[00:22] \o/ http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/ppa-dashboard/ubuntu-mozilla-daily--ppa.html [00:26] all green? [00:27] oh look [00:27] ff4 building [01:07] hi _Tsk_ [01:08] <_Tsk_> Hi [01:08] * _Tsk_ is kind of jetlagged [01:08] _Tsk_: ah, ok, well, have a good night, we can talk later [01:08] <_Tsk_> thanks === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [04:32] ddecator: Looks like FF40/Xul20 built fine at least the first round === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === yofel_ is now known as yofel === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [12:02] hi chrisccoulson [12:12] hi micahg [12:14] chrisccoulson: I wanted to coordinate the Thunderbird 3.0.6 upload with you since I figure we need the same tarball for the security PPA and the archvie [12:17] micahg - yeah, we need to make sure we use the same tarball [12:19] chrisccoulson: so, I have a tarball ready, should I upload to maverick? [12:19] micahg - yeah, you can do that. i will just grab the same tarball when i do the security upload [12:20] chrisccoulson: k [12:20] chrisccoulson: is there anything you want to add before I upload? [12:20] micahg - i don't think so. i pushed the fix for the desktop file didn't i? [12:21] chrisccoulson: for StartupWMClass? yes [12:21] cool, that's ok then [12:21] * micahg supposes installing the local build is a good test :) [12:21] are you running maverick yet? [12:22] chrisccoulson: no, but I test built on Lucid [12:22] cool, that should be ok [12:22] i finally upgraded to maverick last week [12:22] that was when i realised the desktop files for thunderbird and firefox were broken, so i assume something changed in docky that exposed that [12:22] chrisccoulson: I think I'll wait for Beta 1 and hopefully the new Video stack will land by then [12:25] the firefox performance issues that some people have mentioned on maverick seem to be triggered by ubuntuone :/ [12:25] it seems to hammer my disk for ~2 hours after logging in, and it makes the desktop really sluggish [12:26] and firefox is pretty much unusable until ubuntuone stops working [12:26] that's not good [12:26] also, for some reason, Thunderbird built as shredded :( [12:26] *shredder [12:27] in maverick? [12:28] chrisccoulson: no,, locally, and I don't have the ~hg in my version [12:34] chrisccoulson: I'll have to figure out this branding issue before i upload to maverick [12:35] I might try again in pbuilder to see if it's something in my environment [12:35] micahg - ok, no worries [12:37] chrisccoulson: the only "big" change I made to rules was for the dictionary transition, so I'll look there first to make sure I didn't change anything [12:48] _Tsk_: any issues with thunderbird builds showing as shredder when compiled with --enable-official-branding? [12:49] <_Tsk_> doesn't ring anyhting [12:49] _Tsk_: for some reason the build disables official branding even though I have it enabled [12:50] <_Tsk_> what are you trying to build ? [12:50] _Tsk_: 3.0.6 build2 [12:50] <_Tsk_> hum strange [12:50] <_Tsk_> did you clobber your build ? [12:51] _Tsk_: I'm not sure what that is [12:51] <_Tsk_> make clobber [12:51] <_Tsk_> cleans all caches etc .... [12:52] _Tsk_: no, but it was started from scratch [12:52] * micahg can try in a clean environment [12:52] <_Tsk_> hum weird [12:52] it just seems like configure added the --disable-official-branding flag [12:53] * micahg will try in pbuilder and see if that helps, thanks _Tsk_ [12:53] micahg, is the 3.7->4.0 upgrade supposed to work? [12:53] fta2: supposed to :), I haven't tested since my ff40 build isn't done yet [12:54] micahg, i have 3.7 installed, it doesn't upgrade [12:54] fta2: amd64? [12:54] micahg, yep, same for xul [12:54] fta2: hmm, xul builds should be done, weird [12:55] fta2: I added Conflicts/Replaces on the FF37 packages, did I miss something? [12:59] not sure... Provides? [13:02] fta2: ah, ok, that makes sense instead of a transitional package, I'll make that change before tonight's upload === fta_ is now known as fta [13:12] chrisccoulson: is that right, that I need Provides in addition to Replaces/Conflict to get Firefox 3.7 to upgrade to 4.0 automatically [13:13] micahg - do we not normally have a transitional package to do that? [13:13] chrisccoulson: yes, but I was hoping to avoid them [13:13] since it was in PPA only [13:13] i'm not sure provides will work that, i've never tried it before [13:18] chrisccoulson: k, I guess I'll add transitional packages for them === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [16:49] micahg, did you fix the if/elif bug? [17:06] if i found a bug in the 4.0 daily, i'm right there to report this? [17:11] sure but depending on the bug it might be better to report it to mozilla directly [17:11] the bug is: /usr/bin/firefox-4.0: 174: Syntax error: end of file unexpected (expecting "fi") [17:11] fta: yes [17:12] micahg, good. got several reports about that [17:12] fta: sorry [17:12] micahg: any news regarding the beta ppa now that 4.0 is in daily ppa? :) [17:13] Dimmuxx: I need to make it an all-in-one first, so maybe next weekend, I want to get TB3.1 fixed in the dailies first though [17:13] but the 4.0 has bugs -> so i think no news yet [17:14] micahg, fyi, I'm respining the bot just for this fix [17:14] micahg: okay, will it be firefox-4.0 or just firefox package? [17:14] micahg, (you should learn how to do that ;)) [17:14] fta: k, yes, unfortunately, I've got way too many things going on right now [17:15] Dimmuxx: firefox-4.0 or firefox-beta, needs to be discussed [17:15] ok, done [17:16] hm, the lp api is broken. my dashboards are impacted [17:16] in ppa it is firefox-4.0, but replace all other firefox-* [17:17] Hanmac: the daily will stay firefox-4.0 for right now [17:17] micahg: -beta is probably better so that it's ready for 4.1b or whatever [17:17] Hanmac, it should replace 3.7 only, if it replaces anything else, it's seriously broken [17:17] Dimmuxx: that's the idea [17:18] micahg: what will happen in between betas though? Will it be latest official version or just stay on latest beta version? [17:18] Dimmuxx: we need to talk to the upstream drivers about plans for the various branches, then we can make them have more reusable names [17:19] firefox-4.0 replace this packages: firefox-3.0,firefox-3.1,firefox-3.2,firefox-3.3,firefox-3.4,firefox-3.5,firefox-3.6,firefox-3.7 [17:19] Dimmuxx: well, the idea we were kicking around before is firefox, firefox-beta or firefox-next and firefox-trunk [17:19] Hanmac: are you on hardy or jaunty? [17:20] lucid [17:20] or karmic for that matter? [17:20] Hanmac: don't worry tehn [17:21] * micahg should fix it so it doesn't replace hardy/jaunty/karmic defaults [17:21] micahg: ah that sounds good [17:22] yes, the normal firefox package (3.6.8pre it still there), it is not the problem that 4.0 replace 3.7, the prob is that 4.0 is still not working [17:23] Hanmac: well, fta just respun the builds [17:23] Hanmac: what's not working? [17:24] i can not start the /usr/bin/firefox-4.0 because someone miss a "fi" [17:24] Hanmac: yes, the builds are being respun to fix that [17:36] micahg, we still need the fix for the upgrade from 3.7 [17:46] hm, what's used to render the addon tab in 4.0? [17:47] I can't read it :( [17:47] http://yofel.dyndns.org/pics/ext/ffx4_addons0.png === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [19:07] micahg, https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa/+build/1865001 [19:07] fta: hung builder, I'll ping LP [20:31] micahg: an idea what ff4 uses to display the addons tab? I can't read anything http://yofel.dyndns.org/pics/ext/ffx4_addons0.png [20:32] yofel: nope, dark themes usually have issues though [20:34] it's chrome://mozapps/content/extensions/extensions.xul I think? [20:35] see also https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=565855 [20:35] Mozilla bug 565855 in Add-ons Manager "about:addons should respect gtk2 theme's background colour" [Normal,New] [20:35] micahg, are the langpacks in ums still useful? if not, could you please delete them? [20:35] fta: yes, I think we need them for jaunty/karmic still [20:36] :( [20:36] if i activate a lang pack on ff3.7 it breaks the XUL [20:36] Mook_sb: thanks! [20:38] Hanmac: you'll need the xul20 langpacks [20:39] i have the xul20 packs ... but no usable ff4 [20:39] btw, 'firefox-4.0 -h' still says 3.7 in the options [20:40] yofel: I don't have it yet [20:41] micahg: http://paste.ubuntu.com/462669/ [20:41] fta: By the way, if I use aptitude install firefox-4.0 it removes 3.7 [20:41] fta: but I guess that's not an auto upgrade :) [20:42] micahg, maybe, but i want the other way around. when i upgrade 3.7, i want it to be replaced by 4.0 [20:42] yep [20:42] fta: right, so I'll try to get the transitional package in when I get home (about 7 hrs) [20:43] yofel: nice catch, I'll have to figure out where to fix that (might be upstream) [20:45] yofel: seems like one thing didn't get updated, I'll fix it later === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta