=== jjohansen is now known as jjohansen-afk === bjf is now known as bjf[afk] === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler === doko__ is now known as doko [11:05] Hi, what is the problem with the current daily maverick server ISO? The last 3 rolls have failed, and the report looks "odd". [11:06] It seems odd that there are so many "produces uninstallable binaries".. [11:07] well, yesterday's failure was kernel versioning [11:07] forget about the report, use the build log [11:07] debian-installer has kernel ABI 2.6.35-7-generic, but no corresponding udebs are on the CD! [11:07] hmm, this is odd, I revved d-i [11:08] and the cdimage mirror has the up-to-date version [11:08] hmm [11:10] ah, for amd64 it just didn't build until after today's server build run [11:10] Ah.. so it should be resolved for tommorrow? [11:10] i386 has some different problem [11:11] * Daviey only cares about amd64 atm tbh :) [11:11] tar: ./usr/lib/syslinux/isolinux.bin: Not found in archive [11:11] so breakage from the new syslinux [11:11] lovely. [11:11] ah, needs to look at syslinux-common rather than syslinux [11:12] That will also happen with amd64? [11:12] yes [11:12] fixed, rerunning build [11:15] rockin' [11:16] Thanks for the fast turnaround on that cjwatson, i expected to have to wait until tommorrow! [11:25] no problem. that appears to have built [11:25] * cjwatson jigdos to check it works [11:54] seems to boot fine [14:03] ubuntu-archive: please sync mpfr4 from unstable (to main), bug 605657, so that the next gcc uploads can pick it up [14:03] Launchpad bug 605657 in mpfr (Ubuntu) "Please sync mpfr4 3.0.0-2 (main) from Debian unstable (main) (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/605657 [14:34] lamont, can i get the latest BuildLiveCD on the armel builders ? [14:42] ogra: I suppose.... [14:42] :- [14:43] should help with mailing the logs for armel again [14:43] - LOG=${PUBDIR}${NOW}/livecd-${NOW}-${ARCH}${SUBARCH:+-$SUBARCH}.out [14:43] + LOG=${PUBDIR}${NOW}/livecd-${NOW}-${ARCH}.out [14:43] ogra: ^^ that change in 2 places? [14:43] in 2 ? [14:44] should be only in one iirc [14:44] well, LOG= and PUBDIR= [14:44] * ogra checks his code [14:44] http://paste.ubuntu.com/464539/ [14:45] no, i think PUBDIR is supposed to create $flavour-$subarch now [14:46] so... code in the package is b0rked then [14:46] i.e. i have ubuntu-netboo-omap4/ [14:46] *netbook [14:46] its just that the log has no subarch applied [14:46] you'll fix the package? [14:47] that would require to change everything [14:47] debian-cd and cdimage look for $PROJECT-$SUBARCH dirs [14:47] so PUBDIR shouldnt change [14:47] right. and the package's copy of BuildLiveCD is therefore wrong [14:48] * ogra doesnt get what you mean [14:48] after fixing LOG= to match the package, I have: http://paste.ubuntu.com/464541/ [14:48] it works flawless [14:48] and you're telling me that I should not apply that change, correct? [14:48] yes [14:49] so please fix BuildLiveCD in the livecd-rootfs package to no longer have that change in it. [14:49] it works fine as it is, it just doesnt find the logfile since logfiles dont carry the subarch in the name [14:50] for arg in "$@"; do [14:50] PUBDIR=~/public_html/LiveCD/${STE}/${arg}/ [14:50] it doesnt have that change at all [14:50] read the diff again... that's WORKING vs PACKAGED [14:50] so you want me to add it ? [14:51] you're telling me that pubdir needs to have SUBARCH, since that's what's currently running in production [14:51] oh, now i get what you do [14:51] * ogra is slow today, sorry [14:51] i'll add the change [14:52] thanks, no need to reupload, I just don't want the extra diff there for me to forget and apply on the next round [14:52] your LOG= change is now live [14:57] lamont, package adjusted and uploaded [14:58] and thanks for your patience [14:58] np [15:28] doko: done [15:28] cjwatson: thanks, only got the NEW mail, not the accepted one [15:28] ahh, now [15:29] you're welcome to do such syncs yourself BTW [15:31] ok === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf [18:30] if I wanted a 10.04.1~NN (well, really "today current") alternate ISO, would I find that lying around anywhere? [18:30] meh. brain engaged finally, nm === bjf is now known as bjf[afk] === bjf[afk] is now known as bjf === bjf is now known as bjf[afk]