[10:48] <micahg> chrisccoulson: the secmod.db issue seems to be long standing when absolute paths are used
[10:48] <chrisccoulson> micahg - ah, ok. there seems to be a lot of people with the issue after the 3.6.6 upgrade
[10:48] <micahg> chrisccoulson: in Lucid also or just Hardy?
[10:49] <chrisccoulson> i've been browsing around on ubuntuforums to try and pick out issues that people aren't reporting ;)
[10:49] <chrisccoulson> on hardy and lucid
[10:49] <micahg> chrisccoulson: hmm, weird that it should happen on Lucid since NSS didn't change
[10:49] <chrisccoulson> yeah, that's what i thought
[10:50] <micahg> chrisccoulson: might be this: mozilla 534964
[10:50] <ubot2> Mozilla bug 534964 in Libraries "Attached secmod.db hangs electrolysis on startup" [Normal,Unconfirmed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=534964
[10:51]  * micahg will bbiab
[10:51] <chrisccoulson> yeah, could be that
[10:51] <cousin_mario> hi there
[10:51] <cousin_mario> any news about thunderbird 3.1 ?
[12:03] <micahg> cousin_mario: soon :)
[12:05] <Dimmuxx> any news about the beta ppa? ;)
[12:07] <micahg> Dimmuxx: heh, as soon as I can get to it :)
[12:10] <Dimmuxx> hehe okay. Do you know why they removed build 1 of 4.0b1?
[12:11] <Dimmuxx> or hmm they just made it more annoying to get :P
[12:11] <micahg> Dimmuxx: there were issues, build2 should be released soon
[12:12] <Dimmuxx> if you try to go to the ftp directly you get redirected to another page first
[12:12] <micahg> Dimmuxx: right, it was pulled
[12:13] <Dimmuxx> but you can still get it from that page though
[12:13] <micahg> Dimmuxx: idk, I just know that build1 had issues and build2 was spun
[12:14] <Dimmuxx> too bad noone is working on the ui refresh for linux yet :/
[12:17] <micahg> chrisccoulson: do you have time to push gjs for lucid?
[12:17] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, i can look at that in a bit
[12:17] <micahg> bug 597944
[12:17] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 597944 in gjs (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 1 other project) "libgjs needs a rebuild for xulrunner-1.9.2.6 (affects: 5) (heat: 28)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/597944
[12:26] <cousin_mario> micahg: any chance you could be more specific?:)
[12:26] <micahg> cousin_mario: unfortunately not, I have a lot of things on my plate right now
[12:26] <micahg> cousin_mario: I'm hoping for this week sometime
[12:27] <micahg> chrisccoulson: have you seen the discussion on TB2 migration in email?
[12:28] <cousin_mario> micahg: oh, then it's sooner than I expected:)
[12:28] <cousin_mario> thanks
[12:28] <micahg> cousin_mario: maybe next weekend though...but soon
[12:28] <cousin_mario> okok
[12:28] <cousin_mario> bye!
[14:13] <micahg> chrisccoulson: if you get a chance, can you push Seamonkey 2.0.5 to the security PPA with the changelog
[14:14] <micahg> chrisccoulson: just lucid ATM
[14:19] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, will do
[14:19] <micahg> chrisccoulson: thanks
[14:20] <chrisccoulson> btw, gjs should be targetted for lucid-proposed
[14:20] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I can take care of maverick tomorrow hopefully :)
[14:20] <micahg> chrisccoulson: does upload rights to maverick get me upload rights to -proposed in lucid?
[14:21] <chrisccoulson> micahg - i'm not sure, it depends on if the packageset exists in lucid
[14:21] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I guess it doesn't
[14:24] <chrisccoulson> yeah, the packageset only exists for maverick
[14:26] <chrisccoulson> chmsee is giving me a headache on karmic
[14:26] <micahg> chrisccoulson: what's wrong?
[14:26] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I'd just push the lucid version since they're close enough
[14:28] <chrisccoulson> it's crashing in nsEmbedStream::OpenStream on karmic, because do_GetInterface on the nsWebBrowser returns NULL
[14:28] <chrisccoulson> but that doesn't seem like anything that chmsee can influence
[14:29] <micahg> that sounds familiar
[14:30] <micahg> chrisccoulson: wasn't something doing that in hardy?
[14:30] <chrisccoulson> i don't remember this issue in hardy
[14:30] <micahg> maybe it was lucid then, it sounds familiar
[14:30] <micahg> oh, maybe it was part of what I was researching for the gjs test crash
[14:36] <chrisccoulson> hmmm, that's weird. deleting the profile folder makes it work
[14:38] <micahg> chrisccoulson: the chmsee profile?
[14:38] <chrisccoulson> yeah
[15:25] <Guest57002> hallo, anyone has thunderbird imap with gigs of data in the homeprofile
[15:31] <micahg> Guest57002: yes, why?
[17:50] <asac> !test
[17:50] <ubot2> hrm?
[18:31] <chrisccoulson> micahg - i subscribed you to a bug report i just submitted
[18:31] <chrisccoulson> that's the flashplugin crash that all these users seem to be experiencing now
[18:31] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: what's the bug number, I'm curious
[18:32] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, bug 601977
[18:32] <ubot2> chrisccoulson: Bug 601977 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/601977 is private
[18:32] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: could you subscribe ubuntu-security to the bug, please
[18:32] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, yeah, can do
[18:33] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, done
[18:33] <mdeslaur> thanks chrisccoulson
[18:33] <chrisccoulson> the stacktrace is not much use unfortunately
[18:34] <chrisccoulson> but it doesn't crash if you set dom.ipc.plugins.enabled.libflashplayer.so to false
[18:34] <mdeslaur> huh
[20:25] <micahg> thanks chrisccoulson
[20:51] <micahg> chrisccoulson: did you ask for a USN for Thunderbird as well?
[20:52] <chrisccoulson> micahg - not yet
[20:52] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur ^^
[20:52] <chrisccoulson> :)
[20:52] <chrisccoulson> micahg, we have one for 3.0.5 don't we?
[20:52] <micahg> chrisccoulson: yes, but 3.0.6 was tagged :)
[20:52] <chrisccoulson> micahg - cool. we haven't done the lucid release yet have we?
[20:53] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson, micahg: if the USN wasn't published, just use the one you've got already
[20:53] <micahg> chrisccoulson: no, that should happen :)
[20:53] <micahg> mdeslaur: do you have time to publish 3.0.5 to Lucid?
[20:54] <mdeslaur> micahg: tomorrow morning I'll have time
[20:54] <mdeslaur> micahg: is that okay?
[20:54] <micahg> mdeslaur: yep, thanks
[20:54] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson, micahg: I'll get you a new USN for tb 3.0.6
[20:54] <micahg> mdeslaur: thanks
[20:54] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, thanks
[20:54] <chrisccoulson> micahg - want to do the tb3.0.6 update once we've got 3.0.5 published?
[20:55] <chrisccoulson> and i will get the ff3.6.7 update done too
[20:55] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson, micahg: use USN-958-1 for tb 3.0.6
[20:55] <chrisccoulson> thanks
[20:55] <micahg> chrisccoulson: yes, just for Lucid, not sure about Hardy-Karmic yet per the discussion by email
[20:56] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, i'm not too sure about those yet either. i've not had a chance to read all the emails in full just yet
[20:57] <micahg> chrisccoulson: to summarize, it seems that 2.x isn't EOL yet and there's nothing too serious affecting it ATM, they're looking to push a major update to 3.1.x near the end of the month
[20:57] <chrisccoulson> micahg - yeah, i think i saw that bit. i assume they'd prefer us to update to 3.1 too?
[20:58] <micahg> chrisccoulson: yep, the experience should be better
[20:58] <chrisccoulson> i don't know what mdeslaur thinks about that?
[20:59] <chrisccoulson> it would be good if we could drag it out until jaunty goes EOL ;)
[20:59] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: I was about to say that
[20:59] <chrisccoulson> that's only 3 months away now isn't it?
[20:59] <mdeslaur> I would try and stick with 2.x until we can't get updates for it any longer
[20:59] <micahg> chrisccoulson: it seems like backporting seems futile
[21:00] <micahg> mdeslaur: most likely no more updates, we'd have to backport patches manually
[21:00] <mdeslaur> and users may not like the interface changes between 2.x and 3.x..
[21:00] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, we're not getting updates for 2.x already, although it hasn't officially gone EOL
[21:00] <micahg> mdeslaur: yeah, I brought that up in the email
[21:00] <mdeslaur> micahg: ah, well, I guess we'll need to move to 3.1 once something serious hits, unless the backport is trivial
[21:00] <mdeslaur> micahg: where was the mail posted?
[21:01] <micahg> mdeslaur: private email between TB devs and Mozilla maintainers, I can fwd
[21:01] <chrisccoulson> i think we should start preparing lucid for 3.1 anyway, when we do the update for maverick
[21:01] <mdeslaur> micahg: if you can, yes I would like to see it
[21:02] <micahg> chrisccoulson: once I get it ready for maverick, it should be trivial to prepare the rest of the updates
[21:02] <chrisccoulson> yeah, hopefully :)
[21:04] <micahg> mdeslaur: fwded to you and jdstrand
[21:04] <mdeslaur> micahg: thanks! :)
[21:07] <mdeslaur> ah, it's good to know 3.1 is addressing things people didn't like when migrating from 2.x to 3.0.x
[21:08] <micahg> it would be nice to have all releases on the same version like w/Firefox :)
[21:08] <mdeslaur> micahg: yeah, that's what we'll do I guess
[21:08] <micahg> mdeslaur: cool
[21:09] <micahg> mdeslaur: the alternative is to take Debian's patches and credit them, but no guarantees we get everything if we try that
[21:11] <mdeslaur> micahg: maybe we should talk about this during the next security team meeting...just to make sure everyone is okay with it
[21:11] <micahg> mdeslaur: the update to 3.1?  When is the next meeting, I can try to make it
[21:12] <micahg> if it's ok w/ chrisccoulson :)
[21:12] <mdeslaur> micahg, chrisccoulson: it's mondays at 17:00 UTC
[21:12] <micahg> mdeslaur: so 3 hrs ago :P
[21:12] <micahg> :)
[21:12] <mdeslaur> micahg, chrisccoulson: but since my american colleagues are on vacation today, it got cancelled. Maybe we can do it tomorrow if they're back.
[21:13] <chrisccoulson> yeah, we can discuss that next week (or tomorrow)
[21:13] <micahg> I can make next Monday at 17:00
[21:13] <micahg> mdeslaur: are you in CA?
[21:13] <micahg> .ca I should say :)(
[21:13] <mdeslaur> micahg: yes, .ca EDT
[21:14] <micahg> mdeslaur: ah, good to know
[21:27] <chrisccoulson> micahg - hmmm, nearly everything on karmic is crashing after being ported to xul 1.9.2. it seems i have to delete compreg.dat from the applications profile folders to make them work again :-/
[21:27] <chrisccoulson> do you know how i can tell applications to autoregister all the components again?
[21:35] <micahg> chrisccoulson: no, I don't yet
[21:36] <micahg> chrisccoulson: .autoreg file in directory?
[21:41] <chrisccoulson> micahg - ah, touching .autoreg in /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.6 does the trick
[21:41] <chrisccoulson> what has happened is i update xulrunner before updating other components
[21:41] <chrisccoulson> and still ran galeon and chmsee with 1.9.1
[21:41] <chrisccoulson> so the timestamp of .autoreg was before the last time that i ran the apps
[21:42] <chrisccoulson> that's a problem though ;)
[21:56] <micahg> chrisccoulson: can we make the other xul apps touch autoreg for xulrunner when they upgrade?
[21:56] <BUGabundo> any audio/video expert here ?
[21:56] <BUGabundo> avidemux is crashing
[21:56] <BUGabundo> in both maverick and karmic
[21:56] <BUGabundo> on a 1080p film
[21:56] <chrisccoulson> micahg - i'm not sure. i'm just wondering why i didn't notice this before, or whether i've done something to break my install
[21:57] <micahg> chrisccoulson: I don't remember those issues with Lucid
[21:58] <chrisccoulson> neither do i. i'll try upgrading from a fresh install later and see if i get the issue again
[21:58] <micahg> chrisccoulson: k