or something?
[12:30] <lifeless> Perhaps ask a question on rosetta?
[12:31] <Ng> yeah I'll do that, I'm definitely the team admin
[12:31] <lifeless> admin != owner
[12:31] <lifeless> not that owner should be needed for this IMNSHO
[12:31] <Ng> I set it to a test branch overnight and it's done exactly the right thing with its automated commit, and the build recipe test I did also appears to be full of win, so I was hoping that I was one local cron trigger away from daily builds with fresh translations :)
[12:32] <Ng> a good point, but I'm the owner too
[12:33] <wgrant> I believe you can only se the export branch to one that you own.
[12:33] <lifeless> you could change ownership to you
[12:33] <lifeless> set it
[12:33] <lifeless> and change it back
[12:33] <wgrant> It doesn't complain, however, if you temporarily change the ownership, configure the  branch, then change it back.
[12:33] <wgrant> Right, that works.
[12:33] <lifeless> is there a bug on that?
[12:34] <Ng> cute :)
[12:34] <wgrant> Bug #407260
[12:35] <Ng> awesome, thanks guys :)
[16:05] <Lord_Devi> I have a real newbie question. Kind of embarrassing really. I've just subscribed to my first Launchpad mailing list. But I do not recognize things I am used from old MajorDomo lists.. I made a post to a team list, and upon receiving a reply to my post I noticed that the From field has the private address of the actual sender to the list rather than the email of the list itself. Ok.. So if I reply to that email it should go to th
[16:05] <Lord_Devi> e sender and not back to the list I thought. Unless.. I opened the Email details and tried to search for a Reply-To: field that perhaps is not visible in the main header.. And no! So there is no Reply-To: field inside the email, and the sender is the actual sender, not the list! So HOW do I reply to the email via the mailing list then?
[16:06] <Lord_Devi> I MUST be missing something INCREDIBLY obvious..
[16:12] <Lord_Devi> Ok.. I think I found the answer pouring through help.launchpad.net, at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/33649 it seems to be instructing me to use "Reply to All" in my email client. Sorry to bother you guys.
[16:53] <Kangarooo> im registrant of https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu-drupal-theme/+spec/orange-ud-theme but this blueprint doesnt show in https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/~kangarooo/+specs?role=registrant
[16:55] <mwhudson> Kangarooo: probably because it's obsolete
[16:58] <Kangarooo> mwhudson: ah maybe couse its made that its Completed ?
[16:58] <mwhudson> something like that yeah
[16:59] <Kangarooo> ah now i see where that obsolete can be changed.. whats use of obsolete? when to use that?
[20:55] <LaserJock> does anybody happen to know how often LP retries a PPA package that is in dep wait?
[20:57] <geser> LaserJock: it should happen once the dep is there, but I don't know how often the script for is run
[20:58] <LaserJock> geser: any rough idea? like daily or more often?
[20:59] <geser> more often, several times an hour I guess
[21:00] <mwhudson> LaserJock: looks like hourly, but don't quote me on that
[21:00] <geser> why? does it work for you?
[21:00] <geser> s/does/doesn't/
[21:00] <LaserJock> well, I've been waiting for Unity packages for over a day
[21:00] <LaserJock> finally unity got built but of course it was built last
[21:01] <LaserJock> so 2 dependent packages are in dep wait
[21:01] <LaserJock> just a "OMG, I want the latest crack" question :-)
[21:02] <geser> have you the link to that PPA?
[21:03] <LaserJock> https://launchpad.net/~canonical-dx-team/+archive/une/+packages
[21:26] <geser> interesting, I assumed it should have been picked up by now
[22:42] <LaserJock> geser: it is now, now waiting for a build
[22:42] <LaserJock> the i386 builds must have been really backed up
[22:42] <LaserJock> it took 30+ hrs I think for the unity package to get a build
[23:04] <geser> LaserJock: not anymore (only 175 jobs in queue), but there was an archive test-rebuild in the recent days