| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === mordred_ is now known as mtaylor | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === d1b is now known as d-b | ||
| === d-b is now known as d1b | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === sebi_` is now known as sebi` | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| thumper | dspstv: all the launchpad devs are in Prague this week for a sprint, and most are travelling right now | 08:32 |
|---|---|---|
| thumper | dspstv: there should be more people around tonight, or tomorrow | 08:33 |
| thumper | dspstv: sorry I can't be more help | 08:33 |
| forrestv | i'm moving a project to launchpad and i did "bzr push lp:~voights/txrecaptcha/trunk" | 08:54 |
| forrestv | but the project page still says "You haven't yet told Launchpad where your source code is for txreCAPTCHA trunk series." | 08:54 |
| forrestv | figured it out, but that interface isn't really intuitive | 08:57 |
| pajatopmr | I'm looking for some help with launchpad email. A launchpad user tried to send mail to <me>@launchpad.net, got a bounce and asked me to "enable" <me>@launchpad.net. How to do this has escaped me so far. Suggestions? | 09:03 |
| micahg | pajatopmr: normal users don't get those addresses | 09:04 |
| * micahg doesn't know if anyone has one | 09:04 | |
| pajatopmr | OK, I'll pass that along to the User, who is also a project administrator, fwiw. | 09:05 |
| wgrant | pajatopmr: Yeah, normal users certainly don't get those. I only know of a couple of working @launchpad.net addresses, and none of those are personal. | 09:11 |
| thumper | hi wgrant | 09:14 |
| thumper | currently all email to launchpad.net are handled by the email processing scripts | 09:14 |
| thumper | to do things like create new bugs, comment on reviews, bugs or answers | 09:14 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| thumper | I had in the past thought it would be interesting to have <userid>@launchpad.net work, but.. | 09:15 |
| thumper | alas no | 09:15 |
| thumper | probably not going to happen | 09:15 |
| thumper | it wouldn't be hard to write | 09:15 |
| thumper | but not likely something we are likely to do without a lot of thought | 09:16 |
| pajatopmr | thumper: No problem from my perspective. Actually I don't think an additional email address is necessarily a good idea. I do wonder why the admin assumed it was set up by default, though. | 09:16 |
| * thumper shrugs | 09:17 | |
| hyperair | do PPAs support debsrc 3.0 (git)? | 09:49 |
| wgrant | hyperair: No. | 09:57 |
| wgrant | Does dak? | 09:57 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| wgrant | It doesn't look like it. | 10:06 |
| sarhan | Hello | 10:27 |
| sarhan | someone can help me please? | 10:27 |
| sarhan | i have problem or bug with launchpad | 10:28 |
| wgrant | sarhan: Hi. What's the problem? | 10:28 |
| sarhan | i can't translate any thing | 10:28 |
| wgrant | What happens when you try? | 10:28 |
| sarhan | this : http://a.yfrog.com/img257/5919/capture2zp.png | 10:29 |
| sarhan | and the project is with open permisson | 10:30 |
| wgrant | sarhan: Can you go to https://translations.launchpad.net/people/+me/+licensing, and check that you've selected the "License all my translations in Launchpad under the BSD license" option? | 10:31 |
| sarhan | i select it now | 10:32 |
| sarhan | and it works | 10:32 |
| sarhan | thx | 10:32 |
| sarhan | :) | 10:32 |
| wgrant | OK. I'll file a bug that that's really unobvious. | 10:32 |
| sarhan | thank you very much | 10:33 |
| wgrant | No problem. | 10:33 |
| sarhan | bye | 10:33 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| Kruptein | hey I'm still having trouble with ppa's, I've made a .deb file for my project, how can I upload this to the ppa? | 15:28 |
| micahg | Kruptein: you can't, PPAs build from source | 15:29 |
| micahg | Kruptein: https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/Uploading | 15:29 |
| Kruptein | well that's not so funny :( | 15:32 |
| micahg | Kruptein: what's the problem, upload a source package instead of a .deb | 15:33 |
| Kruptein | micahg okay I first have to make one then.. | 15:33 |
| Kruptein | why does the doc mention .debs then? https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/BuildingASourcePackage (3thd paragraph) | 15:33 |
| micahg | Kruptein: because the same folder you use for generating the .deb, you can generate the source upload in most cases | 15:34 |
| dspstv | hi again, i was looking yesterday for help | 15:35 |
| dspstv | i wanted to understand how to troubleshoot my friend | 15:35 |
| dspstv | who got a deb from my PPA | 15:35 |
| dspstv | and gets and error related to the version of jack not being available | 15:36 |
| dspstv | deb is karmic and his system is also karmic | 15:36 |
| dspstv | i guess its all related to his system | 15:36 |
| dspstv | but, the question is: | 15:36 |
| dspstv | could it be related to launchad? | 15:37 |
| dspstv | sorry for being so unclear, im also trying to learn the whole process | 15:37 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| geser | dspstv: does your friend have the universe component enabled? The package "jack" is in universe. | 15:59 |
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| dspstv | geser he does have jack installed but an older version according to dpkg | 16:25 |
| dspstv | it fails telling a more recent version is requiered but tries not to get it | 16:26 |
| dspstv | he tried with gdebi also but failed | 16:26 |
| micahg | dspstv: what version is required? | 16:26 |
| dspstv | now hes not online, i think .18 and he has .16 or so | 16:27 |
| micahg | dspstv: there's the same version of jack in karmic, lucid, and maverick | 16:27 |
| dspstv | ok, i get back with his exact error | 16:28 |
| dspstv | thanks micahg, geser | 16:28 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| geser | has someone an explanation why ma PPA upload landed in the main archive? As far as I currently see I've only missed to specify my PPA when doing an upload through SFTP | 18:43 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| dspstv | micahg: the package built by launchpad says this: libjack0 (>= 0.118+svn3796) | 19:01 |
| dspstv | the version in the karmic my friend has is 0.116 | 19:01 |
| dspstv | the error is this one: | 19:02 |
| dspstv | 20:00 < jag> The following packages have unmet dependencies. | 19:02 |
| dspstv | 20:00 < jag> din: Depends: libjack0 (>= 0.118+svn3796) but 0.116.1-4ubuntu2 is to be installed | 19:02 |
| dspstv | 20:00 < jag> Depends: liblo7 (>= 0.26~repack) but it is not installable | 19:02 |
| dspstv | so my question is, how can i understand how to do this package? | 19:04 |
| dspstv | i could compile under lucid and use the software | 19:04 |
| dspstv | then decided to build the .deb via launchpad | 19:04 |
| dspstv | any ideas where to look? | 19:05 |
| dspstv | google brings me to many results... | 19:05 |
| geser | have you a link to the PPA? | 19:06 |
| geser | my guess is that the package got uploaded to the lucid PPA and then copied to karmic | 19:06 |
| Kruptein | hey I added a package to my ppa, but nothing appears when I go look to my ppa page.. ? what is wrong | 19:09 |
| geser | Kruptein: did you got a mail that your upload got accepted (or rejected)? | 19:09 |
| Kruptein | darragh@kruptools:~/development/ppa$ dput ppa:darragh-ssa/kruptools deditor_0.1-1_source.changes | 19:09 |
| Kruptein | Package has already been uploaded to ppa on ppa.launchpad.net | 19:09 |
| Kruptein | Nothing more to do for deditor_0.1-1_source.changes | 19:09 |
| Kruptein | geser no I didn't get a mail | 19:09 |
| geser | Kruptein: did you sign the upload with the key 0xC88E1FA1? | 19:10 |
| geser | you can check the signature with "gpg --verify deditor_0.1-1_source.changes" | 19:11 |
| Kruptein | geser well I'm not sure :s isn't dput ppa: darragh-ssa/kruptools deditor_0.1-1_source.changes enough? | 19:11 |
| dspstv | geser yes, i did a copy | 19:12 |
| Kruptein | geser the last command does give me: Good Signature from Darragh ... | 19:12 |
| geser | Kruptein: it is if you signed the source package with the right key at source package creation time (or with debsign before the upload) | 19:12 |
| Kruptein | geser I indeed did the last one | 19:12 |
| geser | dspstv: that explains it, with "copy" the debs are also published for karmic but not rebuild for karmic. For a rebuild you need an upload targeting karmic. | 19:13 |
| dspstv | https://launchpad.net/~puredyne-team/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/1229147/+listing-archive-extra | 19:13 |
| dspstv | geser: arggg i knew it (somehow) | 19:13 |
| micahg | dspstv: only lucid has that version | 19:13 |
| dspstv | and i came here asking what was the difference between those 2 options | 19:13 |
| Kruptein | geser, so... what did I do wrong? | 19:14 |
| dspstv | i thnik those options should be explained | 19:14 |
| dspstv | in the formulaire | 19:14 |
| dspstv | ok, will try to make a copy from the sources | 19:14 |
| geser | Kruptein: and the keyid from the output is the same as the keyid in your LP profile? uploads get only accepted when they are signed by a key attached to an LP account | 19:15 |
| Kruptein | geser, yep it's exact the same | 19:16 |
| Kruptein | can it be that it takes some time to appear? | 19:16 |
| geser | the uploads get processed every 5 minutes | 19:16 |
| Kruptein | well I don't see the problem then :( | 19:16 |
| geser | I'm out of ideas now too | 19:17 |
| Kruptein | it maybe has todo with this: | 19:17 |
| Kruptein | sudo add-apt-repository ppa:darragh-ssa/kruptools produces: Error: can't find signing_key_fingerprint at https://launchpad.net/api/1.0/~darragh-ssa/+archive/kruptools | 19:18 |
| Kruptein | is that because I added the fingerprint after I added the ppa? | 19:18 |
| micahg | Kruptein: it's because it's empty | 19:19 |
| dspstv | geser: micahg: now i have this problem, even though i had deleted the package i get this: | 19:19 |
| dspstv | din 1.1.1-0ubuntu-6~planktum in lucid (same version already has published binaries in the destination archive) | 19:19 |
| micahg | dspstv: you can't upload the same version, you need to add a number on the end | 19:20 |
| geser | dspstv: LP remembers the version of accepted uploads even if you delete id | 19:20 |
| micahg | dspstv: or in some way make the version higher | 19:20 |
| dspstv | back to zero.. chaging the chngelog | 19:20 |
| dspstv | ok, thanks | 19:20 |
| dspstv | learning here | 19:20 |
| dspstv | wonder why the copy binary option is offered when going from say lucid to karmic? | 19:21 |
| geser | use something like 1.1.1-0ubuntu-6~planktum1~karmic for your karmic upload and 1.1.1-0ubuntu-6~planktum1~lucid for your lucid upload | 19:21 |
| dspstv | ok | 19:21 |
| geser | dspstv: e.g. for a python script it should be no difference if the package got build on lucid or karmic | 19:22 |
| geser | (as long as the dependencies are available in both karmic and lucid) | 19:22 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| Paraselene_ | Well, that kind of blows... I've merged a new account I created with an old one, and lose the old one's karma and (better) openid :/ | 19:48 |
| Paraselene_ | and only a couple of my old posts reflect the new username, too. Kind of wish I'd just nixxed the new one I created | 19:49 |
| Kruptein | How do you add a signing_fingerprint to a ppa? | 19:56 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| geser | StevenK: do you have an explanation why my SFTP PPA upload landed in the main archive? As far as I currently see I've only missed to specify my PPA when calling dput. | 20:48 |
| Nafallo | geser: the package has the main archive set as default I believe. unless you override it in your .dput.cf that would be where unspecified uploads land. | 20:51 |
| StevenK | geser: If you didn't specify anything, it defaults to whatever your config is set to? | 20:53 |
| StevenK | Surely stuff like this can't be the sftp service? | 20:53 |
| Nafallo | considering ppa.lp.net and upload.u.c goes to different hosts I'd kind of doubt the service being the problem. | 20:56 |
| geser | StevenK: see http://paste.ubuntu.com/462194/ | 20:59 |
| geser | it contains the used dput stance for SFTP upload to PPA, the command I used (I missed to specify a value after the ppa-sftp) and the contents of the only .upload file for that package | 21:00 |
| geser | and instead of getting an accepted mail for my PPA, I got one for the main archive | 21:01 |
| Nafallo | geser: what does the logfile for the main archive upload say? | 21:02 |
| StevenK | I think that's the upload processor on ppa.launchpad.net being clever, rather than the service being wrong | 21:02 |
| StevenK | I'll mention it to others tomorrow. -> bed | 21:03 |
| geser | Nafallo: what logfile for the main archive upload? I intented it upload it to my PPA for test-building and not the main archive (at least not with that version). | 21:03 |
| Nafallo | geser: so, in the manpage for dput, "If omitted, dput uses the host specified by default_host". have you defined default_host in your .dput.cf ? | 21:05 |
| Nafallo | geser: because if not, default_host is bound to be upload.ubuntu.com | 21:05 |
| Nafallo | dput by default make .upload files after run. in that file the "dput without specified host" is likely to state the package getting uploaded to upload.ubuntu.com | 21:06 |
| geser | Nafallo: I specified a host (ppa-sftp) but no value to replace it in the config stance (ppa-sftp:geser) | 21:07 |
| geser | Nafallo: and as you can see in the .upload file dput uploaded it to ppa.launchpad.net (using my ppa-sftp config) | 21:08 |
| Nafallo | geser: ehrm. your original questions states that you "only missed to specify my PPA when calling dput", isn't that the upload that went to the main archive? | 21:08 |
| Nafallo | if you missed to specify where you want to upload it, it will upload to the DEFAULT stanza, which is likely to reside in /etc/dput.cf | 21:09 |
| geser | Nafallo: I called "dput ppa-sftp librep..." instead of "dput ppa-sftp:geser librep..." what I really wanted | 21:09 |
| Nafallo | oh, I see. I thought you called "dput librep..." | 21:10 |
| Nafallo | I wouldn't be surprised if it thought that was invalid and therefor uploaded to default though ;-) | 21:11 |
| Nafallo | but yeah, thats just speculation on my part... | 21:12 |
| geser | but wouldn't in that case the .upload file contain upload.ubuntu.com? | 21:12 |
| Nafallo | yeah, I would argue it should... | 21:13 |
| Nafallo | ..that is strange indeed.. o_O | 21:14 |
| Nafallo | anyway. food time | 21:15 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| wgrant | geser: The upload processors on ppa.launchpad.net and upload.ubuntu.com are identical. | 23:46 |
| wgrant | It's the path that matters. | 23:46 |
| wgrant | Paraselene_: The karma merge should complete within 24 hours. | 23:46 |
| wgrant | I'm not sure about OpenID. | 23:46 |
| Paraselene_ | wgrant: I've fixed the OpenID. The accounts overview page is deceptive in that respect (you'd think the lock would indicate that the openid is not configurable) | 23:47 |
| wgrant | Paraselene_: On Launchpad, a lock normally indicates privacy. | 23:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
