[04:15] <YokoZar> Can checkbox "requires" support the same kind of arguments that package control files can (ie, arch-specific tags like ia32-libs [amd64] ) ?
[07:47] <ara> good morning all!
[08:34] <YokoZar> ara: morning :)
[08:35] <ara> hey YokoZar, how are you?
[08:35] <ara> it has been a long time!
[08:35] <YokoZar> Indeed it has, had some family matters to attend to just after UDS.  But now I'm working on a checkbox branch ;)
[08:38] <YokoZar> currently I'm wishing that checkbox requires supported package dependencies a lot like a package's debian/control file
[09:16] <ara> YokoZar, it does, with package.name == ''
[09:17] <YokoZar> ara: I mean with the kind of conditions you can bracket, such as [i386] for only on i386 arches
[09:17] <ara> YokoZar, ah, ok
[09:17] <YokoZar> I have a test where I want one thing on one arch and one thing on another, and the only real way to do this is just make two tests
[11:07] <davmor2> Morning all
=== smb is now known as smb-afk
[11:40] <ara> morning davmor2
[11:40] <davmor2> ara: I've let evan know if they get a fix together for the wubi/grub issue to let me know and I can test it
[11:41] <ara> davmor2, cool, thanks
[11:42] <davmor2> I haz win7 too thanks to wifes netbook
[11:42] <davmor2> only starter edition but hey beggers can't be chooser
=== jussi is now known as Guest7125
=== jussi01 is now known as jussi
=== smb-afk is now known as smb
=== thekorn_ is now known as thekorn
[14:12] <davmor2> hey fader_ thought it was a black armband day today when you didn't show up yesterday.   But the I was told it was a hol........cr3 what the name of that thing you never take........Holiday that's the one right :)
[14:13] <fader_> Hehe
[14:13] <cr3> davmor2: also note that I'm not american, so I don't get to take american holidays :)
[14:15] <davmor2> cr3: You don't strike like the french, holiday like the states or Canada, I'm left believing you are infact santa claus and are just using canonical as cover.  The number crunching is just finding out whose naughty and nice right?
[14:16] <cr3> davmor2: what do you think all the certification hardware is doing when idle? high throughput computing of naughty and nice kids
[14:19] <davmor2> :D
[14:34] <fader_> davmor2: You're always on the naughty list for some reason
[14:36] <davmor2> fader_: Yeah just below yours :P
[14:39] <fader_> davmor2: I'm trying to be so naughty that I overflow and wrap around into nice
[14:40] <davmor2> fader_: no you drop onto the devils good book then and it's all down hill from there
[14:40] <fader_> Better to reign in hell than rule in heaven, I guess
[14:46] <davmor2> fader_: never you're not good enough for one or bad enough for the other :P
[14:47] <fader_> Argh, s/rule/serve/
[15:55] <ameetp> cyphermox: what was the machine you saw https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/602273?
[15:55] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 602273 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "PXE booting the desktop image fails to configure network (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Medium,Incomplete]
[16:01] <cyphermox> ameetp: any machine I try to PXE boot with desktop :)
[16:01] <ameetp> oh really....
[16:02] <ameetp> could you provide a brand and add that comment as part of additional info
[16:03] <ameetp> e.g. "I see this on HP 'xyz'.  But FYI this happens on any machine I try to PXE boot with desktop "
[16:03] <ameetp> kernel folks are asking for it
[16:05] <cyphermox> sure.
[16:08] <cyphermox> ameetp: updated.
[16:08] <ameetp> cyphermox: thanks
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== Erkan_Yilmaz is now known as Snow_White
[21:54] <ameetp> cyphermox: when you get a chance, can you try the PPA https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/556872
[21:54] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 556872 in linux (Ubuntu) "[lucid] [nouveau] blank screen on Dell Latitude E6410 (NVS 3100M [10de:0a6c]) (affects: 7) (dups: 1) (heat: 54)" [High,Fix committed]
[21:55] <cyphermox> ameetp: that comment re the commit is useless; it's about i915, not nouveau.
[21:56] <cyphermox> I'll still give it a shot, but I check the commits every once in a while and don't notice stuff that would fix the bug with the nouveau driver
[21:59] <cyphermox> ameetp: however, bug #561802 has good news, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/561802/comments/44, which is probably rc4 in mainline
[21:59] <ubot4> cyphermox: Bug 561802 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/561802 is private
[21:59] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 561802 in linux (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 1 other project) "[lucid] [i915] blank screen on Latitude E6410 (affects: 20) (heat: 115)" [Medium,Triaged]
[21:59] <ameetp> cyphermox: yeah, it may be worth a try because the external bug report with the suggested patch has all kinds of architectures mentioned
[22:01] <ameetp> cyphermox: nice!
[22:01] <cyphermox> ameetp: it's a commit in drm for i915, it can only fix i915 ;)
[22:02] <cyphermox> but yeah, this is good, I think it's the last systems that just show nothing on screen :)
[22:03] <ameetp> cyphermox: yes, the commit on its own is of no help you
[22:04] <cyphermox> you mean there are some good nouveau fixes as well?