/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/07/16/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

chrisccoulsonheh, i found another branch with a stacking problem00:00
chrisccoulsoni've added firefox-3.7.head back until i've fixed any more that i find00:01
chrisccoulsonright, thats the 3.6.7build2 updates done on all releases00:02
micahgfta: that problem is fixed in lp:firefox00:03
micahgchrisccoulson: I wonder how the branches got stacked like that00:03
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i'm not too sure. i've added it back for now, and i'm just running bzr reconfigure --unstacked on the other branches that are stacked against it00:04
chrisccoulsonwe can remove it again once we've fixed them00:04
micahgchrisccoulson: k00:04
chrisccoulsonasac - you added your changelog entry in to the version that's already uploaded ;)00:10
chrisccoulsonmicahg - our debian/control is quite a bit smaller now ;)00:13
micahgchrisccoulson: for which version?00:13
chrisccoulsonmicahg - firefox-3.6.head00:13
ddecatormicahg: oh, before i move more reports to the ppa project, is the idea that all bugs filed by someone using the ppa be moved, or that just bugs affecting a release in the ppa and not the stable release be moved?00:14
micahgchrisccoulson: well, I wouldn't have removed all of the transitional packages, since .head is used for the dailies, we still need them until Hardy, Jaunty, and Karmic is EOL00:15
chrisccoulsonb'ah, debcommit duplicated asac's changelog entry in my commit because i moved it around00:15
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i discussed it with asac briefly earlier, he suggested introducing a source package in to PPA's to provide transitional packages00:15
micahgddecator: any report about a version in a PPA that's not the mozilla-security PPA, i.e. anything with a ~ in it00:16
micahgchrisccoulson: ok, that's probably a better idea :)00:16
micahgchrisccoulson: I'll try to do that over the weekend then00:16
ddecatormicahg: alright, just wanted to make sure i moved the right ones. i'll work on that when i get time00:16
chrisccoulsonmicahg - cool, thanks00:16
micahgfta: would you be able to make me a member of the umd team?00:16
asacchrisccoulson: omg00:18
asacman i am too much out of this ;)00:18
asacshould i uncommit ?00:18
chrisccoulsonasac - no worries, i fixed it in the commit i just did00:18
asaci missed it up completely ;)00:18
asaceven the add/update lines were collapsed00:19
chrisccoulsonheh, no worries ;)00:19
* asac runs away in shame00:19
asacchrisccoulson: committed changelog syntax fix ;)00:20
asacafter all i need a few commits ;)00:20
asacchrisccoulson: oh ... the patch i committed i should upstream ;)00:22
asacbug me if you dont see me changing the patch to contain the mozilla version soon00:22
ftamicahg, i'm not the owner, asac is00:22
chrisccoulsonasac - ok, thanks :)00:22
asacmicahg: what about (owner?)00:23
micahgasac: umd00:23
asacwhat do you need?00:23
micahgasac: I just wanted to be added so I can upload00:23
asachmm. from what i understand chris wanted to take over the whole bot ;)00:23
asaci think its smarter as he might have the powers to move that to a data center machine at some point ;)00:24
micahgheh00:24
chrisccoulsonawesome, the hardy daily builds work again :)00:24
micahgjdstrand: would you be able to look at my package set addition request tomorrow?00:33
micahgfta_: can you reenable umd?00:37
=== fta_ is now known as fta
micahgasac: until then, can you add me so that I can upload?00:37
fta<fta> i also said i'll kill the bot00:40
fta<fta> i didn't, but i should00:40
ftamicahg, ^^00:40
fta+have00:41
micahgfta: ah, ok :), thanks, I'll get the builds scored up again tonight, chromium-daily as well :)00:41
ftamicahg, i'm not evil, i'm just angry00:43
micahgfta: I know, I'm trying to help where I can at the moment00:43
ftamicahg, if the lp thing was a new problem, i wouldn't make such a fuss, but it's a recurring issue, cycle after cycle, they don't care00:45
ftaseems soren is angry about the same thing00:46
micahgfta: indeed, well, LP seemed to be running on autopilot for the most part for a couple days which didn't help00:46
ftaby cycle, i meant, maverick, lucid, ..;00:47
ftanot just days00:47
micahgfta: oh, I know, I remember this last cycle00:47
ddecatorthe build score issue?00:47
micahgfta: BTW, you're an admin of the umd team, so you can add people as well00:48
micahgddecator: yes, the PPAs get overloaded when rebuilds happened and they're not always scored low00:51
ddecatormicahg: gotcha00:51
micahgfta: BTW, I had upstream fix the 1.9.2.8/3.6.8 dailies on Lucid/Maverick so they shouldn't FTBFS again00:52
micahgfta: thanks :)00:56
ftai was looking at the wrong place. on the right, there was just "leave the team", no "add member"00:57
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== fta_ is now known as fta
rippsooh... when is chromium-daily/dev gonna get synced? I desperately want that cairo flickering bug fixed.04:19
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== fta_ is now known as fta
DanaGupdate-alternatives: error: alternative path /usr/bin/firefox-4.0 doesn't exist.07:21
DanaGhmm.07:21
DanaGThat's on lucid amd64.07:21
micahgDanaG: yeah, should be fixed in tonight's build07:21
DanaGSweet.07:21
DanaGah, meaning it'll be in dailies by tomorrow?  If so, sweet.07:26
DanaGOh yeah, and thunderbird-3.1 in dailies hasn't been updated in, oh, this year.07:27
DanaGVersion: 3.1~a1~hg20091221r4576+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd107:27
micahgDanaG: yes07:27
micahgDanaG: yeah, I need to figure that out soon07:27
DanaGAnd it was a pain trying to find a 64-bit build of lightning to go with it... I eventually just put 32-bit thunderbird-3.1 in /opt07:28
micahgDanaG: I'm hoping to push lightning with TB3.1 to maverick early next month07:29
DanaGHmm, how about Lucid?  If need be, I can just grab the Maverick packages.07:30
micahgDanaG: will probably go to Lucid after some testing in Maverick and PPAs07:30
DanaGPPA is good.  Thanks.07:31
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== fta_ is now known as fta
micahghi chrisccoulson09:33
micahggood morning :)09:34
chrisccoulsonhi micahg09:34
chrisccoulsonhow are you?09:34
micahgchrisccoulson: do you remember why we didn't have transitional  packages for xul191 in lucid?09:34
micahgchrisccoulson: tired :), should have been asleep a couple hours ago, but alas, not :)09:34
micahgchrisccoulson: how are you?09:36
chrisccoulsonheh, Xorg just crashed09:36
chrisccoulsoni'm good thanks09:36
chrisccoulsonfor xul191 -> xul192, we shouldn't need transitional packages as their dependencies should pull the new package in, and they are parallel installable09:36
micahgchrisccoulson: yes, but the current issue is xul191 breaks eclipse in lucid, bdrung was going to add a breaks, but pitti thinks xul192 should handle it so we don't have xuls cluttering up people's systems09:37
chrisccoulsoni'm not sure about that09:37
chrisccoulsoni think eclipse should be fixed to not use xul191, like we've had to do with other applications in hardy -> karmic09:38
micahgk, I'm too tired to think too deeply about it, can you chat w/pitti about it?09:38
chrisccoulsonyeah, can do09:38
micahgchrisccoulson: we did that, but it wasn't working right, and then they pulled the code that did that09:38
micahgthey = Debian eclipse maintainers09:39
micahgchrisccoulson: I have a build fix for the crash reporter which I'll add in when I wake up, it needs a curl dev lib, I'm doing a local test build now09:54
micahgthat'll cut down on the number of bugs for us :)09:54
micahgchrisccoulson: tty in a few hours09:56
chrisccoulsonmicahg - cool, ok. will see you later!09:56
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== fta_ is now known as fta
asac!test10:49
ubot2hrm?10:49
asacthx10:49
chrisccoulsonasac - i had a look at your comments from yesterday about splitting the xulrunner package for UNE10:57
chrisccoulsonand then i thought....10:57
chrisccoulson....whatever we do won't work anyway10:57
chrisccoulsonas applications still need to discover where mozjs is (either by doing the xulrunner --gre-version hack or by using the xpcom glue)10:58
chrisccoulsonand so they still need xulrunner to exist on the system10:58
chrisccoulsonso, bundling mozjs in couchdb might be the better option10:58
asacchrisccoulson: not sure what you mean. if we package mozjs independent we can maintain the soname11:01
asacetc.11:01
asacand put it in /usr/lib11:01
chrisccoulsonasac - so, debian are maintaining there own SO name? (and just bumping it every time there's an ABI change)11:02
asacyes11:02
asacthere is a bug that would just export public symbols11:02
asacwith that we might have some chance to maintain it11:03
asacdebian currently tries to maintain it without that fix11:03
asacbut well. i really think its setting wrong signal until mozilla agrees that they want this to be exported11:03
asacso lets try to include mozjs in couch11:03
asacand get over it11:03
asaccould also be statically linked in there11:04
asachmm. android checkout is 4.2G ;)11:05
chrisccoulsonasac - ok, i'll have a chat with the couchdb guys too11:05
chrisccoulsonwho's looking after that?11:06
asacthey are crazy11:06
asac;)11:06
asacchrisccoulson: you mean the couchdb package? thats kenvandine most likely11:06
asacit was forced into ubuntu through online services ;)11:06
asacand then got picked up by many things unfortunately :((11:06
asaci think upstream already includes mozjs in their tree11:07
asacso we just dont need to strip it ;)11:07
asacand ship it _the ugly way_ tm11:07
asacmaybe latest couchdb can already be built with javascriptcore?11:08
asachmm. seems not :(11:09
asacat least not what is in maverick according to configure11:09
chrisccoulsonasac - are you still going to be looking after ubufox btw?11:12
chrisccoulsoni've got a search plugin to add here ;)11:12
asacchrisccoulson: baidu?11:13
chrisccoulsonasac - yeah11:13
asacwe shouldnt put it in ubufox11:13
asacrather in the langpack-o-matic database11:13
asacfor cn11:13
asachmm. damn i forgot the hostname of that ;)11:14
asacwas that macquearie11:15
asacor something11:15
chrisccoulsonasac - oh, i wasn't sure whether we want to add it for all users, or just chinese users11:15
asacchrisccoulson: look at http://www.baidu.com/11:15
asaci dont think anyone wants that ;)11:15
chrisccoulsonyeah, i saw already ;)11:15
asacunless you want to encourage ubuntu users to read chinese ;)11:15
chrisccoulsonlol11:16
asacso yeah. we want to add it for chinese folks only ... and make it only for chinese the default11:16
asacthe default change we could do in ubufox11:16
asacbut isnt mozilla even shipping baidu by default for cn upstream?11:16
chrisccoulsonasac - i'm not sure what they ship11:17
chrisccoulsonwe can discuss that at the sprint next week anyway11:17
asacyep. lets do that11:17
asaci have to wait for arne input on the hostname anyway ... just cant remember :((11:17
=== fta__ is now known as fta
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== fta_ is now known as fta
asacchrisccoulson: another sec update building ;)?15:13
asacjust saw that you block the builders :-P15:13
chrisccoulsonasac - yeah, i'm just hogging the builders ;)15:13
asacah its build215:13
asaccool15:13
asacyou are on top :-P15:13
chrisccoulsonand i'm about to rebase openjdk from doko's latest upload to lucid-proposed, which fixes an armel build failure15:14
chrisccoulsonso, the builders are going to be loaded with openjdk too ;)15:14
chrisccoulsonthey've got all weekend to catch up though15:14
asacthey already are15:14
asac  3698369  [building]  Building i386 build of openjdk-6 6b18-1.8-4ubuntu2 in ubuntu lucid PROPOSED15:14
chrisccoulsonyeah, that's doko's latest upload15:14
asacchrisccoulson: you could upload it late EOD ;)15:14
asacchrisccoulson: problem is that security ppa has now a higher default build score than normal archive15:15
asacso you have to be a bit more sensible ;) ... otherwise its not fair15:15
chrisccoulsonyeah, i'll wait until EOD for openjdk ;)15:15
chrisccoulsonelse i will be popular for all the wrong reasons ;)15:16
ftachrisccoulson, is your openjdk in sync with debian?15:17
ftai need a fix in there15:17
chrisccoulsonfta - i'm not sure, i don't maintain openjdk15:17
chrisccoulsondoko will know that though15:17
asacif its not in sync it would show up in MoM, no?15:18
asacno merges for openjdk ... guess its blacklisted ;)15:18
ftabug 52924215:18
asachell. i have many outstanding merges ;)15:18
ubot2Launchpad bug 529242 in chromium-browser (Mandriva) (and 4 other projects) "chromium doesn't recognize icedtea6-plugin (affects: 13) (dups: 1) (heat: 105)" [Unknown,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/52924215:18
ftai need the fix for debian 57636115:19
ubot2Debian bug 576361 in icedtea6-plugin "Please don't link the plugin against libxpcom, libxul, etc." [Normal,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/57636115:19
asacoh right. i did a all-main rebuild for armel last cycle :-P15:19
asacfta: otherwise chromium cannot use jdk?15:21
asac!info openjdk15:22
asac!info openjdk maverick15:22
asac!info openjdk openjdk-6-jre15:22
asac!info openjdk-6-jre maverick15:22
asacman i suck ;)15:22
ubot2asac: Package openjdk does not exist in lucid15:22
ubot2asac: Package openjdk does not exist in maverick15:22
ubot2asac: 'openjdk-6-jre' is not a valid distribution: hardy, jaunty, karmic, lucid, maverick15:22
ubot2asac: openjdk-6-jre (source: openjdk-6): OpenJDK Java runtime, using Hotspot JIT. In component main, is extra. Version 6b20~pre1-0ubuntu2 (maverick), package size 252 kB, installed size 816 kB15:22
asac!info openjdk-6-jre debian15:22
ubot2asac: 'debian' is not a valid distribution: hardy, jaunty, karmic, lucid, maverick15:22
asacshould be fixed15:23
asacwe are at b20 ... debian fix was at b1815:23
asac6b18-1.8-415:23
asacbut you never know if doko synched the packaging too15:23
asacbut i would assume he did that15:23
ftaasac, i asked in the bug, got no answer15:25
asacfta: what makes you believe its not fixed?15:26
asaci would assume its fixed unless you have strong evidence that its not15:26
ftaasac, "what makes you believe its not fixed?" => users complaining :)16:06
ftait's needed in lucid++16:06
asacfta: what are the symptoms16:06
asac?16:06
ftait's in the bug: the plugin doesn't load (because it's linked against libxul while it shouldnt and the lib is unreachable)16:08
ftaasac, ^^16:08
BUGabundo_remotefta: stupid chromium bug16:09
BUGabundo_remoteopen a new clean profile16:09
BUGabundo_remotechanged proxy settings in one of them16:09
BUGabundo_remoteit changes ALL of the profiles16:09
ftaBUGabundo_remote, did you file a bug?16:11
BUGabundo_remotenot yet16:11
BUGabundo_remotejust found it 3h ago16:12
BUGabundo_remotebut I'm scrathing my head16:12
BUGabundo_remoteon HOW is this even possbile16:12
micahgchrisccoulson: I had to kill my test build as I ran out of disk space, should I try it again before commiting the fix for the crashreporter?16:45
chrisccoulsonmicahg - don't worry about it, i'll do a test build before the next upload anyway16:48
chrisccoulson(and it will be in the dailies too)16:48
micahgchrisccoulson: k, I didn't know if you wanted to upload today, that's why, ok, I'll commit to 3.6 and 4.0 branches16:48
micahgchrisccoulson: any difference with using openssl curl vs gnutls curl?16:49
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i'm not sure about any difference. they are both on the CD though16:56
micahgchrisccoulson: k, I"m using the openssl library then16:56
=== fta_ is now known as fta
micahgchrisccoulson: k, pushed17:15
DanaGhmm, firefox 4.0 still broken.17:16
chrisccoulsonmicahg - cool, thanks17:16
chrisccoulsonDanaG, broken in what way?17:18
chrisccoulsonthe PPA builders are a little behind, if you need fixes, then you could try building yourself from the packaging in bzr17:18
* micahg looks at the builds17:18
chrisccoulsonmicahg - 8 hours ;)17:18
micahgchrisccoulson: yeah17:18
chrisccoulsonmicahg - so, firefox sync doesn't actually work in our FF4.0 builds (using the extension from upstream)17:21
chrisccoulsonit fails to initialize NSS17:21
DanaGAh. So how much longer to wait?17:21
chrisccoulsonDanaG, at the moment, ages ;)17:21
DanaG"still broken" referring to the same "alternative doesn't exist" thing.17:21
DanaGah, then I'll just apt-get source and dpkg-buildpackage.17:21
chrisccoulsonDanaG, install the firefox-3.7 package17:21
chrisccoulsonthat should work around that17:22
chrisccoulsonthe symlinks are in the wrong package17:22
DanaGAh, thanks.17:22
DanaGThat worked.17:22
micahgchrisccoulson: idk why sync doesn't work17:24
chrisccoulsonmicahg - "couldn't open library" at let nsslib = ctypes.open(nssfile.path);17:25
chrisccoulsonin WeaveCrypto.js17:25
micahgchrisccoulson: do we need the nss symlink is xul20?17:26
chrisccoulsonoh, apparantly it writes that path to the console, 1 second17:26
chrisccoulsonhmmm, perhaps it doesn't17:27
chrisccoulsonit's a shame this happens as the component registers, i don't think i can catch that in venkman can i?17:27
* micahg doesn't know17:27
chrisccoulsonyeah, i need to insert a break there when it loads, which can only happen when the browser opens17:28
chrisccoulsonthat sucks17:28
micahgchrisccoulson: gdb?17:28
chrisccoulsonmicahg - i need to debug the JS code really17:29
chrisccoulsonalthough17:29
chrisccoulsoni suppose i could look at strace17:29
chrisccoulsonand see where it's searching for the NSS components17:29
Mook_sbhttp://hg.mozilla.org/services/fx-sync/file/f5293dc0b4dd/services/crypto/WeaveCrypto.js#l109 ? has logging on line 134 if you toggle the bit on line 6017:30
AnAntasac: Hello, are you there ?17:30
Mook_sbalso: probably wherever libxul lives, and not system nss17:30
AnAntwhy does Ubuntu build nspluginwrapper for i386 arch ?17:31
chrisccoulsonMook_sb, thanks. i got confused there. i saw "debug : true" as being enabled, and then wondered why i didn't get any output ;)17:32
chrisccoulsoni'll change that and try again17:32
chrisccoulsonoh, hang on17:32
chrisccoulsontrue = enabled isn't it?17:32
Mook_sbchrisccoulson: huh, no, then it should be enabled, yes - http://hg.mozilla.org/services/fx-sync/file/f5293dc0b4dd/services/crypto/WeaveCrypto.js#l9517:32
Mook_sbyou have the browser.dom.window.dump.enabled pref set to true?17:33
chrisccoulsonMook_sb, i'll check17:33
Mook_sb(either way, it should also be showing up in -jsconsole ...)17:33
micahgjdstrand: would you be able to look at my package set addition request today?17:49
micahgfta: doko uploaded your fix from Debian to lucid-proposed17:52
ftagreat18:00
gnomefreakanyone notice firefox-4.0 is not a command. at least it says that for me. I removed 3.7 (just to keep system clean18:08
gnomefreak)18:08
jdstrandmicahg: what are you referring to?18:10
* jdstrand feels dense18:10
micahgjdstrand: I opened a bug for the archive admins requesting 6 packages be added to the mozilla package set18:10
micahggnomefreak: yeah, install firefox-3.7 until the next update18:11
micahggnomefreak: I goofed in teh packaging and we haven't had a good build yet18:11
gnomefreakmicahg: ok thanks18:12
micahgjdstrand: bug 60545318:13
ubot2Launchpad bug 605453 in weave (Ubuntu) (and 5 other projects) "Please add to the Mozilla Package Set (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/60545318:13
=== fta_ is now known as fta
jdstrandmicahg: so I am lookiing at the bug, and I don't know what you are talking about18:37
micahgjdstrand: it's a request to add packages to the package set, I was told the archvie admins were delegated this task18:37
jdstrandmicahg: I don't what a 'package set' is. sorry18:38
* jdstrand feels dense18:38
jdstrandmicahg: oh, you mean for the whole archive reoganization?18:39
* jdstrand is getting it18:39
micahgjdstrand: well, part of it, I have a Mozilla package set now18:39
jdstrandso that ubuntu-mozillateam can fiddle with these18:39
micahgjdstrand: so I can upload a limited number of packages18:39
micahgjdstrand: well, ubuntu-mozilla-uploaders, but yes :)18:40
jdstrandmicahg: can you point me to a wiki page that tells me how to do this?18:40
* micahg doesn't know if there is one...cjwatson set it up originally18:41
jdstrandhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration should list how to do it, but it does not18:41
gnomefreakok anyone have a clue on how to add boot options?18:41
* gnomefreak wonders if redhat has bash scripting classes. i know simple bash and i understand more advanced but not how to impliment it19:11
=== fta_ is now known as fta
micahgjdstrand: what do I do, should I subscribe the TB?20:03
jdstrandmicahg: possibly, though I think asking cjwatson how to proceed would be best20:04
micahgjdstrand: sorry for the trouble20:05
jdstrandnp20:05
chrisccoulsonmicahg - the FF-sync issue is because the extension tries to load libnss3.so from the GRE folder20:11
chrisccoulsonbut i don't really want to add symlinks in there, after the issues we had with similar symlinks in thunderbird20:12
micahgchrisccoulson: ugh, seems like we need a patch for something then20:12
chrisccoulsonyeah, i'll try and see what i can do ;)20:12
LLStarksfta, you there?20:22
LLStarkshey chris20:22
LLStarksanyway, firefox 4.0 packages are still a bit messed up. http://paste.ubuntu.com/464672/20:25
micahgLLStarks: after the dailies finish building they shoudl be fine20:25
micahgLLStarks: install firefox-3.720:25
LLStarksnot touching firefox 3.7 or 4.0 again until that addon menu dies20:25
LLStarksor extension compatability can be overriden20:26
micahgLLStarks: after tonight, it should be fine, but some files accidentally got into firefox-3.720:26
LLStarksoh20:26
* micahg would update topic, but will be resolved w/in 7 hrs20:26
gnomefreakmicahg: 3.1 is Maverick or are we waiting for 11.04?20:28
micahggnomefreak: 3.1 will be in Maverick early next month hopefully20:37
gnomefreakmicahg: ok thanks. let me know when testing can start20:37
micahggnomefreak: as soon as you see it in the dailies :)20:38
=== fta_ is now known as fta
gnomefreakoops makes alot of sense20:38
micahggnomefreak: there's an installer bug ATM where the binaries aren't installed20:39
gnomefreakdamn20:39
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== fta_ is now known as fta
=== fta_ is now known as fta

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!