| micahg | chrisccoulson: the secmod.db issue seems to be long standing when absolute paths are used | 10:48 |
|---|---|---|
| chrisccoulson | micahg - ah, ok. there seems to be a lot of people with the issue after the 3.6.6 upgrade | 10:48 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: in Lucid also or just Hardy? | 10:48 |
| chrisccoulson | i've been browsing around on ubuntuforums to try and pick out issues that people aren't reporting ;) | 10:49 |
| chrisccoulson | on hardy and lucid | 10:49 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: hmm, weird that it should happen on Lucid since NSS didn't change | 10:49 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, that's what i thought | 10:49 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: might be this: mozilla 534964 | 10:50 |
| ubot2 | Mozilla bug 534964 in Libraries "Attached secmod.db hangs electrolysis on startup" [Normal,Unconfirmed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=534964 | 10:50 |
| * micahg will bbiab | 10:51 | |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, could be that | 10:51 |
| cousin_mario | hi there | 10:51 |
| cousin_mario | any news about thunderbird 3.1 ? | 10:51 |
| micahg | cousin_mario: soon :) | 12:03 |
| Dimmuxx | any news about the beta ppa? ;) | 12:05 |
| micahg | Dimmuxx: heh, as soon as I can get to it :) | 12:07 |
| Dimmuxx | hehe okay. Do you know why they removed build 1 of 4.0b1? | 12:10 |
| Dimmuxx | or hmm they just made it more annoying to get :P | 12:11 |
| micahg | Dimmuxx: there were issues, build2 should be released soon | 12:11 |
| Dimmuxx | if you try to go to the ftp directly you get redirected to another page first | 12:12 |
| micahg | Dimmuxx: right, it was pulled | 12:12 |
| Dimmuxx | but you can still get it from that page though | 12:13 |
| micahg | Dimmuxx: idk, I just know that build1 had issues and build2 was spun | 12:13 |
| Dimmuxx | too bad noone is working on the ui refresh for linux yet :/ | 12:14 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: do you have time to push gjs for lucid? | 12:17 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - yeah, i can look at that in a bit | 12:17 |
| micahg | bug 597944 | 12:17 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 597944 in gjs (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 1 other project) "libgjs needs a rebuild for xulrunner-1.9.2.6 (affects: 5) (heat: 28)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/597944 | 12:17 |
| cousin_mario | micahg: any chance you could be more specific?:) | 12:26 |
| micahg | cousin_mario: unfortunately not, I have a lot of things on my plate right now | 12:26 |
| micahg | cousin_mario: I'm hoping for this week sometime | 12:26 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: have you seen the discussion on TB2 migration in email? | 12:27 |
| cousin_mario | micahg: oh, then it's sooner than I expected:) | 12:28 |
| cousin_mario | thanks | 12:28 |
| micahg | cousin_mario: maybe next weekend though...but soon | 12:28 |
| cousin_mario | okok | 12:28 |
| cousin_mario | bye! | 12:28 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: if you get a chance, can you push Seamonkey 2.0.5 to the security PPA with the changelog | 14:13 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: just lucid ATM | 14:14 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - yeah, will do | 14:19 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: thanks | 14:19 |
| chrisccoulson | btw, gjs should be targetted for lucid-proposed | 14:20 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I can take care of maverick tomorrow hopefully :) | 14:20 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: does upload rights to maverick get me upload rights to -proposed in lucid? | 14:20 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - i'm not sure, it depends on if the packageset exists in lucid | 14:21 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I guess it doesn't | 14:21 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, the packageset only exists for maverick | 14:24 |
| chrisccoulson | chmsee is giving me a headache on karmic | 14:26 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: what's wrong? | 14:26 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I'd just push the lucid version since they're close enough | 14:26 |
| chrisccoulson | it's crashing in nsEmbedStream::OpenStream on karmic, because do_GetInterface on the nsWebBrowser returns NULL | 14:28 |
| chrisccoulson | but that doesn't seem like anything that chmsee can influence | 14:28 |
| micahg | that sounds familiar | 14:29 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: wasn't something doing that in hardy? | 14:30 |
| chrisccoulson | i don't remember this issue in hardy | 14:30 |
| micahg | maybe it was lucid then, it sounds familiar | 14:30 |
| micahg | oh, maybe it was part of what I was researching for the gjs test crash | 14:30 |
| chrisccoulson | hmmm, that's weird. deleting the profile folder makes it work | 14:36 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: the chmsee profile? | 14:38 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah | 14:38 |
| Guest57002 | hallo, anyone has thunderbird imap with gigs of data in the homeprofile | 15:25 |
| micahg | Guest57002: yes, why? | 15:31 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| asac | !test | 17:50 |
| ubot2 | hrm? | 17:50 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - i subscribed you to a bug report i just submitted | 18:31 |
| chrisccoulson | that's the flashplugin crash that all these users seem to be experiencing now | 18:31 |
| mdeslaur | chrisccoulson: what's the bug number, I'm curious | 18:31 |
| chrisccoulson | mdeslaur, bug 601977 | 18:32 |
| ubot2 | chrisccoulson: Bug 601977 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/601977 is private | 18:32 |
| mdeslaur | chrisccoulson: could you subscribe ubuntu-security to the bug, please | 18:32 |
| chrisccoulson | mdeslaur, yeah, can do | 18:32 |
| chrisccoulson | mdeslaur, done | 18:33 |
| mdeslaur | thanks chrisccoulson | 18:33 |
| chrisccoulson | the stacktrace is not much use unfortunately | 18:33 |
| chrisccoulson | but it doesn't crash if you set dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.libflashplayer.so to false | 18:34 |
| mdeslaur | huh | 18:34 |
| micahg | thanks chrisccoulson | 20:25 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: did you ask for a USN for Thunderbird as well? | 20:51 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - not yet | 20:52 |
| chrisccoulson | mdeslaur ^^ | 20:52 |
| chrisccoulson | :) | 20:52 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg, we have one for 3.0.5 don't we? | 20:52 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: yes, but 3.0.6 was tagged :) | 20:52 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - cool. we haven't done the lucid release yet have we? | 20:52 |
| mdeslaur | chrisccoulson, micahg: if the USN wasn't published, just use the one you've got already | 20:53 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: no, that should happen :) | 20:53 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: do you have time to publish 3.0.5 to Lucid? | 20:53 |
| mdeslaur | micahg: tomorrow morning I'll have time | 20:54 |
| mdeslaur | micahg: is that okay? | 20:54 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: yep, thanks | 20:54 |
| mdeslaur | chrisccoulson, micahg: I'll get you a new USN for tb 3.0.6 | 20:54 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: thanks | 20:54 |
| chrisccoulson | mdeslaur, thanks | 20:54 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - want to do the tb3.0.6 update once we've got 3.0.5 published? | 20:54 |
| chrisccoulson | and i will get the ff3.6.7 update done too | 20:55 |
| mdeslaur | chrisccoulson, micahg: use USN-958-1 for tb 3.0.6 | 20:55 |
| chrisccoulson | thanks | 20:55 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: yes, just for Lucid, not sure about Hardy-Karmic yet per the discussion by email | 20:55 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - yeah, i'm not too sure about those yet either. i've not had a chance to read all the emails in full just yet | 20:56 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: to summarize, it seems that 2.x isn't EOL yet and there's nothing too serious affecting it ATM, they're looking to push a major update to 3.1.x near the end of the month | 20:57 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - yeah, i think i saw that bit. i assume they'd prefer us to update to 3.1 too? | 20:57 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: yep, the experience should be better | 20:58 |
| chrisccoulson | i don't know what mdeslaur thinks about that? | 20:58 |
| chrisccoulson | it would be good if we could drag it out until jaunty goes EOL ;) | 20:59 |
| mdeslaur | chrisccoulson: I was about to say that | 20:59 |
| chrisccoulson | that's only 3 months away now isn't it? | 20:59 |
| mdeslaur | I would try and stick with 2.x until we can't get updates for it any longer | 20:59 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: it seems like backporting seems futile | 20:59 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: most likely no more updates, we'd have to backport patches manually | 21:00 |
| mdeslaur | and users may not like the interface changes between 2.x and 3.x.. | 21:00 |
| chrisccoulson | mdeslaur, we're not getting updates for 2.x already, although it hasn't officially gone EOL | 21:00 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: yeah, I brought that up in the email | 21:00 |
| mdeslaur | micahg: ah, well, I guess we'll need to move to 3.1 once something serious hits, unless the backport is trivial | 21:00 |
| mdeslaur | micahg: where was the mail posted? | 21:00 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: private email between TB devs and Mozilla maintainers, I can fwd | 21:01 |
| chrisccoulson | i think we should start preparing lucid for 3.1 anyway, when we do the update for maverick | 21:01 |
| mdeslaur | micahg: if you can, yes I would like to see it | 21:01 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: once I get it ready for maverick, it should be trivial to prepare the rest of the updates | 21:02 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, hopefully :) | 21:02 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: fwded to you and jdstrand | 21:04 |
| mdeslaur | micahg: thanks! :) | 21:04 |
| mdeslaur | ah, it's good to know 3.1 is addressing things people didn't like when migrating from 2.x to 3.0.x | 21:07 |
| micahg | it would be nice to have all releases on the same version like w/Firefox :) | 21:08 |
| mdeslaur | micahg: yeah, that's what we'll do I guess | 21:08 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: cool | 21:08 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: the alternative is to take Debian's patches and credit them, but no guarantees we get everything if we try that | 21:09 |
| mdeslaur | micahg: maybe we should talk about this during the next security team meeting...just to make sure everyone is okay with it | 21:11 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: the update to 3.1? When is the next meeting, I can try to make it | 21:11 |
| micahg | if it's ok w/ chrisccoulson :) | 21:12 |
| mdeslaur | micahg, chrisccoulson: it's mondays at 17:00 UTC | 21:12 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: so 3 hrs ago :P | 21:12 |
| micahg | :) | 21:12 |
| mdeslaur | micahg, chrisccoulson: but since my american colleagues are on vacation today, it got cancelled. Maybe we can do it tomorrow if they're back. | 21:12 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, we can discuss that next week (or tomorrow) | 21:13 |
| micahg | I can make next Monday at 17:00 | 21:13 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: are you in CA? | 21:13 |
| micahg | .ca I should say :)( | 21:13 |
| mdeslaur | micahg: yes, .ca EDT | 21:13 |
| micahg | mdeslaur: ah, good to know | 21:14 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - hmmm, nearly everything on karmic is crashing after being ported to xul 1.9.2. it seems i have to delete compreg.dat from the applications profile folders to make them work again :-/ | 21:27 |
| chrisccoulson | do you know how i can tell applications to autoregister all the components again? | 21:27 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: no, I don't yet | 21:35 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: .autoreg file in directory? | 21:36 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - ah, touching .autoreg in /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.6 does the trick | 21:41 |
| chrisccoulson | what has happened is i update xulrunner before updating other components | 21:41 |
| chrisccoulson | and still ran galeon and chmsee with 1.9.1 | 21:41 |
| chrisccoulson | so the timestamp of .autoreg was before the last time that i ran the apps | 21:41 |
| chrisccoulson | that's a problem though ;) | 21:42 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: can we make the other xul apps touch autoreg for xulrunner when they upgrade? | 21:56 |
| BUGabundo | any audio/video expert here ? | 21:56 |
| BUGabundo | avidemux is crashing | 21:56 |
| BUGabundo | in both maverick and karmic | 21:56 |
| BUGabundo | on a 1080p film | 21:56 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - i'm not sure. i'm just wondering why i didn't notice this before, or whether i've done something to break my install | 21:56 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I don't remember those issues with Lucid | 21:57 |
| chrisccoulson | neither do i. i'll try upgrading from a fresh install later and see if i get the issue again | 21:58 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: k | 21:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!