/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/07/16/#ubuntu-x.txt

bjsniderSarvatt, ping00:27
yofelhm, what's upstream for nvidia-settings? (I'm wondering where to send the patch on bug 604525 to)00:31
ubot4Launchpad bug 604525 in nvidia-settings (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "nvidia-settings "Configure Display Device" menu should be drop-down list instead of dialog box (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/60452500:31
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
hyperairSarvatt: [ 13004.621] (II) intel(0): Kernel page flipping support detected, enabling06:24
hyperairthankfully the hangs seem minor enough that i can get back in by using ssh06:24
RAOFYeah, Sarvatt said he was going to drop that patch to get closer to git.06:28
RAOFDamn, what has happened to all the amd64 PPA buildds?06:30
hyperairRAOF: take a look at https://launchpad.net/builders06:30
RAOFHah.  The kernel thwarts me again!06:31
hyperairlol06:31
RAOFHave you tried the intel-legacy DDX?06:31
hyperairwhat's that?06:31
ricotzRAOF, hello06:32
RAOFhyperair: https://edge.launchpad.net/~raof/+archive/aubergine/+packages06:32
RAOFricotz: Hello.06:32
ricotzare there some currently known issues with nouveau in maverick?06:32
RAOFhyperair: It's essentially a gem-less DDX grafted onto 2.12 for those not using KMS.06:33
RAOFricotz: Not known by me particularly.  Are you going to tell me of one? :)06:33
hyperairRAOF: ah i see. but why would i not want to use KMS?06:33
RAOFhyperair: Because you've got an i8xx card, and GEM has been a one-way ticket to random GPU hangs.06:33
RAOFThat's not why _you'd_ want it, that's why someone would want it.06:34
hyperairRAOF: no, i've got an i965 card.06:34
hyperairah i see.06:34
ricotzi cant start a normal x session, xorg.0.log say "no screens found", is there some race condition between kms and gdm or something?06:34
RAOFAnd _I'd_ like you to test it, so it can go upstream and we can have rainbow-dancing unicorns.06:34
RAOFricotz: Care to pastebin dmesg & Xorg.0.log?06:34
ricotzit seems to work after a xserver reinstall so ureadahead it triggered, i think06:35
hyperairRAOF: test how? just install it and leave things be?06:35
RAOFhyperair: Yup.06:35
hyperairor do i have to disable KMS?06:35
RAOFWell, you can try disabling KMS.06:35
RAOFAnd checking that it doesn't explode horribly.06:35
hyperairheh okay.06:36
hyperairi'll give it a go.06:36
RAOFBut even just installing it and finding the KMS works fine is useful.06:36
RAOFs/the/that/g06:36
hyperairi'll give it a go once your amd64 builds are done.06:36
ricotzRAOF, http://paste.pocoo.org/show/238186/ - http://paste.pocoo.org/show/238187/06:37
ricotzRAOF, it happens with maverick packages and edgers06:38
RAOFSo, the very first thing I see is that you're using xorg-edgers ;)06:38
ricotzyes, but i am getting the same error without edgers06:39
RAOFHm.06:41
RAOFAs they say in the movies: let me check my notes.06:42
ricotzRAOF, ok06:43
ricotzRAOF, xorg.failsafe.log of x which is working right now - http://paste.pocoo.org/show/238191/06:48
dupondjenouveau is broken atm in maverick ?06:50
RAOFApparently the answer is “yes”06:55
RAOFricotz: Just for my own amusement, can you get a non-edgers Xorg.0.log?06:55
ricotzRAOF, can you confirm this problem? ok, this will take some time06:56
dupondjehttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/2.4.21-1ubuntu1/+build/187454706:58
dupondjecould this be the reason ?06:58
RAOFNo, that's not going to be the reason.06:58
RAOFI'll update my nouveau laptop & see if this happens locally.07:01
ricotzRAOF, mhh, now i got it with my intel laptop07:03
dupondjeits broken since yesterday evening somewhere ..07:03
dupondjedunno what got upgraded since then07:03
RAOFdupondje: Learn to love the Ubuntu Software Centre.07:04
RAOFFire it up, and hit “history”07:04
RAOFTada!  An answer to the question: what upgraded since last night :)07:05
dupondjei'm not on my broken laptop atm :) can't check07:05
ricotz_RAOF, for me it started before yesterday07:06
dupondjeI updated @ around 16:00 and rebooted, everything was fine.07:07
RAOFricotz_: You've got the same problem with an intel laptop?07:08
RAOFI'm *definitely* not seeing it, then.07:08
ricotz_i am just getting the nouveau log07:08
ricotz_RAOF, ok, first boot after "downgrade" http://paste.plurk.com/show/280757/07:11
ricotz_second boot http://paste.plurk.com/show/280758/07:12
dupondjesecond looks quite the same error like I got ...07:13
ricotz_RAOF, with intel http://paste.plurk.com/show/280759/07:13
RAOFOk.  So it looks a lot like libdrm is broken for you.07:14
RAOFOr, possibly, the kernel.07:14
dupondjeI rebooted after kernel upgrade, and then it still worked ...07:15
RAOFDoes this only happen with 2.6.35-8-generic?07:15
dupondjeno07:15
RAOFHah, too slow.07:15
ricotz_it also happened with -707:15
ricotz_on intel it seemed to start with -807:16
RAOFOk, I've got  a newer libdrm 'cause I'm testing the legacy DDX.  I'll downgrade that and see.07:17
RAOFNope, still works fine here.07:25
RAOFWhat versions of libdrm, libdrm-intel, libdrm-nouveau, kernel, DDX, and xserver are you using?07:26
ricotzthe current maverick versions07:27
dupondjesame here ...07:27
RAOFSo, 2.4.20-1ubuntu2, 2.6.35-8-generic, intel 2.11.0, and 1.8.2RC2?07:28
dupondjecan't check atm :(07:28
RAOFGot an xorg.conf?07:31
ricotzlibdrm 2.4.20-2ubuntu1 - kernel 35-8 - intel 2:2.11.0-1ubuntu2 - xserver-xorg 2:1.8.1.902-0ubuntu207:31
ricotzno07:31
RAOFI need to run some errands - I'll ponder this while I do so, and while the nouveau lappy is updating.07:34
ricotzok, np07:35
dupondjericotz: amd64 or i386 ?07:35
ricotzboth amd6407:35
dupondjeyou also RAOF  ?07:38
RAOFdupondje: Yup.  amd6407:53
ricotzRAOF, any progress? using nomodeset gets it to work08:37
RAOFricotz: For values of “work” equal to “uses vesa instead”, I presume :)08:37
RAOFIt doesn't help that I can't reproduce this locally :/08:38
ricotzoh you are right this disables nouveau08:38
ricotzso it might be a hardware specific problem08:39
RAOFIt shouldn't be.08:40
ricotzi tested kernel 35.7-11 which works on the first boot, and freezes on the second08:41
RAOFIt's not entirely obvious why drmGetBusid is returning "" rather than “pci:0000:01:00.0”, though.08:41
RAOFWorks on the first boot, fails on the second?08:41
RAOFI don't suppose that if you log off and log in again it works?08:42
ricotzno i need to reboot, like i said, it seems to be related to some trigger which is called after a new kernel/x installation08:43
ricotzlike ureadahead which delays some things08:43
dupondjeafter kernel upgrade it was still working here ... tho only 1 reboot, so might have been lucky ;)08:44
RAOFCan you confirm that?  Delete /var/lib/ureadahead/pack and it'll re-profile for you.08:44
ricotzRAOF, will try that08:46
RAOFYou know what?  I need to get a big, beefy desktop machine to build stuff on.08:56
ricotz_RAOF, i have restarted now couple times, deleting this ureadahead pack file seems to resolve it08:57
RAOFCan you give me two dmesg logs — one that has worked and one that hasn't?08:59
ricotz_is the "var.run.pack" introduced recently?08:59
RAOFYou get one pack per filesystem.09:00
RAOFThe root filesystem gets “pack”; the others get “boot.pack”, “usr.pack”, etc.09:00
ricotz_ok, then it is fine09:01
ricotzRAOF, FAIL: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/238215/ - GOOD: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/238216/09:05
ricotzi hope these are the right ones (after rebooting this much)09:06
RAOFWait - the *second* one is good?09:07
ricotzthis is the current boot09:08
RAOFOh, of course.  ureadahead.  *That's* why udev would be starting some 12 seconds earlier in the second trace.09:09
RAOFSo, I'd guess that if you removed “splash” from your kernel command line, this would work.09:10
ricotzit seems to work already09:12
RAOFEven without deleting the pack?09:13
RAOFYou had a problem before - are you suggesting that this has magically fixed itself? :)09:13
ricotzyes, i have deleted it twice, but not the third time09:14
ricotzi will reboot again to be sure09:14
ricotz_ok, there is it again :(09:16
dupondjehttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/2.4.21-1ubuntu1/+build/1874547 is build ... maby install ? :)-09:16
RAOFI'd be surprised if that fixed it.09:17
steveireIs there any other useful information I can put in this bug report? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/60600109:18
ubot4Launchpad bug 606001 in xorg (Ubuntu) "Dual screen setup does not work after installation (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]09:18
ricotz_RAOF, removing "splash" doesnt work09:20
RAOFWell that's put a crimp in an otherwise damn-fine theory :)09:20
RAOFDump a file containing “FRAMEBUFFER=y” into /usr/share/initramfs-tools/conf.d ?  That'll get the drm module added to the initramfs, which should make loading it (a) faster and (b) independent of ureadahead.09:21
ricotz_ok09:22
RAOFsteveire: What have you done to try and get a dual-head display?09:24
steveireRAOF: I have opened system settings and gone to the 'monitors' section, which tells me I do not have 2 monitors.09:25
RAOFsteveire: Also, running “apport-collect 606001” will attach all sorts of tasty information.09:25
steveire"This module is only for configuring systems with a single desktop spread across multiple monitors. You do not appear to have this configuration."09:26
RAOFOk.  That would be useful information to have on the bug :)09:28
ricotz_RAOF, patching initramfs works09:28
RAOFConsistently?09:29
ricotz_i will reboot a third time, but fsck might do some things here09:29
ricotz_i need to reset the fscheck count09:30
steveireRAOF: Is that apport thing interactive? Can I see the info it sends back before it does?09:31
steveirehttp://dpaste.com/218731/09:32
RAOFsteveire: I think so, from memory.09:32
RAOFYou want to give it access - it'll upload xorg.0.log, dmesg, etc.09:33
steveireIt implies it will upload more than that. unspecified 'private data'09:33
steveireAnd it doesn't tell me if I can review it or not.09:34
RAOFNo, that means that it will be able to write to bugs you've marked as “private”09:34
ricotz_RAOF, ok, two working reboots09:36
steveireRAOF: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/606175 I can't run apport-collect yet09:40
ubot4Launchpad bug 606175 in apport (Ubuntu) "apport-collect does not tell me what it will do (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]09:40
RAOFsteveire: I've just checked - it will show you what it'll send.09:42
steveireRAOF: This post http://blog.grossmeier.net/2009/03/02/apport-collect-just-what-you-wanted/ says it works without any other interaction with the reporter09:45
steveireThe man page is also not very clear on it http://man.he.net/man1/apport-collect09:47
RAOFWell, I've just checked with a report on staging, and it pops up the “here's the stuff we'll be reporting” page.09:52
RAOFPossibly if you run it without X it doesn't do that, but it's generally pretty careful to ensure you can easily find out what data is being reported.09:52
ricotzRAOF, so it looks like a race condition, something has gotten slower or faster so this problem appears09:56
RAOFRight.09:56
ricotznow nouveau is loaded 1 second ealier, but initrd is 16MB now09:57
RAOFBecause it's got all the drm modules in it, yeah.09:58
RAOFPlus plymouth09:58
steveireI don't see why it needs 'write access' to read dmesg...09:58
RAOFIt needs write access to your *launchpad* account.09:59
RAOFOtherwise it can't add anything to the bug, obviously!09:59
RAOFIs that not obvious from the messages - both in the terminal, and the launchpad message?10:00
RAOFsteveire: Well, I guess it's clearly not obvious, or you wouldn't be asking the question.  If you can think of a better wording, feel free to add it to the apport bug you just submitted.10:03
steveireRAOF: Ok, well I ran the tool10:09
RAOFsteveire: Ok, now I'm confused.  Only one of your shiny, fancy dell monitors is showing an image?10:23
RAOFsteveire: As far as X is concerned, they should be both lit up and running.10:24
jcristaumeans the kernel is confused, afaict10:24
RAOFI guess so.10:25
* RAOF heads to dinner.10:25
steveireThat's correct. Only one of them is useful. The other is completely blank10:26
RAOFsteveire: I don't suppose running “xrandr --output DVI-I-2 --right-of DVI-1-1” does anything?11:08
arahello all!11:20
arain the middle of a big X upload?11:20
araI think I upgraded and rebooted at the wrong time :)11:20
aramy X won't boot anymore 11:20
steveirestephen@chimera:~$ xrandr --output DVI-I-2 --right-of DVI-1-111:21
steveirexrandr: cannot find output "DVI-1-1"11:21
jcristausteveire: DVI-I-1, not DVI-1-111:21
steveire_That command borked my workstation once I'd fixed the 1 to an I11:23
steveire_All my windows disappeared, and I had fragments of plasmoids in different places and nothing worked. I had to hard-reset11:25
steveire_And now it's having a hard time booting.11:25
RAOFWell, at least it had some impact, even if it wasn't particularly good. :/11:27
RAOFara: No - the next flurry of X will be xserver 1.9, which I won't upload until it stops crashing with clutter apps.11:28
RAOFGah, too slow.11:28
jcristaumaybe mark it as blocking 1.9 in bugzilla?11:29
jcristauwhere "it" is the bug you filed11:29
RAOFI wasn't sure if I should do that - I guess I could.11:29
steveireI'm wondering if I should try again. You know that xkcd comic with the lightning machine?11:30
RAOFHeh.11:31
RAOF“Hm.  I wonder if it does that *every* time”11:31
steveireWhat is the command supposed to do?11:31
tseliotsteveire_: I found kde 4 to act in a weird way when using multiple screens. None of this can be reproduce in gnome, at least here11:31
RAOFThat's meant to make one of your displays left of the other - IE: de-clone them11:31
RAOFI certainly found that KDE4 didn't deal particularly well with multiple heads.  It didn't go totally bananas, though.11:32
RAOFjcristau: Incidentally, I'm thinking of attending XDS, and I was wondering what you thought.11:32
steveireMaybe I'll install ubuntu-desktop and see what happens. Even the boot splash only appears on one screen though.11:36
RAOFara: No - the next flurry of X will be xserver 1.9, which I won't upload until it stops crashing with clutter apps.11:36
RAOFsteveire: Which is strange, given that it worked on the livecd.11:36
RAOFjcristau: Bug marked as blocking.11:37
jcristaui think this xds is the first time i might be able to attend11:37
steveireIndeed.11:39
dupondjeis the x-issue fixed already ? or bugreport / workaround ? That I can boot my computer again this evening :)11:58
jcristauwhatever "the x-issue" means...12:00
RAOFdupondje: If you add the drm module to your initramfs you'll avoid the race condition.12:07
RAOFricotz: Did you file a bug, incidentally?12:08
ricotzRAOF, no, i havent12:08
RAOFPlease do so - I can't fix that race off the top of my head, so a bug will be needed.12:11
ricotzRAOF, will do, as soon i can12:16
ricotzRAOF, what about this bug report https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/45963912:33
ubot4Launchpad bug 459639 in xorg-server (Ubuntu) "[Karmic] X server starts randomly in failsafe when starting from cold boot (affects: 6) (heat: 42)" [High,Confirmed]12:33
jcristaukarmic?12:34
dupondjeand not only from cold boot imo :)12:38
ricotzyeah, i will file a new one12:38
RAOFAnd a huge muddle of multiple “X doesn't start” bugs.12:40
RAOFHandy hint: the binary blob not starting is *almost always* a different bug to any free driver not starting :)12:40
seb128http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52029105/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-i386.clutter-gtk-0.10_0.10.4-0ubuntu3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz12:46
seb128is that libgl installability issue known?12:47
ricotzRAOF, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/60624412:52
ubot4Launchpad bug 606244 in xorg-server (Ubuntu) "X doesn't find a screen and is not starting due a race condition (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]12:52
RAOFseb128: clutter-gtk builds fine locally.  I guess it could be an i386 issue?13:15
seb128I figure it out now13:15
seb128I newed libkms1 to universe yesterday13:16
seb128I've promoted it now, should be fixed after the next publisher run13:16
seb128would be nice to document new libraries in the changelog though13:16
seb128so we know what to do when newing them13:16
seb128Sarvatt, ^13:16
RAOFAaah, the newer libdrm.  Right.13:16
yofelshort question, what's upstream for nvidia-settings? (where to send a patch..)13:16
seb128or to use -v to list debian changes13:17
RAOFThat obviously hasn't hit my amd64 mirror yet.13:17
RAOFWell, back to packing.13:19
tseliotyofel: you can contact Aaron plattner13:20
yofelwhere?13:20
tseliotyou can have a look at whatever commit in git an see his address: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~aplattner/nvidia-settings/commit/?id=655fb95354fdfb7ffe5f44f0341c132165b0c98313:22
tseliotwhat kind of change is that?13:22
yofelbug 60452513:23
ubot4Launchpad bug 604525 in nvidia-settings (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "nvidia-settings "Configure Display Device" menu should be drop-down list instead of dialog box (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/60452513:23
tseliotaah, that one13:23
tseliotyes, feel free to send Aaron a patch13:23
yofelwas asking as launchapd doesn't tell me where to find upstream..13:23
yofelthanks13:23
tseliotseb128: I didn't notice that there were new libraries when I tested/sponsor the upload. So it's my bad too13:24
seb128tseliot, that's ok, I figure what the issue was now ;-)13:25
tseliotgood13:25
dupondjeRAOF: so its a kernel bug? But why is it broken for -7 and -8 since today ? and it worked without issues for days on -7 ? :)13:35
dupondjesomebody else hitting the https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/606244 bug ?13:43
ubot4Launchpad bug 606244 in linux (Ubuntu) "X doesn't find a screen and is not starting due a race condition (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,New]13:43
tseliotmaybe you should try the latest libdrm13:53
dupondjeyea indeed :)13:53
dupondjei'm not @ home, so I can't test13:53
dupondjebut I commented the bug13:53
tseliotok13:57
dupondjehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/60624414:36
ubot4Launchpad bug 606244 in libdrm (Ubuntu) "X doesn't find a screen and is not starting due a race condition (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Fix released]14:36
dupondjelike I tough14:36
dupondjelibdrm and its fixed :)14:36
tseliotvery good14:41
tseliotthanks for testing14:41
ricotzdupondje, the problem is i was hitting this bug also with edgers ppa14:49
ricotzwhere libdrm was up2date for some time14:50
dupondjericotz: so you still have it with newest libdrm ?!16:36
dupondjefeel free to re-open then btw :)16:36
Sarvattthe stuff in the section of the changelog you quoted was already in the previous libdrm dupondje 16:40
dupondjemmmm weird it started working then after libdrm update here ..16:41
dupondjeSarvatt: previous version was 2.4.20-2ubuntu1, now its 2.4.21-1ubuntu116:43
dupondjethe changelog section is in 2.4.20-3 ..16:44
Sarvattyeah I know, but I did the abi bump stuff from 2.4.20-3 in 2.4.20-2ubuntu1 before they did it in debian, thats why we didn't bother merging 2.4.20-316:44
dupondjeah but 2.4.20-2ubuntu1 gives +      03_revert_abi_change.diff - Obsolete16:45
dupondjeanyway it was broken here, and libdrm update resolved it ... so something must be changed ;)16:45
Sarvattyour initrd got rebuilt with the FRAMEBUFFER=Y maybe? :)16:46
dupondjewell no :s16:46
dupondjeit didn't even regenerated my initrd :)16:46
dupondjewas getting completely the same error as ricotz 16:49
Sarvatti dont see anything in libdrm that would have affected that16:50
dupondje[    51.454] drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports  => when it was broken16:53
dupondje[    25.539] drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports pci:0000:01:00.016:54
dupondjenow16:54
dupondje:)16:54
dupondjericotz: did you try libdrm_2.4.21-1 ?16:55
Sarvattthat happens when the kernel drm isn't ready when the ddx is trying to start16:56
dupondjelook, I gonne try to reboot some times, to see if it still works :)16:59
Sarvattdo you guys have agp cards by any chance?17:01
dupondjeSeems like i've been very lucky, that the first boot after libdrm upgrade worked :p17:06
dupondjehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/60624417:07
dupondjeso not fixed ... :)17:07
ubot4Launchpad bug 606244 in libdrm (Ubuntu) "X doesn't find a screen and is not starting due a race condition (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,New]17:07
Sarvattdo you guys have agp cards by any chance?17:08
dupondjein my old computer yes :)17:08
ricotzdupondje, i havent tried it with the maverick version, i am using edgers which gave me the same error17:09
ricotzSarvatt, it is a PCIs card17:09
ricotzPCIe17:09
dupondjeits laptop here, so euh pcie bus also I bet17:10
ricotzdupondje, so you are still getting the error?17:11
ricotzdupondje, nm ;)17:11
dupondjeyep :s17:11
dupondjebeen very lucky that just after the libdrm reboot it worked :p17:12
dupondjethe reboot after I upgraded libdrm .. :)17:12
ricotzyes, like i said before the first boot after some kernel/x changes it works17:12
dupondjeI also see kernel bug in boot: [   33.758638] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000003c017:13
dupondje:p17:13
dupondje[   33.758809] Process plymouthd (pid: 375, threadinfo ffff880037e28000, task ffff880037d38000)17:13
ricotzbrb17:13
hyperairSarvatt: i've observed something rather interesting.once i'm past the first GPU hang, (ssh in and forcefully kill X and restart gdm), it doesn't hang any more.17:44
hyperairSarvatt: also, the first hang happens very quickly after logging in, within the first 5 hours or so.17:45
hyperairmy current uptime is 15h. Xorg's uptime is 12h17:46
hyperairer wait. 11h 23m17:46
bryce2 Sarvatt, tseliot, if lp #567007 sounds like a useful launchpad feature, mind clicking 'Affects me too'?  The more people marked as it affects them, the more likely it'll be to get on the Launchpad team's planning list when work starts on search improvement17:49
ubot4Launchpad bug 567007 in malone "User-specific default tag search parameters (affects: 1) (heat: 3)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/56700717:49
Sarvattdone, that would be a nice feature :)17:52
DarxusThere's a fix for bug #541492.  It involves 5 source packages (one of which is linux).  What needs to be done to get them in Maverick?18:02
ubot4Launchpad bug 541492 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu Lucid) (and 2 other projects) "MASTER: [i845] GPU lockup (apport-crash) (Should KMS be blacklisted?) (affects: 77) (dups: 30) (heat: 523)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/54149218:02
dupondjeeverything seem to crash now :s18:07
dupondjericotz: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/606393 you have this also ?18:37
ubot4Launchpad bug 606393 in linux (Ubuntu) "BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000003c0 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]18:37
ricotzdupondje, yes, this is plymouthd trying18:58
ricotzdupondje, should be the same problem which causes X to fail18:58
bjsniderSarvatt, remember that issue with nvidia-current where it's creating two modprobe.conf files?19:51
Sarvattbjsnider: ya want tseliot, but yeah I remember it :)20:00
bjsniderwhat i don't understand is, the alternatives are putting one of the files by a link into the /etc/modprobe.d directory, the one without the alias, and yet the system behaves as though it knows about the alias20:01
Sarvattlook at the dkms.conf20:05
SarvattDEST_MODULE_NAME[0]="nvidia-current"20:05
Sarvattguessing thats why20:05
bjsnideryeah, the module is built as nvidia-current20:06
bjsniderbut the xorg.conf says nvidia20:06
bjsniderwithout the alias the system should fail to load that module because it doesn't exist20:06
bjsniderand it intermittently does so20:07
bjsniderbut for some reason it works most of the time. i can't see why.20:07
Sarvattthe xorg.conf doesn't have anything to do with it though, the ddx module is still nvidia_drv20:08
bjsniderthen what is the alias used for?20:08
Sarvattit only loads if it wasn't loaded by udev already at startup but yeah i thought it might run into the same problem because thats hardcoded to load nvidia.ko and dkms is just renaming it to nvidia-current.ko instead of aliasing nvidia to nvidia-current20:09
Sarvattit's still built as nvidia.ko by dkms just installed as nvidia-current.ko after20:10
bjsniderwithout the alias i have tried modprobe nvidia, and the response is no such module exists20:10
Sarvattyou'd need to change that DEST_MODULE_NAME to nvidia and alias nvidia nvidia-current to do that20:11
bjsnider$ lsmod|grep nvidia20:12
bjsnidernvidia              11105770  3820:12
Sarvattthe module is nvidia-current.ko though, its confusing :(20:14
bjsnideri think what you have here is the dx module is being renamed so that each nvidia module can be built and installed at the same time20:14
bjsnideri'm fairly sure putting driver "nvidia" in the xorg.conf file is the same as saying modprobe nvidia20:15
Sarvattthe xorg.conf driver you pick specifies which _drv to load bjsnider, nothing to do with kernel modules20:48
Sarvattthe X driver can load kernel modules though20:49
Sarvattthose nvidia_drv.so's are swapped around with the /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules alternative pointing to the different driver's directories20:51
Sarvattxf86LoadKernelModule() does it, i see that in nvidia_drv.so. it'll be trying to load nvidia that doesn't exist probably if it hasn't already been loaded by udev before20:55
bryce2tjaalton, BEL?22:01

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!