duanedesign | :) | 00:16 |
---|---|---|
dholbach | good morning | 07:56 |
=== jussi is now known as Guest7125 | ||
=== jussi01 is now known as jussi | ||
dholbach | nigelb: what is "telling bug squad about us and what needs to be done in case of patche"? | 14:52 |
dholbach | it's still TODO | 14:52 |
dholbach | persia: does "Emmet to clarify buckets and TODO lists!" look like it still needs doing? | 14:53 |
persia | I haven't done it yet. | 14:53 |
dholbach | persia: yeah, I was just wondering how much or what needs changing in the docs | 14:54 |
dholbach | nigelb: I'll do "Nigel to document "black listing process"" | 14:54 |
dholbach | nigelb: it should be really quick | 14:54 |
persia | I've been working on an essay taking about the use of the metaphor of sorting into buckets as a way to explain the patch process. I have no idea why I'm doing it though (and I'm not really sure it's useful) | 14:54 |
dholbach | persia: do you think it makes sense to add a list of the the different buckets (and links to them) to the review guide to help "visualise it"? | 14:56 |
dholbach | it might be a good start already | 14:56 |
persia | Um, what do you mean by that? I don't understand at all. | 14:57 |
dholbach | like to the existing documentation you add a list of the different buckets we have in the process, briefly describe what their function is and give links to the bugs that are in those buckets | 14:57 |
dholbach | (if a fully-blown essay is too much) | 14:58 |
persia | I think I don't understand the action item then. What was the point again? | 14:59 |
dholbach | we have a process that requires people to put various bugs and patches into various buckets as part of it | 15:01 |
dholbach | the work item seems to say that these buckets need clarification | 15:01 |
dholbach | as do the "TODO lists" that people can work on | 15:01 |
dholbach | (like grab a bug that was rejected upstream and improve it… or something) | 15:01 |
persia | Ah, so the point is to list them, rather than define "bucket"? Ah. Right. I'll take a look in that new light tomorrow, and update things. | 15:02 |
dholbach | persia: that's just how I interpreted it | 15:02 |
dholbach | if I don't make sense, blame the dentist - maybe the anaesthesia were too strong ;-) | 15:02 |
persia | I was surprised to discover the action item when I did, so any interpretation is welcome :) | 15:03 |
dholbach | :) | 15:05 |
dholbach | nigelb: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ExcludingPackages - I linked to that page in various places | 15:05 |
nigelb | dholbach: awesome | 16:18 |
nigelb | persia: I remember what it was about | 16:18 |
persia | nigelb: Please tell me :) | 16:18 |
nigelb | when you mentioned that patches are sorted into buckets somone suggets, "emmet can you take can action item to clarify this" | 16:19 |
persia | That was my vague memory, hence the essay. | 16:19 |
persia | But if it ought be something different, that works too. | 16:19 |
nigelb | which means, I think it can be marked as done because review guide pretty much explains how it works, I'm not sure if we need an essay for functional purposes | 16:19 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!