[19:48] <ev> cjwatson: ordering aside, does this approach for multiple partition resizing seem reasonable to you: http://people.canonical.com/~evand/tmp/multiple-partition-resizing-option-one.png (the idea being to expose the largest resizeable partition on each drive, not just the largest partition overall).
[19:49] <ev> I just want to be sure it's okay to expand the question in choices, rather than do_option (like some_device does)
[19:50] <ev> and do you think Debian would be accepting of such a change?  (I'm surprised that to my knowledge, no one has attempted this before)
[19:54] <ev> I'd also like to add an option to replace a partition with Ubuntu/Debian in addition to being able to resize it (the install design spec calls for this).  Not sure if that changes how you envisage this being presented in d-i.
[22:27] <cjwatson> ev: I think that's OK, yes - isn't Debian irrelevant here since resize_use_free has always been Ubuntu-specific anyway?
[22:27] <cjwatson> I suspect I was just lazy in only exposing the best total, or possibly I thought it was the best UI trade-off at the time