=== emma is now known as emm
=== emm is now known as emma
[05:48] <MTecknology> so.. there was a website for testing the load of your website. I have an account at it - but forgot it's name. I'm pretty sure it was a Drupal based website up front too... Any ideas what it is?
[05:52] <lamont> hrmpf.  I want USB_SERIAL_WWAN in a lucid kernel.
[06:07] <achiang> i want to understand bzr branches
[06:23] <jjohansen> achiang: bzr branches aren't that bad, each directory is a branch
[06:23] <achiang> jjohansen: yeah, i got straightened out in #launchpad
[06:24] <jjohansen> okay
[06:24] <achiang> jjohansen: it's a little different from how i'm used to working in git, where i keep all the branches in a single directory
[06:24] <jjohansen> yeah
[06:29] <achiang> why can't launchpad just support git as a backend and be done with it? ;)
[06:30] <jjohansen> would make life easier for kernel devs :)
[06:38] <hyperair> because nobody who knows git well enough has the time and interest to code support for it into launchpad.
[06:39] <hyperair> unfortunately.
[06:39] <achiang> meh. another bzr papercut.
[06:40] <achiang> bzr diff doesn't seem to generate a patch that you can apply with patch(1)
[06:40] <hyperair> doesn't it?
[06:40] <hyperair> none of the $vcs diff tools have given me any trouble with that
[06:41] <achiang> no, that's PEBCAK
[06:41] <achiang> i was applying with the wrong -p level
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[17:09] <lamont> hrm... can I run a maverick kernel with a lucid user space?
[17:13] <lamont> Picking 'linux-meta' as source package instead of 'linux'
[17:13]  * lamont screams
[17:31] <lamont> fortunately, wget is love
[17:36] <soren> lamont: apt-get source linux-image-`uname -r`
[17:36] <soren> lamont: But yeah, it's a bit unintuitive :)
[17:37] <lamont> soren: only if I have deb lines in the sources.list in question
[17:38] <soren> lamont: True.
[17:38] <soren> lamont: The binary package linux is not built from the source package linux which makes for some interesting quirks sometimes :)
[17:39] <soren> Like this.
[17:39] <lamont> "interesting quirks" heh
[17:40] <lamont> the real question is, after the 2.6.35-9.14 kernel builds on i386 in my ppa, will it actually work with the lucid userspace I'm going to stick it under?
[18:04] <penguin42> lamont: There are a few apparmor oddities that will upset a few things I suspect, but they're a bit upset with the maverick userspace anyway, but other than I don't see why not
[18:05] <lamont> cool
[20:24] <MTecknology> penguin42: what's wrong with maverick userspace?
[20:25] <penguin42> MTecknology: Just lack of getattr stuff in apparmor profiles I think isn't it?
[20:25] <MTecknology> oh
[21:00] <penguin42> so what happens with a bunch of bugs that look related? e.g. a bunch of oops's that are all in fb_release; I know we aren't duping kernel bugs - but what else happens?
[21:03] <penguin42> e.g. bug 606377, bug 606546, bug 606545 and maybe bug 606469
[21:03] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 606377 in linux (Ubuntu) "BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/606377
[21:03] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 606546 in linux (Ubuntu) "BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000031500000323 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/606546
[21:03] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 606545 in linux (Ubuntu) "BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/606545
[21:03] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 606469 in linux (Ubuntu) "BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000013 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/606469
[21:08] <penguin42> and maybe bug 606189 ?
[21:08] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 606189 in linux (Ubuntu) "BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000026c (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/606189
[22:12] <zykes-> question: why is "loop" built in ?
[22:13] <zykes-> on lucid.
[23:39] <cwillu_at_work> zykes-, as opposed to being a module?