wgrant | lamont: Hi. I revived that branch: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~wgrant/launchpad/multi-arch-builders. | 01:18 |
---|---|---|
wgrant | This also conveniently lets us later change the master to dispatch multiple archs to a single builder, of course. | 01:18 |
MTecknology | wgrant: neat-o stuff :) | 01:55 |
ZandreBran | hi guys. please, how to use space in the bazaar? | 03:54 |
ZandreBran | Ursinha, ôlas | 03:55 |
mtaylor | spm: I feel like I haven't bugged you in at _least_ 4 hours | 04:53 |
soren | ~pythoneers are officially off my christmas card list. | 05:01 |
soren | srsly. | 05:01 |
wgrant | It seems like those builds should be demoted. | 05:03 |
wgrant | But they should be almost done now. | 05:03 |
soren | Are you kidding? There's still >2000 left. | 05:03 |
wgrant | Ah, it's about half done. | 05:04 |
soren | Sorry, 1095. | 05:04 |
wgrant | Yeah. | 05:04 |
soren | ...but there's more than 2000 in the i386 queue. | 05:04 |
wgrant | I guess the lack of builders last night made it take a while. | 05:04 |
soren | I've been waiting more more than 24 hours now, and I doubt I'm the one worst off. | 05:05 |
wgrant | Oh, certainly. | 05:05 |
wgrant | This situation is completely ridiculous. | 05:05 |
wgrant | But nobody who matters cares :) | 05:05 |
soren | You know what the worst part is? | 05:07 |
soren | Those times where you look at the /builders page and like 80% of the i386 ppa builders are idle. | 05:07 |
soren | Like /right/ now. | 05:08 |
wgrant | That's because buildd-manager takes around 15 minutes to go through all of the builders at times like this. | 05:08 |
wgrant | So it will iterate through all the builders... processing completed builds. | 05:08 |
wgrant | Then it will iterate through them all again... dispatching builds to them. | 05:08 |
wgrant | And because it's so slow, most of the builds have finished by the next cycle. | 05:09 |
wgrant | So it takes ages to complete that cycle too. | 05:09 |
wgrant | etc, etc. | 05:09 |
soren | How long it takes to go through builders depends on how many builds are in the queue? | 05:09 |
soren | ...or what's making it take so long right now? | 05:09 |
wgrant | Mostly how many builds have finished since the last cycle. I also suspect slowness in the query to determine which build is to be dispatched next, but I have no evidence of this theory. | 05:11 |
soren | ok. | 05:12 |
soren | I hope one day I'll work up sufficient motivation to add the capability to Launchpad to provide one's own builder. | 05:14 |
bilalakhtar | what's the matter? lp isn't generating diffs for branch merges. I have been waiting for 5 minutes now. | 07:05 |
bilalakhtar | kiko: you there? | 07:05 |
spm | bilalakhtar: which branch? | 07:08 |
bilalakhtar | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~bilalakhtar/gwibber/fix-585892/+merge/29952 | 07:10 |
bilalakhtar | spm: ^^ and https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~bilalakhtar/ubuntu/maverick/selinux-basics/merge-603595/+merge/29547 | 07:10 |
spm | ta, lookin' | 07:10 |
bilalakhtar | spm: the first one among tese links is just a one-line change and the gwibber branch is only 7mb | 07:12 |
bilalakhtar | spm: seen? | 07:15 |
bilalakhtar | hyperair: welcome | 07:21 |
hyperair | why, thank you =) | 07:21 |
fta2 | guys, for several days, none of my dailies got a chance to build. i thought the scheduler was fixed after the full rebuild nightmare.. | 07:21 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
fta2 | seems that pythoneers/py27stack2 rebuild is taking all the slots | 07:22 |
micahg | fta2: python 2.7 test build | 07:22 |
fta2 | yep | 07:22 |
micahg | fta2: also, the builders were yanked for part of the day | 07:23 |
fta2 | i'm sick of this. i'll shut the dailies for good | 07:23 |
fta2 | they're clearly unwelcome | 07:23 |
micahg | fta2: occasionally things block them, I think overall they build | 07:24 |
micahg | fta2: I believe the Launchpad team is having a sprint which means a little less love for the builders | 07:24 |
micahg | when do the builders recognize if something's should be superceded | 07:26 |
spm | bilalakhtar: the job that generates those had gone gaga, being a technical term; I gave it some lovin' via kill, and things should start happening again, | 07:27 |
maxb | micahg: I believe at the point just before they would otherwise start to build it | 07:27 |
micahg | maxb: ah, so it'll show queued, but not actually build? | 07:27 |
maxb | yes | 07:28 |
micahg | k, I hope so :) | 07:28 |
micahg | ah, I see one where it happened, good :) | 07:29 |
fta2 | micahg, i killed umd, feel free to host the bot on your side | 07:29 |
bilalakhtar | spm: thanks | 07:30 |
micahg | fta2: I'm not ready to do that yet, can you please keep if going for another couple weeks? | 07:30 |
fta2 | micahg, it's useless, no slots to build anything. we're losing our time | 07:30 |
micahg | fta2: the LOSAs offered to score up the builds before, I think we should call in that favor maybe :) | 07:31 |
spm | only if cake is involved | 07:31 |
micahg | spm: next UDS? | 07:31 |
fta2 | i stop grinning. it's not worth it | 07:31 |
fta2 | bye | 07:32 |
micahg | spm: any chance we can get the chromium and mozilla builds scored up so they build? | 07:32 |
spm | micahg: sure, can you give me a link - just makes it easier tracking stuff down | 07:33 |
bilalakhtar | oh yeah, this reminds me, the recipe build I requested 2 days ago and was to build 1 hour after the request, have not been build even now | 07:33 |
micahg | spm: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa/ and the PPAs for this team: https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily, thanks | 07:33 |
spm | ew. 44 in the first one? any particular sets that you can live without for the timebeing? eg lpia? | 07:35 |
micahg | spm: sure, don't need lpia :) | 07:35 |
micahg | spm: and if I had to choose, I"d say hardy, lucid, and maverick should come first | 07:36 |
spm | oki | 07:36 |
micahg | spm: oh, and you can skip firefox 3.6.8 and xulrunner 1.9.2.8 on lucid and maverick | 07:38 |
spm | micahg: oki, so latest chromiums are rescored | 07:42 |
micahg | spm: k, hopefully that'll make fta happy | 07:43 |
micahg | spm: thanks | 07:43 |
spm | np, the ui isn't conducive to mass re-prioritising. no criticism/complaint, just saying. | 07:44 |
micahg | spm: if you can do anything for the mozilla daily PPA, that would be great too | 07:44 |
micahg | spm: should I file a bug for that? | 07:44 |
spm | micahg: heh, getting the firefox ones done next. | 07:44 |
spm | bug, nah. the bug is the slow build scheduling which aiui, is being looked at with some urgency | 07:45 |
micahg | spm: k, thanks, I think I'm going to drop off to sleep then, have a good day | 07:45 |
spm | you too, have a good one! | 07:45 |
micahg | spm: oh, it seems like only the chromium daily has any builds BTW | 07:48 |
spm | micahg: ? not sure I follow? I'm seeing heaps for mozilla here? about 96. | 07:49 |
micahg | spm: no, mozilla does have 96, but you can skip firefox368 and xulrunner1928 for lucid/maverick, lpia builds, | 07:50 |
spm | oh yes, I was. :-) | 07:50 |
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
micahg | spm: but I remember that I asked you for all the chromium PPAs and only the daily one has builds | 07:51 |
spm | Oh! right. sorry - my bad. | 07:52 |
spm | fwiw, I'm only rescoring the most recents. Unf you have a few older ones :-( | 07:52 |
micahg | spm: oh, also skip Firefox 4.0 | 07:53 |
spm | heh, I think I've already done those. just did the xulrunner ones | 07:53 |
micahg | spm: it won't install anyways | 07:53 |
spm | micahg: thunderbird? | 07:54 |
micahg | spm: the thunderbird builds should be ok to rescore | 07:54 |
spm | oki | 07:54 |
spm | micahg: I think that's the lot now... | 07:56 |
micahg | spm: awesome, thanks, can I ping you tomorrow night if the python stuff isn't done yet? | 07:57 |
spm | depends if cake arrives tomorrow or not. let me just dig up the address of a local cake delivery agent.... :-P | 07:57 |
spm | micahg: certainly :-) | 07:58 |
micahg | spm: thanks | 07:58 |
stanley_robertso | hi all.. Need a small info on launchpad .. iam a registered user on launchpad. i have completed the "code of conduct" on the page. hOwever, the status still shows that i didnot do it. | 09:00 |
stanley_robertso | Any help/info on that, from anyone please | 09:00 |
mrevell | stanley_robertso, Do you have a link to your Launchpad profile page? | 09:02 |
stanley_robertso | hi mrevell .. here it is : https://launchpad.net/~roopesh-majeti | 09:03 |
* mrevell looks | 09:04 | |
mrevell | stanley_robertso, Can you try signing it again? | 09:04 |
stanley_robertso | sure | 09:04 |
stanley_robertso | mrevell, but how .. should i do it with differe key ? | 09:05 |
mrevell | stanley_robertso, What exactly happened when you tried last time? | 09:05 |
stanley_robertso | it went fine ... when i click on "code of conduct" link now.. it is saying : "It appears you have already done this. The key XXXXX is registered on your account. You can skip to the next step if you are not intending on signing with a different key. " | 09:06 |
mrevell | stanley_robertso, Have you tried skipping to the next step? | 09:07 |
stanley_robertso | mrevell, i did .. actually iam registering myself for the bug squad team .. and the approval is getting declined ... as "code of conduct" is not shown as completed/signed | 09:08 |
mrevell | And what happened when you skipped to the next step? | 09:09 |
stanley_robertso | nothing.. there is no next step mentioned | 09:10 |
stanley_robertso | i just uploaded my fingerprint and thatz it.. didnot do anything else .. ofcourse.. followed the instruction mentioned in the fingerprint email we get | 09:10 |
wgrant | stanley_robertso: There should be another step on the Code of Conduct page. | 09:13 |
wgrant | Under the message telling you that the key is already registered. | 09:13 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
stanley_robertso | wgrant, mrevell .. i got it | 09:14 |
stanley_robertso | i forgot the final step.. bad on me.. did it just now ... | 09:14 |
stanley_robertso | thanks to all | 09:14 |
falktx | hi guys | 10:38 |
falktx | deleted ppas still appear on my personal page | 10:38 |
falktx | any way to make it disappear? | 10:39 |
falktx | or re.enable the PPA again? | 10:39 |
wgrant | falktx: I don't think you can reenable them yet. | 10:45 |
wgrant | But they only show on your page to you. Others can't see them. | 10:45 |
falktx | oh, ok | 10:45 |
falktx | didn't knew that | 10:45 |
falktx | i guess it's ok then | 10:46 |
falktx | thanks for the info | 10:46 |
geser | has someone an idea what happened here? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51966250/upload_1871365_log.txt | 10:47 |
geser | Looking at the build log it seems to come from "Installed-Size: 4460. | 10:49 |
geser | But I don't have an idea why | 10:49 |
wgrant | geser: The package is bad; Installed-Size has a tab at the end. | 10:49 |
geser | but why? the other arch built fine | 10:49 |
wgrant | Where's the build log? | 10:49 |
wgrant | pkgbinarymangler started mangling Installed-Size a few hours ago. | 10:49 |
wgrant | I wonder if that's related. | 10:50 |
geser | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51966247/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-sparc.gnome-power-manager_2.30.1-1ubuntu2_BUILDING.txt.gz | 10:51 |
geser | https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/2.30.1-1ubuntu2/+build/1871365 | 10:51 |
geser | might be, gnome-session on i386 is also affected | 10:51 |
wgrant | Yeah, so, the package is bad. | 10:52 |
* wgrant checks pkgbinarymangler. | 10:52 | |
wgrant | Woooooah. | 10:52 |
wgrant | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/pkgbinarymangler/ubuntu/revision/85 | 10:53 |
sluimers | Hi there when I upload my PPA I always get a warning that my key is not trusted. Is there anything I can do about that? | 11:37 |
sluimers | I tried signing, but that doesn't work | 11:37 |
geser | can you us the error message you got? | 11:39 |
poolie | hi wgrant | 11:41 |
wgrant | Hi poolie. | 11:41 |
sluimers | gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! | 11:47 |
sluimers | gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. | 11:47 |
lamont | wgrant: nice! | 11:54 |
sluimers | I thought the servers that compile ppa's were back? | 12:13 |
wgrant | sluimers: They were... but they're gone again. | 12:14 |
dnjl | hi! whats wrong with the builders? I am waitung since 27h hours for a 6h job - now it tells me to wait 23h! why this? this is a inpossible situation... | 12:14 |
sluimers | I still get to see that I have to wait till the next day, just like yesterday | 12:14 |
sluimers | I got the same thing dnjl :(. | 12:15 |
dnjl | yo, i see | 12:15 |
wgrant | It would be nice if the remaining 1011 Python 2.7 rebuilds were to be deprioritised... | 12:16 |
sluimers | lol, I see.. | 12:16 |
sluimers | Where's the python ppa? | 12:16 |
wgrant | https://edge.launchpad.net/~pythoneers/+archive/py27stack2/+builds?build_state=pending | 12:16 |
sluimers | After that, is the worst over? | 12:18 |
wgrant | Maybe. | 12:19 |
wgrant | That's around half the remaining jobs. | 12:19 |
wgrant | Er, a third, sorry. | 12:20 |
sluimers | X_X | 12:22 |
sluimers | 3000 builds? | 12:22 |
dnjl | Idea: It would be nice if ppa users would able to provide ressources for builders: the lp would send a secured buildd-vm to the provided machines which do the job(s)... - e.g. with libvirt migration | 12:22 |
wgrant | dnjl: It's impossible to allow users to provide builders in a secure fashion, unfortunately. | 12:23 |
wgrant | sluimers: 3200, but yes, X_X indeed. | 12:23 |
sluimers | Guess I'm not helping with 64 builds ehehehehe ^_^;; | 12:25 |
dnjl | why? if the lp dispatcher would build a ro squashfs-image secured with zertificates to send to the "known registered ppa user", this should a way to think about | 12:25 |
wgrant | dnjl: The user can still tamper with the VM... | 12:26 |
sluimers | wgrant, Where do you see the list of builds? | 12:26 |
wgrant | sluimers: I can't really see a list, but https://launchpad.net/builders provides a summary. | 12:26 |
dnjl | wgrant: yes, sure - but its easy to say fastly "no" - does someone really thought about it? | 12:27 |
jpds | dnjl: builds are insecure by design. | 12:29 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
dnjl | jpds: yes i know, but what if we are sending to the users host a complete precreated "ro/live" buildd image which is secured with lp certs and this will connect through e.g. openvpn to lp to get the rest. | 12:33 |
wgrant | dnjl: The user still has access to the hardware. | 12:34 |
wgrant | And if you have access to the hardware, you have access to the VM. | 12:34 |
dnjl | I thing there are several ways to think about to get the required savety | 12:34 |
wgrant | If you can identify a virtualisation technique which does not involve trusting the hardware, I'm sure everyone involved in cloud computing will be most interested. | 12:36 |
dnjl | but is it possible to manipulate the process if the buildd system is certified and crypted so that you will get i only run if its not manipulated - the vm itself only needs ram and network and network is secured via vpn to lp | 12:39 |
wgrant | It's possible for the VM to trust LP, sure. But it's not possible for LP to trust the VM. | 12:40 |
dnjl | yes, this would tricky - i will thing about... | 12:41 |
dnjl | think | 12:41 |
NEERAJ_GUPTA | Hey http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/maverick/sugar-flipsticks-activity/maverick/revision/3/debian/install is down | 12:44 |
=== flacoste_afk is now known as flacoste | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
ricotz | wgrant, hello | 14:54 |
ricotz | wgrant, any solutions to solve the problem with builds which are waiting for dependencies like forever | 14:55 |
wrinkliez | would anyone know why its taking an abnormally long time to build? like, its been saying waiting to build for 7 hours+ | 15:00 |
geser | wrinkliez: a python2.7 test build of all python-packages takes some PPA resources | 15:03 |
wrinkliez | oh is that whats going on | 15:04 |
wrinkliez | cool | 15:04 |
geser | wrinkliez: and for a reason I don't know, PPA builders come and go as they like | 15:07 |
wrinkliez | huh. | 15:08 |
bigjools | the additional builders are not dedicated to the build farm, they're simply lent to it when someone else is not using them | 15:08 |
kiko | FE FI FO FUM | 15:09 |
bigjools | we're getting 7 new dedicated builders soon | 15:09 |
wgrant | And a fixed buildd-manager? | 15:10 |
sluimers | FE FI FO FUM, I smell a hunam | 15:41 |
jpds | sluimers: Yourself? | 15:47 |
sluimers | Just quoting an old game | 15:50 |
sluimers | I see that there's one ppa armel builder on https://launchpad.net/builders basically doing nothing | 15:51 |
bigjools | it's not for general use | 15:51 |
sluimers | ah, okay | 15:51 |
=== beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
yotta911 | Launchpad is teasing me with an error message saying that my browser don't send a HTTP Referres Header. Why? | 16:52 |
micahg | yotta911: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+faq/1024 | 16:54 |
yotta911 | micahg: I know how it's work and i guess a privacy violation | 16:56 |
yotta911 | micahg: and more: If i woud like attack launchpad, i will forge this header easily. | 16:57 |
yotta911 | But Ok. Thanks for helping. | 16:58 |
micahg | yotta911: I just know where the FAQ is, I don't work on the code (yet) | 16:59 |
maxb | The Referer header check is not intended to protect against direct forged requests, it protects against cross-site request forgery | 16:59 |
yotta911 | What's the problem with cross-site request? | 17:00 |
yotta911 | micahg: I understood and i will open a bug. Thanks again.] | 17:02 |
maxb | yotta911: For example, some website presents you with a form that asks you to vote on something. But secretly (in the html source), it actually directs your browser to ask Launchpad to delete your PPA. | 17:24 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
pmatulis | mneptok: o/ | 19:33 |
=== dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
mneptok | pmatulis: ahoy! | 19:38 |
pmatulis | mneptok: all good on your end? | 19:38 |
mneptok | pmatulis: AFAIK, yes. do you know something i don't know? ;) | 19:39 |
* mneptok is busy prepping for OSCon | 19:39 | |
mneptok | pmatulis: anyone from the office going to DebConf in NYC or LinuxCon in Boston? | 19:40 |
pmatulis | mneptok: etienne mentioned it a while back | 19:40 |
pmatulis | mneptok: debconf | 19:41 |
mneptok | pmatulis: i should call him with travel tips i have accrued. | 19:41 |
pmatulis | mneptok: i'm not sure if he's going though | 19:41 |
mneptok | let's find out .... :) | 19:43 |
sproaty | is loggerhead down? http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~sproaty/whyteboard/development/changes | 19:47 |
sproaty | aand back :P | 19:49 |
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
=== dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
jcastro | bueno had a session on doing merge proposals on lp but is now sick while sprinting, the session is in 15 minutes, can anyone possibly substitute teaching a session for an hour for Ubuntu Developer Week? | 20:47 |
jcastro | rockstar: help? | 20:52 |
rockstar | jcastro, forewarning: I am frakkin' tired right now... | 20:53 |
jcastro | ok, I'll cancel it | 20:53 |
rockstar | jcastro, I can probably field questions or something. | 20:53 |
nhandler | jcastro: We could just turn it into a Q&A session if we don't find anyone | 20:53 |
jcastro | ok | 20:53 |
jcastro | rockstar: want to do that? | 20:53 |
rockstar | jcastro, sure, but can I cut out before the whole hour is up? | 20:54 |
jcastro | yeah | 20:54 |
rockstar | jcastro, for context, I woke up at 330 this morning, couldn't get back to sleep, and it's getting late here. | 20:54 |
jcastro | wait, are you sprinting? | 20:54 |
rockstar | jcastro, I am indeed in Prague. | 20:55 |
rockstar | (I'll see you next week) | 20:55 |
jcastro | I'd rather cut the day early, disregard. | 20:55 |
jcastro | I wasn't aware you were sprinting! | 20:55 |
rockstar | jcastro, as long as it doesn't cause problems. I'm happy to help. | 20:55 |
jcastro | it's all good, go to bed! | 20:56 |
=== chrisccoulson__ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
ahasenack | guys, launchpad is timing out for me | 21:42 |
ahasenack | I'm on this url: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+search?text=landscape-client | 21:42 |
ahasenack | is it a general issue or just a beef with that particular search? | 21:42 |
bobj | hi. Can anybody here help with password reset on launchpad? | 22:10 |
bobj | Can anybody here help with password reset on launchpad? | 22:21 |
iwontbecreative | I've a question, does someone here now how to target a bug for a milestone ? (The milestone doe support bug target.) | 22:29 |
james_w | iwontbecreative: you mean with the API? | 22:31 |
james_w | lifeless: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/testr_recipe/0.1 | 22:34 |
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
iwontbecreative | No i meant in launchpad itself ? | 22:38 |
iwontbecreative | I know it's possible a stupid question but couldn't find | 22:38 |
james_w | iwontbecreative: you need a certain level of access to the project to be able to do that apparently | 22:41 |
iwontbecreative | Oh... | 22:43 |
iwontbecreative | Seems bad for some projects like onehundredpaper cuts :/ | 22:44 |
iwontbecreative | Thank you for the answer :) | 22:44 |
mtaylor | hey spm | 23:33 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!