| lfaraone | btw, i wont be on lter | 02:21 |
|---|---|---|
| kandarpk | dfarning: hi | 04:17 |
| kandarpk | dfarning: good morning. | 13:12 |
| dfarning | kandarpk, good morning .... we lost you for a while:) | 13:12 |
| kandarpk | dfarning: fitness problem :( | 13:12 |
| kandarpk | dfarning: the latest tarball of s-speak-a isn't available at http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/Speak/ | 13:14 |
| kandarpk | any other place I can look for it ? | 13:14 |
| dfarning | kandarpk, I recommend that each documenter set up there own local jhbuild and builddoc set up. | 13:14 |
| kandarpk | dfarning: Ok, that is something which can yield long term benefits | 13:15 |
| dfarning | kandarpk, did you look on aslo for the development information? it might have a another page listed there. | 13:15 |
| kandarpk | dfarning: the model is very similar to git.debian.org | 13:15 |
| bernie | 'morning | 13:15 |
| kandarpk | bernie: Hi :) | 13:16 |
| kandarpk | good morning | 13:16 |
| dfarning | kandarpk, it take me about and hour to prepare a patch:( But working with the developers here it takes them a couple seconds:) | 13:16 |
| kandarpk | dfarning: Great. | 13:17 |
| dfarning | kandarpk, yes the usage of git with the sugar packages is same as with git.debian.org.... That is why we spend all that time learning git. | 13:19 |
| dfarning | bernie, are you around? | 13:19 |
| kandarpk | dfarning: I meant the model we are thinking of, for documentation | 13:20 |
| dfarning | kandarpk, yes when creating the documentation you will be working with the core sure packages and adding docstrings to those packages. | 13:21 |
| bernie | dfarning: yep | 13:26 |
| kandarpk | dfarning: do you have anything for me to work on ? | 13:51 |
| dfarning | kandarpk, sorry my computer stopped beeping at me:( | 14:00 |
| dipankar | hello dfarning , a very good morning | 14:00 |
| dfarning | dipankar, good morning. | 14:00 |
| kandarpk | dfarning: np. | 14:00 |
| kandarpk | dfarning: just that I am logged into windows now. | 14:02 |
| dfarning | kandarpk, I guess a high priority would be setting up your local document build system. And figure out how to modify the docstrings and create patches | 14:02 |
| dfarning | dipankar, good morning | 14:02 |
| dipankar | dfarning, how are you? | 14:02 |
| dipankar | at Paraguay? | 14:03 |
| kandarpk | dfarning: when we push changes, only patches are submitted to git, isn't it ? | 14:03 |
| dipankar | kandarpk, hi | 14:04 |
| dipankar | kandarpk, I don't think so | 14:04 |
| kandarpk | dipankar: Ok. | 14:04 |
| dipankar | kandarpk, I think we need to submit the whole modified code too. | 14:04 |
| kandarpk | dipankar: by the way, how are you doing now ? | 14:05 |
| dfarning | kandarpk, yes. technically a commit is just a diff(patch) | 14:06 |
| dipankar | kandarpk, I am doing good. ^^ Here's your answer | 14:06 |
| dipankar | I was wrong I guess :) | 14:06 |
| dipankar | dfarning, but we upload all the files. oops, thats the mistake. | 14:06 |
| bernie | http://www.newartisans.com/2008/04/git-from-the-bottom-up.html | 14:07 |
| dfarning | dipankar, things are going well. | 14:07 |
| dipankar | ohk, when we use git push, it sends only the changes up to the repo. That must be it then. | 14:07 |
| bernie | dipankar, kandarpk: there's a pdf linked in that page. it's a very good reading about how git "thinks" | 14:07 |
| kandarpk | bernie: thanks | 14:08 |
| kandarpk | dfarning: users can clone the source, make changes and push it back. | 14:10 |
| dipankar | bernie, thanks a lot. | 14:10 |
| dfarning | kandarpk, Yes. | 14:10 |
| bernie | dipankar: yup. push sends one or more commits (~= patches) to a remote repo... no merges are possible on the remote side, so the stuff you send needs to be based directly on top of what the remote end has. | 14:10 |
| kandarpk | dfarning: so they only require to know how to test patches they apply | 14:11 |
| dipankar | bernie, Thanks again. How are you doing btw? How's your project coming along? | 14:11 |
| dfarning | kandarpk, who are the they in you above sentance. | 14:12 |
| kandarpk | dfarning: the users who want to add patches | 14:13 |
| bernie | dipankar: dfarning arrived here a few days ago... the uruguayans arrived a little earlier... we're all working together on completing Dextrose (which is the new name of F11-0.88) | 14:13 |
| bernie | dipankar: well, admittedly, we've been a little unfocused lately... meeting new people, show them the deployment, discuss strategy... we need to do more technical work next week | 14:14 |
| dipankar | bernie, I didn't know you and dfarning are meeting :). I am sure you guys can come over these problems easily | 14:15 |
| dfarning | kandarpk, yes the developer needs to know how to clone a repo(code), modify the code, test the modification, and either push or make a patch. | 14:16 |
| bernie | dipankar: we're nearing release, so only the hard problems are left :-) | 14:18 |
| dipankar | bernie, Best of luck with that :) | 14:19 |
| dipankar | kandarpk, I need your help with debian/rules file | 14:26 |
| dipankar | kandarpk, my log activity didn't work on 0.84 as you tested. | 14:26 |
| kandarpk | yeah | 14:26 |
| dipankar | so now I need to change the debian/rules accordingly. [http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/2010-July/002600.html] | 14:27 |
| dipankar | but it seems the rules file was very different. | 14:27 |
| dipankar | just a sec I will link the debian/rules | 14:28 |
| dipankar | kandarpk, here it is: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-log-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/rules;h=ea5e9a66489c8ad5064a7de8fd6fb4fc1dcb6535;hb=HEAD | 14:31 |
| dipankar | kandarpk, except for line no. 5 there is nowhere else mentioned about DEB_SUGAR_BRANCHES in the file, pretty weird | 14:31 |
| kandarpk | Oh | 14:31 |
| dipankar | could just help with that? | 14:32 |
| dipankar | I am stuck with this portion only | 14:32 |
| kandarpk | dipankar: trying to see if I can help | 14:34 |
| dipankar | kandarpk, thanks very much | 14:34 |
| kandarpk | dipankar: I think after restoring debian/rules to the original state, you need to rename the activity by adding -0.86 | 14:42 |
| kandarpk | in rules and control.in | 14:42 |
| kandarpk | dipankar: that is sugar-log-activity-0.86 | 14:43 |
| dipankar | ohk | 14:43 |
| dipankar | kandarpk, but here it mentions something else I guess (I may be wrong though :)) | 14:44 |
| dipankar | If it works in 0.86 and above, for example, restore your debian/rules | 14:44 |
| dipankar | file to it's original state. Change "DEB_PYTHON_SUGAR_PACKAGES" adding | 14:44 |
| dipankar | "-0.86" to the end. Change the binary package name in debian/control.in | 14:44 |
| dipankar | adding "-0.86" to the end. | 14:44 |
| dipankar | Luke has mentioned to add -0.86 in the DEB_PYTHON_SUGAR_PACKAGES | 14:45 |
| kandarpk | DEB_PYTHON_SUGAR_PACKAGES = sugar-log-activity | 14:45 |
| dipankar | oops | 14:45 |
| dipankar | ohk :) got it | 14:45 |
| kandarpk | your rules file says ^^ | 14:45 |
| dipankar | *thats sickness has raptured my attention. | 14:45 |
| dipankar | sorry to trouble you kandarpk :( | 14:46 |
| kandarpk | dipankar: I often do that when asking for help. | 14:46 |
| kandarpk | dipankar: np | 14:46 |
| * dipankar is taking a 5 min break. | 14:48 | |
| * dipankar is away: Be Right Back | 14:48 | |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Hi Kandarp. | 14:53 |
| manusheel | Around? | 14:53 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: hello sir | 14:53 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: How is Speak activity packaging coming along? | 14:55 |
| kandarpk | manusheel: sir, its latest tarball isn't available. | 14:56 |
| kandarpk | latest version is 16 and tarball available has version 11 if I remember correctly | 14:57 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Ok, that is unfortunate. | 14:57 |
| kandarpk | manusheel: sir, I was waiting for Luke to know if we can generate the orig tarball ourself | 14:58 |
| kandarpk | manusheel: but I don't think thats possible | 14:58 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Let us send an update on not been able to package Speak activity, and possible suggestions on how we could expedite the generation of tarball. | 14:58 |
| kandarpk | else he would have told before | 14:58 |
| manusheel | If not by ourself, then by the Sugar activity team. | 14:59 |
| kandarpk | ok. | 14:59 |
| * dipankar is back (gone 00:13:47) | 15:02 | |
| manusheel | Kandarpk: Did you look at the 4 steps suggested by David? | 15:03 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: yes sir, we discussed about it a little while ago | 15:04 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Can you try to do that process today? | 15:05 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: I am not very clear with the scheme. | 15:06 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: What all things are we not clear with? | 15:06 |
| manusheel | Let us ask David about it. | 15:06 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: can't we just clone jhbuild, make changes and push it back | 15:06 |
| kandarpk | dfarning: Around ? | 15:08 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: I am not sure we can do it like this. | 15:08 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: are some permissions required to push into git repo of jhbuild ? | 15:09 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: I suspect. | 15:10 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: Ok, then we'll need to follow the steps suggested by David. | 15:11 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Yes, we should follow the steps. | 15:12 |
| manusheel | Let us try and see if there are any errors. | 15:12 |
| manusheel | Or issues. | 15:12 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: I don't have much knowledge of git-format-patch. Rest all is quite clear. | 15:14 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: I would like you to search and read on it. Let me send you the resource. | 15:15 |
| * lfaraone waves. | 15:18 | |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: well, you can do the same thing with speak as we did with other activities for which there are no upstream tarballs, use git snapshots. | 15:20 |
| dipankar | hey lfaraone good morning. | 15:20 |
| lfaraone | and ask alsroot nicely to make tarballs. :) | 15:20 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: better late than never. | 15:21 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, I finally am through with the checking of log-activity. Its working for 0.86 and 0.88 only. here is the repo : http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-log-activity.git;a=summary | 15:22 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: cool. | 15:22 |
| * alsroot can release Speak tarball, if there is such need | 15:23 | |
| manusheel | alsroot: Please do so. | 15:23 |
| kandarpk | alsroot: Please release | 15:23 |
| manusheel | Thank you. | 15:23 |
| lfaraone | alsroot: that'd be awesome, thanks. | 15:26 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, I would like you to review that : sugar-log-activity. | 15:27 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: okay, mark it in the wikipage. | 15:27 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, I think I have rectified all things. | 15:28 |
| dipankar | ohk | 15:28 |
| alsroot | done, http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/honey/Speak/Speak-16.tar.bz2, it has bundled "toolkit" dependency but better to leave it as-is, toolkit was rewritten in vala and will be accessible later as polyol | 15:28 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Please have a look at http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-format-patch.html | 15:29 |
| kandarpk | alsroot: thatks a lot. | 15:29 |
| kandarpk | *thanks | 15:29 |
| alsroot | np | 15:30 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Did you get a chance to look at git-format-patch? | 15:36 |
| manusheel | The link that I had send. | 15:37 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: sir, will do that in 5 min. | 15:37 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Sure. | 15:40 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, done | 15:44 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, I have changed the wiki page: http://wiki.debian.org/Sugar/tasks | 15:45 |
| dipankar | *modfied | 15:45 |
| kandarpk | manusheel: sir, I think I understand what needs to be done | 15:49 |
| kandarpk | regarding git format-patch | 15:50 |
| kandarpk | *switching to USR. | 15:51 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: in log, you found that it didn't work in 0.84, right? | 15:57 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: if so, please talk to neeraj about renaming the actiivty to sugar-log-activity-0.86. | 15:57 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, actually I sent it over to Kandarp for checking. | 15:57 |
| dipankar | and he reported me that it is not working on 0.84 | 15:58 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, did I do something wrong? | 15:58 |
| dipankar | I am not getting 'where' to rename activity? | 15:58 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: well, if an activity does not work in 0.84, the activity shoul d have -0.86 appended. If it didn't work in 0.86 or 0.84, it should have -0.88 appended to the name. for ex, see what neeraj did with write. | 15:58 |
| dipankar | ohk. | 15:59 |
| * lfaraone is looking at etoys. | 16:01 | |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: git init isn't creating branch master | 16:10 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: what do you mean? "git init" will initialize a git repository with a master branch. | 16:11 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: git branch gives nothing | 16:11 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, I think I have done that step in renaming the package in debian/rules | 16:11 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: some package missing ? | 16:11 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: because you're on master by default. | 16:12 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: how do I list the branches ? | 16:12 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, here is the debian/rules. line no. 6 http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-log-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/rules;h=5151f39fdd41e9f31d82a1c4dff01ec79a90bb21;hb=89893508c370cf5c27a6eb69fecf4bd72920f3e3 | 16:13 |
| kandarpk | bernie: around ? | 16:14 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: "git branch", but you won't see anything until you commit. | 16:14 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: Ok. | 16:14 |
| bernie | kandarpk: yup? | 16:23 |
| bernie | kandarpk: what lfaraone said | 16:23 |
| bernie | kandarpk: "git branch -a" to see also the remote ones | 16:23 |
| kandarpk | bernie: thanks | 16:23 |
| bernie | kandarpk: normally, when you clone a remote repo called foo, you get many branches foo/bar, foo/baz... | 16:24 |
| bernie | kandarpk: that's the meaning of "origin/master". it's the "master" branch on the "origin" remote repo. | 16:24 |
| kandarpk | bernie: can we straightaway push changes to git repo of sugar-jhbuild ? | 16:27 |
| bernie | kandarpk: you first need to replace the remote url in .git/config | 16:28 |
| bernie | kandarpk: there's a command-line tool "git remote" to edit remotes, but I find it easier to directly edit the config file. | 16:28 |
| bernie | kandarpk: the remote url you'll find is of rhe git://... kind | 16:29 |
| bernie | kandarpk: that's the read-only git protocol which can't be used for pushing | 16:29 |
| bernie | kandarpk: if you go to the repository page on git.sugarlabs.org, you'll find what the correct push url is supposed to be | 16:29 |
| bernie | kandarpk: you'll see the push url *only* if you are logged in and you happen to be one of the authorized committers. | 16:30 |
| bernie | kandarpk: what repo is this? | 16:30 |
| kandarpk | bernie: Ok. | 16:30 |
| kandarpk | bernie: git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-jhbuild/mainline.git | 16:30 |
| kandarpk | bernie: it contains the source codes for various sugar modules | 16:30 |
| kandarpk | and more | 16:31 |
| bernie | kandarpk: then you could ask silbe for access... but normally one does not directly commit to a repository until he/she becomes a maintainer of the project. | 16:31 |
| bernie | kandarpk: that's a different mindset from cvs and svn... | 16:31 |
| kandarpk | bernie: I only wanted to confirm this | 16:31 |
| kandarpk | bernie: that ordinary users don't push their changes | 16:31 |
| kandarpk | bernie: thanks | 16:32 |
| bernie | kandarpk: yep | 16:35 |
| bernie | kandarpk: there's a BUT though... | 16:35 |
| kandarpk | bernie: ? | 16:39 |
| * dipankar says good bye to all. | 16:39 | |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Ok, great. | 16:49 |
| manusheel | What needs to be done? | 16:49 |
| manusheel | Can you share your approach? | 16:49 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: Sir, creating patches is quite easy | 16:52 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir; 1) clone the repo | 16:52 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Ok. Did you read about git-format-patch, the link that I had send? | 16:53 |
| kandarpk | 2) copy master into some new branch | 16:53 |
| bernie | kandarpk: back | 16:53 |
| kandarpk | 3) make changes in new branch | 16:53 |
| kandarpk | 4) git format-patch master | 16:53 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Neat. | 16:54 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: it will create a patch of changes b/t master and new | 16:54 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: http://paste.ubuntu.com/468492/ | 16:54 |
| kandarpk | changes in activityservice.py and activity.py | 16:55 |
| manusheel | Yes, I saw that. | 16:55 |
| bernie | kandarpk: that's a good workflow | 16:56 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: So, have we submitted the patch? | 16:56 |
| kandarpk | bernie: thanks | 16:56 |
| bernie | kandarpk: you can also _not_ do a separate branch until you find out you need it | 16:57 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: No. | 16:57 |
| kandarpk | bernie: we need other users to submit changes | 16:57 |
| bernie | kandarpk: you get a local branch for free when you clone. "origin/master" gets implicitly branched into the local "master" branch | 16:57 |
| kandarpk | bernie: Ok. | 16:58 |
| bernie | kandarpk: btw, I mentioned an alternative to push earlier... | 16:58 |
| bernie | kandarpk: here it is: | 16:58 |
| bernie | kandarpk: gitorious lets *any* logged in user create clones of any repository | 16:58 |
| kandarpk | bernie: yes. | 16:59 |
| bernie | kandarpk: once you've created your own clone (jhbuild-kandarkpk, jhbuild-seeta or jhbuild-ubuntu), you can push to it | 16:59 |
| bernie | kandarpk: then, you can request merge with mainline (or any other clone) | 16:59 |
| bernie | kandarpk: that's an interesting workflow promoted by these new distributed forges such as gitorious and github. | 16:59 |
| bernie | kandarpk: I like more the workflow of sending patches with git-format-patch + git-send-email and get them reviewed on the mailing lists. | 17:00 |
| bernie | kandarpk: because all these inter-branch merges are likely to go unnoticed by the majority of the community | 17:00 |
| bernie | kandarpk: and one important factor in open source development is to make everyone aware of what the others are doing so they can learn from each other. | 17:01 |
| kandarpk | bernie: Nice. | 17:01 |
| bernie | kandarpk: for the same reason, reviews done in bug trackers are anti-community. | 17:01 |
| kandarpk | bernie: Ok. Great. | 17:01 |
| * bernie gets into the shower | 17:02 | |
| bernie | :-) | 17:02 |
| kandarpk | bernie: thanks a lot. | 17:02 |
| kandarpk | bernie: still there ? | 17:02 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: the patch doesn't have anything substantial in it. | 17:05 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Ok. | 17:08 |
| manusheel | kanarpk: Can you document this workflow with a sample example? | 17:08 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: It is important for us to recognize that this workflow works. | 17:09 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: sure. | 17:11 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Great. Please share the expected output at every step. | 17:11 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Again, prepare the steps, expected output and commands from a perspective of encouraging patch submissions from the community. | 17:12 |
| manusheel | Try to make it for a user with a basic familiarity with Linux. This strategy will be helpful for us towards getting maximum patch submissions committed. | 17:13 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: Ok. | 17:15 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Thanks Kandarp. | 17:16 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: I'll need to include steps for working on sphinx as well ? | 17:16 |
| kandarpk | that will be required for testing changes locally | 17:17 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Yes. Please do. You can take references from the document prepared earlier. | 17:17 |
| manusheel | That would expedite process. | 17:17 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: One problem. | 17:17 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Ok, please go ahead. | 17:17 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: how will users be able to get the rst files prepared by us. | 17:18 |
| kandarpk | for testing locally they'll need that to create something similar to nline version | 17:18 |
| kandarpk | *online | 17:19 |
| kandarpk | but there is an online resource available to see how the docstring will look in HTML format after conversion. | 17:20 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: ^^ | 17:20 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Ok, interesting question. | 17:20 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: http://www.tele3.cz/jbar/rest/rest.html | 17:21 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: I think the user here would only like to see if his docstring will be correctly converted into HTML or not | 17:22 |
| kandarpk | creating a complete website look-alike wont be required | 17:22 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: I don't think users will be able to get the rst files prepared by us. Yes, they'll need to use this tool to preview the correct conversion of their docstrings to HTML. | 17:22 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Yes, that is more than good for them and us. | 17:23 |
| manusheel | They should be able to see their docstrings getting converted to HTML. | 17:23 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: I think it should be easy for us to see their submissions, and revisions, wherever possible. | 17:26 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: Ok. | 17:32 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: so, we should isolate the user from the process of using sphinx ? | 17:32 |
| === neeraj is now known as neeraj_afk | ||
| kandarpk | lfaraone: for how long will you be around ? | 17:53 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: about 5 minutes. | 17:53 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: Oh, not much time left then. | 17:54 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: what can I do for you? | 17:54 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: Jonas wanted one of us to add README.source to sugar wiki | 17:55 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: so I thought if I could send it to you first for review | 17:55 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: right, I can do that, since it'll be hard to track down the right version. | 17:55 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: sure. I'll reply to you by monday on tha. | 17:55 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: do I need to reply on the mailing list ? | 17:57 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: well, you might as well post it to the wiki, we can always edit it later. | 17:57 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: Ok. | 17:58 |
| kandarpk | *will be back in 2min. | 17:59 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: sugar-emulator is crashing on my system as well | 18:02 |
| kandarpk | on installing python-gi | 18:02 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: cool, thanks. | 18:02 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: I am using README.source from core sugar | 18:04 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: sure. | 18:04 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: by the way, when you finish working on a bug and uplaod a new patch (like in https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sugar-connect-activity/+bug/609249) you should set it back to "confirmed" or "new" from "incomplete" and unassign yourself. | 18:10 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: Ok. | 18:11 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: reset-upstream-to-v87 | 18:14 |
| kandarpk | what should I replace v87 with something general ? | 18:14 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: not sure what you mean, but I have to go. | 18:16 |
| lfaraone | it's j ust a branch name, so it doesn't matter what you call it. | 18:16 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: I mean, writing something like v.VERSION_NUMBER | 18:17 |
| lfaraone | sure. | 18:17 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: thanks. | 18:18 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Yes, the user might not be interested in Sphinx like us. | 18:19 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: Ok. | 18:19 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: However, we should keep in mind that we should have an option for that too. | 18:19 |
| manusheel | Never know, who want to indulge in that :-) | 18:19 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: for that all our files should be accessible online. | 18:20 |
| manusheel | kandarpk; Ok, then let us take that part later. | 18:27 |
| manusheel | First, let us concentrate on the workflow, where they are not online. | 18:27 |
| manusheel | However, please add a small section on this part too. | 18:27 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: Fine. | 18:28 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Great. | 18:31 |
| === neeraj_afk is now known as neeraj | ||
| manusheel | So, let us try to generate a sample implementation using the 4 steps. | 18:32 |
| manusheel | Hope it works out well. | 18:32 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Please take screenshots, and copy paste outputs wherever possible. | 18:54 |
| manusheel | We'll put it at the wiki. | 18:54 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: of the HTML pages ? | 18:54 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Output per step. | 19:00 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: Ok. | 19:00 |
| manusheel | That is we write a command at the terminal, and we get this "...." as the output. | 19:01 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Great work. | 19:01 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: as suggested by Jonas, I've added README.sources at : | 19:01 |
| kandarpk | http://wiki.debian.org/Sugar/README | 19:01 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Neat. | 19:02 |
| manusheel | Yes, can you send an update e-mail to the team about this. | 19:03 |
| manusheel | That should be very helpful. | 19:03 |
| manusheel | We should also reply on Debian olpc mailing list about it. | 19:03 |
| manusheel | kandarp, this is very neat. | 19:06 |
| manusheel | Do send an e-mail on olpc debian mailing list. | 19:07 |
| manusheel | kandarpk, neeraj: Did you get a chance to review jigsawpuzzle? | 19:08 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: no sir. Shall I review it now ? | 19:09 |
| neeraj | *seeing it now | 19:10 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: after, we complete the sample implementation. | 19:11 |
| manusheel | neeraj: you can review it now. | 19:11 |
| neeraj | manusheel sir, doing that | 19:11 |
| neeraj | manusheel sir, acco to lfaraone review on tasks http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/2010-July/002682.html, Ankur has made the changes.. | 19:15 |
| neeraj | manusheel sir, As far as I can see he has made changes correctly. There might be just one redundant line in the last of debian/copyright, o/w all changes seems to be fine.. | 19:16 |
| manusheel | neeraj: ok, great. | 19:17 |
| neeraj | kandarpk sir, please confirm > acco to luke review on tasks http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/2010-July/002682.html, Ankur has made the changes.. | 19:18 |
| kandarpk | neeraj: just 5 min. | 19:19 |
| neeraj | kandarpk: np.. take ur time | 19:20 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: git clone git://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-jhbuild/mainline.git | 19:39 |
| kandarpk | isn't getting the source | 19:39 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Interesting. | 19:40 |
| manusheel | What is the error? | 19:40 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: some folders are missing | 19:41 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: till now, I was working on the sugar-jhbuild folder I had used to install sugar | 19:42 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Ok. | 19:43 |
| manusheel | Can you copy paste the logs? | 19:43 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: We should touch base with alsroot and bernie about it. | 19:43 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: | 19:44 |
| kandarpk | ls | 19:44 |
| kandarpk | configdebiansbuildbot scrils | 19:44 |
| kandarpk | configdebiansbuildbot scripts sjhbuild sugar-jhbuild sugar.jhbuildrc | 19:44 |
| kandarpk | pts sjhbuild sugar-jhbuild sugar.jhbuildrc | 19:44 |
| * alsroot is not using jhbuild, so can't help with it | 19:44 | |
| kandarpk | wait | 19:44 |
| kandarpk | -------------------------------- | 19:44 |
| kandarpk | ls | 19:45 |
| kandarpk | config, debian,sbuildbot, scripts, sjhbuild, sugar-jhbuild, sugar.jhbuildrc. | 19:45 |
| kandarpk | this is what I got on cloning | 19:45 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: contents of jhbuild-folder I already had | 19:47 |
| kandarpk | ls | 19:47 |
| kandarpk | config,debian,install, jhbuild, sbuildbot, scripts, sjhbuild,source,sugar-jhbuild, sugar.jhbuildrc. | 19:47 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Ok. | 19:48 |
| manusheel | alsroot: Thank you for letting us know. | 19:49 |
| manusheel | Appreciate it. | 19:49 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: I see. | 19:50 |
| manusheel | Lot of folders are missing. | 19:50 |
| * alsroot uses gentoo instead of jhbuild :) | 19:50 | |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: the size has reduced from 426 MB to 2MB | 19:50 |
| manusheel | alsroot: Ok :-) Whom can we touch base on jhbuild. | 19:51 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: That is a massive decrease. | 19:51 |
| alsroot | manusheel: silbe on #sugar is a jhbuild maint, but looks like he is offline these days | 19:52 |
| manusheel | alsroot: Kandarp does not get all the folders on cloning jhbuild from the mainline git. It seems some issues. Ok, will touch base with Sascha Silbe. Thank you for the pointer. | 19:53 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Let us write an e-mail to Sascha and Bernie on this issue. | 19:54 |
| manusheel | They should be able to help here. | 19:54 |
| manusheel | kandarpk; In the meantime, let us focus on 2 MB clone. | 19:54 |
| manusheel | Move with the next steps to see the things in action. | 19:54 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: the source is missing | 19:56 |
| manusheel | kandarpk; Ok. | 19:57 |
| manusheel | We cannot proceed ahead then. | 19:57 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: there isn't much to do | 19:57 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Let us see if Bernie is around, and can help us on this. | 19:58 |
| manusheel | bernie: Hi Bernie. Around? | 19:58 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: I've run the other step on the jhbuild folder I already had | 19:58 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Ok, how did it come along? | 19:59 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: sir, the patch file I generated was using the steps we had discussed | 20:00 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Great. That is neat. | 20:03 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Can we complete the next 2 steps using that patch? | 20:03 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Wish to see the missing gaps in the 4 steps. | 20:04 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: I didn't get what steps are missing ? | 20:05 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: we only need to submit the patch, isn't it ? | 20:05 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: We are also the reviewers of the patch, and see their conversion to HTML. | 20:08 |
| manusheel | I.e. docstrings to HTML. | 20:08 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: we'll need to generate HTML using patch file ? | 20:11 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: I'll leave now. | 20:19 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Sure. | 20:20 |
| manusheel | Please take rest. | 20:20 |
| manusheel | We have a meeting tomorrow. | 20:20 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir, neeraj : good night | 20:20 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Please send an e-mail To Bernie. | 20:20 |
| manusheel | And Sascha. | 20:20 |
| manusheel | "Sascha Silbe" <sascha-ml-ui-sugar-devel@silbe.org>, | 20:21 |
| kandarpk | manusheel: Ok. | 20:21 |
| neeraj | kandarpk sir, good night | 20:21 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: I'll send you his sugarlabs id. | 20:21 |
| manusheel | Sascha Silbe <silbe@sugarlabs.org> | 20:22 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: This is the e-mail id for sugarlabs. | 20:22 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: Ok. | 20:23 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Great. Please send them an e-mail on jhbuild issue. | 20:25 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Good night. | 20:25 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: good nihgt sir | 20:25 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: See you tomorrow. | 20:26 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: :) | 20:26 |
| Ian_Daniher | What part of the ubuntu-sugar-remix package from the PPA requires compiz? | 21:07 |
| lfaraone | Ian_Daniher: I'm not sure. Why do you think it does? | 22:05 |
| Ian_Daniher | lfaraone: because I installed USR from the PPA on an ubuntu-netbook-remix install and it pulled compiz as a depend. | 23:26 |
| lfaraone | okay, no idea. | 23:27 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!