| === BUGa_ITCrowd is now known as BUGa_Eureka | ||
| bobby | Anyone know when the UI overhaul is coming? | 02:43 |
|---|---|---|
| fta2 | micahg, ff4.0 needs a patch refresh | 07:34 |
| micahg | fta2: yes, I did one last night, and tonight it needs another | 07:34 |
| micahg | fta2: if I do it now, do you want to respin? | 07:34 |
| fta2 | sure, np | 07:34 |
| micahg | fta2: k, give me about 10 minutes | 07:34 |
| fta2 | micahg, done?? | 07:59 |
| micahg | sorry, the patch doesn't look right, I'm looking into it | 08:00 |
| micahg | I geuss it's fine..., almost done | 08:00 |
| micahg | fta2: I pushed it, I guess give it a minute to update | 08:02 |
| micahg | fta2: got the emails, so should be good to go | 08:07 |
| fta2 | i didn't.. | 08:07 |
| fta2 | maybe i'm not subscribed to this branch | 08:07 |
| micahg | fta2: nope, I didn't know what options to subscribe you with | 08:08 |
| micahg | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-4.0.head | 08:08 |
| micahg | hi chrisccoulson | 08:08 |
| chrisccoulson | hi micahg | 08:09 |
| chrisccoulson | have you tested 3.6.7+build2 in lucid? | 08:09 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: so, all the mozilla apps were release, but no security info yet | 08:09 |
| micahg | *released | 08:09 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, i just saw that | 08:09 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I've been running it since you published it there | 08:09 |
| chrisccoulson | i'll ask jdstrand to publish them when we get security info, but i've not had a chance to test on lucid yet | 08:10 |
| micahg | aside from a memory leak, which I think was there before, it seems to be fine | 08:10 |
| chrisccoulson | ok, thanks | 08:10 |
| * micahg still needs to write a patch for upstream for xul191 branch and cairo 1.8.10 | 08:10 | |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I didn't fix the gnome-shell/gjs issue yet, so we might have to respin in Lucid | 08:11 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: right now gnome-shell is FTBFS in maverick, so I figured, I have to fix that before I can fix the one in lucid | 08:11 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - ok, thanks. i'm not too concerned about gnome-shell, the breakage went mostly unnoticed before anyway ;) | 08:14 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: so, I should just file anotehr bug for -proposed to respin after xulrunner lands? | 08:14 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, can do | 08:14 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - do you know what is happening with the UI in FF4.0 on the linux versions? | 08:15 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: no, I've seen some posts about UI, but haven't had time to keep up | 08:16 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, i was wondering about that, as the windows version is looking quite nice | 08:16 |
| micahg | fta2: awesome, thanks | 08:16 |
| * micahg should try the windows version in a VM | 08:17 | |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, i tried it last week, it's looking pretty good | 08:17 |
| fta2 | asac, is chromium working fine on arm? i see debian has lots of arm related changes and i wonder why | 08:17 |
| asac | fta2: what is "lot"? | 08:18 |
| asac | fta2: just build options or also assembler? | 08:18 |
| fta2 | asac, http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/c/chromium-browser/current/changelog | 08:19 |
| asac | fta2: yeah so: | 08:19 |
| asac | Do not use armv4 incompatible code | 08:19 |
| asac | [armel] Disabled thumb to fix FTBFS in armel | 08:19 |
| asac | [armel] set arm_neon=0 | 08:19 |
| asac | [armel] Remove all V5TE, VFP code from ffmpeg | 08:19 |
| asac | are there because debian wants to supports really old boards | 08:20 |
| fta2 | no idea | 08:20 |
| asac | we go for armv7 ++ | 08:20 |
| asac | and they even want to support armv4t | 08:20 |
| asac | which is nothing of real relevance from what i know ... like old routers etc. | 08:20 |
| fta2 | ok | 08:21 |
| micahg | asac: do we need enigmail-locales if enigmail is shipping locales in a .jar file? | 08:21 |
| fta2 | asac, and bug 539245? | 08:22 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 539245 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) (and 2 other projects) "[armel] chromium-browser's rendering is off (affects: 1) (heat: 31)" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/539245 | 08:22 |
| [reed] | what do I use for enabling webgl on ubuntu? | 08:22 |
| fta2 | i didn't change anything so i'm surprised it's fixed | 08:22 |
| [reed] | like, what package do I need to install and such | 08:22 |
| fta2 | [reed], webgl works for me here | 08:23 |
| fta2 | it's auto-detected by configure when the headers are there | 08:23 |
| [reed] | fta2: didn't you have to set a pref? | 08:23 |
| fta2 | hm, maybe. i don't remember.. it's been a while | 08:24 |
| [reed] | what do you have set for webgl.osmesalib ? | 08:24 |
| [reed] | (pref) | 08:24 |
| fta2 | i just have webgl.enabled_for_all_sites=true | 08:25 |
| [reed] | hmm | 08:25 |
| fta2 | and it works on say https://cvs.khronos.org/svn/repos/registry/trunk/public/webgl/sdk/demos/google/san-angeles/index.html | 08:25 |
| * micahg is off, have a good day everyone | 08:26 | |
| fta2 | micahg, bye, and thanks for the fix (another one is needed apparently) | 08:27 |
| micahg | fta2: yeah, the crash reporter has issues on hardy and jaunty | 08:27 |
| fta2 | ok, good to know | 08:28 |
| fta2 | asac, so apparently lsb_release is slow. any idea of a good equiv for us ? http://bzr.debian.org/scm/loggerhead/pkg-chromium/chromium-browser/chromium-browser.sid/revision/619/debian/changelog | 08:35 |
| micahg | fta2: shouldn't that be set at build time? | 08:38 |
| fta2 | not this one, it's to display "built on ubuntu/maverick, running on debian/unstable" | 08:38 |
| fta2 | or similar | 08:38 |
| fta2 | that's the running on part | 08:39 |
| micahg | fta2: that's not what those commands output though | 08:39 |
| micahg | DIST=Ubuntu RELEASE=10.04 | 08:40 |
| micahg | fta2: his fix should be reverted and replaced with build time substitution | 08:40 |
| fta2 | yep | 08:40 |
| fta2 | no | 08:41 |
| fta2 | you need to read the full code | 08:41 |
| asac | no clue | 08:42 |
| micahg | fta2: ah, I see :) | 08:42 |
| asac | in general it shouldnt be slow | 08:42 |
| asac | but well ;) | 08:42 |
| micahg | fta2: can you do version substitution in .postinst? | 08:42 |
| fta2 | asac, it takes 2~3sec here, which is slow for chromium | 08:42 |
| asac | usually you should display the lsb release from build time i guess | 08:42 |
| asac | and not at runtime | 08:43 |
| asac | we do that in firefox too | 08:43 |
| fta2 | the reason i added that is because in bugs, it's obvious that people are running the wrong builds | 08:43 |
| fta2 | like BUGabundo ;) | 08:44 |
| micahg | fta2: what do you think of my idea about modifying those variables in .postinst? | 08:45 |
| micahg | or is that not a good thing to do | 08:46 |
| fta2 | micahg, i already have that in .postinst (for the built-on part), but for the running-on part, it's needs to be dynamic | 08:49 |
| fta2 | -'s | 08:49 |
| micahg | fta2: why? do they copy the files off one machine and use them on another? | 08:50 |
| micahg | or just install the wrong debs? | 08:50 |
| micahg | or is it, my computer can boot 10 different linux kernels w/the same files | 08:51 |
| fta2 | micahg, no some people are obviously using the wrong ppa, or one of the ppa on another distro, then they file weird bugs | 08:51 |
| micahg | fta2: right, but are they using the wrong debs or they use the same install for Debian and UBuntu | 08:51 |
| micahg | .postinst will fix the deb issue, but not the other one | 08:51 |
| fta2 | micahg, some are using the ppa on debian, some are using the maverick ppa on say lucid or even hardy | 08:52 |
| micahg | fta2: k, then .postinst will solve your issue | 08:52 |
| fta2 | how come? | 08:52 |
| micahg | you do the substitution after install | 08:52 |
| fta2 | postinst has no impact on running on | 08:53 |
| fta2 | oh | 08:53 |
| fta2 | i see | 08:53 |
| micahg | fta2: the built on logic, should probably be in rules | 08:53 |
| fta2 | well, it's in d/rules | 08:53 |
| micahg | fta2: oh, ok :) | 08:54 |
| fta2 | i'm not very comfortable substituting stuff in the wrapper are install time, maybe another file | 08:54 |
| fta2 | i will think about it | 08:54 |
| micahg | fta2: k, good luck, now I really need to get some sleep before the sun comes up :) | 08:55 |
| fta2 | :) | 08:55 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: *sigh* | 09:25 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: so, mozilla released 3.6.7 | 09:25 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: (hi btw :) | 09:25 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: jaunty/sparc/xul did compile (yea!) | 09:25 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: but, there seems to be a sparc chroot problem on jaunty that is preventing the build | 09:25 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: so, I think we should publish and push an updated openjdk later | 09:27 |
| chrisccoulson | jdstrand, yeah, they've released FF3.6.7, TB3.0.6 and SM2.0.6 | 09:28 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: ie, once openjdk/karmic/armel is finished, we can publish. what has your testing been like? | 09:28 |
| chrisccoulson | jdstrand, i need to talk to Arne this morning about the jaunty / karmic en-GB langpack, as the translations for yelp are definately broken | 09:28 |
| chrisccoulson | i mentioned it a couple of weeks ago, but i'm not sure if any progress has happened with it yet | 09:29 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: ok. my goal is to publish tomorrow | 09:29 |
| chrisccoulson | ok, i'll see if we can fix those translations today | 09:29 |
| chrisccoulson | did you see the vulnerabilities for 3.6.7? | 09:29 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: I'd rather it not go out on friday. I will be testing today | 09:29 |
| jdstrand | chrisccoulson: yes, I did | 09:29 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| micahg | fta2: pitti has a better solution for Chromium :) | 16:40 |
| fta | ? | 16:41 |
| micahg | bug 608253 | 16:41 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 608253 in chromium-browser (Ubuntu) "eliminate lsb_release from chromium startup (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/608253 | 16:41 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| fta | chrisccoulson, is icedtea6-plugin still linked with xul in lucid? maverick? (i have a workaround in chromium i'd like to drop) | 17:18 |
| micahg | fta: in Maverick should be no, but in lucid, it's in lucid-proposed | 17:18 |
| fta | micahg, short night? :) | 17:19 |
| micahg | fta: yes :( | 17:19 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: still around? | 19:36 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - i am | 19:47 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: we need to decide about enigmail-locales, if we're dropping it, we need to get language-selector updated for 10.04.1 (which was just pushed back 2 weeks) | 19:48 |
| chrisccoulson | i think we're still pretty much frozen for 10.04.1 though | 19:49 |
| chrisccoulson | i'll try and find out | 19:49 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: the email today said to bug fixes are fine | 19:49 |
| micahg | and I think this is on the list anyways | 19:49 |
| chrisccoulson | ah, ok. i've not read my emails yet | 19:50 |
| micahg | yes, still on the list, so, we have 1 week to decide | 19:50 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: ^^ | 19:55 |
| chrisccoulson | is there a bug report tracking it? | 19:55 |
| micahg | bug 572018 | 19:56 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 572018 in debian (and 3 other projects) "enigmail-locales weren't updated for 1.0.1 enigmail release (affects: 13) (dups: 2) (heat: 122)" [Unknown,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/572018 | 19:56 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg - ok, we should update the language-selector then to not pull in the broken translations | 20:01 |
| chrisccoulson | but the bug report should probably have a language-selector task | 20:01 |
| chrisccoulson | and i'll ask pitti to remove them from maverick later | 20:01 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I was going to add one once you decided whether or not to drop it :) | 20:01 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I can take care of that too now that I can upload :) | 20:02 |
| chrisccoulson | cool, that seems fine anyway | 20:02 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: alright, I'll take care of all the tasks tonight then | 20:02 |
| chrisccoulson | thanks | 20:03 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I assume we should upload empty packages to lucid-updates as well so that people don't get conflicts on update? | 20:03 |
| chrisccoulson | i'll ask mvo about that | 20:04 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: unless we want update-manager to remove on upgrade? | 20:04 |
| chrisccoulson | that's what i'm wondering. but empty packages might be easier | 20:04 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: yeah, ok, let me know if I need to work on that | 20:05 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: how's the sprint going? | 20:06 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, it's going ok. i'm pretty tired though | 20:06 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| === Dimmuxx_ is now known as Dimmuxx | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!