dipankar | dfarning, hello. | 03:09 |
---|---|---|
dipankar | lfaraone, hello | 03:10 |
dfarning | dipankar, good morning | 03:10 |
lfaraone | dipankar: hi. | 03:10 |
dipankar | dfarning, good evening :) | 03:10 |
dipankar | lfaraone, did you get a chance to review the flipsticks? | 03:11 |
lfaraone | dipankar: not yet, apologies, I'm behind today | 03:11 |
dipankar | lfaraone, no worries. I tried them myself. | 03:12 |
lfaraone | dipankar: are all of the acitivties you packaged up to date? | 03:12 |
lfaraone | dipankar: iirc there is a newer Log out. | 03:13 |
dipankar | lfaraone, in flipsticks, the some files seem to have got modified somehow | 03:13 |
dipankar | lfaraone, just a sec I am pasting the debian/changelog | 03:14 |
dipankar | lfaraone, http://paste.ubuntu.com/461383/ | 03:16 |
dipankar | lfaraone, see at lines 36, 42, 48; | 03:16 |
dipankar | dfarning, it would be great if you could help too. You might have faced this similar problem :) | 03:22 |
lfaraone | dipankar: i think I edited the changelog in one of my commits. | 03:23 |
lfaraone | dipankar: and you did too before you pulled. | 03:23 |
dipankar | lfaraone, I went through the 'fast-forwarding' section in man page of git push | 03:23 |
dipankar | lfaraone, I guess yes | 03:23 |
dfarning | dipankar, a simple merge conflict. just delete the unwanted line manually and recommit. | 03:24 |
lfaraone | dipankar: is log ready for review or should I wait? | 03:24 |
dipankar | lfaraone, I got confused with the log. Since the activity name was 'logviewer' initially, | 03:24 |
lfaraone | dipankar: well, it's not a problem. just create a new changelog entry with "sugar-log-activity" and change all other mentions of logviewer to log. (but not in older entries of debian/changelog) | 03:25 |
lfaraone | dfarning: can you do "/mode -t #ubuntu-sugarteam" so I can change the topic? | 03:26 |
lfaraone | dfarning: you may need to "/msg ChanServ op dfarning" first. | 03:27 |
dipankar | lfaraone, so here is what I should do then: | 03:28 |
lfaraone | (NB: current review queue s-flip-a, s-poll-a, s-connect-a) | 03:28 |
dipankar | - use git-import-orig -u '23' PATH/TO/ORIG TARBALL | 03:28 |
dfarning | lfaraone, - You are not authorized to perform this operation. | 03:28 |
dipankar | - Make a new debian/changelog | 03:29 |
lfaraone | dipankar: /msg ChanServ op dfarning #sugarteam | 03:29 |
dipankar | ^^ not for me | 03:29 |
dipankar | I guess | 03:29 |
lfaraone | * dfarning | 03:29 |
dfarning | Channel dfarning is not registered. | 03:29 |
lfaraone | dfarning: swap the #sugarteam and dfarning then :) | 03:30 |
lfaraone | dfarning: my IRC-fu is weak. | 03:30 |
dfarning | dipankar, see http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html#resolving-a-merge | 03:30 |
lfaraone | dfarning: yep. although this may be a good time to write the debian/watch file so you can automate the package download phase. | 03:30 |
dipankar | ^^ That was for me I guess | 03:31 |
lfaraone | dipankar: hehe, yes. | 03:31 |
lfaraone | dipankar: this is a test of your agility. :P | 03:31 |
lfaraone | dipankar: but seriously, here's an example of a watch file: http://git.debian.org/?p=users/ffm-guest/sugar-terminal-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/watch; | 03:31 |
dfarning | lfaraone, I think I might have to log on from my desktop. | 03:32 |
lfaraone | dipankar: rather, http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-terminal-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/watch | 03:32 |
dipankar | lfaraone, so, if I add the new repository to watch file, then the updating would take automatically?? | 03:33 |
dipankar | * new repo -> sugarlabs one. | 03:33 |
lfaraone | dipankar: I mean the download location, at http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Log/ | 03:34 |
dipankar | lfaraone, * I meant download location. Just accidentally used 'repo' | 03:35 |
lfaraone | dipankar: if you replace the URL in the watch file example I gave you with "http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/Log/Log-(.*)\.tar\.bz2" then you can run "uscan --force-download --rename" and it'll automatically fetch the latest version and put it in .. | 03:35 |
dipankar | lfaraone, now I am again confused :( | 03:36 |
dipankar | lfaraone, which process should I use : watch file or creating a new local repository? | 03:36 |
lfaraone | dipankar: if there are upstream release tarballs that are current (more recent or at the same level as) compared to what's in git, we prefer tarballs over git-built tarballs using get-orig-source. | 03:37 |
lfaraone | *prefer upstream release tarballs | 03:38 |
dipankar | lfaraone, ok. | 03:39 |
dipankar | lfaraone, that means we take up the 'watch' files menthod | 03:39 |
dipankar | lfaraone, you are here till 0000 hrs I guess. | 03:41 |
lfaraone | dipankar: probably. | 03:41 |
dipankar | lfaraone, I will be back in 15. | 03:42 |
* dipankar is away: I'm not here | 03:42 | |
* dipankar is back (gone 00:05:29) | 03:47 | |
dipankar | lfaraone, I seem to have screwed up my local repo for log. | 03:48 |
dipankar | lfaraone, will it be good to clone the repo from git alioth to a new directory? | 03:48 |
lfaraone | dipankar: sure. | 03:48 |
dipankar | lfaraone, btw I couldn't understand the git pull --rebase. Could you explain it a bit? will be of great help. | 03:49 |
lfaraone | dipankar: sorry, I've never had to use it. | 03:50 |
dipankar | lfaraone, actually I found it in the merge conflicts help. Never mind :P | 03:51 |
dipankar | lfaraone, in the watch file : shall I change the 'version=3' to 'version=23'? | 04:03 |
lfaraone | dipankar: nonono. | 04:03 |
lfaraone | dipankar: "version=" tells uscan which version of the uscan policy the watch file complies to. | 04:03 |
dipankar | lfaraone, ohk. I thought other way. :P so, each time it would take the latest upstream tar ball? | 04:04 |
dipankar | lfaraone, do I need to change the debian/changelog too before running the uscan command : ' Parameters are then read from those | 04:07 |
dipankar | control files and upstream ftp or http sites are inspected for newly available updates (as compared with | 04:07 |
dipankar | the upstream version number retrieved from the debian/changelog file in the same directory).' | 04:07 |
dipankar | ?? | 04:07 |
lfaraone | dipankar: no, you don't. | 04:16 |
lfaraone | dipankar: but uscan is used by automated tools such as DEHS <http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/> to determine whether Debian packages are up to date. | 04:17 |
lfaraone | dfarning: Poll reviewed. | 04:17 |
dfarning | lfaraone, great | 04:17 |
dipankar | lfaraone, ran uscan. what should be the next step? | 04:18 |
lfaraone | dipankar: in http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-flipsticks-activity.git;a=commitdiff;h=345139af686507595e3a4e2863f643d7498933a3 , you changed debian/control directly, rather than debian/control.in. That means your changes will get lost when somebody regenerates debian/control from debian/control.in. | 04:18 |
dipankar | lfaraone, ohk. | 04:19 |
dipankar | lfaraone, so thats where the problem lies. | 04:20 |
lfaraone | dipankar: also, your commit message was "Rectified debian/control", but you modified a number of other files. In the future, please try to ensure that each change is in a separate commit. | 04:20 |
lfaraone | dipankar: same with "changed : debian/copyright, debian/docs, debian/rules". Not only does that contain more than one logical change per commit, the description tells me nothing about what you actually did. | 04:21 |
lfaraone | dipankar: commit messages are supposed to inform people as to what you did, not to what you did it. | 04:21 |
dipankar | lfaraone, ohk. Will keep that in mind. Sorry for this mistake :( | 04:22 |
lfaraone | dipankar: not a problem, just telling you so you'll know in the future. | 04:22 |
lfaraone | dipankar: also, I noticed on line 74 of http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-flipsticks-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/rules#l74 you said "rm -f debian/sugar-flipsticks-activity/usr/share/activities/FlipSticks.activity" | 04:22 |
lfaraone | dipankar: this removed the entire FlipSticks.activity directory from the resulting package, and is almost certainly not what you want. Perhaps you meant "rm -f debian/sugar-flipsticks-activity/usr/share/activities/FlipSticks.activity/COPYING"? | 04:23 |
lfaraone | dipankar: let me know if you'd rather I bundle this up in an email, I thought it just might be easier to tell you via IRC since there were only a few things. | 04:23 |
dipankar | lfaraone, I left out so many things! | 04:25 |
lfaraone | dipankar: huh? | 04:25 |
lfaraone | dipankar: what was your question about log? | 04:32 |
dipankar | lfaraone, logviewer-activity: I ran uscan and have the upstream tar ball | 04:33 |
dipankar | lfaraone, how should I proceed now? | 04:33 |
lfaraone | dipankar: import it, push up, and I'll review it if you think it's ready for review. | 04:34 |
dipankar | lfaraone, what about the debian/changelog? You mentioned something about that | 04:34 |
lfaraone | dipankar: yeah, you want to increment the debian revision with a new changelog entry. "dch -v NEW_VERSION-1" and say "initial upload to debian. Closes: BUGNUMBER" or something similar. | 04:36 |
dipankar | lfaraone, and the import command will be : git-import-orig? | 04:36 |
lfaraone | dipankar: oh, before you import, rename the package to "sugar-log-activity" in debian/control. create the new changelog entry as I said, and change the package name in the first changelog entry too. | 04:37 |
lfaraone | dipankar: and rename the tarball you downloaded from sugar-logviewer-activity_VERSION.orig.tar.gz to sugar-log-activity_VERSION.orig.tar.gz. | 04:37 |
dipankar | lfaraone, is it control.in or control? (I have to be careful with this from now on) | 04:38 |
lfaraone | dipankar: sorry, control.in. | 04:38 |
dipankar | lfaraone, :P. Now I remember. In hurry I followed the irc logs and saw 'change debian/control' that caused the problem :P | 04:39 |
dipankar | lfaraone, Anything else before I continue? | 04:39 |
dipankar | * I have to leave in 20 minutes to somewhere. | 04:39 |
lfaraone | dipankar: I don't think so. Just do that *before* you import the New Upstream Version. | 04:39 |
dipankar | lfaraone, I will email you when I am ready for review. You will find it in the morning (EST) only :) | 04:40 |
lfaraone | mk. | 04:41 |
dipankar | lfaraone, good night. I must leave. | 04:42 |
dipankar | dfarning, goodnight. | 04:42 |
* dipankar says goodbye to all. | 04:42 | |
dfarning | dipankar, good night | 04:42 |
lfaraone | bye dipankar | 04:42 |
dfarning | lfaraone, I am going to head to bed so I can get up early. | 04:45 |
lfaraone | dfarning: good i dea. | 04:45 |
kandarpk | lfaraone: Hi | 05:37 |
kandarpk | lfaraone: thanks for the review, will make necessary amends and push the package soon | 05:38 |
lfaraone | kandarpk: cool. I'll look at the other activity in my tomrorow. | 05:39 |
kandarpk | lfaraone: sure, and thanks again | 05:39 |
kandarpk | lfaraone: I'll try to correct that package first then | 05:40 |
manusheel | kandarpk: Hi Kandarp. | 08:27 |
kandarpk | manusheel sir: Hello sir | 08:28 |
manusheel | kandarpk: Could you please summarize the updates for the last 24 hours. | 08:28 |
kandarpk | manusheel sir: I've pushed poll-activity and connect-activity | 08:29 |
kandarpk | lfaraone has reviewed the poll-activity, so right now making the necessary amends | 08:29 |
manusheel | kandarpk: Ok, great. | 08:29 |
kandarpk | he'll review the connect-activity when he gets back | 08:30 |
manusheel | kandarpk: Great, Kandarp. | 08:31 |
kandarpk | lfaraone: around ? | 09:11 |
kandarpk | dipankar: around ? | 10:12 |
dipankar | kandarpk, yes, hi | 10:12 |
dipankar | kandarpk, I was just working on the review that Luke sent. | 10:13 |
kandarpk | dipankar: how can I import changes that Luke has made ? | 10:13 |
dipankar | kandarpk, just go to your local repo and use : git pull <git+ssh://..> | 10:17 |
kandarpk | ok | 10:17 |
kandarpk | dipankar, will it update all the files ? | 10:18 |
dipankar | kandarpk, it will pull in changes and merge your current files with the updated onces. | 10:19 |
kandarpk | dipankar: ok, thanks | 10:20 |
dipankar | kandarpk, ni problem. | 10:20 |
dipankar | *no | 10:20 |
kandarpk | dipankar: and how can I undo changes ? | 10:21 |
kandarpk | *I've made some changes before updating | 10:22 |
dipankar | kandarpk, I don't remember that correctly, It was like ' rm git add' something like that.<Unless you have committed the changes | 10:23 |
kandarpk | dipankar: ok. I'll leave now. will be back in 45 min. | 10:24 |
kandarpk | dipankar: around ? | 12:25 |
dipankar | kandarpk, yup | 12:25 |
dipankar | kandarpk, I am stuck with a bad situation :( | 12:26 |
kandarpk | what does "all lines in the package description should be wrapped at 72 characters." mean ? | 12:26 |
dipankar | *s/with/in | 12:26 |
kandarpk | dipankar: oh, whats that ? | 12:26 |
dipankar | kandarpk, that means when you are writing description in control.in file, each line should contain 72 characters. But there can be any number of lines. | 12:27 |
kandarpk | dipankar: exactly 72 or can it be lesser than this ? | 12:27 |
dipankar | kandarpk, can be less than that :) | 12:28 |
kandarpk | ohk :) | 12:28 |
kandarpk | what are you stuck with ? | 12:28 |
dipankar | kandarpk, can you please tell me the command of git-import-orig? I was getting an error related branch settings. :( | 12:28 |
kandarpk | git-import-orig --pristine-tar -u ''87'' sugar-read-activity_87.orig.tar.gz | 12:29 |
kandarpk | dipankar: what error are you getting ? | 12:29 |
dipankar | oops, I was missing the pristine-tar tag :P | 12:32 |
dipankar | kandarpk, here is the error: | 12:33 |
dipankar | Repository does not have branch 'upstream' for upstream sources. If there is none see | 12:33 |
dipankar | file:///usr/share/doc/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.import.html#GBP.IMPORT.CONVERT | 12:33 |
dipankar | on howto create it otherwise use --upstream-branch to specify it. | 12:33 |
kandarpk | dipankar: you need to run "git rm sugar-abc-activity_28.orig.tar.gz" | 12:34 |
kandarpk | after git-import-orig | 12:34 |
dipankar | kandarpk, that error is when I run the git-import-orig command | 12:35 |
kandarpk | oh, yes | 12:35 |
kandarpk | I too got this error sometimes | 12:35 |
kandarpk | did you try importing aain ? | 12:36 |
dipankar | kandarpk, :). I have tried making new local git repos | 12:36 |
dipankar | nothing is working :( | 12:36 |
kandarpk | dipankar: were there any errors while running fakeroot debian/rules get-orig-source | 12:37 |
dipankar | nope | 12:38 |
dipankar | kandarpk, this is very confusing :( | 12:42 |
dipankar | kandarpk, here is some info related to the command http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.import.html | 12:42 |
dipankar | lfaraone, you around? | 12:56 |
dfarning | good morning all | 13:14 |
dipankar | dfarning, Good Morning. You seem to be in very good mood :) | 13:15 |
dfarning | dipankar, Yep. I just woke up, poured a cup of coffee, and turned on IRC. The first thing I saw was that 18 Users are logged in #ubuntu-sugarteam | 13:18 |
dipankar | dfarning, :) | 13:19 |
* dipankar will be back in 10 | 13:19 | |
* dipankar is away: I'm not here | 13:19 | |
* dipankar is back (gone 00:00:02) | 13:19 | |
* dipankar is away: I'm not here | 13:20 | |
* dipankar is back (gone 00:13:31) | 13:33 | |
dipankar | dfarning, any idea when lfaraone will be around? | 13:35 |
dfarning | in 1.5 hours | 13:36 |
dipankar | dfarning, I need your help on the problem of git-import-orig | 13:37 |
dipankar | dfarning, here is the error: | 13:37 |
dipankar | dipankar@dipankar-laptop:~/work20/sugar-log-activity$ git-import-orig --pristine-tar -u ''23'' ~/work20/sugar-log-activity_23.orig.tar.bz2 | 13:37 |
dipankar | Repository does not have branch 'upstream' for upstream sources. If there is none see | 13:37 |
dipankar | file:///usr/share/doc/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.import.html#GBP.IMPORT.CONVERT | 13:37 |
dipankar | on howto create it otherwise use --upstream-branch to specify it. | 13:37 |
dfarning | dipankar, I be back in a few minutes | 13:37 |
dipankar | dfarning, sure | 13:39 |
kandarpk | dfarning: good morning | 13:43 |
dfarning | kandarpk, good morning - I am on the phone -- will be back shortly:) | 13:44 |
kandarpk | *will be back in 60 min. | 13:44 |
* dipankar is away: I'm not here | 13:48 | |
* dipankar is back (gone 00:58:56) | 14:46 | |
kandarpk | all: memorize-activity - up and running :) | 15:57 |
kandarpk | neeraj: I've build memorize-activity :) | 15:57 |
neeraj | sir did u faced that error? | 15:58 |
neeraj | I was unable to find the cause for it? | 15:58 |
neeraj | kandarpk, or I was making some stupid mistake :( | 15:58 |
* lfaraone pops his head up. Anything going on? | 15:58 | |
kandarpk | neeraj: lfaraone work-around helped | 15:59 |
lfaraone | neeraj: what was "the error"? | 15:59 |
kandarpk | I renamed the version to 34+git20091021.837e6c6b | 15:59 |
kandarpk | and followed all the other steps as usual | 16:00 |
neeraj | kandarpk, please explain version number | 16:00 |
kandarpk | lfaraone: I'll push it once it is a bit refined :) | 16:01 |
neeraj | lfaraone, lemme open previous log and find the paste bin link :) | 16:01 |
kandarpk | neeraj: it contains of two parts | 16:01 |
kandarpk | 20091021=2009/10/21 (yyyy/mm/dd) | 16:01 |
kandarpk | date on which last commit was applied | 16:02 |
kandarpk | 837e6c6b=commit ID | 16:02 |
kandarpk | neeraj: please see here: | 16:03 |
kandarpk | http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/memorize/repos/mainline | 16:03 |
kandarpk | for commit details | 16:03 |
neeraj | kandarpk, ok :) | 16:06 |
neeraj | lfaraone, this was the error which i faced even after running git rm <package name>.orig tarball file | 16:08 |
neeraj | http://paste.ubuntu.com/460367/ | 16:08 |
kandarpk | lfaraone: sugar-memorize-activity.git exists | 16:17 |
kandarpk | lfaraone: what should I do now ? | 16:18 |
satellit__ | note I just installed USR20100628 on a 8 GB USB then drag dropped firefox-6 from ASLO and it works fine.....(experimental) | 16:18 |
kandarpk | satellit__: thanks for reporting | 16:20 |
satellit__ | nice replacement for browse....full firefox... | 16:21 |
kandarpk | satellit__: I'll to give it a try :) | 16:22 |
satellit__ | http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Soas_V4/ASLOxo_Activity_Test_Table will test some more applicaions | 16:22 |
satellit__ | ASLO: have to search and use password for firefox | 16:22 |
satellit__ | http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/ASLOxo-3ss.iso has all of them on .iso put on USB and drag drop into sugar journal | 16:24 |
satellit__ | kandarpk: I use sugar-emulator -f as command for full screen of sugar... | 16:28 |
satellit__ | kandarpk using sugar-emulator -f for full screen sugar should be standard setup....(an idea) | 16:33 |
kandarpk | *I'll be back in 45 min | 16:42 |
ankur | neeraj, are you here | 16:42 |
ankur | ? | 16:42 |
neeraj | ankur, yes | 16:43 |
ankur | do you know something about tagging? | 16:43 |
ankur | well i am having a problem and i searched about it | 16:43 |
ankur | it seems that it can be solved by tagging | 16:43 |
neeraj | ankur, sorry, i don't have ny idea about it. ;( | 16:44 |
ankur | i think kandarp was also having same kind of prob some day back | 16:44 |
ankur | never mind :) | 16:44 |
=== satellitUSR-02e3 is now known as satellitUSR-628- | ||
manusheel | kandarpk: Hi Kandarp. Around? | 17:05 |
manusheel_ | lfaraone: Hi Luke. Around? | 17:10 |
dfarning | hello kandarpk | 17:46 |
manusheel_ | dfarning: Hi David. | 17:47 |
dfarning | Do you have a question regarding memorize? | 17:47 |
dfarning | manusheel_, hello | 17:47 |
manusheel_ | dfarning: Kandarp just send an e-mail to you and Luke. | 17:47 |
manusheel_ | kandarpk: around? | 17:48 |
kandarpk | dfarning: hi | 17:48 |
manusheel_ | kandarpk: Let us discuss the question soon. | 17:48 |
kandarpk | dfarning: I had build thememorize activity | 17:48 |
kandarpk | but memorize.git repo. is already present | 17:49 |
kandarpk | http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-memorize-activity.git;a=summary | 17:49 |
dfarning | kandarpk, I would suggest deleting the existing memorize activity and replacing it with your own. | 17:49 |
kandarpk | dfarning: can I do that ? | 17:49 |
kandarpk | it was made by some one else | 17:49 |
dfarning | kandarpk, I belive that you have full read write autohrizte on all collab-maint projects? | 17:50 |
kandarpk | dfarning: will it be ok to delete someone else's work ? | 17:51 |
kandarpk | *though the last commit was in 2008 | 17:51 |
dfarning | since the package is so old, it does not use the recent packaging methods as the rest of sugar. | 17:51 |
kandarpk | ok | 17:52 |
kandarpk | dfarning: should I go on and delete the repo | 17:53 |
kandarpk | ? | 17:53 |
kandarpk | *if I have rights to do that | 17:53 |
dfarning | Since the package is so old, it can be considered abandoned. I wouldn't suggest just deleting it.... but deleting it replacing it with a more recent version is good:) | 17:53 |
kandarpk | ok | 17:54 |
kandarpk | dfarning, manusheel_ sir : replaced | 17:56 |
dfarning | kandarpk, great. another one for the review queue. | 17:57 |
kandarpk | dfarning: its owner is still Patrick Winnertz ? | 17:57 |
kandarpk | dfarning: that will take some time | 17:58 |
kandarpk | *copyright file takes time | 17:58 |
dfarning | kandarpk, yes, that wen page probobly only refreshes every couple of minutes. | 17:59 |
kandarpk | dfarning: ok, I'll wait. | 17:59 |
dfarning | Yes, the copy right is critical though. | 18:00 |
manusheel_ | dfarning. Kandarp is also working on - Delete sugar-activities from the ppa and remove sugar-activities as a dependancy so sugar can be installed and tested without sugar-activites being installed. | 18:01 |
satellit__ | dfarning: I have USR20100628 on 8 GB USB drag dropped firefox-6 .xo from ASLO and it works fine.... | 18:01 |
manusheel_ | kandarpk: Any questions on this task? | 18:01 |
dfarning | kandarpk, we are providing/sell USR to schools, school districts, and ministries of education.... we want to be 100% confident of the ownership of what we ship. | 18:02 |
satellit__ | also OooKids | 18:02 |
kandarpk | how do we proceed with removing sugar-activity dependency | 18:02 |
dfarning | satellit__, that is great. | 18:02 |
satellit__ | nice workaround for browse with full tabed browsing | 18:03 |
kandarpk | dfarning: how can we know which modules are required by sugar | 18:04 |
kandarpk | *modules which are present in sugar-activities | 18:04 |
dfarning | kandarpk, I belive that you will need to remove sugar-activities as a dependency in debian/control in the ubuntu-sugar-remix in the ppa. | 18:04 |
kandarpk | dfarning: will sugar work without installing sugar-activities ? | 18:06 |
dfarning | satellit__, As activity central we are focusing on improving browse. Via Lucian's conversion to webkit and adding tabs. | 18:06 |
satellit__ | ok Ooo4kids is nice also though large .xo | 18:06 |
dfarning | kandarpk, we will have to install the activities by hand when working from the ppa. | 18:07 |
dfarning | satellit__, Yes, based on your reminder, I need to take a closer look at ooo4kids. | 18:07 |
kandarpk | dfarning: what purpose does removing sugar-activities from dependency list solve, if we need to install it anyway ? | 18:08 |
satellit__ | very nice can configure it for easy thru advanced menus | 18:08 |
satellit__ | http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Soas_V4/ASLOxo_Activity_Test_Table details drag-drop .xo files for sugar | 18:10 |
dfarning | kandarpk, Currently if we install the full collection of activites via sugar activites. We run into problems when install the .dep packages of the activities we are currently working on. | 18:10 |
dfarning | kandarpk, if two different packages try to install the same file dpkg gives an error. | 18:10 |
kandarpk | hmmm | 18:10 |
dfarning | kandarpk, what we will do is create a meta package called sugar-activities. Which installs the activities we have packaged as proper .deb packages. | 18:12 |
kandarpk | dfarning: getting some idea | 18:13 |
dfarning | kandarpk, we want to stop pulling in the activity bundle I made a couple of months ago and only automatically install the proper packages after they have passed lukes review and QA | 18:15 |
kandarpk | dfarning: ok, you mean we are breaking the activities bundle into smaller single activity | 18:16 |
dfarning | kandarpk, exactly. | 18:17 |
kandarpk | ok | 18:17 |
neeraj | dfarning, after breaking the activity bundle, will we still push it into ppa only or start pushing them on debian repository only | 18:22 |
dfarning | neeraj, we will start syncing packages from debian into the ppa. | 18:23 |
neeraj | dfarning, ok.. | 18:24 |
kandarpk | dfarning: who is the author of memorize-activity ? | 18:38 |
dfarning | kandarpk, sorry I will look. | 18:42 |
dfarning | great. | 18:42 |
dfarning | http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/memorize | 18:46 |
dfarning | kandarpk, looks like erikos | 18:46 |
kandarpk | dfarning: Ok. | 18:47 |
kandarpk | dfarning: the owner of memorize is still Patrick Winnertz | 18:49 |
kandarpk | should I delete again ? | 18:49 |
kandarpk | I think I didn't delete the directory | 18:49 |
dfarning | kandarpk, yes. | 18:50 |
kandarpk | ok | 18:50 |
dfarning | neeraj, how are you doing? | 18:53 |
kandarpk | dfarning: to remove sugar-activity from dependency, we just need to modify control file | 19:04 |
kandarpk | ? | 19:04 |
dfarning | kandarpk, yes | 19:04 |
kandarpk | dfarning: any package build required after that ? | 19:04 |
dfarning | kandarpk, since it is in the ppa all you will have to do is dput it and launchpad will take care of the rest. | 19:05 |
kandarpk | dfarning: ok. | 19:05 |
kandarpk | *logging into USR | 19:16 |
kandarpk | dfarning: which package should I use ? | 19:36 |
kandarpk | sugar-0.88 - 0.88.1-2ubuntu3+maverick | 19:36 |
kandarpk | or | 19:36 |
kandarpk | sugar-0.88 - 0.88.1-2ubuntu3 | 19:37 |
dfarning | kandarpk, the second one. maverick is ubuntu 10.10 | 19:38 |
kandarpk | ok | 19:38 |
kandarpk | dfarning: do I need to modify the rules file, as there is no direct listing of activities in control file ? | 20:01 |
dfarning | which package are you looking at? | 20:01 |
kandarpk | sugar-0.88_0.88.1-2ubuntu3 | 20:02 |
dfarning | kandarpk, the sugar-activites package is listed as a depandcy in the Ubuntu-sugar-remix package | 20:04 |
kandarpk | dfarning: ohk | 20:04 |
neeraj | dfarning, Hi, for dropping the sugar-activities, we have to only remove it from depends filed in debian/control file of usr mera package or we have to make ny change in rules file? | 20:30 |
dfarning | I think just the debian/control | 20:31 |
neeraj | Actually both me and kandarpk sir are little confused.. | 20:31 |
dfarning | neeraj, yes, | 20:32 |
neeraj | Ok, also can you please re-explain why we made changes in the rule file while dropping sucrose.. | 20:32 |
neeraj | I just got that we are changing it because while installing sugar,sucrose package was installing read and browse activity which were/are un-available | 20:33 |
neeraj | wish I had used the seeta channel while discussing this :) | 20:34 |
neeraj | had not* | 20:34 |
dfarning | neeraj, can I get back to you in a few minutes. I am on the phone. ping me if I forget:) | 20:38 |
neeraj | ok :) | 20:40 |
dfarning | neeraj, ok back. | 20:54 |
dfarning | neeraj, one reason this is confusing is that we are work in two repositories Debian and our ppa:( | 20:56 |
dfarning | neeraj, initially we had to remove read and write from sucrose because they are broken in Ubuntu. | 20:57 |
neeraj | ok | 20:58 |
dfarning | neeraj, but becuause I want to provide the seeta developers with some sample activites, I created the bundle, Now that we have a good understand in packaging, we can start individually add the .debs (which work) as dependanciesas | 20:58 |
dfarning | neeraj, s/want/wanted/ | 21:00 |
dfarning | neeraj, does that help? | 21:00 |
neeraj | dfarning, yes I guess i am getting it.. | 21:01 |
neeraj | So in debian read is working fine.. also browse to.. ain't they? | 21:02 |
dfarning | neeraj, I don't think so. As for browse we are in the process of rewriting it upstream to remove the dependency on xulrunner which was the problem. | 21:04 |
dfarning | neeraj, I have not dug into the problem with read yet. | 21:05 |
neeraj | dfarning, ok.. | 21:06 |
dfarning | neeraj, sometimes there are differences between ubuntu and debian due to the differences in the release cycle. | 21:06 |
dfarning | neeraj, ubuntu 9.10 was a long term release meaning Canonical promises to support it for three years. debian is currently in the development phase. | 21:07 |
dfarning | neeraj, because of questions/problems with the future of xulrunner. Ubuntu decided to drop it in favor of webkit. | 21:08 |
neeraj | dfarning, ok, thanks for telling this :) | 21:10 |
dfarning | neeraj, in this case debian is progressing in a normal evolutionary process.... where as ubuntu had to make a decision/guess about the state of xulrunner three years from now. | 21:10 |
dfarning | neeraj, glad it helped. | 21:11 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!