[08:32] <thumper> dspstv: all the launchpad devs are in Prague this week for a sprint, and most are travelling right now
[08:33] <thumper> dspstv: there should be more people around tonight, or tomorrow
[08:33] <thumper> dspstv: sorry I can't be more help
[08:54] <forrestv> i'm moving a project to launchpad and i did "bzr push lp:~voights/txrecaptcha/trunk"
[08:54] <forrestv> but the project page still says "You haven't yet told Launchpad where your source code is for txreCAPTCHA trunk series."
[08:57] <forrestv> figured it out, but that interface isn't really intuitive
[09:03] <pajatopmr> I'm looking for some help with launchpad email.  A launchpad user tried to send mail to <me>@launchpad.net, got a bounce and asked me to "enable" <me>@launchpad.net.  How to do this has escaped me so far.  Suggestions?
[09:04] <micahg> pajatopmr: normal users don't get those addresses
[09:04]  * micahg doesn't know if anyone has one
[09:05] <pajatopmr> OK, I'll pass that along to the User, who is also a project administrator, fwiw.
[09:11] <wgrant> pajatopmr: Yeah, normal users certainly don't get those. I only know of a couple of working @launchpad.net addresses, and none of those are personal.
[09:14] <thumper> hi wgrant
[09:14] <thumper> currently all email to launchpad.net are handled by the email processing scripts
[09:14] <thumper> to do things like create new bugs, comment on reviews, bugs or answers
[09:15] <thumper> I had in the past thought it would be interesting to have <userid>@launchpad.net work, but..
[09:15] <thumper> alas no
[09:15] <thumper> probably not going to happen
[09:15] <thumper> it wouldn't be hard to write
[09:16] <thumper> but not likely something we are likely to do without a lot of thought
[09:16] <pajatopmr> thumper: No problem from my perspective.  Actually I don't think an additional email address is necessarily a good idea.  I do wonder why the admin assumed it was set up by default, though.
[09:17]  * thumper shrugs
[09:49] <hyperair> do PPAs support debsrc 3.0 (git)?
[09:57] <wgrant> hyperair: No.
[09:57] <wgrant> Does dak?
[10:06] <wgrant> It doesn't look like it.
[10:27] <sarhan> Hello
[10:27] <sarhan> someone can help me please?
[10:28] <sarhan> i have problem or bug with launchpad
[10:28] <wgrant> sarhan: Hi. What's the problem?
[10:28] <sarhan> i can't translate any thing
[10:28] <wgrant> What happens when you try?
[10:29] <sarhan> this : http://a.yfrog.com/img257/5919/capture2zp.png
[10:30] <sarhan> and the project is with open permisson
[10:31] <wgrant> sarhan: Can you go to https://translations.launchpad.net/people/+me/+licensing, and check that you've selected the "License all my translations in Launchpad under the BSD license" option?
[10:32] <sarhan> i select it now
[10:32] <sarhan> and it works
[10:32] <sarhan> thx
[10:32] <sarhan> :)
[10:32] <wgrant> OK. I'll file a bug that that's really unobvious.
[10:33] <sarhan> thank you very much
[10:33] <wgrant> No problem.
[10:33] <sarhan> bye
[15:28] <Kruptein> hey I'm still having trouble with ppa's, I've made a .deb file for my project,  how can I upload this to the ppa?
[15:29] <micahg> Kruptein: you can't, PPAs build from source
[15:29] <micahg> Kruptein: https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/Uploading
[15:32] <Kruptein> well that's not so funny :(
[15:33] <micahg> Kruptein: what's the problem, upload a source package instead of a .deb
[15:33] <Kruptein> micahg okay I first have to make one then..
[15:33] <Kruptein> why does the doc mention .debs then? https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA/BuildingASourcePackage  (3thd paragraph)
[15:34] <micahg> Kruptein: because the same folder you use for generating the .deb, you can generate the source upload in most cases
[15:35] <dspstv> hi again, i was looking yesterday for help
[15:35] <dspstv> i wanted to understand how to troubleshoot my friend
[15:35] <dspstv> who got a deb from my PPA
[15:36] <dspstv> and gets and error related to the version of jack not being available
[15:36] <dspstv> deb is karmic and his system is also karmic
[15:36] <dspstv> i guess its all related to his system
[15:36] <dspstv> but, the question is:
[15:37] <dspstv> could it be related to launchad?
[15:37] <dspstv> sorry for being so unclear, im also trying to learn the whole process
[15:59] <geser> dspstv: does your friend have the universe component enabled? The package "jack" is in universe.
[16:25] <dspstv> geser he does have jack installed but an older version according to dpkg
[16:26] <dspstv> it fails telling a more recent version is requiered but tries not to get it
[16:26] <dspstv> he tried with gdebi also but failed
[16:26] <micahg> dspstv: what version is required?
[16:27] <dspstv> now hes not online, i think .18 and he has .16 or so
[16:27] <micahg> dspstv: there's the same version of jack in karmic, lucid, and maverick
[16:28] <dspstv> ok, i get back with his exact error
[16:28] <dspstv> thanks micahg, geser
[18:43] <geser> has someone an explanation why ma PPA upload landed in the main archive? As far as I currently see I've only missed to specify my PPA when doing an upload through SFTP
[19:01] <dspstv> micahg: the package built by launchpad says this: libjack0 (>= 0.118+svn3796)
[19:01] <dspstv> the version in the karmic my friend has is 0.116
[19:02] <dspstv> the error is this one:
[19:02] <dspstv> 20:00 < jag> The following packages have unmet dependencies.
[19:02] <dspstv> 20:00 < jag>   din: Depends: libjack0 (>= 0.118+svn3796) but 0.116.1-4ubuntu2 is to be installed
[19:02] <dspstv> 20:00 < jag>        Depends: liblo7 (>= 0.26~repack) but it is not installable
[19:04] <dspstv> so my question is, how can i understand how to do this package?
[19:04] <dspstv> i could compile under lucid and use the software
[19:04] <dspstv> then decided to build the .deb via launchpad
[19:05] <dspstv> any ideas where to look?
[19:05] <dspstv> google brings me to many results...
[19:06] <geser> have you a link to the PPA?
[19:06] <geser> my guess is that the package got uploaded to the lucid PPA and then copied to karmic
[19:09] <Kruptein> hey I added a package to my ppa, but nothing appears when I go look to my ppa page.. ? what is wrong
[19:09] <geser> Kruptein: did you got a mail that your upload got accepted (or rejected)?
[19:09] <Kruptein> darragh@kruptools:~/development/ppa$ dput ppa:darragh-ssa/kruptools deditor_0.1-1_source.changes
[19:09] <Kruptein> Package has already been uploaded to ppa on ppa.launchpad.net
[19:09] <Kruptein> Nothing more to do for deditor_0.1-1_source.changes
[19:09] <Kruptein> geser no I didn't get a mail
[19:10] <geser> Kruptein: did you sign the upload with the key 0xC88E1FA1?
[19:11] <geser> you can check the signature with "gpg --verify deditor_0.1-1_source.changes"
[19:11] <Kruptein> geser well I'm not sure :s   isn't    dput ppa: darragh-ssa/kruptools deditor_0.1-1_source.changes    enough?
[19:12] <dspstv> geser yes, i did a copy
[19:12] <Kruptein> geser the last command does give me:  Good Signature from Darragh ...
[19:12] <geser> Kruptein: it is if you signed the source package with the right key at source package creation time (or with debsign before the upload)
[19:12] <Kruptein> geser I indeed did the last one
[19:13] <geser> dspstv: that explains it, with "copy" the debs are also published for karmic but not rebuild for karmic. For a rebuild you need an upload targeting karmic.
[19:13] <dspstv> https://launchpad.net/~puredyne-team/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/1229147/+listing-archive-extra
[19:13] <dspstv> geser: arggg i knew it (somehow)
[19:13] <micahg> dspstv: only lucid has that version
[19:13] <dspstv> and i came here asking what was the difference between those 2 options
[19:14] <Kruptein> geser, so... what did I do wrong?
[19:14] <dspstv> i thnik those options should be explained
[19:14] <dspstv> in the formulaire
[19:14] <dspstv> ok, will try to make a copy from the sources
[19:15] <geser> Kruptein: and the keyid from the output is the same as the keyid in your LP profile? uploads get only accepted when they are signed by a key attached to an LP account
[19:16] <Kruptein> geser, yep it's exact the same
[19:16] <Kruptein> can it be that it takes some time to appear?
[19:16] <geser> the uploads get processed every 5 minutes
[19:16] <Kruptein> well I don't see the problem then :(
[19:17] <geser> I'm out of ideas now too
[19:17] <Kruptein> it maybe has todo with this:
[19:18] <Kruptein> sudo add-apt-repository ppa:darragh-ssa/kruptools   produces:  Error: can't find signing_key_fingerprint at https://launchpad.net/api/1.0/~darragh-ssa/+archive/kruptools
[19:18] <Kruptein> is that because I added the fingerprint after I added the ppa?
[19:19] <micahg> Kruptein: it's because it's empty
[19:19] <dspstv> geser: micahg: now i have this problem, even though i had deleted the package i get this:
[19:19] <dspstv> din 1.1.1-0ubuntu-6~planktum in lucid (same version already has published binaries in the destination archive)
[19:20] <micahg> dspstv: you can't upload the same version, you need to add a number on the end
[19:20] <geser> dspstv: LP remembers the version of accepted uploads even if you delete id
[19:20] <micahg> dspstv: or in some way make the version higher
[19:20] <dspstv> back to zero.. chaging the chngelog
[19:20] <dspstv> ok, thanks
[19:20] <dspstv> learning here
[19:21] <dspstv> wonder why the copy binary option is offered when going from say lucid to karmic?
[19:21] <geser> use something like 1.1.1-0ubuntu-6~planktum1~karmic for your karmic upload and 1.1.1-0ubuntu-6~planktum1~lucid for your lucid upload
[19:21] <dspstv> ok
[19:22] <geser> dspstv: e.g. for a python script it should be no difference if the package got build on lucid or karmic
[19:22] <geser> (as long as the dependencies are available in both karmic and lucid)
[19:48] <Paraselene_> Well, that kind of blows... I've merged a new account I created with an old one, and lose the old one's karma and (better) openid :/
[19:49] <Paraselene_> and only a couple of my old posts reflect the new username, too. Kind of wish I'd just nixxed the new one I created
[19:56] <Kruptein> How do you add a signing_fingerprint to a ppa?
[20:48] <geser> StevenK: do you have an explanation why my SFTP PPA upload landed in the main archive? As far as I currently see I've only missed to specify my PPA when calling dput.
[20:51] <Nafallo> geser: the package has the main archive set as default I believe. unless you override it in your .dput.cf that would be where unspecified uploads land.
[20:53] <StevenK> geser: If you didn't specify anything, it defaults to whatever your config is set to?
[20:53] <StevenK> Surely stuff like this can't be the sftp service?
[20:56] <Nafallo> considering ppa.lp.net and upload.u.c goes to different hosts I'd kind of doubt the service being the problem.
[20:59] <geser> StevenK: see http://paste.ubuntu.com/462194/
[21:00] <geser> it contains the used dput stance for SFTP upload to PPA, the command I used (I missed to specify a value after the ppa-sftp) and the contents of the only .upload file for that package
[21:01] <geser> and instead of getting an accepted mail for my PPA, I got one for the main archive
[21:02] <Nafallo> geser: what does the logfile for the main archive upload say?
[21:02] <StevenK> I think that's the upload processor on ppa.launchpad.net being clever, rather than the service being wrong
[21:03] <StevenK> I'll mention it to others tomorrow. -> bed
[21:03] <geser> Nafallo: what logfile for the main archive upload? I intented it upload it to my PPA for test-building and not the main archive (at least not with that version).
[21:05] <Nafallo> geser: so, in the manpage for dput, "If omitted, dput uses the host specified by default_host". have you defined default_host in your .dput.cf ?
[21:05] <Nafallo> geser: because if not, default_host is bound to be upload.ubuntu.com
[21:06] <Nafallo> dput by default make .upload files after run. in that file the "dput without specified host" is likely to state the package getting uploaded to upload.ubuntu.com
[21:07] <geser> Nafallo: I specified a host (ppa-sftp) but no value to replace it in the config stance (ppa-sftp:geser)
[21:08] <geser> Nafallo: and as you can see in the .upload file dput uploaded it to ppa.launchpad.net (using my ppa-sftp config)
[21:08] <Nafallo> geser: ehrm. your original questions states that you "only missed to specify my PPA when calling dput", isn't that the upload that went to the main archive?
[21:09] <Nafallo> if you missed to specify where you want to upload it, it will upload to the DEFAULT stanza, which is likely to reside in /etc/dput.cf
[21:09] <geser> Nafallo: I called "dput ppa-sftp librep..." instead of "dput ppa-sftp:geser librep..." what I really wanted
[21:10] <Nafallo> oh, I see. I thought you called "dput librep..."
[21:11] <Nafallo> I wouldn't be surprised if it thought that was invalid and therefor uploaded to default though ;-)
[21:12] <Nafallo> but yeah, thats just speculation on my part...
[21:12] <geser> but wouldn't in that case the .upload file contain upload.ubuntu.com?
[21:13] <Nafallo> yeah, I would argue it should...
[21:14] <Nafallo> ..that is strange indeed.. o_O
[21:15] <Nafallo> anyway. food time
[23:46] <wgrant> geser: The upload processors on ppa.launchpad.net and upload.ubuntu.com are identical.
[23:46] <wgrant> It's the path that matters.
[23:46] <wgrant> Paraselene_: The karma merge should complete within 24 hours.
[23:46] <wgrant> I'm not sure about OpenID.
[23:47] <Paraselene_> wgrant: I've fixed the OpenID. The accounts overview page is deceptive in that respect (you'd think the lock would indicate that the openid is not configurable)
[23:48] <wgrant> Paraselene_: On Launchpad, a lock normally indicates privacy.