[00:16] :) [07:56] good morning === jussi is now known as Guest7125 === jussi01 is now known as jussi [14:52] nigelb: what is "telling bug squad about us and what needs to be done in case of patche"? [14:52] it's still TODO [14:53] persia: does "Emmet to clarify buckets and TODO lists!" look like it still needs doing? [14:53] I haven't done it yet. [14:54] persia: yeah, I was just wondering how much or what needs changing in the docs [14:54] nigelb: I'll do "Nigel to document "black listing process"" [14:54] nigelb: it should be really quick [14:54] I've been working on an essay taking about the use of the metaphor of sorting into buckets as a way to explain the patch process. I have no idea why I'm doing it though (and I'm not really sure it's useful) [14:56] persia: do you think it makes sense to add a list of the the different buckets (and links to them) to the review guide to help "visualise it"? [14:56] it might be a good start already [14:57] Um, what do you mean by that? I don't understand at all. [14:57] like to the existing documentation you add a list of the different buckets we have in the process, briefly describe what their function is and give links to the bugs that are in those buckets [14:58] (if a fully-blown essay is too much) [14:59] I think I don't understand the action item then. What was the point again? [15:01] we have a process that requires people to put various bugs and patches into various buckets as part of it [15:01] the work item seems to say that these buckets need clarification [15:01] as do the "TODO lists" that people can work on [15:01] (like grab a bug that was rejected upstream and improve it… or something) [15:02] Ah, so the point is to list them, rather than define "bucket"? Ah. Right. I'll take a look in that new light tomorrow, and update things. [15:02] persia: that's just how I interpreted it [15:02] if I don't make sense, blame the dentist - maybe the anaesthesia were too strong ;-) [15:03] I was surprised to discover the action item when I did, so any interpretation is welcome :) [15:05] :) [15:05] nigelb: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/ExcludingPackages - I linked to that page in various places [16:18] dholbach: awesome [16:18] persia: I remember what it was about [16:18] nigelb: Please tell me :) [16:19] when you mentioned that patches are sorted into buckets somone suggets, "emmet can you take can action item to clarify this" [16:19] That was my vague memory, hence the essay. [16:19] But if it ought be something different, that works too. [16:19] which means, I think it can be marked as done because review guide pretty much explains how it works, I'm not sure if we need an essay for functional purposes === yofel_ is now known as yofel