[00:24] <Mez> why can't I set a bug as "Won't fix" that is filed against Debian?
[00:24] <Mez> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/debian/+source/xdebug/+bug/491839
[00:25] <Mez> it recognises me as Maintainer.
[00:26] <wgrant> Mez: You need to be the Debian bug supervisor or owner.
[00:26] <wgrant> You're in the DD team, but that appears to be just the members team.
[00:26] <wgrant> And that doesn't have any privileges.
[00:27] <wgrant> Debian also obviously doesn't use LP for bug tracking, so it's not terribly clear whether you should be changing the status manually in LP. Is there not a BTS bug to link to?
[00:33] <Mez> nope
[00:33] <Mez> because it's a failbug
[01:00] <Quintasan> james_w: I still can't get the revno to work, it won't expand no matter what I do. Buildlog (with -v) -> http://wklej.org/id/362175/ , changelog (the one I created) -> http://wklej.org/id/362176/  ,  recipe -> http://wklej.org/id/362177/
[01:01] <lifeless> Mez: what do you mean a 'failbug'
[01:05] <james_w> Quintasan: that is odd
[01:05] <james_w> Quintasan: do you have work/debian/changelog ?
[01:06] <Quintasan> james_w: hmm no, the debian/changelog is in project-neon-1.0-{revno}
[01:06] <Quintasan> should I move it there?
[01:07] <james_w> Quintasan: hang on
[01:07] <james_w> Quintasan: what's the ls of your $PWD?
[01:07] <Quintasan> changelog  nightly.asc  project-neon  project-neon-qt.recipe  qt-ubuntu  work
[01:08] <james_w> Quintasan: and work contains project-neon-1.0-{revno}?
[01:08] <Quintasan> yes
[01:09] <Quintasan> why on earth changelog landed up in my home?
[01:09] <james_w> Quintasan: and there is a debian/changelog in there?
[01:09] <Quintasan> james_w: yes
[01:10] <Quintasan> and it contains what I sent you
[01:10] <james_w> Quintasan: ok, thanks, let me read the code and see if I can work out what is going on
[01:11] <Quintasan> james_w: by the way, with the current recipe, will it work like this: grab code -> grab debian dir -> create new changelog entry -> *changes file ?
[01:11] <james_w> Quintasan: yes
[01:11] <Quintasan> awesome
[01:12] <james_w> Quintasan: so, your changelog has a syntax error, I wonder if it is that
[01:12] <james_w> -- Michał Zając <michal.zajac@gmail.com>, Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:37:43 +0200
[01:12] <james_w> there shouldn't be a comma after your email address, it should be two spaces before the date I believe
[01:13] <Quintasan> hmm, it was generate by my dch I belive
[01:13] <Quintasan> let me redo it
[01:14] <james_w> I don't see why that would give you that behaviour though
[01:16] <Quintasan> ha
[01:16] <Quintasan> damn you, colons and semi-colons
[01:16] <Quintasan> james_w: such a trivial issue :(
[01:17] <james_w> Quintasan: it is fixed?
[01:18] <Quintasan> I think yes, I get Building the source package and it does something (probably)
[01:18] <james_w> Quintasan: good
[01:18] <james_w> Quintasan: I will file some bugs
[01:19] <Quintasan> yeah, worked
[01:19] <james_w> \o/
[01:19] <james_w> thanks for your help Quintasan
[01:19] <Quintasan> no problem :)
[01:20] <Quintasan> well, back to hacking Project Neon
[02:34] <spm> *** FYI. restarting the lpnet production (not edge) app servers for a Cherry Pick ***
[02:36] <lifeless> is that user visible, generally ?
[02:36] <lifeless> just curious
[02:37] <spm> maybe. if you manage to time it just right, sure.
[02:40] <wgrant> Heh, yes, it is user-visible.
[02:40] <wgrant> Apparently back now, though.
[02:42] <spm> well. sorta. still restarting them all.
[02:43] <spm> and should be done.
[02:47] <spm> *** FYI. About to restart ppa uploads for a Cherry Pick ***
[02:48] <spm> and back
[02:51] <wgrant> The archive restricted families one?
[02:51] <wgrant> I don't see why edge is excluded from that.
[02:51] <wgrant> It still needs it.
[02:51] <spm> it does, I was just going to rnu a manual auto edge update tho; not a special
[02:52] <wgrant> Ah, right.
[03:31] <spm> wgrant: shoulda mentioned sooner, edge should be groovy now too
[11:55] <sluimers> Hi there! I've got a problem with uploading/building my personal package, it keeps saying it's unable to locate crtn.o .
[11:56] <sluimers> Could anyone help me with this?
[11:56] <jpds> sluimers: It seems to be in: libc6-dev: /usr/lib/crtn.o
[11:57] <sluimers> Yes, but despite adding that as a build dependency it still can't find it.
[11:58] <sluimers> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51619755/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.libcorona_1.0.2-2karmic1~ppa2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[11:58] <sluimers> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7), libtool (>= 2.2), libaudiere-dev, libwxgtk2.8-dev, libsdl1.2-dev, libpng12-0, libpng12-dev, libjpeg62, libjpeg62-dev, libc6-dev (>= 2.10)
[12:02] <sluimers> http://www.pastebin.org/387332
[12:02] <sluimers> There, should be clear now wht the problem is
[12:31] <yofel_> hm, is it intentional that https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+expirable-bugs shows all incomplete bugs and not only those with can_expire set?
[12:35] <deryck> yofel, it shouldn't be all incomplete bugs.  there is a set of requirements for being expirable.  having said that, bdmurray is doing some work in this area of the code, and possibly there is a new bug now?
[12:36] <deryck> can_expire is going away, for example.
[12:40] <yofel> ah, thx anyway, I'm just irritated as that list shows bug that were changed minutes ago too, or mabe I'm misunderstanding what that list is supposed to show...
[13:08] <[diablo]> afternoon all
[13:08] <[diablo]> guys, I registered a project we want to develop, and later a team
[13:08] <[diablo]> I wish to change the ownership of the project from me, to the team
[13:08] <[diablo]> anyone know where I can do this please?
[13:10] <[diablo]> ah sorry, got it
[13:37] <Phantomas> hello, if a user commits a bug, which is more like a feature request, or some improvements, with a code tarball attached, how should I handle the bug? I mean, it's not really a bug, is it?
[14:34] <KangOl> hi
[14:41] <nuovodna> KangOl: hi
[15:34] <yofel> hm, can someone else check if they see the comments from 'lau' on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/283168 ? They aren's shown on the main page but only in the full activity log here.
[15:39] <warp10> Anybody around available to help me a little with a daily-build recipe issue?
[16:41] <bdmurray> yofel: can you elaborate on what is wrong?
[16:56] <bdmurray> yofel: the list shows bug reports that *may* expire if enough time passes and the can_expire attribute is the same thing.  If you look at the list of expirable bugs on production and edge they are not different.  If you want to find out if a bug is eligible for expiration right now, using the default date criteria, you can use bug.isExpirable().
[16:57] <bdmurray> yofel: The content of +expirablebugs should not have changed at all
[17:08] <yofel> bdmurray: ah, thanks for the explenation
[17:32] <prafulla> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/5.3/annotate/head:/sql/sql_select.cc
[17:32] <prafulla> I am unable to view the above file
[17:32] <prafulla> it says "there was some problem connecting to server"
[17:32] <prafulla> can some admin at launchpad take a look ?
[17:48] <shadeslayer> hi ...  any lp admins around...
[17:49] <shadeslayer> rekonq is going to be shipped as the default web browser for kubuntu,unfortunately,when adding comments with it on bugs.lp i get a error,but when i refresh the page i see the comment was added
[17:49] <shadeslayer> this needs to be fixed asap
[17:50] <shadeslayer> ( im part of the rekonq team + kubuntu member , so i took this responsibility of fixing this bug :P )
[17:50] <shadeslayer> for eg. i just commented on https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/k3b/+bug/328432
[17:51] <shadeslayer> Lp said : The Following errors were encountered <Ok> : no actual error was listed tho
[17:51] <shadeslayer> and when i refreshed the page.. the comment was there
[17:51] <shadeslayer> setting the status seems to work fine tho
[17:55] <shadeslayer> no help contact as well...
[17:55] <shadeslayer> :P
[18:23] <rockstar> shadeslayer, asking a question on the Launchpad project would be the best way to get an admin's attention.
[18:24] <shadeslayer> rockstar: uh... sure.. the question would should be assigned to launchpad right? ( like bugs are assigned packages and stuff )
[18:25] <rockstar> shadeslayer, https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad
[18:25] <shadeslayer> rockstar: right.. thanks ;)
[19:03] <dspstv> hia all,
[19:03] <dspstv> i want to make a copy of a built package but is not clear to me the difference between
[19:03] <dspstv>  Rebuild the copied sources Copy existing binaries
[19:04] <dspstv> i will select copy
[19:04] <dspstv> but im trying to get a lucid build into karmic
[19:04] <dspstv> im guessing copy won't work
[19:05] <dspstv> am i making a mess or is not clear enough for non native english speakers
[19:09] <dspstv> btw, im reading this:
[19:09] <dspstv> https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/Copying
[19:09] <dspstv> and it has not mention whatsoever to my question..
[19:10] <dspstv> or is it here:
[19:10] <dspstv> If you only copy the source, the corresponding build records are created in the destination PPA immediately.
[19:10] <dspstv> uhmm really not clear for me
[19:16] <maxb> dspstv: Are you trying to copy a package within one PPA, or from one PPA to a different destination PPA?
[19:16] <dspstv> from one to another
[19:16] <dspstv> org is lucid dest karmic
[19:17] <maxb> OK. "Copy existing binaries" will result in the exact same .deb files simply being made available for download under a different distro series.
[19:17] <dspstv> maxb: then that will be faster
[19:17] <dspstv> maxb: thanks
[19:18] <maxb> "Rebuild the copied sources" will cause the source package to be rebuilt in a karmic environment - however, I strongly recommend against that in most cases, since the resulting packages will have the exact same name and version - the potential for confusion is high.
[19:18] <dspstv> i think it will be nice if there is a small description in there
[19:18] <dspstv> or no options should be offered
[19:20] <dspstv> maxb: now, is there a way to cancel a rebuild?
[19:21] <maxb> It is not possible to cancel a build in progress. If you upload a new version that supersedes the old, or delete the source package, before a build starts, then it will be cancelled.
[19:22] <dspstv> ok, too late though i noticed that for karmic i will get the lpia version that was not built for lucid dunno why
[19:34] <maxb> oh yes, that happens when you copy from a distro that has less architectures to one which has more
[20:25] <dspstv> maxb, yes, i now i have to wait for 4 hours to have a "copy"
[20:25] <dspstv> argg
[20:25] <dspstv> or more than 4.. who know
[20:25] <dspstv> s
[20:26] <dspstv> im sure in not the first one choosing this copy options in the wrong way
[20:26] <dspstv> if only there was a small note...
[20:37] <MTecknology> is it not possible to assign a bug to a certain person?
[20:38] <lifeless> unless you are their manager, no.
[20:38] <MTecknology> alrighty..
[20:38] <MTecknology> thanks
[20:38] <lifeless> thats reality :)
[20:38] <lifeless> uhm, I don't recall how lp models 'manager' - I thinkts 'bug control for the product'
[20:39] <lifeless> which is slightly surprising :)
[20:45] <jonafan> hi guys
[20:45] <jonafan> i've been working on/hosting a project that i'm thinking about moving to launchpad
[20:46] <jonafan> i currently have it broken up into 3 different branches
[20:46] <jonafan> should i open 3 branches on launchpad, or should i merge them and put them in one branch?
[22:34] <shadeslayer> rockstar: seems its a issue with webkit
[22:35] <shadeslayer> not rekonq