| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| Quintasan | wgrant: maybe you could help me, can I somehow force stripping in PPA build? I need dbg libs for Project Neon :) | 00:36 |
|---|---|---|
| wgrant | Quintasan: Not really... but I was working on that over the weekend, as it happens. | 00:36 |
| Quintasan | gah | 00:37 |
| wgrant | It's mostly done. | 00:38 |
| Quintasan | wgrant: well, I'm doing that via dh_strip --dbg-package=project-neon-qt-dbg | 00:39 |
| wgrant | I guess that works. | 00:40 |
| wgrant | But it'll be automatic and less awful soon. | 00:40 |
| Quintasan | yeah, I thought it would work in PPA too | 00:40 |
| Quintasan | :S | 00:40 |
| wgrant | It doesn't? | 00:41 |
| wgrant | Why not? | 00:41 |
| Quintasan | dh_strip --dbg-package=project-neon-qt-dbg | 00:41 |
| Quintasan | dh_strip debug symbol extraction: disabling for PPA build | 00:41 |
| Quintasan | dh_strip debug symbol extraction: not doing anything since NO_PKG_MANGLE is given | 00:41 |
| wgrant | Hmm. | 00:43 |
| wgrant | Well. | 00:43 |
| wgrant | I guess pkg-create-dbgsym's overridden dh_strip doesn't work like that. | 00:43 |
| wgrant | I wonder if it would work if you used dh_strip.pkg-create-dbgsym (the actual debhelper version) instead. | 00:44 |
| Quintasan | wgrant: huh, I can't find that command | 00:45 |
| wgrant | Quintasan: It only exists when pkg-create-dbgsym is installed. | 00:47 |
| wgrant | pkg-create-dbgsym diverts the original dh_strip. | 00:47 |
| Quintasan | wgrant: I should add that to build-depends as well? | 00:47 |
| wgrant | Quintasan: It's already installed in the buildd chroots, so there's no point. Perhaps get debian/rules to call dh_strip.pkg-create-dbgsym if it exists, but otherwise call plain dh_strip. | 00:48 |
| wgrant | Of course, this may not work at all :) | 00:48 |
| Quintasan | wgrant: well, I'll try that, thanks. Better this than nightly builds with no dbg libs | 00:49 |
| Quintasan | :S | 00:49 |
| wgrant | Well, you could have a convenient checkbox on the PPA page in a month, if all goes well. | 00:49 |
| Quintasan | oh, month is a looong time | 00:50 |
| Quintasan | I think I will get the builds ready by then | 00:50 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: if priority never changes on a build and the queue stays full - what are the changes of me waiting for days to get the amd64 versions built? | 00:57 |
| wgrant | lamont: Why does i386 have so many builders, and amd64 so few? | 01:00 |
| lamont | luck of the draw, pretty much | 01:01 |
| wgrant | lamont: Can I remove the slave's architecture and just make it believe the master, so this can be fixed by clicking a couple of buttons in LP? | 01:01 |
| lamont | once you fix LP so that the buildd uses the LP answer as gospel, instead of having its own hardcoded copy of the answer.... | 01:02 |
| lamont | there's a bug about that | 01:02 |
| MTecknology | I've been waiting about 9 hours now for a build that will just be superceded right away - It wouldn't bother me if I had some indication that it'll eventually get there - like the priority going up. | 01:02 |
| lamont | wgrant: that is, we have some buildds that could do amd64/i386/lpia, and some that can do i386/lpia | 01:03 |
| wgrant | lamont: I have a branch to do that... I should get it merged. | 01:04 |
| bp0 | so no lp staff showed up yet? | 01:07 |
| lamont | bp0: how so? | 01:08 |
| bp0 | help contact i guess it is called | 01:08 |
| bp0 | i was told there would be one here at 4 | 01:08 |
| bp0 | but it is 7 now | 01:08 |
| wgrant | bp0: I replied to you not two second after you left the channel :( | 01:08 |
| wgrant | 08:42:01 -!- bp0 [~bp@unaffiliated/bp0] has quit [Quit: Leaving] | 01:09 |
| wgrant | 08:42:03 < wgrant> bp0: The Launchpad developers are all in Prague at the moment, so there won't be anyone around right now. | 01:09 |
| wgrant | What's the issue that you're having? | 01:09 |
| bp0 | heh | 01:09 |
| bp0 | alright | 01:09 |
| bp0 | i was trying to post a bug and it times out | 01:09 |
| bp0 | always | 01:09 |
| bp0 | not possible to post bugs | 01:09 |
| wgrant | Against Ubuntu, or something else? | 01:09 |
| bp0 | against gnome-control-center | 01:10 |
| wgrant | In Ubuntu? | 01:10 |
| bp0 | package in Ubuntu | 01:10 |
| wgrant | Right. | 01:10 |
| wgrant | Try using a shorter summary to start with. Once it gives you the list of duplicates, you can put the whole summary back in. | 01:10 |
| wgrant | That may work around it. | 01:11 |
| wgrant | But I haven't seen this issue for quite some time. | 01:11 |
| MTecknology | bp0: any reason apport won't work? | 01:11 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: if a project is private, should anyone be able to pull the bzr branches? | 01:12 |
| MTecknology | or better yet.. see the branches | 01:12 |
| wgrant | MTecknology: There's no such thing as a private project (yet). Projects can have private branches, however. | 01:12 |
| bp0 | i dont use apport | 01:12 |
| wgrant | bp0: Why not? | 01:13 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: how do you set a branch to be private? | 01:13 |
| bp0 | I don't like it | 01:13 |
| wgrant | MTecknology: You need an admin to do it, or to configure your project to have private branches by default. | 01:13 |
| wgrant | bp0: You need a very good reason to not use it. | 01:13 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: I thought if you did the commercial thing then anything in the project was private | 01:13 |
| wgrant | It is the way Ubuntu bugs are meant to be filed. | 01:13 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: thanks for the info - definitely an oversight on my part | 01:14 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: and I suppose you can't do it for me? | 01:14 |
| wgrant | MTecknology: I've no special privileges, no. | 01:15 |
| bp0 | filing a bug in launchpad is straightforward, apport uses mystical questions that are never accurate enough, its always guessing, and then it attaches unnecessary information | 01:16 |
| bp0 | not liking it is a good reason. | 01:16 |
| MTecknology | bp0: there are (probably) millions of bugs in the database for the ubuntu project. When you're filing a bug it searches through every one of those to find a duplicate. | 01:17 |
| wgrant | bp0: The questions are there for a reason. | 01:17 |
| bp0 | launchpad also tries to do that, but it always times out | 01:18 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: I still wish I was smart enough to get that pretty white hat.. | 01:18 |
| bp0 | well not always, i've seen it happen once or twice | 01:18 |
| bp0 | that it gives a list of possible duplicates | 01:18 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| exarkun | bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: "http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~exarkun/pyopenssl/trusted/". | 03:08 |
| exarkun | I reckon it is though. | 03:08 |
| exarkun | It was a few minutes ago at least. | 03:08 |
| exarkun | Oh no. My mistake. In my haste to complain about launchpad bugs I missed the extra "ed" on the end. It really isn't a branch. My apologies. | 03:09 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| mtaylor | what do I need to do to make a branch private? | 04:19 |
| wgrant | mtaylor: Is your project set up for them? | 04:19 |
| mtaylor | wgrant: it's set up as non-free and has a payment voucher applied to it | 04:20 |
| mtaylor | wgrant: is there another step? | 04:20 |
| wgrant | mtaylor: An admin needs to set up a branch privacy policy. | 04:21 |
| wgrant | I'm not sure if that's done normally. | 04:21 |
| mtaylor | ah. lovely. probably my bad for not pinging someone then - I thought it was automatic | 04:21 |
| mtaylor | wgrant: should I file a question? | 04:22 |
| wgrant | spm: What's the process for this? | 04:22 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless | ||
| spm | mtaylor: wgrant: it's usually done automatically (manually, but) as part of getting a commerical whatsit | 05:06 |
| micahg | spm: can you fix PPA builders? | 05:06 |
| spm | maybe... | 05:07 |
| micahg | spm: https://edge.launchpad.net/builders/shipova | 05:07 |
| spm | woo. no, can't fix that. aiui, that needs a serious h/w level power stab | 05:08 |
| spm | micahg: however, I can ask someone who can stab. that should be happening RSN. :-) | 05:11 |
| micahg | spm: thanks :) | 05:11 |
| wgrant | spm: It should resolve itself if you disable it, let buildd-manager run through a whole iteration (normally a few seconds, but currently several minutes), then reenable it. | 05:11 |
| wgrant | Since that will fire the reset trigger. | 05:12 |
| spm | wgrant: really? that's worth a try. | 05:12 |
| wgrant | Indeed. I think it's worth a test, if it means you don't have to poke GSAs as much in future... | 05:12 |
| spm | for sure! | 05:14 |
| spm | wgrant: hrm. is 'disabled' == to Not builder state ok, or Not Active? I assume the former. | 05:15 |
| wgrant | spm: The former. Unchecking 'active' just hides it from the listings. | 05:15 |
| spm | heh, I thought so, but... well.. this *is* soyuz. :-) | 05:15 |
| wgrant | I will be interested to see if this works. It depends on how badly the builder is wedged. There's a case or two that won't work yet. | 05:16 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| wgrant | spm: You can try flipping it back on now, since buildd-manager has finished with it. | 05:26 |
| wgrant | We are up to >11min cycles :/ | 05:26 |
| spm | heh, was just about to - we're tailing the log in great interest :-) | 05:26 |
| wgrant | Ah, yes, that capability could be handy. | 05:27 |
| spm | I've found it so, now and then. :-D | 05:27 |
| wgrant | So, it should be trying to abort the build now. | 05:27 |
| wgrant | That might work. | 05:27 |
| wgrant | Oh, well, when it gets around to that builder again, I guess... | 05:28 |
| spm | 10-15 minutes. :-) | 05:28 |
| wgrant | Only 180 times slower than it's meant to be :) | 05:28 |
| spm | is there any value in restarting the buildd-manager? or is the problem elsewhere in some way shape or form? | 05:32 |
| wgrant | No point doing that. It'll just start the cycle from the start again. | 05:33 |
| spm | bleh. | 05:33 |
| mtaylor | spm: so... | 05:40 |
| spm | 010-07-13 05:45:06+0100 [-] Builder 'shipova' rescued from '7fc224047f7daec3ad6ec408fd4e039814fe2665': 'No job assigned to builder' \o/ | 05:49 |
| micahg | spm: awesome, thanks | 05:50 |
| wgrant | spm: It remains to be seen whether the builder will respond. | 05:50 |
| wgrant | But it was responding to queries before, so there's a good chance it will. | 05:50 |
| wgrant | We really should make it hit the reset trigger when aborting a virtual build, but the architecture makes that somewhat difficult :/ | 05:51 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| bilalakhtar | Launchpad should set the status of a bug to 'fix committed' once it is fixed in the devel focus branch. Opinions? | 08:00 |
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| spiv | bilalakhtar: it depends :) | 08:25 |
| bilalakhtar | spiv: Atleast, there should be an option for project maintainers to enable such a feature | 08:27 |
| spiv | That would be nice. | 08:28 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === Meths_ is now known as Meths | ||
| malcolmci | Hey guys, I've tried multiple times, but gpg is reports errors every time I try to decrypt the validation email sent to me. I'm on Maverick atm. | 12:09 |
| malcolmci | At the moment, the error is: gpg: CRC error; 89342B - DC3893 | 12:09 |
| malcolmci | gpg: quoted printable character in armour - probably a buggy MTA has been used | 12:09 |
| malcolmci | Just tried revalidating, now the error is "gpg: malformed CRC. gpg: quoted printable character in armour - probably a buggy MTA has been used" | 12:12 |
| wgrant | malcolmci: How are you decrypting it? | 12:13 |
| malcolmci | It's being sent to my Gmail address, from which I'm selecting "Show Original" (text version), then copying the text from and including ----BEGIN to ---END into a text file using gedit, then running "gpg --decrypt test.txt" | 12:13 |
| wgrant | Does "Show Original" show the message source? | 12:14 |
| wgrant | You shouldn't be using the source. You should be using the text in the message itself. | 12:14 |
| malcolmci | It just shows the text version of the email, so yeah headers and all | 12:14 |
| malcolmci | no, it's not showing markup if that's what you mean | 12:15 |
| wgrant | There is HTML markup, since it is a text message. | 12:15 |
| wgrant | But the source is an encoded version of the text. | 12:16 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| malcolmci | OK, that's strange. Didn't know about that behaviour. Copied the text from directly from the email this time, now gpg is telling me 'You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for..' | 12:18 |
| malcolmci | oh wait sorry | 12:18 |
| malcolmci | didn't notice the prompt | 12:18 |
| malcolmci | Thanks wgrant :) | 12:18 |
| geser | do the buildds support the "[linux-any]" limitation in the build-dependencies? | 12:43 |
| wgrant | I saw discussion of that on debian-devel last week. I suspect not. | 12:47 |
| wgrant | I meant to check. | 12:47 |
| * wgrant tries acpid. | 12:47 | |
| geser | wgrant: when I read http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51835076/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-amd64.glib2.0_2.25.11-1ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz correctly, the buildds don't support it | 12:48 |
| wgrant | geser: dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libselinux1-dev | 12:49 |
| wgrant | That doesn't look related... | 12:49 |
| geser | libselinux1-dev [linux-any], | 12:49 |
| wgrant | Oh, right. | 12:49 |
| geser | but the buildd installs "libgamin-dev [!linux-any]" from some reason | 12:50 |
| geser | does it believe it is !linux-any? | 12:50 |
| wgrant | It is. | 12:50 |
| wgrant | It's far too old. | 12:50 |
| wgrant | Both Soyuz and launchpad-buildd need support. | 12:50 |
| wgrant | unstable's acpid source is not uploadable. | 12:50 |
| wgrant | (it's Architecture field is linux-any) | 12:50 |
| geser | do you know if there is a bug for it? Didn't see one on launchpad-buildd (or soyuz) | 12:54 |
| wgrant | There's no bug, no. | 12:54 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| * geser files one | 12:55 | |
| wgrant | It needs two. | 12:56 |
| wgrant | One for Soyuz, one for lp-buildd. They're different issues. | 12:56 |
| geser | bug #604981 for the lp-buildd issue | 13:00 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 604981 in Launchpad Auto Build System "The buildd doesn't support [linux-any] in build dependencies (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/604981 | 13:00 |
| geser | what's the soyuz issue? I'd file a bug if I'd know the problem | 13:01 |
| wgrant | geser: Some sources (like unstable's acpid) are 'Architecture: linux-any' | 13:02 |
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| wgrant | geser: At least the sbuild side should be pretty trivial. | 13:15 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| MTecknology | I think there's a bug in the LP Login | 13:49 |
| MTecknology | I can't log in at all | 13:50 |
| MTecknology | I can log into login.launchpad.net but can't get from there to launchpad.net | 13:52 |
| wgrant | I really hate Perl. | 13:55 |
| geser | then replace it with Python | 13:55 |
| wgrant | It's sbuild :( | 13:55 |
| geser | wgrant: bug #605002 for the soyuz issue | 14:03 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 605002 in Soyuz "Soyuz doesn't accept upload with "Architecture: linux-any" (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/605002 | 14:03 |
| wgrant | geser: Thanks. | 14:04 |
| MTecknology | So.. I have a project with private branches. I'm not able to push to those branches anymore. I'm told 'You can't create branches in "~team/project" | 14:22 |
| MTecknology | I'm in the team that owns the project.. I should be able to push to it.. right? | 14:25 |
| alopenerp | need help from launchpad team, i have private branch that doesn't work, it's well known bug i already had in the past, you need to fix it manually | 14:36 |
| alopenerp | we already did that fix in the past | 14:36 |
| MTecknology | alopenerp: what's your issue with the private branches? | 14:41 |
| alopenerp | impossible to create private branches | 14:42 |
| alopenerp | they are public, it's a known bug | 14:42 |
| MTecknology | any link to the bug report? I'm having that issue too | 14:42 |
| alopenerp | i have two project one that works one that doesn't | 14:42 |
| MTecknology | I'm trying to push a new (private) branch to a project, my first time | 14:43 |
| alopenerp | loook it should display this | 14:43 |
| alopenerp | https://code.launchpad.net/openerp-security | 14:44 |
| alopenerp | New branches you create for OpenERP Security are private initially. | 14:44 |
| alopenerp | if it doesn't it need manual fix from launchpad team | 14:44 |
| alopenerp | https://code.launchpad.net/openerp-int here it doesn't | 14:44 |
| alopenerp | MTecknology: what is your project name ? | 14:48 |
| MTecknology | alopenerp: sounds like we're both having issues at the wort possible time. LP guys are busy with a summit I think. | 14:48 |
| MTecknology | alopenerp: https://code.launchpad.net/kalliki | 14:48 |
| MTecknology | alopenerp: when I try to create a new private branch I get told I'm not allowed to | 14:48 |
| MTecknology | danilos: did you come here to help us out? | 14:49 |
| alopenerp | You don't have the notice at the top it wont work, same bug | 14:49 |
| alopenerp | look this one is ok https://code.launchpad.net/openerp-security | 14:50 |
| alopenerp | cause it has the notice on top | 14:50 |
| alopenerp | see that ? | 14:50 |
| alopenerp | we already had the problem in the past, but they fixed here from here | 14:50 |
| MTecknology | alopenerp: I don't see any notice like that | 14:50 |
| MTecknology | http://dpaste.com/217688/ | 14:51 |
| alopenerp | MTecknology: ah then you only see it when loggued | 14:54 |
| alopenerp | MTecknology: but you should see such a notice on your own project page | 14:55 |
| MTecknology | alopenerp: alrighty, I'm sure someone will be around to help us soon :) | 14:55 |
| MTecknology | depending on various definitions of soon :P | 14:56 |
| alopenerp | MTecknology: :) | 14:56 |
| * alopenerp a few centuries later... | 15:00 | |
| danilos | MTecknology, I didn't, but I can try :) | 15:08 |
| danilos | MTecknology, what is the problem you are having? | 15:08 |
| danilos | MTecknology, (we are all together in a big room having a meeting, but I am sure I can find someone who can help you if I can't :) | 15:09 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| MTecknology | danilos: I can't push to a private branch | 15:26 |
| MTecknology | danilos: alopenerp was having the same issue - she said there's supposed to be a notice about branches being pushed being private ont eh code.lp.net/project page | 15:26 |
| danilos | abentley, rockstar, thumper: hey, can you guys help MTecknology and alopenerp? | 15:27 |
| MTecknology | danilos: thanks, I actually only bugged you because you came in with a LP hostmask :P | 15:28 |
| danilos | MTecknology, not to worry :) | 15:28 |
| thumper | MTecknology: which branch, and what is your lp id? | 15:29 |
| MTecknology | thumper: I'm trying to push new branches to https://code.edge.launchpad.net/kalliki - my id is MTecknology | 15:29 |
| MTecknology | thumper: The branches were just made private by default yesterday | 15:32 |
| MTecknology | wow... Start 2010-07-14 (2505) | 15:34 |
| thumper | MTecknology: I can see why | 15:34 |
| MTecknology | thumper: did I break something? | 15:34 |
| thumper | MTecknology: who should be able to push branches for kalliki | 15:34 |
| thumper | MTecknology: no it wasn't you :) | 15:34 |
| thumper | MTecknology: the policy hasn't been set up right | 15:34 |
| MTecknology | thumper: anyone in the ~kalliki team | 15:34 |
| MTecknology | oh | 15:34 |
| thumper | MTecknology: done now | 15:35 |
| MTecknology | thumper: Yay :) - thanks | 15:35 |
| thumper | np | 15:35 |
| MTecknology | thumper: was it setup for just me to be able to - but then I couldn't either because i wasn't part of the team? | 15:36 |
| thumper | MTecknology: just not set up properly | 15:36 |
| MTecknology | ok | 15:36 |
| thumper | you don't want to know the details :) | 15:36 |
| MTecknology | alrighty :P | 15:36 |
| MTecknology | thumper: is it possible to also have blueprints and answers kept private or how does that work? | 15:37 |
| thumper | MTecknology: not yet | 15:37 |
| MTecknology | thumper: ok- thanks | 15:37 |
| MTecknology | thumper: you say alopenerp having the same issue? | 15:37 |
| thumper | MTecknology: was it for the same project? | 15:38 |
| MTecknology | no it was for https://code.launchpad.net/openerp-security i think | 15:39 |
| MTecknology | thumper: oh.. I was also going to ask - I thought it was possible for PPA builds to get a little extra priority for projects that are being paid for - am I wrong about that? | 15:40 |
| bigjools | it's possible | 15:40 |
| bigjools | we just don't have a policy | 15:41 |
| MTecknology | oh, I thought I read something about that in the build queue wiki | 15:41 |
| MTecknology | 36 hours is a long time for a build queue... | 15:43 |
| MTecknology | I take it the builders that weren't building yesterday were taken offlline | 15:44 |
| wgrant | Someone needs to throw some of the i386 builders back onto amd64. | 15:44 |
| wgrant | Oh, all the builders are gone now. | 15:44 |
| thumper | MTecknology: are you involved with the openerp projects? | 15:45 |
| MTecknology | thumper: no, that person just came in here with the same problem shortly after me | 15:45 |
| * thumper nods | 15:45 | |
| thumper | ok | 15:45 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: my package will take less than 10min to build once it starts building :P | 15:46 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: the good news is that they're keeping full - there's no builders just sitting idle for long | 15:46 |
| MTecknology | except for the two armel | 15:47 |
| MTecknology | thumper: "Building private source" - That's what I was thinking of. I'm guessing a private ppa costs either more money - or needs to have a specific reason? | 15:48 |
| thumper | MTecknology: I don't really know, but I didn't think so | 15:48 |
| * thumper looks at bigjools | 15:49 | |
| MTecknology | bigjools: :) | 15:49 |
| * bigjools speaks to thumper in person | 15:50 | |
| thumper | MTecknology: if you have the private voucher thingy, you can have a private ppa | 15:51 |
| bigjools | btw we're down on builders temporarily | 15:51 |
| thumper | MTecknology: you need to make a ppa and before you upload anything, we have a losa mark it private | 15:51 |
| bigjools | or me :) | 15:51 |
| MTecknology | bigjools: any chance you could do that for me? | 15:51 |
| bigjools | sure | 15:51 |
| MTecknology | I'll make one for this quick | 15:51 |
| bigjools | once private, always private BTW | 15:52 |
| bigjools | you can't switch gto | 15:52 |
| bigjools | argh | 15:52 |
| bigjools | you can't switch to public | 15:52 |
| MTecknology | bigjools: alrighty - I just made a ppa for private specifically - https://edge.launchpad.net/~kalliki/+archive/internal | 15:53 |
| bigjools | MTecknology: ok it's private now | 15:54 |
| MTecknology | bigjools: thanks :D | 15:55 |
| MTecknology | This is an exciting day for me :P | 15:55 |
| MTecknology | I no longer need to try to manage our own code and bug server | 15:55 |
| ricotz | bigjools, hi | 16:04 |
| bigjools | hello | 16:05 |
| ricotz | bigjools, is it possible to remove old build in the ppa system, like this one https://edge.launchpad.net/~mono-testing/+archive/ppa/+build/1516923 | 16:05 |
| ricotz | bigjools, in this current builders-situation they are very annoying and it seems there are several build like these present which are over one year old | 16:06 |
| bigjools | one year? | 16:07 |
| ricotz | bigjools, this build was published on 2009-05-31 | 16:07 |
| ricotz | bigjools, https://edge.launchpad.net/~mono-testing/+archive/ppa/+packages | 16:08 |
| bigjools | hmmm interesting | 16:08 |
| ricotz | and seems to be building over and over again | 16:08 |
| bigjools | ah | 16:08 |
| ricotz | there are more like this | 16:09 |
| wgrant | It's not depwaiting on debhelper 7, is it? | 16:09 |
| wgrant | Lots are doing that. | 16:09 |
| bigjools | yes, it is | 16:09 |
| ricotz | so builds like these should be marked failed or something to stop this | 16:10 |
| wgrant | Well, we should fix the bug that causes them to be retried every hour. | 16:10 |
| bigjools | indeed | 16:11 |
| bigjools | they're not supposed to get dispatched until deps are met | 16:11 |
| wgrant | Basically, debhelper 7 is in hardy-backports. The retry script notices this, so tries to rebuild your package. | 16:11 |
| bigjools | ah THT bug | 16:11 |
| wgrant | But the script doesn't realise that your PPA doesn't use -backports. | 16:11 |
| wgrant | Oh, sorry, I thought you knew it. | 16:11 |
| bigjools | I did, I'd forgotten | 16:11 |
| bigjools | grar | 16:12 |
| ricotz | it is not my ppa, i just wanted to point out this thing which uses ressources | 16:12 |
| bigjools | so what do we do when -backports is not available, leave it getting checked for dependencies forever? | 16:12 |
| wgrant | bigjools: It retries every time the script runs. | 16:12 |
| bigjools | when I fix the script I mean | 16:12 |
| wgrant | Right. | 16:13 |
| bigjools | it'll still get considered | 16:13 |
| wgrant | It will. | 16:13 |
| wgrant | Along with lots of other stuff. | 16:13 |
| wgrant | Until the series goes obsolete, I guess, although I'm not sure that even that's excluded at the moment. | 16:13 |
| bigjools | someone can't have noticed that it's waiting for a year now | 16:14 |
| wgrant | There are quite a few builds around like it. | 16:14 |
| ricotz | wgrant, just curious, how many? | 16:14 |
| bigjools | I could change the script so that if it's been depwaiting for > N days, then kill it | 16:14 |
| wgrant | bigjools: If you do that to the primary archive, people will be most displeased. | 16:15 |
| bigjools | how big does N need to be? | 16:15 |
| bigjools | surely it's not infinite, even for Ubuntu | 16:15 |
| wgrant | I don't know. I'd first be checking if it's actually a performance issue yet. | 16:15 |
| MTecknology | 30 days? | 16:16 |
| wgrant | We can obviously exclude obsolete series for primary and PPAs, and non-development Release pockets for primary archives. I'm not sure if either of those are in place at the moment. | 16:16 |
| MTecknology | You guys know of anything that could teach me python in a retardedly simple and easy way? | 16:16 |
| wgrant | Ah, so it already skips obsolete series. | 16:17 |
| wgrant | bigjools: Is it really slow? | 16:17 |
| bigjools | MTecknology: google diveintopython | 16:17 |
| bigjools | wgrant: yes, it hammers the DB every hour | 16:18 |
| bigjools | which makes all of LP slower | 16:18 |
| bigjools | I shifted a load of the queries onto slaves. but still ... | 16:18 |
| wgrant | How many builds are there that it considers each time? | 16:19 |
| bigjools | sh^Wa lot | 16:19 |
| wgrant | It currently materialises a whole lot of extra stuff, since it doesn't exclude Release pockets in the initial query. | 16:19 |
| bigjools | indeed | 16:19 |
| MTecknology | bigjools: thanks :) | 16:20 |
| bigjools | too much stuff to fix, not enough lifetimes to do it in | 16:21 |
| MTecknology | bigjools: indeed, for rund 2 I think I'm going to take it easy :P | 16:22 |
| bigjools | when you know Python, come and fix some Soyuz bugs :) | 16:22 |
| wgrant | Yes, JOIN US! | 16:23 |
| bigjools | <deep voice> | 16:23 |
| * StevenK belts wgrant with the Free Software song | 16:24 | |
| StevenK | Also known as "Assilimation doesn't hurt a bit ... *twitch*" | 16:24 |
| MTecknology | bigjools: I've been wanting to help with LP dev | 16:25 |
| MTecknology | I also need to learn a little bit of C to finially finish another year lkong project - it's beeno no the back burner about 11mo | 16:26 |
| wgrant | StevenK: Ow. | 16:26 |
| StevenK | wgrant: Which bit? :-) | 16:28 |
| wgrant | StevenK: D) All of the above. | 16:28 |
| MTecknology | You guys use vim/emacs for writing python or something else? | 16:31 |
| wgrant | Vim! | 16:32 |
| StevenK | MTecknology: Both, mostly vim | 16:33 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: any special plugins that make it easier or not so much? | 16:33 |
| wgrant | https://dev.launchpad.net/UltimateVimPythonSetup | 16:33 |
| MTecknology | yay | 16:34 |
| === mpt_ is now known as mpt | ||
| * bigjools chuckles at StevenK's mis-spelling | 16:38 | |
| bigjools | wgrant: are you using the vim pyflakes plugin? | 16:39 |
| wgrant | bigjools: No. Where's that? | 16:39 |
| bigjools | wgrant: on vim.org | 16:40 |
| bigjools | it's the best plugin I have for vim | 16:40 |
| MTecknology | I've yet to actually us a vim plugin.. | 16:40 |
| lool | Hmm I need someone to witness a bug | 16:40 |
| lool | https://launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/4.4 | 16:40 |
| MTecknology | in 4+ years of using it :P | 16:40 |
| lool | See the milestones | 16:40 |
| lool | The same milestones is listed twice, instead of listing the two milestones we have | 16:40 |
| lool | I fear this is a cache issue | 16:41 |
| wgrant | I see -0 and -1. | 16:41 |
| wgrant | So yes, probably caching. | 16:41 |
| MTecknology | lool: heh.. I've seen this too - and it was cache | 16:41 |
| bigjools | MTecknology: I started with vi, 21 years ago. :o | 16:41 |
| MTecknology | bigjools: I was 1 then | 16:41 |
| StevenK | lool: Looks perfectly fine to me? | 16:41 |
| wgrant | bigjools: Your vi skills are older than me :( | 16:42 |
| lool | In the list of milestones below | 16:42 |
| lool | Not in the graph | 16:42 |
| bigjools | lol | 16:42 |
| lool | Milestones and releases section | 16:42 |
| lool | I see the -0 one twice | 16:42 |
| lool | after reloading as hard as I can | 16:42 |
| lool | but not with w3m, sigh | 16:42 |
| mwhudson | i guess i've been using emacs for about 2/5ths of my life now | 16:43 |
| MTecknology | lool: ya... I would file a bug at least, I've seen that before - it's not just firefox - anything thata caches has that issue | 16:43 |
| lool | LP #605061 | 16:47 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 605061 in Launchpad itself "Wrong cached milestone information (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/605061 | 16:47 |
| wgrant | Night all. | 16:57 |
| === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
| JoshBrown | I'm working with Bazaar on Launchpad and was wondering how the branch, change, commit, merge process goes? Currently I am pulling from the branch, working on it, then pushing it back, is this 'best practice'? | 17:15 |
| geser | wgrant: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2441 (pyflakes.vim) | 17:18 |
| mtaylor | JoshBrown: depends | 17:21 |
| mtaylor | JoshBrown: is it just you? if so, that's probably fine... if you're aiming on working with a team of folks there are some other ways you can address this? | 17:21 |
| JoshBrown | mtaylor: I'm working in a small team ( lp:codemonkey ), what's wrong with this method for a team? | 17:28 |
| === warp10 is now known as warp10-captato | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| shadeslayer | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/kdelibs/kde4 << can someone help with that ? | 18:44 |
| shadeslayer | the import fails for some reason | 18:45 |
| Quintasan | james_w: I have asked about this earlied but I can't remember why it is like this. I'm using {revno} in my recipe, the directory name still contains {revno} but the tar.gz is created with proper revision number, I can't do source format 3.0 like this. Is there a known workaround for this or I have to manually copy it and create a .orig.tar.bz2? | 18:59 |
| james_w | Quintasan: source format 3.0 (quilt)? | 18:59 |
| Quintasan | yes | 19:00 |
| Quintasan | james_w: ^ | 19:01 |
| james_w | Quintasan: bzr-builder only supports native packages currently, so I don't think you can do it | 19:02 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| BlackZ | there's a typo in the "Subscribe someone else" button, move your cursor on it (without clicking it) and you will see "Launchpad will email that person whenever this bugs changes", s/bugs/bug | 19:03 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| alopenerp | any here from the lanuchpad support team ? | 19:38 |
| beuno | alopenerp, what's up? | 19:41 |
| alopenerp | i need somebody from launchpad team to fix my project, it's a known bug and we already ahd it in the past, it's a paid propritary project, and there no way to create a private branch, i know that you have to tweak something to make it work | 19:42 |
| beuno | bac, you around? | 19:43 |
| alopenerp | project https://launchpad.net/openerp-int doesn't work, i also have https://code.launchpad.net/openerp-security this one work, you see the difference, there are no notice on the code page | 19:43 |
| beuno | alopenerp, the launchpad team is having a team-wide sprint at the moment | 19:44 |
| alopenerp | both are paid, https://code.launchpad.net/openerp-security you see a notice about private branches, https://code.launchpad.net/openerp-int no notices | 19:44 |
| beuno | let me see if I can find someone who knows about this subject | 19:45 |
| beuno | otherwise I'll have to deflect you to a support email | 19:45 |
| alopenerp | beuno: i know but it is supposed to have somebody on duty for such kind of problem | 19:45 |
| alopenerp | beuno: they say that irc is preferred over email | 19:45 |
| beuno | right, except for the one week a year they all sprint | 19:45 |
| beuno | but, hold on a minute | 19:45 |
| beuno | flacoste, ^ | 19:46 |
| alopenerp | beuno: ok i can send a mail | 19:46 |
| alopenerp | last time they fixed it from this channel | 19:46 |
| alopenerp | that's why i come here | 19:46 |
| beuno | alopenerp, let me see if I can find someone | 19:46 |
| alopenerp | beuno: thanks | 19:46 |
| alopenerp | beuno: are you part of that sprint ? | 19:47 |
| beuno | alopenerp, no, which is why it's taking me a little while :) | 19:48 |
| Quintasan | grr | 19:54 |
| alopenerp | Quintasan: hello are you from launchpad team ? | 19:54 |
| Quintasan | alopenerp: nope, but I'm angry at LP | 19:55 |
| Quintasan | :P | 19:55 |
| alopenerp | Quintasan: about ? | 19:55 |
| alopenerp | Quintasan: they are all busy with the summit right now | 19:56 |
| alopenerp | Quintasan: a launchpad sprint/summit happening this week | 19:56 |
| Quintasan | yes, I know that | 19:56 |
| === MTeck is now known as MTecknology | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === mm-mysql is now known as mark|autoconnect | ||
| rduivenvoorde | hi all, trying to submit a bug, yesterday and today, but I get Timeout erros oll the time (Error ID: OOPS-1655A1315) | 20:33 |
| ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1655A1315 | 20:33 |
| flacoste | rduivenvoorde: try putting a shorter title initially | 20:38 |
| flacoste | rduivenvoorde: you can change it once it's filed | 20:38 |
| rduivenvoorde | ah, that's possible :-) I kind of trying to be a little verbose ... | 20:38 |
| flacoste | some duplicate searches trigger bad performance in the query | 20:39 |
| flacoste | alopenerp: you should be set-up now | 20:52 |
| rduivenvoorde | flacoste: thanks this worked, additional question: how to add multiple files as attachment? | 21:02 |
| rduivenvoorde | I see reports in which all files are in one comment, but I can just add one file per comment | 21:02 |
| alopenerp | flacoste thank you i hceck | 21:06 |
| flacoste | rduivenvoorde: you can only add one attachment at a time through the web UI | 21:09 |
| flacoste | rduivenvoorde: the web API can be used to bundle multiple files in a comment, but it's not exposed in the UI | 21:09 |
| flacoste | the reports you see were likely filed through apport | 21:09 |
| flacoste | which makes use of the underlying API | 21:09 |
| rduivenvoorde | ah, clear | 21:09 |
| alopenerp | flacoste: You are not allowed to create branches in OpenERP-int | 21:10 |
| alopenerp | flacoste: tried from web, and bzr push | 21:11 |
| alopenerp | flacoste: even worse than before because we could create branche althought only public ones :) | 21:15 |
| bac | hi beuno | 21:16 |
| beuno | hola bac | 21:16 |
| bac | hi beuno! make it quick the hotel internet is crap | 21:17 |
| beuno | bac, it's all taken care of | 21:17 |
| beuno | so thank you | 21:17 |
| alopenerp | bac: can you fix my private branch problem ? | 21:17 |
| bac | beuno: ok. | 21:17 |
| bac | alopenerp: perhaps. can you tell me what the problem is/ | 21:18 |
| alopenerp | bac: both are paid, https://code.launchpad.net/openerp-security you see a notice about private branches, https://code.launchpad.net/openerp-int no notices | 21:18 |
| alopenerp | bac: impossible to create private branches in openerp-int | 21:18 |
| alopenerp | bac: openerp-int was paid recently (2 weeks ago or something) | 21:18 |
| alopenerp | bac: last time we had a paid project we also had a problem and it was fixed from here | 21:19 |
| flacoste | bac: mbarnett is on the issue | 21:23 |
| flacoste | mbarnett: both are now Private only | 21:23 |
| flacoste | bac, alopenerp: both projects are now Private branches only | 21:23 |
| flacoste | alopenerp: that's how openerp-security is setup | 21:23 |
| flacoste | alopenerp: do you want to be able to create public branches on openerp-int? | 21:23 |
| alopenerp | flacoste nope i want to push a private branch | 21:24 |
| flacoste | alopenerp: do you want only to push private branches? | 21:25 |
| alopenerp | flacoste: yes bzr push bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~openerp-dev/openerp-int/test | 21:25 |
| alopenerp | flacoste: gives: | 21:25 |
| alopenerp | flacoste: bzr: ERROR: Permission denied: "~openerp-dev/openerp-int/test/": : You cannot create branches in "~openerp-dev/openerp-int" | 21:25 |
| flacoste | alopenerp: that i get | 21:25 |
| flacoste | my question is do you want to be able to create public branches in addition to private branches on that project | 21:26 |
| flacoste | now it's setup for Private only | 21:26 |
| alopenerp | flacoste that's ok | 21:26 |
| flacoste | we need to investigate why you are denied permission | 21:26 |
| alopenerp | flacoste we have many other projects for public branches | 21:26 |
| alopenerp | flacoste: thanks | 21:26 |
| lifeless | gnight | 21:26 |
| flacoste | makes sense | 21:26 |
| flacoste | good night lifeless | 21:27 |
| alopenerp | flacoste: most of our work is publis only a small subset must be private, that's why we need openerp-int for internal stuff | 21:27 |
| bac | hi alopenerp | 21:38 |
| alopenerp | bac: hi | 21:39 |
| maxb | *blink* | 22:08 |
| maxb | wow | 22:08 |
| maxb | 11 active mercurial code imports, 499 active git code imports | 22:08 |
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| bdrung | what's the difference between those two merge requests: https://code.launchpad.net/~lfaraone/ubuntu/maverick/memtest86+/4.10-1ubuntu1/+merge/28594 and https://code.launchpad.net/~serge-hallyn/ubuntu/lucid/qemu-kvm/memleak-fix/+merge/28645 | 22:15 |
| bdrung | i can change the status for the first one, but not for the second one. I am member of the ubuntu-sponsors team | 22:16 |
| mbarnett | alopenerp: heya, so, you can't create branches against openerp-int? | 22:21 |
| beuno | mbarnett, is this maybe a project vs a project group thing? | 22:22 |
| beuno | I *think* you can't create branches in project groups | 22:23 |
| beuno | flacoste or sinzui would know | 22:23 |
| flacoste | beuno: no, that's not related | 22:27 |
| MTecknology | This has been in the build queue for 15 hours how... | 23:02 |
| MTecknology | now* | 23:02 |
| MTecknology | And only 3 hours to go.... which is what it said this morning... | 23:04 |
| MTecknology | what the heck is going on? | 23:04 |
| MTecknology | oh.. priority is STILL only 2505 - it's supposed to increase as it sits in the queue ?? | 23:04 |
| alopenerp | mbarnett: fixe by bac | 23:21 |
| alopenerp | mbarnett: fixed by bac | 23:21 |
| mbarnett | alopenerp: did he subscribe the correct teams to the project? | 23:21 |
| alopenerp | mbarnett: beuno; it's now working, bac did the manual setup | 23:21 |
| mbarnett | excellent | 23:22 |
| alopenerp | mbarnett: yes i tested it ~openerp-dev and ~openerp | 23:22 |
| mbarnett | perfect. | 23:22 |
| alopenerp | mbarnett: thank you for worrying about me :) | 23:22 |
| mbarnett | heh, np | 23:22 |
| beuno | alopenerp, we all worry about you! | 23:23 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!