| Sarvatt | might just throw this all in maverick edgers depending on how much it screws up upgrading, will see after everything builds | 01:15 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | :) | 01:16 |
| Sarvatt | leaving lucid on 1.8.x for sure though | 01:16 |
| Sarvatt | got a refreshed bgnr patch that doesn't break the video abi finally so everything's fine, thats what was holding me back before because gdm was all kinds of screwed up without -nr support | 01:19 |
| RAOF | Sweet! | 01:19 |
| Sarvatt | felt like i've been in australia for the past week, had to tiptoe around a 5GB bandwidth cap on my cell phone until I got net here :D | 01:23 |
| RAOF | Heh. | 01:26 |
| RAOF | I've chewed through 70% of my cap already this month; rollover date is the 27th. | 01:26 |
| RAOF | That steam sale was a bit of a killer :) | 01:26 |
| bjsnider | luckily i'm uncapped | 01:28 |
| johanbr | RAOF, did you lose a bet? | 01:28 |
| Sarvatt | i dont think i'm capped either because i used about 20gb last week on the phone but i coulda swore it was 5gb | 01:28 |
| RAOF | johanbr: ? | 01:29 |
| johanbr | RAOF, "I've chewed through 70% of my cap already" | 01:29 |
| Sarvatt | so warewolf, got some logs for me to dig through to see about your touchscreen? :) | 01:29 |
| johanbr | sounds like you promised to eat your hat if... | 01:30 |
| warewolf | Sarvatt: you're the third person I have involved in this now actually | 01:30 |
| warewolf | Sarvatt: and each of you seem to be chiming in when the rest are idle :) | 01:30 |
| Sarvatt | /var/log/Xorg.0.log, dmesg would help | 01:30 |
| warewolf | Sarvatt: in the mean time, enjoy my fireworks photos from yesterday: http://picasaweb.google.com/richard.harman/WashingtonDCFireworks20100704# | 01:30 |
| RAOF | johanbr: :P | 01:31 |
| warewolf | Sarvatt: actually I'm certain it isn't an X problem, it's a kernel problem. | 01:31 |
| warewolf | Sarvatt: the hid-mosart driver isn't "attaching" to the hardware, and making a /dev/input device. | 01:31 |
| warewolf | Sarvatt: want me to give you an account on the EeePC so you can mess with it directly or are you preoccupied | 01:32 |
| Sarvatt | that'd be perfect if you dont mind | 01:32 |
| RAOF | Woot! One Q965 motherboard received. Let's play “hunt that bug”! | 01:32 |
| warewolf | ok just a sec | 01:32 |
| warewolf | lemme find a crossover cable so I can stick this bad boy in a DMZ | 01:33 |
| Sarvatt | RAOF: Q965 is just a gma 950 derivative isn't it? you want a real 965! | 01:34 |
| Sarvatt | yeah its a GMA 3000, just a souped up gen 3 | 01:35 |
| warewolf | GMA-- | 01:35 |
| warewolf | poulsbo-- | 01:35 |
| warewolf | crossover acquired | 01:36 |
| Sarvatt | \o/ | 01:36 |
| RAOF | No, I want me a Q965. | 01:36 |
| Sarvatt | thanks richard, a lot faster if i can poke around on it :) | 01:36 |
| RAOF | So I can unbreak resolution changing. | 01:37 |
| warewolf | Sarvatt: I thought as much | 01:38 |
| warewolf | yaay | 01:47 |
| RAOF | Aww, man. Everyone with Q965 should totally run checkbox and do the randr cycle test. | 04:40 |
| maco | do what now? | 04:41 |
| maco | is Q965 the same as i965? | 04:41 |
| RAOF | Nope. | 04:42 |
| RAOF | It's a GMA3000, not an X3000 | 04:42 |
| RAOF | Important difference :) | 04:42 |
| Sarvatt | ugh what the heck, almost all drivers failed to build because of missing dependencies against xserver 1.8.99.904 | 04:59 |
| Sarvatt | i guess xserver-xorg-dev needs to pull in libxext-dev now? | 05:00 |
| Sarvatt | well its a lot more widespread than that, acecad just needed libxext but everything else is failing at compile time - https://edge.launchpad.net/~sarvatt/+archive/xorg-testing/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=maverick | 05:03 |
| Sarvatt | thats a nasty looking list | 05:03 |
| Sarvatt | RAOF: want me to run it on 945 or do ya know its q965 specific? | 05:08 |
| Sarvatt | these packages all build fine locally, now i'm stumped.. | 05:13 |
| RAOF | Sarvatt: You're welcome to try, but I'm pretty sure it's 965-specific. | 05:13 |
| RAOF | Looks like CFLAGS isn't getting set correctly? | 05:21 |
| Sarvatt | yeah none of the packages can find /usr/include/xorg | 05:31 |
| Sarvatt | xorg-server.pc is fine, doesn't happen locally with the same packages, hmm | 05:32 |
| Sarvatt | of course i dont have pbuilder set up or the space to set one up at the moment :( | 05:34 |
| warewolf | Sarvatt: I thought you were going to bed :P | 05:36 |
| Sarvatt | yeah then i saw like 50+ build failures i could upload and have ready when i wake up if i figure it out :) | 05:36 |
| * warewolf is having fun helping a friend figure out WTF happened and how his box got hacked into | 05:36 | |
| warewolf | haha | 05:36 |
| warewolf | this is the life of a geek | 05:37 |
| Sarvatt | i'm stumped.. anyone have any idea why all of these packages aren't getting proper CFLAG's now when they build fine locally with the same packages? https://edge.launchpad.net/~sarvatt/+archive/xorg-testing/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=maverick | 07:13 |
| Sarvatt | everything builds fine against xserver 1.8.2, did that a few hours before trying against 1.8.99.904 | 07:20 |
| Sarvatt | guess i should compare the build deps on the ones that actually built right and see if its one of those | 07:26 |
| RAOF | Mayhap. | 07:27 |
| RAOF | Hm. Is it a change in xorg-macros that's breaking it? | 07:31 |
| Sarvatt | hmm | 07:32 |
| RAOF | x-x-v-intel, for example, doesn't ever explicitly AC_SUBST(XORG_CFLAGS) anywhere, but that's what it uses to pick up the include directories. | 07:32 |
| Sarvatt | i built the server against 1.10 then built all those drivers against 1.8.99.904, and for 1.8.2 i already had the server built and just built the libs and drivers | 07:32 |
| Sarvatt | so could be that | 07:33 |
| Sarvatt | lessee what changed between 1.8.0 and 1.10.0 | 07:33 |
| Sarvatt | just doc stuff | 07:34 |
| Sarvatt | xorg-server.pc added this in 1.8.99.904 - Requires.private: xproto >= 7.0.17 randrproto >= 1.2.99.3 renderproto >= 0.11 xextproto >= 7.0.99.3 inputproto >= 1.9.99.902 kbproto >= 1.0.3 fontsproto videoproto dri2proto >= 2.3 xineramaproto | 07:35 |
| Sarvatt | its gotta be some build dep needing to be added because it builds fine locally just not on a ppa or pbuilder | 07:36 |
| Sarvatt | hmm | 07:47 |
| Sarvatt | everything that built right has sdkdir=`$PKG_CONFIG --variable=sdkdir xorg-server` in configure.ac | 07:47 |
| Sarvatt | darn nope, just hadn't finished grepping yet | 07:48 |
| RAOF | Sarvatt: xserver-xorg-dev is missing a depends on xineramaproto | 07:50 |
| RAOF | At least, as of my reading of the package and the xorg-server.pc file. | 07:51 |
| Sarvatt | ahhhhhhhh i ran into that problem a few weeks ago too, lets see if that fixes it | 07:52 |
| Sarvatt | thanks so much RAOF | 07:52 |
| RAOF | No problem whatsoever. I'd like to update to 1.8.99.904 in Maverick/experimental soon, so you're helping tremendously. | 07:53 |
| Sarvatt | bingo! | 07:56 |
| Sarvatt | that's all it was | 07:58 |
| Sarvatt | sheesh, can't thank you enough, i should have been asleep 4 hours ago :) | 07:58 |
| Sarvatt | now to hit rebuild 100 times after the new server builds | 07:59 |
| * Sarvatt ponders jumping to japan and just reuploading everything again instead | 08:02 | |
| RAOF | Sarvatt: Would you like *me* to hit those rebuild buttons? | 08:42 |
| Sarvatt | could just copy it all to edgers :) | 08:45 |
| Sarvatt | cant hit rebuild until the server is closer to building, was 4 hours last i looked | 08:47 |
| Sarvatt | and its in a personal ppa so ya cant hit rebuild | 08:47 |
| Sarvatt | tormod didn't want a crackier ppa on edgers team than edgers and would rather me put the crack in there but i get 100+ emails when favicons go transparent because of cairo so i'm a little conservative in there and build big things in my ppa first... :D | 08:50 |
| Sarvatt | its good to go for edgers maverick though, just need a few drivers not in pkg-xorg like tslib | 08:51 |
| Sarvatt | sheesh, i386 queue time goes up every time i look.. amd64 is all rebuilding now though | 09:38 |
| seb128 | Sarvatt, it's a queue of langpack builds but it seems to have lower priority than uploads so should not be an issue | 09:57 |
| === kenvandine_ is now known as kenvandine | ||
| === jussi is now known as Guest7125 | ||
| === jussi01 is now known as jussi | ||
| Sarvatt | so wacom needs updating, and acecad/citron don't build against 1.8.99.904 but otherwise everything is good | 17:38 |
| Sarvatt | of course this is with everything from git, will probably run into problems using released versions of things | 17:40 |
| Sarvatt | ah hell, binary copied xserver and it hadn't been published yet when the drivers started building | 18:19 |
| bryceh | heya Sarvatt, welcome back! | 18:23 |
| Sarvatt | heyo bryceh! sorry had to run out for a bit | 19:31 |
| Sarvatt | darnit, can't copy nvidia-graphics-drivers from maverick to x-updates because maverick's is using a different orig.tar.gz | 20:13 |
| Sarvatt | deleted it from x-updates a day ago and its still saying the orig.tar.gz exists in the ppa even though it doesnt | 20:14 |
| Sarvatt | looks like the package makes its own orig.tar.gz now too so i cant just make a debian native without one to get around it, and changing the version to something like 256.35+xup1 makes it try to look for .run's with that name | 20:15 |
| Sarvatt | maybe it'll let me upload just not copy | 20:20 |
| bryceh | could be | 20:22 |
| bryceh | if it's totally stuck, put a request in via Answers for someone to take a loo | 20:22 |
| bryceh | +k | 20:23 |
| bjsnider | Sarvatt, just repackage it | 20:44 |
| Sarvatt | i've been trying | 20:46 |
| Sarvatt | its all screwed up now | 20:46 |
| Sarvatt | Rejected: | 20:46 |
| Sarvatt | File nvidia-graphics-drivers_256.35.orig.tar.gz already exists in Primary Archive for Ubuntu, but uploaded version has different contents | 20:46 |
| Sarvatt | primary archive for ubuntu? | 20:46 |
| bjsnider | for that series | 20:47 |
| Sarvatt | lucid | 20:47 |
| bjsnider | so install the source package, then do debuild -S -sd and upload | 20:47 |
| Sarvatt | it got rejected, i did that as well | 20:48 |
| Sarvatt | oh maybe i packaged that for maverick by mistake that time | 20:48 |
| Sarvatt | nope | 20:48 |
| Sarvatt | Version: 256.35-0ubuntu0sarvatt2~lucid | 20:48 |
| Sarvatt | Distribution: lucid | 20:48 |
| bjsnider | i didn't know hte 256 driver had been officially packaged for lucid | 20:50 |
| Sarvatt | i think its just screwed because I tried copying it and it failed | 20:51 |
| Sarvatt | checking changes | 20:51 |
| bjsnider | you tried copying it from maverick to lucid? | 20:51 |
| Sarvatt | yeah | 20:51 |
| Sarvatt | rebuild copying | 20:51 |
| bjsnider | from official maverick to ppa lucid? | 20:52 |
| Sarvatt | yeah i do it all the time | 20:52 |
| bjsnider | so why did it fail? | 20:52 |
| Sarvatt | https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+copy-packages?field.name_filter=nvidia&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=maverick | 20:52 |
| Sarvatt | it says the orig.tar.gz is already exists in the PPA | 20:52 |
| bjsnider | it does | 20:52 |
| Sarvatt | but it doesn't, and its not on any of the sources lists | 20:52 |
| bjsnider | you put it there | 20:52 |
| Sarvatt | i deleted it 24 hours ago | 20:52 |
| Sarvatt | so i could copy the official one since its different | 20:53 |
| bjsnider | it takes a week for the deleted stuff to actually be deleted | 20:53 |
| Sarvatt | since when? | 20:53 |
| bjsnider | i dunno, ever i guess | 20:53 |
| Sarvatt | its not on the ppa or in any of the sources when i look at the lists directly | 20:53 |
| Sarvatt | it only took about 2 hours a few weeks ago | 20:53 |
| bigjools | Hi - you can't overwrite file versions with different contents - ever. | 20:53 |
| bjsnider | yeah, it's removed from the list | 20:53 |
| bjsnider | that's right too | 20:54 |
| bjsnider | there can only every be one source package with that unique name | 20:54 |
| bjsnider | you can never replace it | 20:54 |
| * bigjools is the lead dev for Soyuz | 20:54 | |
| Sarvatt | it's worked in the past, but i've never done it while copying, but i am positive i have done it in the past many times with strictly uploaded sources | 20:55 |
| bjsnider | bigjools, so what does he do, upload the one he deleted again? | 20:55 |
| bigjools | it's impossible to overwrite a file with different contents, you've never done it I can assure you :) | 20:55 |
| bigjools | the easiest thing is to bump the version if you can and upload it again | 20:56 |
| bjsnider | he cannot bump the version and keep it accurate | 20:56 |
| bigjools | I've never tried uploading a deleted one again, it might work | 20:56 |
| bjsnider | he'd have to change the resulting package name by adding a dash somewhere after the .35 | 20:56 |
| Sarvatt | thats what I mean I've done in the past before many times | 20:56 |
| Sarvatt | but yeah I can't alter the version on this package in a way that it'll accept, crap :( | 20:57 |
| bigjools | darn | 20:57 |
| bjsnider | Sarvatt, try uploading the source package you originally created for the ppa | 20:57 |
| bjsnider | not the maverick one | 20:57 |
| Sarvatt | i did :( | 20:57 |
| bjsnider | it rejected it? | 20:57 |
| Sarvatt | it's stuck saying it exists in primary archive for ubuntu | 20:57 |
| bjsnider | ok, when is nvidia releasing a new driver? | 20:58 |
| Sarvatt | and contents different | 20:58 |
| bjsnider | now would be a good time | 20:58 |
| Sarvatt | yeah tell me about it, won't be doing that again :) | 20:58 |
| bigjools | Sarvatt: that means you're uploading to Ubuntu, not a PPA | 20:58 |
| Sarvatt | bigjools: I copied it from primary archive for ubuntu and it's screwed up where it thinks the file is, i'm positive it's going to the PPA | 20:59 |
| Sarvatt | Uploading to x-updates (via ftp to ppa.launchpad.net): | 20:59 |
| bigjools | what upload path? | 20:59 |
| Sarvatt | fqdn = ppa.launchpad.net | 21:00 |
| Sarvatt | method = ftp | 21:00 |
| Sarvatt | incoming = ~ubuntu-x-swat/x-updates/ubuntu | 21:00 |
| bigjools | ok | 21:00 |
| bigjools | the error is misleading because the file was copied from Ubuntu | 21:00 |
| bigjools | bleh | 21:00 |
| Sarvatt | yeah only it wasn't really copied because it had an error so it's kinda stuck in limbo | 21:00 |
| bigjools | so, how long ago did you delete the package? | 21:00 |
| bjsnider | but the point remains it's still complaining about the source package name | 21:00 |
| Sarvatt | 24 hours or so | 21:00 |
| Sarvatt | aha! | 21:01 |
| Sarvatt | [PPA ubuntu-x-swat-x-updates] [ubuntu/lucid] nvidia-graphics-drivers 256.35-0ubuntu2~xup (Accepted) | 21:01 |
| bigjools | ok you can resurrect it by copying it within the PPA I think | 21:01 |
| Sarvatt | woot | 21:01 |
| bigjools | FWIW you can refer to .orig files in Ubuntu from your PPA as well | 21:01 |
| Sarvatt | i tried that but the .orig isn't really available and it got rejected | 21:02 |
| Sarvatt | thanks for the help bigjools, got it worked out :) | 21:02 |
| bigjools | this is why the UI to copy files from Ubuntu is not linked anywhere :) | 21:02 |
| bigjools | it's got issues | 21:03 |
| Sarvatt | yeah definitely going to be more careful with it in the future :) | 21:03 |
| bigjools | anyway, you're welcome | 21:03 |
| bjsnider | it should have stopped him from trying to do this in the first place | 21:03 |
| bigjools | why should it have done that? | 21:03 |
| Sarvatt | i dont see how it could, this is a really fringe problem | 21:03 |
| bjsnider | he was trying to overwrite an already-existing source package with another of the same name but different contents | 21:04 |
| bigjools | hmmm | 21:04 |
| bjsnider | it shoul dhave looked at the ppa contents and said "you don't wanna do that, sparky" | 21:04 |
| bigjools | can you file a bug please? I can take a look. | 21:04 |
| * Sarvatt tries to figure out how to explain the situation in a bug | 21:05 | |
| bigjools | bugs.launchpad.net/soyuz | 21:05 |
| bigjools | just say what you did, exactly | 21:05 |
| bjsnider | there's something it stops you from doing, which is rebuilding a package in a new series but keeping the same package name. that is a good policy, to just say "no" when someone tries to do something that would violate the rules | 21:08 |
| Sarvatt | writing up the bug I'm not really sure it's a bug outside of it saying the orig.tar.gz existed in the primary archive for ubuntu, in the end it did accept a package with my original orig.tar.gz | 21:12 |
| Sarvatt | (saying it existed already in the rejected mail) | 21:12 |
| Sarvatt | man, I'm even more confused now, the orig.tar.gz it accepted was actually the one copied from the archive! | 21:14 |
| bjsnider | was there any difference between that one and your original orig fie in terms of contents? | 21:15 |
| Sarvatt | the one in the archive uses the nocompat32 .run | 21:15 |
| Sarvatt | for x64 | 21:16 |
| bjsnider | what? why? | 21:16 |
| Sarvatt | it uses the 32 bit .run contents directly | 21:16 |
| bjsnider | i see | 21:16 |
| Sarvatt | it had to have actually deleted my orig.tar.gz with the same name and copied the one from the archive over because this one it accepted really is the archive one | 21:18 |
| Sarvatt | dpkg-source: info: building nvidia-graphics-drivers using existing nvidia-graphics-drivers_256.35.orig.tar.gz | 21:19 |
| Sarvatt | i opened up that orig.tar.gz and it's got the nocompat32.run in it | 21:19 |
| bjsnider | then the original error doesn't make sense | 21:20 |
| Sarvatt | yeah for sure.. i'm totally lost | 21:20 |
| bjsnider | bigjools, it takes a week for files to actually disappear from a ppa once they are deleted, right? | 21:21 |
| Sarvatt | 871f54c6c8e0b30fcb5fec40fe3eed7b7081203c 49082614 nvidia-graphics-drivers_256.35.orig.tar.gz << the uploaded one it accepted f8ec98f1d0deef487e60f8435ce8ccc7e3f30bd4 65596688 nvidia-graphics-drivers_256.35.orig.tar.gz << my original one i deleted | 21:21 |
| bigjools | from the repo. 15 minutes or so, from inside Launchpad it takes a week | 21:21 |
| bjsnider | bigjools, in other words, launchpad still thinks they're there for a week? | 21:23 |
| Sarvatt | http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-x-swat/x-updates/ubuntu/pool/main/n/nvidia-graphics-drivers/ | 21:23 |
| bigjools | no, it just keeps a copy in the librarian in case you want to keep it | 21:23 |
| bigjools | for downloading later | 21:23 |
| Sarvatt | definitely the one from the maverick archive in there, i only uploaded the diff | 21:23 |
| bjsnider | that error message would happen if you had tried to copy a maverick package into the ppa into the maverick series. i don't see why it would happen if copying into the lucid series | 21:25 |
| warewolf | Sarvatt: hey, I figured out how to get dhcpd working on two interfaces, so it should be easier to into my EeePC now. | 23:28 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!