[09:10] <nessita> pitti: where can I find you? I was told you have some answers I'm looking for :-)
[09:37] <robert_ancell> seb128, lp:~ubuntu-desktop/+junk/gtk-2.21.4-ubuntu
[09:48] <huats> morning
[09:48] <seb128> lut huats
[09:48] <huats> hello seb128
[09:48] <seb128> slomo, hey
[09:49] <jcastro> hey huats
[09:49] <jcastro> huats: I heard you were looking for something to update?
[09:49] <huats> jcastro, lol
[09:49] <jcastro> :D
[09:49] <huats> jcastro, indeed, I should have more time these days :)
[09:50] <jcastro> upstream glom needs an SRU in lucid
[09:50] <jcastro> they have their latest stable in the openismus ppa
[09:50] <huats> jcastro, ok this is  a package I have already touched so it would be easier
[09:50] <huats> I'll have a look
[09:50] <jcastro> and they think their packaging could be improved
[09:50] <jcastro> I was thinking, they run their own ppa
[09:51] <jcastro> we should encourage them to do the per package upload thing
[09:51] <jcastro> and just push their updates themselves
[09:52] <huats> I have another stuff before to do first and I'll look after that probably early next week
[09:52] <jcastro> huats: no worries
[09:52] <huats> but your idea seems doable indeed
[09:52] <jcastro> huats: I'll see them next week at guadec
[09:52] <huats> jcastro, unfortunatly no
[09:52]  * jcastro will try to get you an openismus shirt. :D
[09:53] <huats> jcastro, I am trying to stay home a few weeks
[09:53]  * jcastro nods
[09:53] <huats> jcastro, I think the next FOSS event I'll try to attend will the next UDS
[09:53] <jcastro> huats: community people are in #ubuntu-community-team these days, miss seeing you around!
[09:53] <huats> (well if I am sponsored of course)
[09:54] <huats> jcastro, let's say that I am already on #ubuntu-locoteams :)
[09:54] <huats> jcastro, but I have added that channel as well :)
[09:54] <huats> thanks
[09:59] <rodrigo_> is there anything wrong on the build machines? I get something similar to this (http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52276184/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-amd64.evolution-couchdb_0.4.93-0ubuntu2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz) for a few packages/architectures
[10:03] <seb128> rodrigo_, could you ask to doko?
[10:03] <seb128> rodrigo_, hey btw
[10:03] <seb128> rodrigo_, since today updates I get firefox launching on sessions tart
[10:03] <seb128> start
[10:03] <seb128> it wants me to authentification for ubuntuone
[10:04] <seb128> is that a known issue?
[10:12] <rodrigo_> seb128, hmm, not that I know, I'll ask about it
[10:14] <slomo> hi seb128
[10:17] <seb128> slomo, did you see my ping yesterday?
[10:19] <slomo> seb128: about gdk-pixbuf?
[10:20] <seb128> slomo, no, about libdmapsharing
[10:20] <seb128> slomo, but we would welcome help on getting the gdk-pixbuf updates rolling
[10:23] <slomo> remaining problem is the udeb? or something else?
[10:23] <seb128> udeb and review
[10:24] <seb128> there might be other issues, other eyes on it would be welcome
[10:24] <slomo> sure, i'd really like to get gtk 2.21 updated soon ;)
[10:24] <seb128> slomo, lp:~ubuntu-desktop/libdmapsharing/ubuntu
[10:25] <seb128> slomo, if you want to sponsor that into debian as well
[10:25] <seb128> I will change the documentation package to be arch all still
[10:25] <slomo> ok, i'll first take a look at gdk-pixbuf now :)
[10:25] <seb128> slomo, thanks
[10:25] <slomo> are you happy with vala now btw?
[10:25] <seb128> yes, built fine and we are on sync again, thanks!
[10:27] <slomo> nice :)
[10:28] <slomo> seb128: do you have gdk-pixbuf in ubuntu already?
[10:29] <rodrigo_> seb128, hmm, nothing has changed that might trigger that firefox window, so you were not getting it before?
[10:31] <seb128> rodrigo_, no, it started today and it's happening in a guest session as well
[10:31] <rodrigo_> seb128, ok, looking
[10:32] <seb128> slomo, not yet, we wanted some debian comments first and syncing directly if we can
[10:32] <slomo> seb128: ok, i'll fix everything myself then and upload :)
[10:32] <slomo> looks good in general though
[11:23] <robert_ancell> Riddell, http://paste.ubuntu.com/467437/
[11:25] <seb128> bug #608509
[11:25] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 608509 in ubuntuone-client (Ubuntu) "Ubuntuone pulls up Firefox on boot up and spams me (affects: 4) (heat: 20)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/608509
[11:25] <seb128> rodrigo_, ^
[11:25] <rodrigo_> seb128, ok, thanks
[11:26] <seb128> what is natalia IRC nickname?
[11:28] <pitti> seb128: nessita
[11:29] <seb128> pitti, thanks
[13:29] <seb128> robert_ancell, http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/pkg-gnome/desktop/experimental/
[14:06] <seb128> rodrigo_, your libubuntuone gir is named wrongly
[14:07] <seb128> it should be gir1.0-ubuntuone-1.0
[14:07] <seb128> since the gir is named UbuntuOne-1.0.typelib
[14:07] <rodrigo_> ah, ok
[14:07] <seb128> it's gir<abi_version>-<typelibname>-<version>
[14:08] <seb128> rodrigo_, can you fix it? I will keep those binaries on hold so you don't get conflicts
[14:08] <seb128> ie I will accept those with the correct name
[14:08] <rodrigo_> seb128, yes, give me 10 mins
[14:08] <seb128> thanks
[14:08] <seb128> no hurry take your time
[14:24] <rodrigo_> seb128, fixed package uploaded
[14:26] <seb128> rodrigo_, thanks
[15:28] <robert_ancell> slomo, gdk-pixbuf compiles fine with gobject-introspection (patch http://paste.ubuntu.com/467534/, build-dep libgirepository1.0-dev, debian/tmp/usr/share/gir-1.0 in -dev.install).
[16:22] <seb128> slomo, robert_ancell got the new gtk to build, you might want to use those changes for debian
[16:38] <seb128> pitti,
[16:38] <seb128> https://edge.launchpad.net/~indicator-sound-developers/+archive/sound-menu-v2-deps/+build/1885548
[16:38] <seb128> https://edge.launchpad.net/~indicator-sound-developers/+archive/sound-menu-v2-deps/+build/1885549
[16:53] <robert_ancell> slomo, hey, I patches librsvg to work with the new gdk-pixbuf.  Would you like the patch / how should I get it to you?
[16:53] <robert_ancell> patched
[16:55] <seb128> robert_ancell, email him maybe to slomo @ debian.org
[16:56] <robert_ancell> seb128, is a bug report better?
[16:56] <seb128> robert_ancell, works as well I guess
[17:18] <kenvandine> ^^
[17:40] <kenvandine> pitti, can you rescore https://edge.launchpad.net/~indicator-sound-developers/+archive/sound-menu-v2-deps/+build/1885645
[18:19] <dobey> anyone around? why would pysupport be installing my modules to /usr/lib in the packaging?
[18:22] <dobey> nevermind, i think i know
[18:23] <dobey> oh, no
[18:24] <dobey> i guess it's not the X[BS]-Python-Version thing
[18:25] <dobey> confused
[19:47] <slomo> robert_ancell: seb128 said that you have librsvg/wmf patches for new gdk-pixbuf
[19:47] <slomo> robert_ancell: where? :)
[19:48] <robert_ancell> slomo, lp:~ubuntu-desktop/librsvg and lp:~ubuntu-desktop/libwmf
[19:49] <seb128> lp:~ubuntu-desktop/librsvg/ubuntu I guess rather
[19:49] <seb128> same for the other one
[19:50] <slomo> robert_ancell: anything else i should look at? ;)
[19:50] <seb128> slomo, the libwmf has been switched to cdbs which apparently was easier than adding a patch system to the rules ;-)
[19:50] <robert_ancell> slomo, do you know how many packages install loaders?  I've removed the update-gtkpixbuf code from the local pacakge
[19:50] <robert_ancell> from debian/ I mean
[19:51] <slomo> robert_ancell: apt-file will tell you :)
[19:52] <seb128> slomo, is there any reason to still ship update-gtkpixbuf?
[19:54] <robert_ancell> I guess we need these scripts *just in case*, but we should remove all their content
[19:57] <slomo> seb128: isn't it used by dh_gtkmodules?
[19:58] <robert_ancell> slomo, but dh_gtkmodules is not a nop right?
[19:58] <slomo> yes
[19:59] <slomo> and update-gdkpixbuf and the immodules one is a no-op since a long time too
[19:59] <slomo> i'll drop them ;)
[19:59] <robert_ancell> yay!! :)
[20:02] <slomo> lool: could you upload a new libwmf to experimental after i've uploaded gdk-pixbuf? :)
[20:03] <slomo> lool: robert_ancell has patches for you at lp:~ubuntu-desktop/libwmf/ubuntu
[20:04] <robert_ancell> slomo, I converted it to cdbs and it uses dh-autoreconf so you guys may want to massage it
[20:04] <robert_ancell> slomo, how do you feel about dh-autoreconf?  It seems to be working well in Ubuntu
[20:05] <slomo> robert_ancell: no idea, automatic autotools magic during build time often gets things wrong ;)
[20:06] <slomo> i didn't know it existed since earlier today
[20:06] <slomo> hm, i assume i should let gdk-pixbuf break librsvg and libwmf
[20:07] <robert_ancell> sure, seb128 was sceptical but I convinced him :)
[20:08] <slomo> robert_ancell: is the librsvg patch really necessary? isn't it enough to simpy move the loader library to the new location?
[20:10] <robert_ancell> slomo, when you put it that way, yes
[20:10] <slomo> ok, i'll do that then, it's simpler ;)
[20:11] <robert_ancell> yeah, a lot simpler.  I should have done that...
[20:19] <slomo> ok, triggers are working as expected too
[20:19] <slomo> great, gdk-pixbuf uploaded
[20:19] <slomo> robert_ancell: you could sync gtk+2.0 from pkg-gnome svn if you want
[20:19] <robert_ancell> slomo, been doing it as you commit :)
[20:20] <slomo> and packaging gtk+3.0 based on this should be very easy because there are no stupid scripts necessary anymore
[20:20] <slomo> robert_ancell: already committed
[20:22] <slomo> and i'm running it here, it works ;)
[20:22] <robert_ancell> slomo, you still have the update-g-p manpage
[20:22] <slomo> oh?
[20:23] <robert_ancell> slomo, in .manpages
[20:23] <robert_ancell> slomo, we have gir support in our gtk, you should pull that
[20:24] <slomo> ok, dropped... thanks
[20:25] <seb128> slomo, is there any reason to not take the gir changes I forwarded for atk, pango, gtk?
[20:26] <seb128> ie building those from the corresponding sources
[20:28] <slomo> i don't like the NEW queue and there will be a new gir version in the next few weeks
[20:28] <slomo> the patches are good though
[20:28] <slomo> but i don't want to update the copyright files of gtk and friends, that's a lot of work ;)
[20:31] <seb128> slomo, does it really make sense to maintain those copyright files?
[20:32] <slomo> no, but the ftp-masters are picky
[20:35] <seb128> do they really review the copyright for new binaries? ;-)
[20:45] <robert_ancell> merged with you.  The only change I'm carrying is I've removed the contents of dh_gtkmodules