| EzraR-m | persia: are you around? | 01:08 |
|---|---|---|
| === shadeslayer is now known as evilshadeslayer | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: poke | 02:12 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: bug 603831 | 02:12 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 603831 in fprint-demo (Ubuntu) "Please Merge fprint-demo from debian" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/603831 | 02:12 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === MTecknology is now known as MTeck-ricer | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === pythonlova is now known as apachelogger | ||
| === warp11 is now known as warp10 | ||
| === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
| joaopinto | is REVU actively used lately ? | 09:34 |
| AnAnt | Hello, I need help with an apport script, I want to get the value of a config variable, so I did this: | 11:04 |
| AnAnt | SLModemdDevice = command_output(['sh', '-c', '[ ! -r /etc/default/sl-modem-daemon ] || (. /etc/default/sl-modem-daemon ; echo $SLMODEMD_DEVICE)']) | 11:04 |
| AnAnt | is that correct ? | 11:04 |
| AnAnt | also, is there a way to test some apport functions directly in a python shell ? I tried , import apport ; command_output('ls') ; but that gave the following error: | 11:06 |
| AnAnt | NameError: name 'command_output' is not defined | 11:06 |
| geser | when you use "import apport" then you need "apport.command_output('ls')" | 11:06 |
| geser | or use "from apport import *" then "command_output('ls')" works | 11:07 |
| tumbleweed | (although command_output is in apport.hookutils not apport) | 11:11 |
| AnAnt | ah, ok | 11:37 |
| === BlackZ_ is now known as BlackZ | ||
| AnAnt | thanks | 11:42 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === Zhenech_ is now known as Zhenech | ||
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: ping | 13:40 |
| tumbleweed | ari-tczew: hi, is LP: #414247 good to go? | 13:41 |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: do you mean bug 414247 ? | 13:42 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 414247 in firmware-addon-dell (Ubuntu) "Please upgrade firmware-addon-dell to 2.2.9 version" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/414247 | 13:42 |
| tumbleweed | ari-tczew: yes | 13:42 |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: I'm not sure to coolbhavi package. Some things are not included. | 13:42 |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: could you look at bug 602450 ? | 13:51 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 602450 in python-xattr (Ubuntu) "Sync python-xattr 0.4-5 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/602450 | 13:51 |
| tumbleweed | ari-tczew: my question on that is should I look at it or unsubscribe sponsors? | 13:52 |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: hmm, not yet. I'd like to see a feedback from sponsor, who is expierenced with python packages. | 13:53 |
| tumbleweed | in that case I'll look. If there's anything I know about, it's python | 13:54 |
| tumbleweed | xattr sync looks good | 13:55 |
| joaopinto | anyone with experience with ruby apps packaging ? | 14:07 |
| joaopinto | this app Makefile is using /usr/local/lib/site_ruby for a ruby module (or whatever it's called), I have no idea on the expected place for ruby | 14:08 |
| ari-tczew | joaopinto: look for motu ruby on launchpad | 14:21 |
| joaopinto | ok, tks | 14:21 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: btw you took on kadu right | 14:22 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: it doesnt need a merge :P | 14:22 |
| ari-tczew | evilshadeslayer: I didn't look at kadu yet. | 14:26 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: doesnt need merging.. not from what i interpreted | 14:26 |
| ari-tczew | evilshadeslayer: why? | 14:28 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: well,we the ubuntu package has a added dep,and debian doesnt ship with that dep | 14:28 |
| ari-tczew | evilshadeslayer: so ubuntu should ship that dep. | 14:29 |
| ari-tczew | so it;s needs merging | 14:29 |
| ari-tczew | it;s due to new kde IIRC - that said debfx | 14:29 |
| Laney | you should rather understand why and whether we need to keep it | 14:30 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: uh wait,youve got it the wrong way :P | 14:30 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: we *do* ship that dep | 14:30 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: debian *doesnt* | 14:30 |
| evilshadeslayer | build dep | 14:30 |
| ari-tczew | evilshadeslayer: so why you want to drop it? | 14:31 |
| evilshadeslayer | i dont want to drop it... | 14:31 |
| evilshadeslayer | thats why it doesnt need a merge | 14:31 |
| ari-tczew | evilshadeslayer: I don't understand you. | 14:35 |
| evilshadeslayer | i dont understand my self sometimes:P | 14:35 |
| ari-tczew | QtWebKit is no longer part of libqt4-dev so all packages using it need to build-depend on libqt4-webkit-dev. | 14:35 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: do you mind if i took a look at kadu? | 14:36 |
| ari-tczew | evilshadeslayer: I think that we should ship that B-D. | 14:37 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: ok lemme look a it,and ill get back :) | 14:37 |
| Laney | would be nice if that changelog had more detail | 14:46 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| ScottK | What ari-tczew said about QtWebKit is exactly correct. We're using a newer version of Qt than Debian, so we need to add this, whereas they don't. | 14:55 |
| === shadeslayer_ is now known as evilshadeslayer | ||
| === shadeslayer_ is now known as evilshadeslayer | ||
| === evilshadeslayer_ is now known as evilshadeslayer | ||
| ari-tczew | kadu ftbfs: error: 'fchmod' was not declared in this scope :( | 17:36 |
| coolbhavi | ari-tczew, include #include <sys/stat.h> in the ftb file | 17:43 |
| ari-tczew | coolbhavi: already exist | 17:44 |
| coolbhavi | or check if the header if already included is properly linking on to the compiler | 17:44 |
| ari-tczew | coolbhavi: how can I check it? | 17:45 |
| coolbhavi | ari-tczew, maybe something like this: gcc -include /path/to/directory/containing/header_name/header_name.h -o myoutputfile myoutputfile.c and you can compile and check again | 17:53 |
| ari-tczew | coolbhavi: you are doing a lot work for Ubuntu. I encourage you to present here more frequently. In team we can do more and more. | 17:54 |
| coolbhavi | ari-tczew, sure! | 17:54 |
| evilshadeslayer | :P | 17:55 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: yeah i got involved with rbot.. seems debian released a new package | 17:55 |
| ari-tczew | evilshadeslayer: what is rbot? | 17:56 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: one sec | 17:56 |
| evilshadeslayer | !info rbot | 17:56 |
| ubottu | rbot (source: rbot): IRC bot written in ruby. In component universe, is optional. Version 0.9.14-2ubuntu1 (lucid), package size 459 kB, installed size 1608 kB | 17:56 |
| ari-tczew | aha | 17:56 |
| evilshadeslayer | ^^ for eg | 17:56 |
| evilshadeslayer | evilbot: hi | 17:56 |
| evilbot | howdy, evilshadeslayer! | 17:56 |
| ari-tczew | o_O | 17:57 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: hmm? | 17:57 |
| ari-tczew | evilshadeslayer: nothing ;p don't care | 17:58 |
| evilshadeslayer | :P | 17:58 |
| evilshadeslayer | the current version doesnt work in ubuntu | 17:59 |
| evilshadeslayer | was fixed in latest release | 17:59 |
| coolbhavi | evilshadeslayer, rbot ftb'd on my PPA due to missing rake and some modules | 17:59 |
| evilshadeslayer | coolbhavi: yeah im fixing those :P | 17:59 |
| coolbhavi | :P | 18:00 |
| evilshadeslayer | idk how but it doesnt ftbfs in debian | 18:00 |
| coolbhavi | evilshadeslayer, build environments are different | 18:00 |
| evilshadeslayer | yeah | 18:00 |
| evilshadeslayer | probably build deps get pulled in properly there | 18:01 |
| coolbhavi | hmm | 18:01 |
| evilshadeslayer | coolbhavi: rbot fixed :) | 18:16 |
| evilshadeslayer | just going through patches | 18:16 |
| coolbhavi | evilshadeslayer, It required module tweaking and b-d on rake I guess :) | 18:17 |
| evilshadeslayer | coolbhavi: had to add a few more build deps | 18:17 |
| evilshadeslayer | coolbhavi: rake, rubygems, libgettext-ruby1.8 | 18:17 |
| coolbhavi | evilshadeslayer, thats what i meant i think :) | 18:18 |
| evilshadeslayer | yeah .. was just telling you which ones i added ;) | 18:18 |
| coolbhavi | rock on :) | 18:19 |
| evilshadeslayer | yeah.. will have to drop patches | 18:21 |
| coolbhavi | :) | 18:21 |
| === IdleOne is now known as IdleTwo | ||
| === IdleTwo is now known as IdleOne | ||
| ari-tczew | coolbhavi: am I correct with following command? gcc -include /usr/include/sys/stat.h -o main main.cpp | 18:28 |
| coolbhavi | ari-tczew, try out on trial and error mate you ll stick! | 18:28 |
| ari-tczew | coolbhavi: only errors in output ... | 18:30 |
| coolbhavi | ari-tczew, try linking with ftb file | 18:30 |
| coolbhavi | and see | 18:30 |
| coolbhavi | if the header is included on recompilation | 18:31 |
| ari-tczew | I don't understand. No idea how to fix it. | 18:36 |
| === evilshadeslayer is now known as evilbot | ||
| === evilbot is now known as skynet | ||
| === skynet is now known as shadeslayer | ||
| === shadeslayer is now known as Saphira | ||
| === Saphira is now known as Arya | ||
| === Arya is now known as Razac | ||
| === Razac is now known as Solembum | ||
| === Solembum is now known as editGrimrr | ||
| === editGrimrr is now known as Grimrr | ||
| === Grimrr is now known as Thorn | ||
| === Thorn is now known as Glaedr | ||
| === Glaedr is now known as Roran | ||
| === Roran is now known as evilshadeslayer | ||
| ari-tczew | if package doesn't have a patchsystem and I'm preparing a merge, can I patch files directly? | 19:04 |
| tumbleweed | yes | 19:04 |
| evilshadeslayer | the patch will appear in diff.gz.. | 19:06 |
| === virtuald_ is now known as virtuald | ||
| === evilshadeslayer is now known as Roran | ||
| === rmcbride_ is now known as rmcbride | ||
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: I thought that if you'll join MOTU, then you'll doing less, but I see that you're active. I'm glad. thanks! | 19:29 |
| Roran | hmm | 19:29 |
| Roran | anyone up for a merge? | 19:29 |
| Roran | https://edge.launchpad.net/~rohangarg/+archive/experimental/+packages << merge from there.. after it builds | 19:29 |
| === Roran is now known as evilshadeslayer | ||
| tumbleweed | ari-tczew: yeah I thought I'd do less too. Dunno what happened :P | 19:31 |
| * evilshadeslayer looks at tumbleweed | 19:32 | |
| ari-tczew | tumbleweed: what do you think about upgrade libsmbios? | 19:33 |
| tumbleweed | ari-tczew: yes, it's borken and needs to be fixed. I saw the merge bug, looks like it needs work | 19:34 |
| tumbleweed | I have an SRU patch for when we have maverick sorted out | 19:34 |
| evilshadeslayer | ok rbot built and needs love | 19:35 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: you don't like the review queue? :) | 19:38 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: i can upload to revu for merges too? :) | 19:38 |
| evilshadeslayer | sweet :D | 19:38 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: | 19:38 |
| tumbleweed | no, I meant ubuntu-sponsors | 19:38 |
| evilshadeslayer | oh | 19:38 |
| ari-tczew | evilshadeslayer: revu is for new packages | 19:38 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: yeah | 19:38 |
| ari-tczew | tag: needs-packaging | 19:39 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: thats why i was surprised :P | 19:39 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: uh.. well.. sure.. ill file a bug | 19:39 |
| ari-tczew | evilshadeslayer: can't you use a 1 nickname? | 19:39 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: ah.. i was registering a nick for the bot :P | 19:40 |
| kees | ScottK: around? I'd like to try to figure out why we're seeing different results with drkonqi. :P | 19:40 |
| evilshadeslayer | but all of them were taken :P | 19:40 |
| BlackZ | evilshadeslayer: if you have not the upload rights you have *always* to file a merge bug | 19:40 |
| evilshadeslayer | BlackZ: yes.. im filing it | 19:40 |
| kees | ScottK: ah, nm, I installed rekonq and see what you're seeing now. seems like it's different from kate somehow. | 19:41 |
| tumbleweed | hi BlackZ: haven't seen much from you on the review queue recently | 19:42 |
| BlackZ | tumbleweed: I'm busy with exams, however I'm working on some merges now | 19:42 |
| evilshadeslayer | BlackZ: can i point to the PPA instead of attaching a debdiff? | 19:43 |
| tumbleweed | BlackZ: good :) | 19:43 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: no, please post the diffs, it makes life easier for the reviewer | 19:44 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: ok.. | 19:44 |
| ari-tczew | or use bazaar | 19:44 |
| tumbleweed | yeah, that too (although I still find the diff workflow faster) | 19:44 |
| BlackZ | evilshadeslayer: it would be better to attach a debdiff in the bug as a patch: 1. this will indicate the sponsors there's a patch; 2. the work of the sponsors will be facilitated | 19:45 |
| evilshadeslayer | ok | 19:45 |
| BlackZ | evilshadeslayer: also, according to our policy for the merges, you have to attach two debdiffs to the bug report (if you just attach the debdiff of versiondebian -> versiomerged that's not a big deal) | 19:47 |
| tumbleweed | yes, the ubuntu -> ubuntu diff can be massive. If it's more than a few screenfulls, nobody will read it anyway | 19:48 |
| evilshadeslayer | BlackZ: im attaching diff of our current ubuntu packaging and new ubuntu packaging,since this is a new upstream release | 19:48 |
| ari-tczew | I miss for archive admins :( | 19:50 |
| BlackZ | evilshadeslayer: if you're doing a version-upgrade the debdiff aren't suitable | 19:50 |
| evilshadeslayer | i know ;) | 19:50 |
| BlackZ | since they can be too big (of size) | 19:50 |
| ari-tczew | MoM would looks cleaner after ACKed syncs | 19:50 |
| evilshadeslayer | yeah i pasted a 5 MB debdiff once | 19:50 |
| BlackZ | you could use your PPA (if you have one) for that | 19:51 |
| tumbleweed | or a branch | 19:51 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: is this something debian doesn't have? or something debian is lagging behind in? | 19:51 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: whut? | 19:52 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: why are we getting a new version, not syncing from debian? | 19:52 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: were merging from debian since a sync would not work,we need extra deps to make the package not FTBFS | 19:52 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: in that case, you post a diff between the current debian version and your fixes | 19:53 |
| tumbleweed | that diff should be small | 19:53 |
| BlackZ | evilshadeslayer: so it's not a version upgrade | 19:53 |
| BlackZ | evilshadeslayer: if that fixes a bug, it's a bug fix ;) | 19:53 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: ok.. that would mean just the changelog,control and rules files | 19:54 |
| evilshadeslayer | BlackZ: well | 19:54 |
| evilshadeslayer | BlackZ: idk if it fixes any bugs :P | 19:54 |
| evilshadeslayer | but it will make rbot work :P | 19:54 |
| tumbleweed | let my pot on my bot developer hat and say "use ibid" :) | 19:55 |
| evilshadeslayer | ibid ?? :P | 19:55 |
| tumbleweed | launchpad.net/ibid (it's in the repos) | 19:55 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: i like my ruby bot :P | 19:56 |
| BlackZ | evilshadeslayer: if it's a bug, report a bug and attach your debdiff | 19:56 |
| BlackZ | then subscribe ubuntu-sponsors and wait | 19:57 |
| evilshadeslayer | kewl | 19:57 |
| * evilshadeslayer has to upload kdegames after this | 19:57 | |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| evilshadeslayer | BlackZ: tumbleweed so i just post the changes i did to debian packaging right? | 20:00 |
| evilshadeslayer | in the bug report | 20:01 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: as a debdiff | 20:01 |
| evilshadeslayer | ok | 20:01 |
| BlackZ | evilshadeslayer: if that's the first modify in ubuntu for the package, yes | 20:04 |
| BlackZ | otherwise you have to modify the *currently* ubuntu package for include your modify | 20:04 |
| evilshadeslayer | BlackZ: that will make the debdiff huge | 20:05 |
| BlackZ | evilshadeslayer: why? if that will happen, just do a clean to the debdiff | 20:05 |
| evilshadeslayer | BlackZ: because debian has a new version and packaging has changed alot | 20:06 |
| BlackZ | evilshadeslayer: I don't understand: are you doing a merge? | 20:06 |
| evilshadeslayer | yes | 20:07 |
| BlackZ | evilshadeslayer: ah, then yes: just do as you said (remember to flag it as a patch) | 20:07 |
| evilshadeslayer | ok | 20:07 |
| BlackZ | evilshadeslayer: obviously it must be a debdiff | 20:08 |
| evilshadeslayer | yeah ok :) | 20:09 |
| evilshadeslayer | BlackZ: http://pastebin.com/jLWK7aRN << i get that in the debdiff,but i didnt modify that | 20:18 |
| evilshadeslayer | i think its the doing of debuild -S -sa | 20:18 |
| evilshadeslayer | due to that it makes a file debian-changes-0.9.15+post20100705+gitb3aa806-1ubuntu1 in debian/patches http://pastebin.com/VwyDt1zU | 20:19 |
| BlackZ | evilshadeslayer: does the package use quilt 3.0 ? | 20:19 |
| evilshadeslayer | yes | 20:19 |
| BlackZ | evilshadeslayer: so is there a patch in debian/patches auto-generated during the build? | 20:20 |
| evilshadeslayer | yes | 20:20 |
| evilshadeslayer | http://pastebin.com/VwyDt1zU << thats the one | 20:21 |
| BlackZ | evilshadeslayer: you should check what's happened there; maybe the problem is a patch | 20:23 |
| tumbleweed | most likely it's an issue with clean not cleaning up enough | 20:23 |
| BlackZ | evilshadeslayer: ever if you didn't modified nothing outside the debian directory | 20:24 |
| BlackZ | tumbleweed: yeah | 20:24 |
| evilshadeslayer | hmm | 20:24 |
| evilshadeslayer | BlackZ: since i was not sure,i pulled clean debian sources again and modified the stuff again | 20:24 |
| evilshadeslayer | but it still created the patch | 20:25 |
| evilshadeslayer | uh wait | 20:29 |
| evilshadeslayer | doh... debian ships that patch | 20:29 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: it's still a bug | 20:30 |
| evilshadeslayer | so how do we fix it? | 20:30 |
| * tumbleweed has a look | 20:30 | |
| evilshadeslayer | maybe debian did want to modify that file? | 20:30 |
| ari-tczew | can I run 2 builds both on pbuilder? | 20:32 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: afaik no | 20:32 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: if you have two different base tarballs then yes | 20:33 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: they used to have a line in their clean rule to remove that file, but it's gone | 20:33 |
| ari-tczew | I want to build two differents packages, so differents tarballs and .dsc | 20:33 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: mv debian/rbot/usr/share/rbot/plugins/$${PL}.rb debian/rbot/usr/share/rbot/plugins/$${PL}.rb.disabled; \ | 20:33 |
| evilshadeslayer | ari-tczew: base tarball of pbuilder :P | 20:34 |
| evilshadeslayer | uh wait | 20:34 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: no, rm -f lib/rbot/pkgconfig.rb | 20:34 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: where does it clean that file in debian/rules? | 20:34 |
| evilshadeslayer | uh.. no such stuff here | 20:35 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: "used to" | 20:35 |
| evilshadeslayer | ohh | 20:35 |
| evilshadeslayer | right | 20:35 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: so they delibrately removed it? | 20:35 |
| tumbleweed | looks like it was an accident | 20:35 |
| tumbleweed | they forgot to B-D on rake, too (and possibly other things) | 20:36 |
| evilshadeslayer | yeah | 20:42 |
| evilshadeslayer | so i add that to clean right | 20:43 |
| tumbleweed | yip | 20:43 |
| evilshadeslayer | uh waut | 20:43 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: see debian/clean | 20:43 |
| evilshadeslayer | whats that file? | 20:44 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: oh I missed that. man dh_clean | 20:44 |
| evilshadeslayer | :P | 20:44 |
| evilshadeslayer | right | 20:44 |
| tumbleweed | only problem is that dh_clean gets called before this file is created | 20:44 |
| evilshadeslayer | then were missing dh_clean | 20:44 |
| tumbleweed | no, cdbs calls dh_clean for you | 20:45 |
| evilshadeslayer | hmm | 20:45 |
| evilshadeslayer | oh ok | 20:45 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: so we still have to add that command manuall in clean: ? | 20:47 |
| evilshadeslayer | *manually | 20:47 |
| tumbleweed | yes, so we might as well delete debian/clean | 20:50 |
| evilshadeslayer | ok | 20:50 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: i can remove the patch as well then right? | 20:53 |
| evilshadeslayer | the debian series patch that is auto generated | 20:54 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: yes | 20:54 |
| evilshadeslayer | ok | 20:54 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: http://pastebin.com/kEpkj0fp | 20:55 |
| evilshadeslayer | im attaching that | 20:55 |
| tumbleweed | I thought you were going to delete that debian-xxx patch? | 20:55 |
| evilshadeslayer | i did | 20:55 |
| tumbleweed | did you? | 20:56 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: debdiff of debian package with new ubuntu package | 20:56 |
| evilshadeslayer | not old ubuntu package and new ubuntu package :) | 20:56 |
| tumbleweed | oh i see it was in the debian source too. nm | 20:56 |
| evilshadeslayer | :) | 20:57 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: to make your reviewer's life easier, you can remove the debian-changes-0.9.15+post20100705+gitb3aa806-1 section of the debdiff | 20:58 |
| tumbleweed | it'll get deleted when the reviewer bulids the ubuntu source package | 20:58 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: ah ok :) | 20:58 |
| tumbleweed | please forward that patch to debian | 20:58 |
| tumbleweed | (but don't send them our changelog or maintainer-changes | 20:58 |
| evilshadeslayer | hehe :P | 20:58 |
| evilshadeslayer | of course not | 20:59 |
| tumbleweed | err, what was I saying, it won' tget deleted | 20:59 |
| evilshadeslayer | first lemme upload with the correct stuff to ubuntu and will forward later | 20:59 |
| tumbleweed | (with source format 1, it would get deleted, but with 3, because it's a quilt patch it has to be manually deleted) | 21:00 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: ok,i cant remove the debian-changes stuff from debdiff,since ill be posting this debdiff as is and ask the reviewer to apply it to current debian packaging | 21:10 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: I can't understand that | 21:11 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: ill ask the reviewer to download the debian package and apply this debdiff on top of it | 21:11 |
| evilshadeslayer | so,i cant remove the debian-changes stuff | 21:11 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: that's the normal way merges are handled, yes | 21:11 |
| tumbleweed | no, don't remove that, I was wrong (as I said) | 21:12 |
| evilshadeslayer | ok :P | 21:12 |
| evilshadeslayer | bug 604102 | 21:13 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 604102 in rbot (Ubuntu) "Please merge rbot from debian unstable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/604102 | 21:14 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: ^^ | 21:14 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: did you forward th epatch to debian? | 21:14 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: im going to | 21:14 |
| evilshadeslayer | but just in a few secs | 21:14 |
| tumbleweed | please link to the bug when you do | 21:14 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: ok,should i mail it to them or upload it somewhere? | 21:14 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Debian | 21:15 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: btw merge bugs are normally titled with this format: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging#File a merge bug | 21:16 |
| evilshadeslayer | oh | 21:17 |
| tumbleweed | and you need to subscribe ubuntu-sponsors if you want it to show up in the sponsorship queue | 21:17 |
| evilshadeslayer | done | 21:21 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-universe-sponsors ?? | 21:21 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: no, just ubuntu-sponsors | 21:21 |
| evilshadeslayer | ah ok | 21:22 |
| tumbleweed | universe and main sponsors were merged into one | 21:22 |
| evilshadeslayer | done | 21:22 |
| tumbleweed | great. Now we'll give debian a few days to pick up your fix, otherwise we go with your merge | 21:23 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: :P | 21:23 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: btw i cant find a build log on that page | 21:30 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: which page? | 21:30 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rbot.html | 21:31 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: that's because it's an arch all package. It was built on the maintainer's PC | 21:31 |
| evilshadeslayer | -.- | 21:31 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: he just uploaded the .deb? | 21:32 |
| tumbleweed | debian does binary uploads for one arch, and the buildd farm builds the rest (if necessary) | 21:32 |
| tumbleweed | yes | 21:32 |
| evilshadeslayer | .... | 21:32 |
| tumbleweed | yes, he really should have tested in pbuilder :) | 21:32 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: i could not imagine debian could be this lazy/callous :P | 21:33 |
| evilshadeslayer | oh also, should i add my self to debian changelog as well? | 21:33 |
| evilshadeslayer | documenting the changes | 21:33 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: no, don't touch the changelog | 21:34 |
| evilshadeslayer | uh alright | 21:34 |
| joaopinto | uh, Debian accepts direct .deb uploads ? | 21:39 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: uh.. i used reportbug .. but .. it sent the mail and all... but i didnt get a chance to attach a patch :P | 21:49 |
| evilshadeslayer | i didnt even get a bug number | 21:50 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: you'll be e-mailed th ebug number | 21:50 |
| tumbleweed | then you can attach the patch | 21:50 |
| evilshadeslayer | oh ok | 21:50 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: btw submittodebian makes it all easier | 21:50 |
| evilshadeslayer | hmm | 21:50 |
| evilshadeslayer | well the page said to use reportbug :P | 21:50 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: submittodebian is a wrapper around reportbug | 21:51 |
| evilshadeslayer | hmm didnt see that | 21:51 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588657 | 21:59 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 588657 in rbot "The current rbot packaging has missing build deps and needs a patch to correct it" [Important,Open] | 21:59 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: i just send a mail to the specified bug address with the patch? | 21:59 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: yes, but while you are there, let's do a few more things | 22:01 |
| evilshadeslayer | uh ok | 22:01 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: what needs to be done? | 22:02 |
| tumbleweed | ok, so, you filed the bug as important, but you can actually raise it to serious | 22:02 |
| evilshadeslayer | ok,how? | 22:03 |
| tumbleweed | you should also add the tag "patch" | 22:03 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: i have no idea how to do this :P | 22:03 |
| tumbleweed | http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control | 22:04 |
| tumbleweed | cc your email to control@bugs.debian.org, and start it with this http://paste.ubuntu.com/461747/ | 22:05 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: just that part of pastebin in the body? | 22:07 |
| tumbleweed | evilshadeslayer: yes, the bug control server follows instructions in the mail body. It'll stop when it gets to thanks. | 22:09 |
| evilshadeslayer | ok | 22:09 |
| tumbleweed | oh, if you want to mark the bug as coming from debian, you can add this in too: | 22:09 |
| tumbleweed | user ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com | 22:09 |
| tumbleweed | usertag 588657 + origin-ubuntu maverick | 22:09 |
| evilshadeslayer | anything in subject? apart from " Patch for rbot " | 22:09 |
| tumbleweed | ...coming from ubuntu, I mean | 22:09 |
| tumbleweed | fine | 22:09 |
| evilshadeslayer | :) | 22:09 |
| evilshadeslayer | sent :D | 22:10 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: hmm.. somethings wrong.. where do i add the upstream url again? | 22:14 |
| evilshadeslayer | to LP bugs | 22:14 |
| tumbleweed | "also affects distribution" | 22:14 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: and i put the bug link right? | 22:15 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| tumbleweed | yes | 22:15 |
| evilshadeslayer | doesnt work :( | 22:15 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: you try | 22:16 |
| tumbleweed | you chose Debian as the distribution? | 22:16 |
| evilshadeslayer | wait | 22:18 |
| evilshadeslayer | tumbleweed: done :D | 22:18 |
| evilshadeslayer | now i wait :P | 22:18 |
| === Zhenech_ is now known as Zhenech | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!