[00:24] why can't I set a bug as "Won't fix" that is filed against Debian? [00:24] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/debian/+source/xdebug/+bug/491839 [00:24] Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: list.index(x): x not in list (https://launchpad.net/bugs/491839) [00:25] it recognises me as Maintainer. [00:26] Mez: You need to be the Debian bug supervisor or owner. [00:26] You're in the DD team, but that appears to be just the members team. [00:26] And that doesn't have any privileges. [00:27] Debian also obviously doesn't use LP for bug tracking, so it's not terribly clear whether you should be changing the status manually in LP. Is there not a BTS bug to link to? [00:33] nope [00:33] because it's a failbug === fta_ is now known as fta [01:00] james_w: I still can't get the revno to work, it won't expand no matter what I do. Buildlog (with -v) -> http://wklej.org/id/362175/ , changelog (the one I created) -> http://wklej.org/id/362176/ , recipe -> http://wklej.org/id/362177/ [01:01] Mez: what do you mean a 'failbug' [01:05] Quintasan: that is odd [01:05] Quintasan: do you have work/debian/changelog ? [01:06] james_w: hmm no, the debian/changelog is in project-neon-1.0-{revno} [01:06] should I move it there? [01:07] Quintasan: hang on [01:07] Quintasan: what's the ls of your $PWD? [01:07] changelog nightly.asc project-neon project-neon-qt.recipe qt-ubuntu work [01:08] Quintasan: and work contains project-neon-1.0-{revno}? [01:08] yes [01:09] why on earth changelog landed up in my home? [01:09] Quintasan: and there is a debian/changelog in there? [01:09] james_w: yes [01:10] and it contains what I sent you [01:10] Quintasan: ok, thanks, let me read the code and see if I can work out what is going on [01:11] james_w: by the way, with the current recipe, will it work like this: grab code -> grab debian dir -> create new changelog entry -> *changes file ? [01:11] Quintasan: yes [01:11] awesome [01:12] Quintasan: so, your changelog has a syntax error, I wonder if it is that [01:12] -- Michał Zając , Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:37:43 +0200 [01:12] there shouldn't be a comma after your email address, it should be two spaces before the date I believe [01:13] hmm, it was generate by my dch I belive [01:13] let me redo it [01:14] I don't see why that would give you that behaviour though [01:16] ha [01:16] damn you, colons and semi-colons [01:16] james_w: such a trivial issue :( [01:17] Quintasan: it is fixed? [01:18] I think yes, I get Building the source package and it does something (probably) [01:18] Quintasan: good [01:18] Quintasan: I will file some bugs [01:19] yeah, worked [01:19] \o/ [01:19] thanks for your help Quintasan [01:19] no problem :) [01:20] well, back to hacking Project Neon === fta_ is now known as fta [02:34] *** FYI. restarting the lpnet production (not edge) app servers for a Cherry Pick *** [02:36] is that user visible, generally ? [02:36] just curious [02:37] maybe. if you manage to time it just right, sure. [02:40] Heh, yes, it is user-visible. [02:40] Apparently back now, though. [02:42] well. sorta. still restarting them all. [02:43] and should be done. [02:47] *** FYI. About to restart ppa uploads for a Cherry Pick *** [02:48] and back [02:51] The archive restricted families one? [02:51] I don't see why edge is excluded from that. [02:51] It still needs it. [02:51] it does, I was just going to rnu a manual auto edge update tho; not a special [02:52] Ah, right. [03:31] wgrant: shoulda mentioned sooner, edge should be groovy now too === fta_ is now known as fta === mtaylor is now known as Trouble === Trouble is now known as mtaylor === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === adeuring1 is now known as adeuring === noodles785 is now known as noodles775 [11:55] Hi there! I've got a problem with uploading/building my personal package, it keeps saying it's unable to locate crtn.o . [11:56] Could anyone help me with this? [11:56] sluimers: It seems to be in: libc6-dev: /usr/lib/crtn.o [11:57] Yes, but despite adding that as a build dependency it still can't find it. [11:58] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51619755/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.libcorona_1.0.2-2karmic1~ppa2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [11:58] Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7), libtool (>= 2.2), libaudiere-dev, libwxgtk2.8-dev, libsdl1.2-dev, libpng12-0, libpng12-dev, libjpeg62, libjpeg62-dev, libc6-dev (>= 2.10) [12:02] http://www.pastebin.org/387332 [12:02] There, should be clear now wht the problem is [12:31] hm, is it intentional that https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+expirable-bugs shows all incomplete bugs and not only those with can_expire set? === yofel_ is now known as yofel [12:35] yofel, it shouldn't be all incomplete bugs. there is a set of requirements for being expirable. having said that, bdmurray is doing some work in this area of the code, and possibly there is a new bug now? [12:36] can_expire is going away, for example. [12:40] ah, thx anyway, I'm just irritated as that list shows bug that were changed minutes ago too, or mabe I'm misunderstanding what that list is supposed to show... === salgado-dr is now known as salgado [13:08] <[diablo]> afternoon all [13:08] <[diablo]> guys, I registered a project we want to develop, and later a team [13:08] <[diablo]> I wish to change the ownership of the project from me, to the team [13:08] <[diablo]> anyone know where I can do this please? [13:10] <[diablo]> ah sorry, got it === warp10 is now known as warp10_scared === warp10_scared is now known as warp10 === fta_ is now known as fta [13:37] hello, if a user commits a bug, which is more like a feature request, or some improvements, with a code tarball attached, how should I handle the bug? I mean, it's not really a bug, is it? === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk [14:34] hi [14:41] KangOl: hi === Ursinha is now known as Guest32709 === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha-otm === Ursinha-otm is now known as Ursinha [15:34] hm, can someone else check if they see the comments from 'lau' on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/283168 ? They aren's shown on the main page but only in the full activity log here. [15:34] Launchpad bug 283168 in Ubuntu "gfloppy write permission denied with external usb floppy (affected: 1, heat: 7)" [Low,Incomplete] [15:39] Anybody around available to help me a little with a daily-build recipe issue? === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === fta_ is now known as fta === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] [16:41] yofel: can you elaborate on what is wrong? [16:56] yofel: the list shows bug reports that *may* expire if enough time passes and the can_expire attribute is the same thing. If you look at the list of expirable bugs on production and edge they are not different. If you want to find out if a bug is eligible for expiration right now, using the default date criteria, you can use bug.isExpirable(). [16:57] yofel: The content of +expirablebugs should not have changed at all [17:08] bdmurray: ah, thanks for the explenation === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch [17:32] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/5.3/annotate/head:/sql/sql_select.cc [17:32] I am unable to view the above file [17:32] it says "there was some problem connecting to server" [17:32] can some admin at launchpad take a look ? === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck [17:48] hi ... any lp admins around... [17:49] rekonq is going to be shipped as the default web browser for kubuntu,unfortunately,when adding comments with it on bugs.lp i get a error,but when i refresh the page i see the comment was added [17:49] this needs to be fixed asap [17:50] ( im part of the rekonq team + kubuntu member , so i took this responsibility of fixing this bug :P ) [17:50] for eg. i just commented on https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/k3b/+bug/328432 [17:50] Launchpad bug 328432 in k3b (Ubuntu) "k3b in kubuntu 8.10 freezes at 16x and does not trottle down (affected: 0, heat: 5)" [Undecided,New] [17:51] Lp said : The Following errors were encountered : no actual error was listed tho [17:51] and when i refreshed the page.. the comment was there [17:51] setting the status seems to work fine tho [17:55] no help contact as well... [17:55] :P === fta_ is now known as fta [18:23] shadeslayer, asking a question on the Launchpad project would be the best way to get an admin's attention. [18:24] rockstar: uh... sure.. the question would should be assigned to launchpad right? ( like bugs are assigned packages and stuff ) [18:25] shadeslayer, https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad [18:25] rockstar: right.. thanks ;) === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado === apachelogger is now known as pythonlova [19:03] hia all, [19:03] i want to make a copy of a built package but is not clear to me the difference between [19:03] Rebuild the copied sources Copy existing binaries [19:04] i will select copy [19:04] but im trying to get a lucid build into karmic [19:04] im guessing copy won't work [19:05] am i making a mess or is not clear enough for non native english speakers [19:09] btw, im reading this: [19:09] https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/Copying [19:09] and it has not mention whatsoever to my question.. [19:10] or is it here: [19:10] If you only copy the source, the corresponding build records are created in the destination PPA immediately. [19:10] uhmm really not clear for me [19:16] dspstv: Are you trying to copy a package within one PPA, or from one PPA to a different destination PPA? [19:16] from one to another [19:16] org is lucid dest karmic [19:17] OK. "Copy existing binaries" will result in the exact same .deb files simply being made available for download under a different distro series. [19:17] maxb: then that will be faster [19:17] maxb: thanks [19:18] "Rebuild the copied sources" will cause the source package to be rebuilt in a karmic environment - however, I strongly recommend against that in most cases, since the resulting packages will have the exact same name and version - the potential for confusion is high. [19:18] i think it will be nice if there is a small description in there [19:18] or no options should be offered === fta_ is now known as fta [19:20] maxb: now, is there a way to cancel a rebuild? [19:21] It is not possible to cancel a build in progress. If you upload a new version that supersedes the old, or delete the source package, before a build starts, then it will be cancelled. [19:22] ok, too late though i noticed that for karmic i will get the lpia version that was not built for lucid dunno why === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [19:34] oh yes, that happens when you copy from a distro that has less architectures to one which has more === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === salgado is now known as salgado-afk === fta_ is now known as fta [20:25] maxb, yes, i now i have to wait for 4 hours to have a "copy" [20:25] argg [20:25] or more than 4.. who know [20:25] s [20:26] im sure in not the first one choosing this copy options in the wrong way [20:26] if only there was a small note... [20:37] is it not possible to assign a bug to a certain person? [20:38] unless you are their manager, no. [20:38] alrighty.. [20:38] thanks [20:38] thats reality :) [20:38] uhm, I don't recall how lp models 'manager' - I thinkts 'bug control for the product' [20:39] which is slightly surprising :) [20:45] hi guys [20:45] i've been working on/hosting a project that i'm thinking about moving to launchpad [20:46] i currently have it broken up into 3 different branches [20:46] should i open 3 branches on launchpad, or should i merge them and put them in one branch? === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [22:34] rockstar: seems its a issue with webkit [22:35] not rekonq === fta_ is now known as fta