[05:37] morning all [05:37] hello [05:38] Images Ubuntu 10.04.1 images from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lucid/daily-live/current/ contains packages from lucid-proposed repository, is this ok? [05:38] See build logs: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/livefs-build-logs/lucid/ubuntu/current/livecd-20100719-i386.out [05:38] AFAIK it's a bug [05:51] mantiena-baltix: no, it's intended behavior. [05:52] sbeattie: so, Ubuntu 10.04.1 final images also will contain packages from proposed repositories? [05:53] mantiena-baltix: the idea is that the -proposed queue will be emptied out before the 10.04.1 release happens. [05:58] sbeattie: thanks for info, I thought, that all packages in -proposed repository must wait at least one or two weeks before entering into -updates... === kermiac_ is now known as kermiavc === kermiavc is now known as kermiac [06:15] sbeattie: maybe you know when -proposed repository will be will be emptied and final Ubuntu 10.04.1 CD images will be build ? According to the Lucid release schedule 10.04.1 will be released after 9 days, I wonder how many days will be left for testing final CD images... === yofel_ is now known as yofel === ogasawara_ is now known as ogasawara [10:55] morning all [13:08] stgraber, ping [14:30] hello [14:33] hello [14:36] does anyone know if there are plans to redesign the QA tracker at some point? [14:37] I mean ISO tracker [14:38] ara: ^ over to you :) [14:39] alourie, well, there are plans, but not current plans [14:40] alourie, if the TestTracker (a Launchpad extension for tracking results) gets implemented, then, we will get rid of the backend [14:40] alourie, then, if someone wants to reimplement the ISO tracker in django, he/she is more than welcome [14:58] ara: so I read this correctly, the current php platform will probably not be changed? [14:58] alourie, if there is no people interested in changing it, no [14:58] alourie, why are you asking? [14:59] ara: I had couple of ideas for that [14:59] alourie, for the PHP version, or to change it to something else? [15:00] ara: in general [15:00] the project is in launchpad, under ubuntu-qa-website [15:00] yes, I know :-) [15:00] :) [15:00] feel free to summarize your ideas and present them in a qa meeting or the mailing lists [15:02] one of them is about redefining some tests organization [15:03] so, for example, there's one test that includes 3 different installation methods, each with its own verifications. So making it one test with one "success" report doesn't seem to serve the purpose well enough [15:04] I'd break them into 3 different tests [15:05] and there's an idea about presenting the steps of the test on the test page - without redirecting to wiki [15:05] that's why I asked if there are redesigns in plans :-) [15:09] alourie: I believe ara snuck off to a meeting, so an email to the qa list is probably the best :) [15:09] fader_: ok [15:09] thanks [15:09] alourie: (I'm interested in reading your ideas as well :) ) [15:10] fader_: well, it just that I happened to build a test tracker once, and it was more convenient than an ISO tracker :-) [15:10] subjectively, of course [15:44] ara: pong [15:45] sorry, have been travling a bit lately :) [15:46] stgraber, hey! [15:46] stgraber, I am going to propose a merge into ubuntu-qa-website fixing some issues needed for alpha3 [15:46] I was wondering if you will have some time to review it [15:52] ara: I'll try. I don't have a test environment around at the moment but I can at least read the php code and see if I find something weird :) [15:53] stgraber, OK, thanks, I will finish a couple of things and I hope to push it later today [15:57] ok, thanks for doing all that work :) I'm quite glad I don't have to do it anymore so I can try to spend more time on Edubuntu and LTSP.