=== fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === yofel_ is now known as yofel === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [09:32] Any luck with Thunderbird 3.1 in the PPA? [09:33] buckethead: I will try later today, but I want to get Firefox 4 merged in first [09:34] Cool. [09:35] I was going to start looking into some issues I was having with lightning, then it occured to me I should get slightly current versions first. LOL! [09:36] buckethead: well, that's another issue, we don't have lightning packaged at the moment [09:37] 1b2 wasn't happy being installed on tb3.0. [09:38] buckethead: right, you need 1.0b1 [09:40] buckethead: 32 bit or 64 bit? [09:40] 64, therein lies the first problem. [09:41] buckethead: http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/releases/1.0b1/contrib/linux-x86_64/lightning.xpi [09:42] Thanks. [09:43] buckethead: lightning will get into lucid-backports eventually, I'm just waiting to find out how long 3.0.x will be supported before deciding what to do with Lucid [09:45] I only recently started using lightning, I like it so far. === fta_ is now known as fta [11:38] hi [11:41] Can anyone help me with my problem with flashplayer 10 and Ubuntu 10.04 AMD64.I use Firefox 3.6.6 and the control-panel doesnt work in the flashplayer. [11:58] morning === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === BUGabundo is now known as BUGa_IT_Crowd === fta_ is now known as fta [15:38] fta: do you see a problem if I repoint fennec.head to a release branch temporarily? === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [17:17] fta_: do you think it's a problem if I repoint fennec.head to mobile-1.1 since we don't build dailies === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [21:09] fta: are you around? === fta_ is now known as fta [21:30] ddecator: I need to make a couple changes to your FF4.0 merge, but I'll leave you in the changelog [21:30] micahg: that's fine, i figured it wasn't perfect [21:30] ddecator: normally, I should let you fix, but I'm very short on time and I want to get this in tonight if possible [21:31] micahg: no worries, i'm tight on time too so i wouldn't have time to fix it today. i'll just look at what you changed later [21:31] micahg, hi [21:31] fta: hi, I'm wondering how long you'll be around, I want to get at least FF40 and xul20 merged [21:32] micahg, ~1h, 1h 1/2 [21:32] fta: k, that should be enough for the merge at least [21:33] fta: did you see my question about fennec earlier? [21:33] no [21:33] fta_: do you think it's a problem if I repoint fennec.head to mobile-1.1 since we don't build dailies [21:34] nope [21:34] fta: k, I want to get 1.1 in maverick so it's out of the way [21:35] micahg, feel free, i have no plan to touch it anyway and i'm not aware of anyone else willing to touch it [21:35] ddecator: I'm wondering how these got in Name[en_US]=abrowser-4.0.desktop [21:35] fta: k, thanks [21:35] micahg: i wondered that too.. [21:35] ddecator: they're in your merge :) [21:36] * micahg is removing them [21:36] micahg: my best guess is they got put in there automatically when i was trying to rename things before i knew about 'bzr mv' (yah, i know :p) [21:36] micahg: go for it, i meant to but forgot [21:40] tonight would be good for FF 4 since several popular add-ons just updated to be compatible with it [21:43] fta: should I just rename the current ff37 changelog to ff40 or start a new one on top? === fta_ is now known as fta [22:09] micahg, rename [22:09] fta: k, I'll add a bzr revision on top cleaning up the changelog, does it help if I push the branches one at a time or just both when I'm done [22:10] micahg, doesn't matter [22:10] rename the branches on lp too [22:11] fta: k [22:21] fta: there seems to be an old ff4.0 branch, what should I do with it? https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-4.0.head [22:21] drop it [22:21] it was the old 3.1 branch [22:22] after 3.0 branched off, they started 4.0 for a while, then renamed it 3.1 [22:22] I renamed it since it was merged to ff3.1.head.old [22:22] we're all good [22:24] k, ff40 is done, now onto xul193->xul20 [22:29] Is it in the PPA yet? [22:29] *Twitch* [22:29] bobby: no, I need to finish the merge [22:29] :( [22:29] ...and i need to reconfigure the bot [22:30] lol, I don't care, as long as it works [22:30] fta: almost done, xul20 was easier :) [22:30] Running the beta 1 from an sh script lol... [22:31] Hey, random question, if anyone knows: Has FF home been approved for the App Store yet? [22:31] bobby: ? [22:32] The app that lets you sync your FF bookmarks on your iTouch [22:32] bobby: what does that have to do with Ubuntu? [22:33] Hence me saying "random question" [22:33] Just wondering if anyone knew [22:36] micahg, did you change the format of the branch? [22:36] micahg, http://paste.ubuntu.com/462239/ [22:36] fta: no [22:36] :( [22:38] how did that happen :( [22:38] no idea [22:38] xul20 is still format 6, but ff40 is format 7 [22:39] fta: ddecator's branch was 7 and I didn't get a warning about it [22:41] fta: do you want to push overwrite the branch and I"ll redo these merges? [22:41] too late [22:42] fta: are we ok then? [22:42] i guess we'll have to upgrade [22:43] fta: I probably have an old branch lying around, we can move this one out of the way and redo it [22:43] let's keep it that way and see if it causes troubles [22:44] fta: k [22:47] micahg, what's the upstream branch for those 2? mozilla-central? [22:51] fta: At the moment [22:53] grr [22:53] fta_: what's wrong? [22:54] my dsl connection [22:54] fta_: ah, is that why you've been bouncing for the past 24 hours [22:54] flaps ~30 times a day === fta_ is now known as fta [22:54] yep [22:54] started ~10d ago [22:55] micahg, what's the upstream branch for those 2? mozilla-central? [22:55] (04:51:44 PM) micahg: fta: At the moment [22:55] I figure they'll branch soon [22:57] ok, let's kick the bot and see how it goes [22:57] fta: k :) [22:58] respinning the whole umd [22:58] fta: k, builders aren't too busy :) [23:01] dahh [23:02] *ERROR* src package differs: xulrunner-2.0 != xulrunner-1.9.3 [23:02] there's still a 1.9.3 somewhere [23:02] * micahg looks [23:03] * micahg doesn't see one [23:05] n-m, it's my bot. it compares with the daily branch, and chokes on the new src package name [23:07] * micahg is test building TB 3.0.6 === fta_ is now known as fta