[10:33] <ripps> fta2: hey, do you know how I can force a reupload of a tarball using drobotik? I had some backport builds that screwed up and the solution was redo how I was doing the tarballs. But it doesn't look like the upstream source is going to update anytime soon.
[10:34] <micahg> fta2: launchpad won't take a new tarball
[10:34] <micahg> oops
[10:34] <micahg> ripps: ^^
[10:34] <ripps> micahg: is it possible to put a temporary +build1 to the end of the tarball's version?
[10:34] <micahg> ripps: yeah, or +repack
[10:35] <ripps> I'm going to have to do it manually, aren't I?
[10:35] <micahg> ripps: no, you can add something to the rules file to do it
[10:36] <ripps> micahg: any idea how?
[10:36] <micahg> ripps: well, in get-orig-source, just make it append +repack or something
[10:36] <micahg> or +rebuild
[10:37] <ripps> micahg: but how am I suppose to force it to remake the tarball, drobotik won't make it unless the upstream source has been updated.
[10:37] <micahg> ripps: idk, maybe fta2 knows...
[10:38] <ripps> :\
[11:24] <cousin_mario> hi there
[11:24] <cousin_mario> would something bad happen should I install tb3.1 from the tarball on lucid?
[12:08] <micahg> cousin_mario: bad? no, I'll try to have the daily working a little later maybe
[12:10] <cousin_mario> micahg: I mean the official mozilla release, not the daily build
[12:10] <cousin_mario> 3.0x junk filter is slipping, I assume it would be better with a more up-to-date version
[12:10] <micahg> cousin_mario: yeah, nothing bad will happen, I'd suggest backing up your profile first though
[12:11] <cousin_mario> micahg: yeah, sounds like a sensible idea
[12:11] <micahg> cousin_mario: well, actually, I think you should use a different profile with upstream builds
[12:11] <cousin_mario> micahg: why?
[12:12] <micahg> cousin_mario: some of the paths might be different, if you have a backup, you should be ok though
[12:12] <cousin_mario> micahg: oh, ok
[12:13] <cousin_mario> micahg: any other possible conflict? dependency mismatch?
[12:14] <micahg> cousin_mario: there shouldn't be any new dependencies except for the extensions, you'll need a new enigmail and a new lightning
[12:15] <cousin_mario> micahg: lightning is another reason for upgrading
[12:16] <cousin_mario> micahg: and I don't use enigmail anyway
[12:16] <micahg> cousin_mario: 1.0b1 isn't working?
[12:16] <cousin_mario> micahg: it is, actually
[12:17] <cousin_mario> but I'd like to keep it up-to-date
[12:17] <cousin_mario> actually, I'm more worried about the inbuilt junk-mail filter
[12:17] <micahg> cousin_mario: it is up to date for 3.0.x :)
[12:17] <cousin_mario> then it's not great!:D
[12:18] <micahg> it's what's supported :)
[12:18] <cousin_mario> I guess I'll have to check what my mail provider offers
[14:38] <cousin_mario> thanks everybody
[14:38] <cousin_mario> bye!
[17:19] <JoeMaverickSett> has anyone tried signing in to Windows Live Mail from Namoroka? *btw, it's eligible to talk about Namoroka here, right?*
[17:21] <BUGabundo> no
[17:21] <BUGabundo> blame msft
[17:21] <BUGabundo> for looking into browser name
[17:21] <BUGabundo> and not rendering agent
[17:22] <JoeMaverickSett> it changes to mobile version isn't it?
[17:23] <BUGabundo> no
[17:23] <JoeMaverickSett> BUGabundo, mine always changes to mobile version of Live mail.
[17:23] <BUGabundo> weird
[17:24] <JoeMaverickSett> BUGabundo, but if my Pidgin shows one mail from my Live account and click it, it's fine, after that if i go any other pages like profile, it will change in to mobile version. how weird is that?
[17:25] <BUGabundo> ask msft!
[17:25] <BUGabundo> its their code
[20:46] <micahg> JoeMaverickSett: try user agent switcher from addons.mozilla.org
[23:33] <bobby> Does anybody know when FF4 is getting the UI overhaul?
[23:33] <micahg> bobby: not sure for Linux
[23:33] <bobby> :(, too bad... Why are we always treated like second class citizens to windows :(
[23:35] <bobby> Thanks micahg :)