[00:49] <BUGabundo> kklimonda: you didn't ping me back, I forgot to check :(
[00:49] <BUGabundo> I'm pretty sure one of my ALL DISC backups has an older version :P
[02:06] <Guest2741> unable to boot to GUI with 2.6.35-6 -7 -8 -9. get to the Ubuntu splash and then it goes black. any suggestions?
[02:12] <IdleOne__> How in the world do people live without a GUI :/
[02:13] <Jordan_U> IdleOne__: I remember back with Ubuntu 5.10 I had to do it fairly often :)
[02:14] <Jordan_U> Most of my early learning on using the terminal I learned when I broke X :)
[02:14] <IdleOne__> Jordan_U: agreed but I am stuck here with 4 kernels to load and nothing loading
[02:15] <Jordan_U> IdleOne__: Can you elaborate a bit?
[02:15] <IdleOne__> I should of known better then to restart when the system suggested it lol
[02:15] <IdleOne__> unable to boot to GUI with 2.6.35-6 -7 -8 -9. get to the Ubuntu splash and then it goes black. any suggestions?
[02:16] <Jordan_U> IdleOne__: Can you boot into recovery mode?
[02:16] <IdleOne__> I didn't try to boot to recovery. I figured I would boot to text mode by adding text to the grub line
[02:17] <Jordan_U> Did you also remove "quiet splash"?
[02:17] <IdleOne__> let me try booting to recovery mode and see what happens. I'll ping you when/if I get back. I did not remove quiet splash
[02:18] <IdleOne__> guess I should and see what errors I get
[02:18] <IdleOne__> I'll be back.
[02:24] <IdleOne> back still in text mode
[02:25] <IdleOne> tried booting to recovery and when I selected boot failsafe X I got a Fatal error: no screens found
[02:28] <IdleOne> Jordan_U: did you get what I last said?
[02:31] <IdleOne> Well I been meaning to try out Kubuntu hehe
[02:31] <IdleOne> maybe I'll just do a clean install
[02:31] <Jordan_U> IdleOne: Yes, can you pastebin your Xor.0.log?
[02:31] <IdleOne> Jordan_U: full path?
[02:32] <Jordan_U> IdleOne: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
[02:34] <IdleOne> pastebin.com/aCUrxLQ6
[02:34] <IdleOne> Jordan_U: ^^
[02:36] <Jordan_U> IdleOne: Can you try uninstalling the proprietary video drivers with the command "jockey-text"?
[02:37] <IdleOne> let me try
[02:40] <IdleOne>  /user/lib/pymodelues/python2.6/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py:57: GtkWarning: could not open display
[02:40] <IdleOne> without the typos of course
[02:41] <IdleOne> How do I select/copy text in TTY?
[02:41] <Jordan_U> IdleOne: Did you run "jockey-gtk" or "jockey-text"? If jockey-text is trying to use gtk that's a bug.
[02:42] <IdleOne> jockey-text
[02:47] <IdleOne> hmm, so I am sol?
[02:48] <Jordan_U> IdleOne: Try "sudo apt-get remove nvidia-*" then "sudo mv /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf-bak"
[02:51] <IdleOne> ok done
[02:52] <IdleOne> startx?
[02:52] <Jordan_U> Reboot
[02:52] <IdleOne> ok
[02:55] <IdleOne> Jordan_U: got a GUI back. thank you.
[02:55] <IdleOne> no nvidia but that is fine
[02:55] <Jordan_U> IdleOne: You're welcome.
[03:58] <Andre_Gondim> I can't install choqok in maverick in a fresh install
[05:25] <slyrus_> did a dist-upgrade today and my graphics config got hosed
[05:27] <slyrus_> no screens found, whatever that means
[06:23] <Jordan_U> slyrus_: Are you using the proprietary nvidia drivers?
[06:23] <slyrus_> no, intel h55 core i3 hdmi
[06:24] <Jordan_U> slyrus_: If so try disabling them with: "sudo apt-get remove nvidia-*" then "sudo mv /etc/X11/xorg.conf /etc/X11/xorg.conf-bak"
[06:25] <slyrus_> oh, ok. maybe I was using those drivers without realizing it.
[06:26] <slyrus_> hmm... that's a problem. no /etc/X11/xorg.conf! just the failsafe
[06:37] <slyrus_> removing those drivers seems to fixed things. not sure how they got installed though!
[06:37] <slyrus_> thanks Jordan_U
[06:37] <Jordan_U> slyrus_: You're welcome.
[06:45] <twb> Why isn't ubuntu+1 listed on packages.u.c?
[06:54] <yofel_> twb: server issues I believe
[09:28] <|eagles0513875|> hi guys :)
[09:39] <rye> anybody has experienced maverick killing nomadix ag 2100 'hotspot in a box' thing? In case I try to go online on my maverick machine, it kills network for everybody else trying to connect to that network. Lucid netbook with pretty much the same config (miredo, ipv6 lookups, ath5k-driven card) works ok
[09:41] <BUGabundo_remote> kklimonda: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1542599/libflashplayer.so
[10:05] <|eagles0513875|> has anyone tried to install maverick on virtual box
[10:06] <|eagles0513875|> im having issues where the iso is a 64bit version but  saying that the cpu is a 32bit cpu which it isnt as im running 64bit ubuntu server with gnome desktop on it for my boss
[10:06] <|eagles0513875|> any ideas as to why
[12:57] <Vi0L0> hi, which xserver version will 10.10 use? :)
[12:57] <Vi0L0> @ www i can see that 10.10 is now using xserver 1.8, but maybe there are chances for xserver 1.9? :)
[13:01] <gnomefreak> IIRC 1.9 was to be in 10.10 but i heard that a while ago. im too busy to see what version i have right now
[13:02] <gnomefreak> but maybe look at the topic there is a list of stuff that made it in A2
[13:02] <gnomefreak> Vi0L0: ^^^
[13:03] <Vi0L0> ok, thx
[13:03] <gnomefreak> np
[13:11] <Vi0L0> its now 1.8, but im hoping it will be 1.9 so ati catalyst would support it not so long after final 1.9 release which will be in next month :)
[13:38] <duffydack> an hour and a half later still installing... 87% yawn
[14:05] <Daekdroom> !info usb-modeswitch
[14:29] <h00k> So, are windicators proposed for Maverick? Or is this Maverick+1?
[14:43] <komputes> h00k: It's possible that we could also see the new default theme evolve and benefit from experimental features that were deferred during this cycle, such as RGBA colormaps and client-side window decorations. - http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/04/ubuntu-1010-to-be-codenamed-maverick-meerkat.ars
[14:45] <komputes> h00k: also good - http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/333
[14:46] <komputes> for more info you can take a look at the ayatana mailing list
[14:47] <vish> komputes: hey!!!!!!!!!!
[14:47] <komputes> or join #ayatana
[14:47] <komputes> vish! my main man what up?
[14:49] <vish> komputes: good ,  you are at the sprint now ?
[15:00] <komputes> vish: nope, just working
[15:00] <komputes> vish: you?
[15:02] <vish> komputes: me neither.. just making sure you arent having fun without me ;p
[15:03] <vish> err , are* having fun..
[15:03] <vish> bah... whatever.. #fail...
[15:03]  * vish sleeps 
[15:46] <komputes> night vish, you party animal
[15:50] <kklimonda> BUGabundo_remote: thanks
[15:52] <duffydack> Is there a plugin or something to have audacious display tracks in sound menu like rhythmbox does
[15:52] <Daekdroom> duffydack, that sound menu function is way too fresh
[15:52] <duffydack> Daekdroom, yeah, thought so :)
[15:53] <Daekdroom> It's not even ready for rhythmbox, because the progressbar doesn't even work
[15:53] <duffydack> Daekdroom, umm does here
[15:54] <BUGabundo_remote> kklimonda: may I delete it?
[15:54] <Daekdroom> duffydack, really? so you don't have the problem in this screenshot? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52097598/Captura_de_tela.png
[15:59] <duffydack> ah yeah the slider doesnt show time properly and clicking the slider just restarts the track.. thought because it moved it worked:)
[15:59] <duffydack> ive only just got this installed so im still looking through it all
[15:59] <Daekdroom> Ah. Thought I reported the bug for nothing.
[16:03] <ricotz> somebody here who is managing the webupd8.org site?
[16:05] <kangarooo> hello ive put xubuntu 10.10 on 2 comps and after all updates made that auto login happens and also dont ask for password but i cant log in anymore- doesnt auto logs and when asking pass it doesnt asks. here on this comp i made screenshot how it looks in that comp login settings. btw when installing i chose option to secure with pass and encrypt
[16:05] <kangarooo> http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/ekrnkopija-20100720-175511.php
[16:43] <kklimonda> BUGabundo_remote: yes, thanks for sharing
[16:44] <BUGabundo_remote> np
[16:44] <BUGabundo_remote> what are friends for :D
[17:27] <duffydack> I dont suppose the sound menu track info thingy-me-bob is available for lucid in some backport type way ?
[19:52] <geri> hi
[19:55] <Italian_Plumber> I have an ISO on my machine called "maverick-desktop-i386.iso".  Is there a way for me to determine if it's Alpha 1 or Alpha 2?
[19:58] <Daekdroom> Italian_Plumber, boot it up and check? o.O
[19:59] <Italian_Plumber> fair enough.  Once it's booted, what would telle me which it is?
[20:00] <Daekdroom> I think the installer should tell you.
[20:00] <Daekdroom> In the start screen, when it tells it's alpha software.
[20:02] <Italian_Plumber> ok thanks!
[20:02] <yofel> Italian_Plumber: check the date when the image was created maybe or simply zsync it to make sure you get the newer image
[20:13] <knittl> hi. Xorg/gnome has been feeling really sluggish for a week or so
[20:13] <knittl> anyone can confirm?
[20:14] <knittl> (prop. nvidia + xinerama is my current graphics solution)
[20:23] <BUGabundo> knittl: tried to change theme?
[21:02] <ascheel> Any known issues with 10.10 and nvidia drivers?  Running a GeForce 240m and on 10.04, the graphics flew.  In 10.10, it's like I'm running w/o hardware acceleration
[21:03] <fagan> ascheel: nope
[21:03] <fagan> im using them right now
[21:03] <fagan> its very fast
[21:03] <fagan> I played a game earlier and its good
[21:04] <ascheel> fagan: what about desktop performance in compiz and whatnot?
[21:05] <fagan> Im using compiz
[21:05] <fagan> :)
[21:05] <zakscott> nvidia non-free drivers?
[21:05] <fagan> yep
[21:05] <ascheel> zakscott: yes here, as well
[21:05] <fagan> I cant play games with the open source drivers sadly
[21:06] <fagan> needs the acceleration
[21:06] <zakscott> im also without 3d acceleration for the time being, but using nouveau drivers
[21:06] <fagan> the nouveau drivers dont have 3d yet
[21:07] <zakscott> using gallium / libmesa its worked occasionally
[21:08] <fagan> zakscott: yeah but thats no where near stable enough to push to ubuntu
[21:08] <zakscott> more stable than the non-free drivers for my ion chip :)
[21:09] <uncon> ascheel: thanks, sometime i forget how to use teh irssi
[21:09] <ascheel> lol
[21:10] <ascheel> k, I lied fagan and zakscott.  It's uncon with the issue, not me.
[21:10] <fagan> zakscott: I have a old enough computer ish 2 years and the drivers are perfect
[21:10] <fagan> ascheel: lol
[21:10] <fagan> its fine
[21:10] <ascheel> :)  Take it away!
[21:10] <uncon> does anyone know of an issue with the clearlooks gtk engine on maverick?
[21:10] <ascheel> since I'm half 'tarded when it comes to Linux graphics, I'm going to lurk and learn.
[21:10] <fagan> uncon: dont have a clue
[21:11] <Daekdroom> uncon, never heard of such thing
[21:11] <fagan> not many people use clearlooks from what I remember
[21:11] <uncon> whenever i use it, it seems to bog everything down
[21:11] <fagan> you should file a bug about it
[21:11] <uncon> using any other engine seems to be speedy
[21:11] <fagan> I wouldnt knwo
[21:11] <uncon> kthnx
[21:11] <fagan> well it might have something to do with client side decorations
[21:11] <fagan> thats new to maverick
[21:12] <zakscott> maverick defaults to metacity right?
[21:12] <Daekdroom> uncon, have you tried running gtkperf and comparing against other engines?
[21:12] <uncon> no
[21:12] <Daekdroom> zakscott, gtk-window-decorator if it can, I believe.
[21:14] <uncon> Daekdroom: 11.78 vs 55.63 on total time in gtkperf
[21:15] <Daekdroom> Wow. That's quite a lot.
[21:15] <uncon> yeah, and my system is basicaly unresponsive while it's running in clearlooks
[21:15] <knittl> BUGabundo: yes, i have ambience instead of radiance now
[21:15] <knittl> no change ^^
[21:39] <BUGabundo> knittl: shame....
[21:39] <knittl> but i think it's a wee bit faster now
[21:39] <knittl> maybe 2 %
[21:39] <knittl> :D
[22:05] <BUGa_TopGear> yeah I feel the same
[22:36] <Daekdroom> indicator-applet is using a whole 63MB...
[22:38] <Daekdroom> Killing gnome-panel set it back to 4MB used..
[22:38] <Daekdroom> Does that mean it's memory leaking?
[22:48] <Daekdroom> Found out what triggers it. Going to check if there's any report on launchpad about it