| yofel | hey, how long does it usually take for packages to be published? The package here already waits 10h to be published https://edge.launchpad.net/~neon/+archive/ppa/+packages | 00:06 |
|---|---|---|
| wgrant | yofel: It should be done within 5 minutes. | 00:07 |
| wgrant | Let's see. | 00:07 |
| Quintasan | yofel: I was about to ask that | 00:07 |
| === flacoste is now known as flacoste_afk | ||
| === flacoste_afk is now known as flacoste | ||
| yofel | Quintasan: beat you :P | 00:07 |
| wgrant | yofel: Can you visit https://launchpad.net/~neon/+archive/ppa/+edit and confirm that the 'Publish' setting is checked? | 00:15 |
| yofel | Quintasan: ^ | 00:16 |
| Quintasan | ahh | 00:17 |
| Quintasan | solved | 00:17 |
| Quintasan | wgrant: thanks | 00:17 |
| wgrant | I really need to convince people that we should remove that checkbox. | 00:18 |
| wgrant | it doesn't make sense for users to have access to it. | 00:19 |
| Quintasan | well | 00:21 |
| Quintasan | I can only agree on that | 00:21 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: You ever have a day where you've done a whole lot of work - but got nowhere? | 00:26 |
| wgrant | MTecknology: Regrettably so. | 00:27 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: All I can think about is going to the bar - but I don't go there so it wouldn't make sense... | 00:27 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: you happen to know much about recipes? | 00:27 |
| wgrant | MTecknology: A bit. | 00:28 |
| wgrant | Why? | 00:28 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: I've been fighting them and maybe I'm missing some dumb thing | 00:29 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: I have this recipe that works perfect locally - http://paste.ubuntu.com/467253/ - but a recipe in LP can't use run | 00:31 |
| rinze | MTecknology: Couldn't you just use merge for the debian changes? | 00:32 |
| MTecknology | rinze: bzr: ERROR: Branches have no common ancestor, and no merge base revision was specified. | 00:32 |
| wgrant | Give them a common ancestor. | 00:33 |
| MTecknology | how? | 00:33 |
| wgrant | Base your packaging changes branch on your normal branch. | 00:33 |
| MTecknology | Any chance you could hold my hand a wee bit on this one? | 00:34 |
| MTecknology | as if it hasn't been held enough.... | 00:35 |
| wgrant | MTecknology: Why isn't lp:~nginx/ninx/debian-changes-0.8 based on lp:~nginx/ninx/debian? | 00:35 |
| wgrant | If it was, you could just merge it in. | 00:35 |
| MTecknology | I couldn't figure out how to base it on the branch | 00:36 |
| wgrant | bzr branch lp:~nginx/ninx/debian debian-changes-0.8 | 00:36 |
| wgrant | Make the changes. | 00:36 |
| wgrant | Commit. | 00:36 |
| wgrant | Push. | 00:36 |
| MTecknology | and if I only want to maintain the one file in that branch? | 00:37 |
| wgrant | Why would you want to do that? | 00:37 |
| MTecknology | the more I think about that - the more it sounds like a better idea | 00:38 |
| MTecknology | I'll do that | 00:38 |
| spiv | Incidentally, I'm working on a change to recipes to allow merging files/directories from unrelated branches, but I think wgrant's advice here is good even if that work were finished and deployed. | 00:41 |
| MTecknology | spiv: I'm doing that now and finally clicked why that's a better idea | 00:42 |
| MTecknology | spiv: and incredibly awesome feature to add :) | 00:42 |
| === mordred_ is now known as mtaylor | ||
| MTecknology | wgrant: so I'm taking the lp:~nginx/ninx/debian out of the recipe entirely? | 00:46 |
| wgrant | MTecknology: It depends. | 00:48 |
| wgrant | If you leave it in, you'll automatically get changes from that branch. | 00:48 |
| wgrant | Which is probably what you want. | 00:49 |
| MTecknology | yup - which is why i thought I didn't need any files other than the ones i was changing | 00:49 |
| wgrant | Remember that it's a merge, not a clobber. | 00:50 |
| MTecknology | so it'll look like this instead? http://paste.ubuntu.com/467258/ | 00:51 |
| wgrant | I think so. | 00:52 |
| MTecknology | I'll try it out... | 00:53 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: do I love you, no... do I want to buy you a beer... yes | 00:55 |
| wgrant | Hah. | 00:55 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: so if they change file xyz my branch will overwrite their change when I do the merge since it's something I changed? | 00:56 |
| wgrant | MTecknology: It will follow normal bzr merge rules. | 00:57 |
| wgrant | If you both change the same part of the file, it will conflict. | 00:57 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: oh... that'll happen every time | 00:58 |
| wgrant | MTecknology: lp:nginx/ninx/debian changes regularly? | 00:58 |
| wgrant | It's only your delta relative to lp:nginx/ninx/debian that matters. | 00:59 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: the file I changed will | 00:59 |
| MTecknology | I changed a file that they will change | 00:59 |
| wgrant | Howso? | 00:59 |
| MTecknology | I'm horrible with understanding merge conflicts so my face blanks | 00:59 |
| MTecknology | changelog and a couple others that will be less frequently changed | 01:00 |
| wgrant | You shouldn't be modifying the changleog. | 01:00 |
| wgrant | bzr-builder does that for you. | 01:00 |
| MTecknology | except that it won't handle if your building a different version with the same changelog | 01:01 |
| wgrant | Hm? | 01:01 |
| MTecknology | there's stable 0.7.x and development 0.8.x - both can use the exact same debian/ | 01:02 |
| wgrant | But bzr-builder handles the new changelog entry for you. | 01:03 |
| MTecknology | how do I assign it the right version? | 01:04 |
| wgrant | MTecknology: The deb-version bit in the first line of the recipe. | 01:04 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: I'd very much rather not have to change that for every single build but... doesn't sound like I have the choice | 01:05 |
| spiv | MTecknology: the deb-version can include things like {revno} | 01:05 |
| spiv | So you shouldn't have to change it every single build. | 01:06 |
| wgrant | Exactly. | 01:06 |
| MTecknology | spiv: the version will change with every build | 01:06 |
| wgrant | It'd be fairly useless for daily builds otherwise. | 01:06 |
| wgrant | MTecknology: What do you mean? | 01:07 |
| MTecknology | the branches will only change with new versions | 01:07 |
| wgrant | As in new stable releases? | 01:07 |
| MTecknology | yup | 01:07 |
| wgrant | Hmm. I don't know enough about the version syntax to tell you how to solve that. | 01:08 |
| wgrant | spiv: Do you know? | 01:08 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: I was saying earlier that {last_tag:branch_name} would solve this for me | 01:09 |
| wookey | wgrant: I can see no sign of the file that dpkg-source is whinging about in the uploaded archive | 01:09 |
| wgrant | wookey: It must be a dpkg bug which has since been fixed. | 01:09 |
| spiv | wgrant: it just has {revno}, {time}, {revno:BRANCH-NAME} and {debupstream} I think | 01:10 |
| MTecknology | {debupstream} is what I was trying to get at | 01:10 |
| MTecknology | that's the exact string I want for 0.7.x | 01:10 |
| MTecknology | but not for 0.8.x | 01:10 |
| wookey | hmm, so given that I promised to upload this today, but the pristine source I gave to Debian won;t uplaod to my PPA, what do you suggest I do? | 01:11 |
| wookey | (the user who wanted it need a version rebuild on maverick because the libvtk is different on ubuntu) | 01:12 |
| === Ursinha-dinner is now known as Ursinha | ||
| wookey | I can build it on my maverick chroot here but that will produe amd64 packages and he wants i386 | 01:13 |
| MTecknology | spiv: # bzr-builder format 0.2 deb-version {debupstream}-0ppa{revno} <-- I think that's right for 0.7.x - For 0.8.x I would need to have 0.8.34-0ppa{revno} and for every branch upload change the version.. | 01:14 |
| spiv | What's the recipe look like? | 01:16 |
| MTecknology | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~nginx/+recipe/nginx-develpment | 01:16 |
| spiv | Won't the {revno} take care of that already? | 01:18 |
| MTecknology | spiv: It's the 0.8.34 that I don't like having to change every time I want to make a new build | 01:19 |
| MTecknology | spiv: I know I'm asking a lot from something that's still very beta.. | 01:19 |
| spiv | MTecknology: oh, I see. | 01:24 |
| spiv | MTecknology: it would be good to support that, although I'm not sure what a good mechanism for that would be | 01:25 |
| MTecknology | spiv: last_tag :D | 01:25 |
| spiv | There's no such concept in bzr. | 01:25 |
| spiv | "highest" tag, perhaps. | 01:26 |
| MTecknology | ya, that | 01:26 |
| spiv | Although that strikes me as pretty fragile, and dependent on details of how projects tag things. | 01:26 |
| wgrant | I wonder if it could use pristine tar information instead. | 01:26 |
| spiv | Please file a bug on bzr-builder for this, but the solution isn't obvious to me. | 01:27 |
| spiv | In the meantime, perhaps just call your package 0.8? Or 0.8.x if debian allows that... | 01:27 |
| MTecknology | spiv: maybe you know this one... bug 608450 mentions having a branch you can merge that makes the changes | 01:28 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 608450 in Launchpad Bazaar Integration "Can't use 'run' in recipe (affected: 1, heat: 6)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/608450 | 01:28 |
| wgrant | The rationale given there doesn't make sense, AFAICT. | 01:29 |
| wgrant | We put in an awful lot of work to make sure recipe builds were as secure as PPA builds. | 01:30 |
| wgrant | And they are. | 01:30 |
| wgrant | So there's no security risk, unless we evaluate the recipe somewhere else. | 01:30 |
| spiv | MTecknology: I have a branch intended to permit merging debian/ from a branch with unrelated history | 01:30 |
| MTecknology | spiv: that one let lets you basically overwrite files? | 01:30 |
| spiv | MTecknology: no | 01:31 |
| spiv | But if you know there are files in an existing branch, well make a branch based on the existing branch and merge it in. | 01:31 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: It's kinda sad because I actually got excited when I maqde it run locally :P | 01:31 |
| MTecknology | I've also been considering just asking the deb maintainer to just had another svn branch in trunk for 0.8 :P | 01:33 |
| spiv | My patch is targetted to the 'parallel import' case, where Launchpad has essentially the same project in unrelated branches via code imports and package imports, and you'd like to make a recipe to e.g. package the latest upstream trunk using the same packaging that's already in ubuntu. | 01:33 |
| MTecknology | that sounds a lot like my use case | 01:33 |
| wgrant | I don't think it is. | 01:34 |
| MTecknology | oh | 01:34 |
| MTecknology | maybe a use case matching what i had in my head | 01:34 |
| spiv | My patch (currently) adds a 'merge-part' instruction to recipes so that you can specify merging just part of a (possibly unrelated) branch, e.g. 'merge-part debian-from-parallel url://to/branch -1 debian/', IIRC | 01:36 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: far as the security things goes - I could see the point if rules didn't basically allow you to do the same thing | 01:36 |
| MTecknology | spiv: nice | 01:37 |
| wgrant | MTecknology: Right. You can already execute arbitrary code, so the restriction is pointless. | 01:37 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: I guess this is just part of workign out the kinks :P | 01:39 |
| MTecknology | It's 19:40 and I got here at 07:40... I should continue working from home.. | 01:41 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: so.. I just emailed upstream about making a debian-dev - we'll see if she's up for that | 02:45 |
| tcr | Can I cross-reference a bug in project FOO in a bug report to a project BAR? If so, how? | 03:20 |
| wgrant | tcr: So, it depends on how the bugs are related. Do you have two in particular for this case? | 03:21 |
| spiv | What do you mean by cross-reference, exactly? As a minimal option, you can write "See also bug 999999" in a comment, and it will be automatically hyperlinked. | 03:22 |
| ubot5 | Error: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: 999999 (https://launchpad.net/bugs/999999) | 03:22 |
| tcr | spiv: The numbers are universally unique? I'd have thought they're unique per project only? | 03:23 |
| wgrant | No, they're universally unique. | 03:23 |
| thiebaude | I had my account suspended, how do i find out why it was? | 03:23 |
| tcr | Oh that's cool, and news to me. | 03:23 |
| wgrant | Unless your project has 600000 bugs. :) | 03:23 |
| thiebaude | launchpad account | 03:23 |
| spm | thiebaude: which account? | 03:23 |
| thiebaude | lauchpad | 03:23 |
| thiebaude | launchpad | 03:23 |
| spm | thiebaude: no :-) what was the name of it. | 03:23 |
| tcr | spiv: That's all I wanted. Thanks | 03:24 |
| wgrant | launchpad.net/~thiebaude? | 03:24 |
| thiebaude | ok let me check 1 sec | 03:24 |
| thiebaude | yes it is thiebaude | 03:25 |
| spm | thiebaude: ok, apparently your account was being abused to send spam back in April; and was duly suspended. | 03:27 |
| thiebaude | can i get it back | 03:28 |
| thiebaude | since i did't spam | 03:28 |
| spm | thiebaude: I didn't mean to imply _you_ had; only that your account was. possibly your PC was trojaned or similar. You ain't the first, won't be the last. | 03:30 |
| thiebaude | ok thanks for that info:) | 03:30 |
| thiebaude | spm | 03:30 |
| thiebaude | i understand | 03:30 |
| thiebaude | what is the next step for me to get the account back? | 03:31 |
| spm | thiebaude: I've reactivated it; but you'll need to go thru the 'forgotten password' steps | 03:31 |
| thiebaude | spm ,ok thanks i sure will, and thank you for helping me:) | 03:32 |
| spm | np :-) | 03:33 |
| thiebaude | tc | 03:33 |
| Muscovy | Is it possible to add icons and screenshots to thing in my PPA for the software centre? | 04:34 |
| wgrant | Muscovy: Not at the moment. But I believe the Software Center people are working on that sort of thing. | 04:38 |
| Muscovy | Ok, thanks. | 04:46 |
| === Cepheus is now known as Cepheus|Away | ||
| MTecknology | spm: whois says you're around - any chance you could make me blink with joy? | 05:23 |
| thumper | MTecknology: whazzup? | 05:47 |
| MTecknology | thumper: I was hoping for a peak at an answer request | 05:48 |
| thumper | MTecknology: ah | 05:48 |
| MTecknology | thumper: Are you an LP admin? | 05:48 |
| thumper | MTecknology: alas, no | 05:49 |
| MTecknology | Seems there used to be a lot more than there are now | 05:49 |
| thumper | MTecknology: no... not really | 05:50 |
| MTecknology | oh, then my mind fooled me in the past :P | 05:50 |
| wgrant | There were, but not for a few years now. | 05:51 |
| MTecknology | I've been using LP for a while now.. I can vaguely name a few I was pretty sure were on the list - back when I called 'em all rubber duckies | 05:52 |
| MTecknology | so.. what is the limit on number of times you can build a package for each release in a day? | 05:53 |
| wgrant | 5, I believe. | 05:54 |
| wgrant | It is a stupid restriction. | 05:54 |
| MTecknology | oh.. I thought I did a lot more than 5 today - I wasn't surprised to hit it :P | 05:55 |
| spm | there's a restriction on #builds of a package? huh. didn't know that one. | 06:35 |
| wgrant | spm: There's a new restriction on the number of builds per day of a recipe for each series. | 06:36 |
| wgrant | It is the only such arbitrary limit in Launchpad, I believe. | 06:36 |
| spm | Ahh I see. I'm aware of the new recipe stuff, but don't know too much about it unf. | 06:36 |
| wgrant | Except for the PPA disk quota, I guess. | 06:37 |
| spm | that one does make sense in a 'please clean up what you *really* want from what you don't; then ask for more' sense. | 06:37 |
| james_w | MTecknology: please file bugs on bzr-builder with your requests | 07:41 |
| mistrynitesh | https://help.launchpad.net/ReadingOpenPgpMail recommends using FireGPG for reading openpgp mails on Gmail. However, the FireGPG project is discontinued and the software no longer supports gmail | 08:00 |
| mistrynitesh | is this the correct channel to report this? | 08:01 |
| thumper | mistrynitesh: yeak | 08:04 |
| thumper | mistrynitesh: there has been some recent work on email authentication using DKIM (I think that's right) | 08:05 |
| thumper | mistrynitesh: so that may mean that email from gmail will be trusted as if it was signed | 08:05 |
| lifeless | yes | 08:05 |
| * thumper just noticed the typo above | 08:06 | |
| thumper | s/yeak/yes/ | 08:06 |
| thumper | although I probably was going to say yeah | 08:06 |
| thumper | ak isn't anywhere near s | 08:06 |
| wgrant | thumper: It's actually landed. | 08:06 |
| wgrant | So 10.08 will automatically verify emails from Gmail. | 08:07 |
| thumper | wgrant: but probably not live yet | 08:07 |
| wgrant | Right. | 08:07 |
| thumper | wgrant: how goes the new semester? | 08:07 |
| thumper | last one right? | 08:07 |
| thumper | lifeless: morning, you there for the entire week? | 08:07 |
| mistrynitesh | thumper: i did not understand what you meant by "email from gmail will be trusted as if it was signed" | 08:08 |
| lifeless | thumper: yea, GHM in den hag on the weekend then home on monday, get in wed | 08:09 |
| thumper | mistrynitesh: sorry I misread your initial question | 08:09 |
| thumper | mistrynitesh: is the email signed or encrypted? | 08:09 |
| mistrynitesh | encrypted | 08:09 |
| mistrynitesh | so I had to copy the mail to a text file and then read it on command line | 08:10 |
| thumper | I don't know an answer, perhaps a more general firefox forum could help | 08:10 |
| === jtv changed the topic of #launchpad to: http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: jtv | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | ||
| thumper | morning jtv | 08:10 |
| jtv | hi thumper | 08:10 |
| jtv | you going to Den Haag then? | 08:10 |
| mistrynitesh | sure, what I wanted to report is that the help page on launchpad should be updated with this development | 08:10 |
| thumper | mistrynitesh: ok, thanks | 08:11 |
| wgrant | thumper: It starts Monday. And yes, it's the last one. | 08:11 |
| wgrant | Then I have to find something to do. | 08:11 |
| lifeless | jtv: thumper is in NZ again already | 08:11 |
| jtv | ah | 08:11 |
| * thumper wanders off | 08:13 | |
| === oubiwann-away is now known as oubiwann | ||
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| === persia` is now known as persia | ||
| Quintasan | james_w, wgrant, maxb: can something be done about that import -> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/kdelibs/kde4 failing? | 12:19 |
| maxb | Quintasan: Only by someone first fixing bug 579491 | 12:21 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 579491 in Bazaar Subversion Plugin "iter_changes on caching logwalker supports only one prefix (affected: 1, heat: 4)" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/579491 | 12:21 |
| shadeslayer | hi i would like to know if theres a way to make https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/kdelibs/kde4 work | 12:21 |
| maxb | <Quintasan> james_w, wgrant, maxb: can something be done about that import -> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/kdelibs/kde4 failing? | 12:22 |
| maxb | <maxb> Quintasan: Only by someone first fixing bug 579491 | 12:22 |
| shadeslayer | ah.. | 12:22 |
| shadeslayer | i see Quintasan already asked :D | 12:22 |
| wgrant | You two seem to come in pairs :P | 12:22 |
| Quintasan | well, we want Project Neon to move since I figured out how to build Qt :P | 12:22 |
| shadeslayer | wgrant: were trying to get project Neon up and working | 12:22 |
| Quintasan | shadeslayer: wut, I'm the spokesperson for our project :P | 12:23 |
| geser | wgrant: perhaps the idea is: if more people ask then it seems to be important and more likely to get fixed. would that work? | 12:23 |
| * shadeslayer thought it was a collaborative effort :( | 12:23 | |
| Quintasan | shadeslayer: yeah, but repeating the same sentence over again won't help :P | 12:24 |
| yofel | well, let's increase the 'affects' count a bit in any case... | 12:24 |
| shadeslayer | Quintasan: i didnt know you asked ^_^ | 12:24 |
| yofel | shadeslayer: http://paste.ubuntu.com/467466/ | 12:25 |
| shadeslayer | ok :P | 12:26 |
| shadeslayer | btw how come gitorious.org is not recognized by LP? | 12:41 |
| wgrant | Not recognised? In what sense? | 12:42 |
| shadeslayer | wgrant: for eg. when i login with the LP open id , i get a warning saying that gitorious.org is not recognised by launchpad open sign in service | 12:44 |
| === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
| wgrant | I don't know. Ubuntu/Launchpad SSO aren't actually part of Launchpad any more. | 12:44 |
| shadeslayer | ah ok | 12:45 |
| wgrant | But it just means it's not been explicitly configured yet. | 12:45 |
| wgrant | I don't know why it tells you that. | 12:45 |
| mtaylor | spm: not still up are you? | 13:04 |
| shadeslayer | merge packaging lp:~bzr/bzr/packaging << whats the role of the word 'packaging' here? | 13:10 |
| shadeslayer | the first one... | 13:10 |
| poolie | shadeslayer, is this in a build recipe? | 13:10 |
| shadeslayer | yes | 13:10 |
| shadeslayer | im trying it out for rekonq first.. so that i can work on kdelibs | 13:11 |
| wgrant | shadeslayer: It gives the branch a name in the recipe. You can then say {revno:packaging} in the version string. | 13:13 |
| shadeslayer | wgrant: ok.. another question then,suppose im merging the 2 branches,and my packaging is in http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~rekonq/rekonq/rekonq-ubuntu/files | 13:14 |
| shadeslayer | and im using merge packaging lp:~rekonq/rekonq/rekonq-ubuntu | 13:15 |
| shadeslayer | would that work? | 13:15 |
| wgrant | That should work, yes. | 13:15 |
| wgrant | Assuming that the branches have a common ancestor. | 13:15 |
| shadeslayer | common ancestor? :D | 13:15 |
| wgrant | rekonq-ubuntu has to be based on the original branch. | 13:16 |
| shadeslayer | theres no original branch | 13:17 |
| wgrant | Hm? | 13:17 |
| wgrant | You're merging the branch into something. | 13:18 |
| shadeslayer | wgrant: this is the first import of rekonq packaging branch | 13:18 |
| wgrant | shadeslayer: What is the base branch of your recipe? | 13:18 |
| shadeslayer | wgrant: none... | 13:18 |
| shadeslayer | uh | 13:18 |
| shadeslayer | you mean the initial code import | 13:19 |
| wgrant | You can't merge into nothing. | 13:19 |
| wgrant | After the initial recipe header line, there is a branch name. | 13:19 |
| shadeslayer | ohhh.. one sec | 13:19 |
| wgrant | Then you have subsequent directives like 'merge blah lp:blah' | 13:19 |
| wgrant | The base branch is retrieved, then the directives are followed on top of that. | 13:20 |
| shadeslayer | wgrant: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~rekonq | 13:20 |
| shadeslayer | rekonq-ubuntu is packaging and rekonq/trunk is base branch | 13:20 |
| wgrant | So, that's not going to work. | 13:21 |
| shadeslayer | ok.. why? | 13:21 |
| wgrant | rekonq-ubuntu isn't based on trunk. | 13:21 |
| wgrant | So there's no way to merge them. | 13:21 |
| wgrant | rekonq-ubuntu appears to be the contents of the debian/ directory? | 13:22 |
| shadeslayer | YES | 13:22 |
| shadeslayer | sorry for the caps | 13:22 |
| wgrant | Why isn't it a full branch, with an added debian/ directory? | 13:22 |
| shadeslayer | you mean it should be a branch with a debian/ folder and then it should be used? | 13:23 |
| wgrant | I think you should create a new branch of trunk and throw the debian/ directory in there. | 13:23 |
| wgrant | That's pretty much how the Ubuntu packaging branches work. | 13:24 |
| shadeslayer | ohh i see | 13:24 |
| wgrant | So your packaging branch is a complete extracted Debian source package. | 13:24 |
| wgrant | It has the application source, and it has the debian directory. | 13:24 |
| shadeslayer | wgrant: lemme show you something | 13:24 |
| mtaylor | shadeslayer: http://www.advogato.org/person/robertc/diary/130.html may be helpful | 13:24 |
| shadeslayer | wgrant: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~neon | 13:24 |
| shadeslayer | same thing there... we have qt-ubuntu and qt-trunk | 13:25 |
| shadeslayer | uh.. qt-kde | 13:25 |
| shadeslayer | so qt-kde is our intial import | 13:26 |
| shadeslayer | and qt-ubuntu is our packaging branch | 13:26 |
| wgrant | Is there a reason you've done in that way? | 13:27 |
| shadeslayer | wgrant: you would have to ask Quintasan :D | 13:27 |
| Quintasan | wgrant: well, if there is a debian/ directory inside a branch and nest requires a name of the dir | 13:32 |
| Quintasan | so it would look like: ./debian/debian/control | 13:33 |
| wgrant | Quintasan: Why not make the branch look like a source package? | 13:33 |
| wgrant | Just a branch of trunk, but with the debian/ directory added. | 13:33 |
| wgrant | Then a plain merge is all that's required; no nest. | 13:33 |
| shadeslayer | btw is the {date} plugin now available in recipes ? | 13:34 |
| Quintasan | wgrant: I don't get it, you want me to put debian/ to our kde-qt branch | 13:34 |
| Quintasan | ? | 13:34 |
| Quintasan | shadeslayer: date was available all the time O_o | 13:34 |
| shadeslayer | ah ok | 13:34 |
| wgrant | Quintasan: No. In a branch of kde-qt. | 13:35 |
| wgrant | Rather than having qt-ubuntu as a standalone branch, have it be based on qt-kde, but with the added debian/ directory. | 13:36 |
| Quintasan | and how do I do that? | 13:36 |
| wgrant | bzr branch qt-kde qt-ubuntu | 13:36 |
| wgrant | cd qt-ubuntu | 13:36 |
| wgrant | <copy in packaging> | 13:36 |
| wgrant | bzr add | 13:36 |
| wgrant | bzr ci -m "Add packaging." | 13:37 |
| wgrant | bzr push | 13:37 |
| shadeslayer | ill bbl | 13:37 |
| Quintasan | wgrant: and how the daily build will handle this? | 13:40 |
| wgrant | Quintasan: The recipe that's there at the moment is for this kind of model. | 13:41 |
| wgrant | It won't work with the qt-ubuntu branch that's up there now. | 13:41 |
| Quintasan | wgrant: http://pastebin.com/t9XE2wnv | 13:41 |
| Quintasan | that's the recipe I used to generate qt-kde source tarball | 13:41 |
| === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
| lool | Hey folks | 13:43 |
| lool | I fucked up | 13:43 |
| wgrant | Quintasan: Ah. I was looking at a recipe on LP, which has since been deleted. | 13:43 |
| wgrant | Quintasan: Replace the third line with 'merge debian lp:~neon/project-neon/qt-ubuntu'. | 13:43 |
| lool | I created a regular project and cant attach it to a project group now; I should have created it under the project group | 13:43 |
| lool | Would some admin be able to fix that for me? | 13:43 |
| wgrant | lool: Click 'Change details' on your project. | 13:44 |
| lool | linaro-toolchain is the meta-project (group) and linaro-toolchain-misc is the project which should be attached to the group | 13:44 |
| wgrant | Find the 'Part of' field. | 13:44 |
| lool | wgrant: Gah, thakns | 13:44 |
| lool | wgrant: worked fine | 13:45 |
| Quintasan | wgrant: well no need to place debian/ intro source then? | 13:45 |
| Quintasan | into* | 13:45 |
| wgrant | Quintasan: debian/ will exist in qt-ubuntu. qt-kde won't have it. So you tell the recipe to merge qt-ubuntu into qt-kde. | 13:45 |
| Quintasan | great | 13:46 |
| wgrant | That way you get the latest code from qt-kde, and the debian/ directory from qt-ubuntu. | 13:46 |
| Quintasan | bzr: ERROR: Branches have no common ancestor, and no merge base revision was specified. | 13:58 |
| Quintasan | wgrant: ^ | 13:58 |
| wgrant | Quintasan: Sounds like you didn't branch qt-ubuntu from qt-kde... | 13:58 |
| ttx | from #openstack: <jonesy> you know, from an end-user perspective (someone looking for info or code for a project they're interested in), I've never liked launchpad, but I just did a merge proposal, and it was one of the easiest experiences I've had outside of maybe github. | 13:59 |
| poolie | nice :) | 14:00 |
| poolie | now let's fix the other bits | 14:00 |
| wgrant | Well, some UI design might help... | 14:00 |
| Quintasan | GRR | 14:36 |
| Quintasan | wgrant: I have qt-kde (Qt source code) and qt-ubuntu (contains debian/) directories sitting in my home, doing bzr branch qt-kde qt-ubuntu = bzr: ERROR: Target directory "qt-ubuntu" already exists. and --use-existing-dir yields me error that qt-ubuntu is already a branch | 14:38 |
| === Cepheus|Away is now known as Cepheus | ||
| ocatacoo | I keep getting bug reports sent to me from launchpad and see no way to stop them or unsubscribe what should I do to unsubscribe from them | 15:05 |
| Meths | Are you receiving updates on one bug or lots of bugs for a project? | 15:07 |
| jelmer | ocatacoo: the last line of the email should explain why you are receiving the email. | 15:07 |
| jtv | ocatacoo: there should be an explanation of how you're subscribed at the bottom of each email. | 15:07 |
| ocatacoo | You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to | 15:08 |
| ocatacoo | Hardware Certification. | 15:08 |
| shadeslayer | thats why :) | 15:08 |
| ocatacoo | but I am not subscribed | 15:08 |
| shadeslayer | ocatacoo: un-subscribe from the h/w certification team/ML | 15:08 |
| ocatacoo | thats not the bug kist but I am not subscribed to them either and not getting from the mailing list anyway | 15:10 |
| Meths | ocatacoo: Have you been to https://bugs.launchpad.net/hardware-certification to check what subscription options you get in the right-hand menu? | 15:11 |
| shadeslayer | hi im getting this FBTFS with LP recipes http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52316355/buildlog.txt.gz | 15:13 |
| shadeslayer | and i have no idea what it means... ive never seen that error before | 15:13 |
| ocatacoo | it shows that I can subscribe | 15:14 |
| maxb | shadeslayer: I believe it means recipe builds are completely broken on maverick owing to changes in the default package seeding which no longer include aptitude in the chroot | 15:14 |
| Quintasan | :/ | 15:15 |
| shadeslayer | hmm... | 15:15 |
| Quintasan | maxb: about that import bug, do you have someone working on it or you lack information? | 15:15 |
| shadeslayer | maxb: how can we fix this? | 15:15 |
| ocatacoo | hardware cert doesnt have a mailing list that I can find anyway | 15:15 |
| maxb | Quintasan: You sound like you think I'm officially associated with Launchpad :-) I'm not. | 15:16 |
| maxb | shadeslayer: I've not looked into it in detail, but I imagine the proper fix is to fix pbuilder to not assume aptitude is part of the base chroto | 15:16 |
| Quintasan | maxb: Well, you're running around answering everything, I assumed you are in some way :P | 15:18 |
| * maxb afk | 15:18 | |
| jelmer | Quintasan: Hi | 15:18 |
| Quintasan | jelmer: um, hello | 15:18 |
| jelmer | Quintasan: what are you trying to do exactly? | 15:19 |
| jelmer | Quintasan: it sounds like you're trying to clone a branch to a location where a branch already exists | 15:19 |
| Quintasan | jelmer: doesn't matter now, I'm not going to copy 300mb source tree just to replace a nest line with merge | 15:20 |
| Quintasan | not worth it | 15:20 |
| ocatacoo | so where do I need to ask to unsubscribe? | 15:20 |
| jtv | ocatacoo: gmb may be able to help | 15:22 |
| ocatacoo | jtv, ? whatis gmb ? | 15:22 |
| jelmer | Quintasan: I think "bzr join" does what you were looking for, if you ever need it later | 15:22 |
| jelmer | ocatacoo: he's a Launchpad engineer, gmb is his nickname on IRC :-) | 15:23 |
| jtv | ocatacoo: gmb is someone who may show up now that his name's been dropped :-) | 15:23 |
| jelmer | shadeslayer: What is the related recipe? | 15:23 |
| shadeslayer | jelmer: for rekonq? | 15:24 |
| jelmer | shadeslayer: yeah - is that for which you just pasted the FTBS log? | 15:24 |
| shadeslayer | yes one sec | 15:25 |
| shadeslayer | jelmer: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~rekonq | 15:25 |
| shadeslayer | everything is there | 15:25 |
| shadeslayer | rekonq-ubuntu is packaging branch | 15:26 |
| bigjools | shadeslayer: you probably need to add a build-depend on aptitude | 15:27 |
| abentley | bigjools, I don't think that will work, pbuilder satisfies those depends, so pbuilder will already be running before aptitude is installed. | 15:30 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| === sebi_` is now known as sebi` | ||
| ocatacoo | jtv: I contacted him through launchpad , I just didnt want to file a bug because of something so trivial | 15:39 |
| jelmer | abentley: it also should be up to the user to install aptitude because pbuilder happens to use it | 15:40 |
| jelmer | has the dependency on aptitude in maverick perhaps been changed from Depends to Recommends? | 15:40 |
| jelmer | the dependency of pbuilder on aptitude I mean | 15:40 |
| jelmer | abentley, bigjools: Yeah, that looks like it: | 15:41 |
| abentley | jelmer, pbuilder never had a dependency on aptitude, but aptitude used to be in base. | 15:41 |
| jtv | ocatacoo: you can also file a question under Answers | 15:41 |
| jtv | ocatacoo: if it turns out to be really a bug, the question can be turned into one—although of course usually that's not the case | 15:42 |
| abentley | jelmer, the choice to use pbuilder is not the user's, so it shouldn't be up to the user to install aptitude. | 15:42 |
| jelmer | abentley: It seems strange that it doesn't even recommend or suggest it even though it can generate scripts that use it. | 15:42 |
| jelmer | abentley: Argh - that's what I meant to say, sorry | 15:42 |
| jelmer | missing negation in that sentence | 15:43 |
| abentley | jelmer, yes, bugs have been filed about the lack of a dependency. However, when used as directed, AIUI, pbuilder's lack of a dependency is not a problem. | 15:43 |
| ocatacoo | jtv: thank you I am sure that I just don't see something that I should , but I have looked , just obviously not in the right place... | 15:44 |
| jelmer | abentley: ah, ok | 15:44 |
| abentley | jelmer, because the scripts install aptitude in the chroot and then run scripts in the chroot. | 15:44 |
| jelmer | abentley: Ahh, of course | 15:44 |
| jelmer | abentley: Please ignore me :-) | 15:44 |
| jtv | ocatacoo: it's not always easy with so many ways to get subscribed to something... I do know for a fact that it must be some kind of direct subscription in your case. If it were indirect (i.e. because you're a member of a team that's subscribed) then the message would say so. | 15:45 |
| jtv | ocatacoo: you're not registered as a bug reporting contact or somesuch either? | 15:45 |
| ocatacoo | not that I can see but ...? | 15:47 |
| shadeslayer | btw any idea if the svn import plugin will be fixed? | 15:49 |
| ocatacoo | Have a good day... | 15:49 |
| maxb | Fixed in what way? the kdelibs thing? | 15:49 |
| shadeslayer | maxb: yeah :( | 15:49 |
| shadeslayer | were stalled for now | 15:49 |
| maxb | I gave the bug number. You can look at the history of it there. | 15:49 |
| maxb | Or maybe even try your hand at fixing it :-) | 15:49 |
| shadeslayer | if only i knew python ^_^ | 15:50 |
| jelmer | I know how to fix it, I just haven't had the time to spend on doing so. | 15:50 |
| shadeslayer | jelmer: oh please please please fix it :D | 15:51 |
| shadeslayer | ill send you cookies | 15:51 |
| jelmer | (-: | 15:53 |
| shadeslayer | also.. pbuilder needs fixing :/ | 15:53 |
| shadeslayer | btw how come Quintasan's Qt build went through but not my build? | 15:54 |
| jelmer | shadeslayer: Was he perhaps building for Lucid? | 15:54 |
| shadeslayer | jelmer: nope..karmic build | 15:54 |
| jelmer | shadeslayer: Ah, still.. karmic and lucid had aptitude in base, maverick doesn't | 15:55 |
| shadeslayer | uh | 15:55 |
| jelmer | IIUC | 15:55 |
| shadeslayer | jelmer: s/karmic/maverick | 15:55 |
| jelmer | shadeslayer: No idea then.. | 15:55 |
| jelmer | abentley: do you know perhaps? | 15:55 |
| abentley | jelmer, know what? | 15:56 |
| shadeslayer | abentley: why rekonq is FTBFS in maverick while Qt builds fine | 15:57 |
| abentley | shadeslayer, not yet. Can you give me some build URLs? | 15:58 |
| shadeslayer | sure | 15:58 |
| shadeslayer | abentley: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~rohangarg/+recipe/rekonq-daily/+build/402 | 15:58 |
| shadeslayer | thats rekonq FTBFS | 15:58 |
| shadeslayer | which is due to aptitude not being in the base ubuntu chroot | 15:58 |
| shadeslayer | abentley: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52262923/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-amd64.project-neon-qt_1.0%2B1200~ppa1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz | 15:59 |
| shadeslayer | thats Qt being built fine | 15:59 |
| abentley | shadeslayer, that looks like a binary build. | 16:00 |
| shadeslayer | abentley: binary build? Quintasan ^^ | 16:00 |
| MTecknology | james_w: for being able to use 'run' I filed one and it was marked invalid - I'll add a bug for the latesttag | 16:01 |
| james_w | MTecknology: thanks | 16:17 |
| === bigjools-afk is now known as bigjools | ||
| === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
| MTecknology | mthaddon: You renamed ninx to nginx but I still see "Bazaar branches of Ninx" :S | 16:38 |
| === fta__ is now known as fta | ||
| mthaddon | MTecknology: ok, fixed | 16:41 |
| sense | Could someone help me to merge the imported account 'sense-ubuntu' into 'sense'? I've tried several times, but it timed out each time. The latest Error ID is OOPS-1664ED1753. I need to merge before I can get my new email address to associate with my account. | 16:42 |
| ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1664ED1753 | 16:42 |
| MTecknology | mthaddon: was it just an easy to set variable? | 16:43 |
| mthaddon | yep | 16:43 |
| MTecknology | cool | 16:44 |
| MTecknology | mthaddon: oh, that stuff was removed if you want to disable the other one :) | 16:44 |
| mthaddon | MTecknology: ok, done | 16:45 |
| maxb | Either the PPA publisher is getting slower or I'm getting more impatient | 16:46 |
| bigjools | it's slower than it used to be :( | 16:46 |
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| === jtv changed the topic of #launchpad to: http://launchpad.net/ | Read https://help.launchpad.net/ for help | Help contact: - | Join https://launchpad.net/~launchpad-users | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | Launchpad is open source: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | ||
| === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
| === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-nom | ||
| romaia | hello, who should I talk to about the ppa builder? | 20:19 |
| romaia | two of my build seen to have entered a loop | 20:19 |
| romaia | https://launchpad.net/~stoq-maintainers/+archive/unstable/+build/1885729 | 20:19 |
| romaia | kiko, ^ | 20:20 |
| shadeslayer | romaia: entered a loop? | 20:21 |
| shadeslayer | romaia: the one you posted just started | 20:21 |
| romaia | shadeslayer, yes, | 20:21 |
| shadeslayer | +building | 20:21 |
| romaia | shadeslayer, try reloading the page. | 20:21 |
| romaia | the time counter restarts a few times, | 20:21 |
| romaia | than the status go back to queued | 20:21 |
| romaia | it has been like for amount an hour. | 20:22 |
| shadeslayer | mmm | 20:23 |
| shadeslayer | its back to started 7 secs ago | 20:23 |
| shadeslayer | something is wrong it seems | 20:23 |
| romaia | https://launchpad.net/~stoq-maintainers/+archive/unstable/+build/1885704 | 20:23 |
| romaia | this one as well | 20:23 |
| matsubara | StevenK, hey, could you take a look at the issue ^ please? anything wrong with the builder? | 20:27 |
| shadeslayer | romaia: the second one seems to be fixed | 20:27 |
| romaia | shadeslayer, yes. | 20:27 |
| shadeslayer | and the first one is now building | 20:27 |
| romaia | shadeslayer, any idea what happend? | 20:29 |
| romaia | is it worth filling a bug? | 20:29 |
| shadeslayer | romaia: a) temporary issue b) someone fixed it | 20:29 |
| shadeslayer | romaia: nah... | 20:29 |
| shadeslayer | but if it makes you feel good,go ahead :P | 20:29 |
| romaia | if it happens again... | 20:30 |
| romaia | maybe it has something to do with the fact that I pressed the force rebuild button. | 20:30 |
| romaia | shadeslayer, thanks anyway | 20:31 |
| shadeslayer | romaia: :D | 20:31 |
| === Ursinha-nom is now known as Ursinha | ||
| MTecknology | What's going on here? bzr branch lp:~nginx/nginx/debian.mod_wsgi bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: "bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~nginx/ninx/0.8/". | 21:36 |
| MTecknology | oh! | 21:39 |
| MTecknology | lifeless: how can I unstack a branch? | 21:40 |
| romaia | bzr reconfigure --unstacked | 21:41 |
| MTecknology | thanks | 21:41 |
| * MTecknology corsses fingers | 21:41 | |
| MTecknology | romaia: that's generating the same error - any ides how I can fix it - the project was renamed so the branch it was stacked on is gone | 21:42 |
| romaia | MTecknology, sorry, no idea. | 21:43 |
| romaia | I just know the unstacked commands since I use it quite often | 21:43 |
| MTecknology | I rarely use it but was hoping that'd be the ticket - I suppose it need sot know what it's stacked against before it can unstack though | 21:44 |
| MTecknology | Looks like the guys that can fix it are in a meeting | 21:46 |
| MTecknology | mthaddon: when you're back from your meeting could you take a peak at this? | 21:47 |
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| === dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
| === dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!