=== fta_ is now known as fta === mdeslaur is now known as mdeslaur-afk === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === micahg changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team: | Mailing List: http://is.gd/83fnr | Firefox 3.6.8 in Hardy-Maverick | Thunderbird 3.1 Coming Soon to Maverick/PPA | Help test Mozilla prerelease updates http://is.gd/dsudW | Next Meeting: TBD === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === mconnor is now known as 52AABTY2C === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta === kbrosnan_ is now known as kbrosnan [09:29] morning === Dimmuxx_ is now known as Dimmuxx [14:46] any news on the beta ppa? === gavin__ is now known as gavin [16:16] chrisccoulson: ping [16:24] hi nxvl === fta_ is now known as fta [17:07] back to normal :) [17:07] almost [17:16] no gwibber daily for maverick anymore? [17:30] jdstrand, mdeslaur-afk: http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2010/07/stable-channel-update_26.html [17:35] fta: the security guys are off or at blackhat, sbeattie should be available, but chrisccoulson should be able to take care of getting it into -proposed, you don't really need the security guys until next week to copy to -security :) [17:35] k [17:36] fta: actually, you can upload yourself to -proposed and just ask pitti to accept [17:37] is this still 0ubuntu0.10.04.1 ? or .2 now? [17:38] .1 since it's the first upload for this version [17:38] it's not actually connected to the point releases for Lucid [17:38] hm, i thought it was to match lucid.1 [17:38] oh [17:39] ok, good then [17:39] it's just a way to upload the same version to multiple releases [17:43] this is crazy, we need to sort out getting an exception for chromium so we can just upload directly to the security PPA and then copy to -security [17:43] rather than going through -proposed [17:43] did anyone look at doing that? === fta_ is now known as fta === fta_ is now known as fta [19:29] chrisccoulson: I think for chromium not to go through -proposed, the TB needs to make an exception [19:30] fta: were you aware the chromium is a transitional package for chromium-bsu? [19:32] micahg, chromium used to be the game [19:32] that's why i had to name the browser differently [19:32] fta: right, but the guy transitioned it because of chromium [19:33] micahg, yes, but it's still impossible to reuse the name [19:33] fta: not true [19:33] fta: in fact the guy had a blog fit recently about it [19:34] micahg, if you had the game, even after the transition, reusing the name will make the browser appear even if you don't want/need it [19:34] fta: http://rss.sourceforge.net/~r/SourceforgeCommunityHub/~3/lMSnlqgHg90/ [19:34] fta: most people want the browser, not the game [19:35] fta: even the source was renamed back before karmic [19:36] micahg, i have the game installed here, had it for years, long before the browser [19:36] fta: that's fine, but there's plenty of confusion still [19:37] reading the blog, he seems to just ask us to drop his transitional package to stop the bogus bug reports [19:43] fta: yeah, well the thing is Debian's stuck, they have to use the transistional package for squeeze [19:44] version wise, we can take over that package name, but i'm not sure it's wise [19:44] asac, ^^, thoughts? [19:49] also, it would be hard to do in the ppa, because of hardy [19:50] ..and jaunty [19:51] when are those two supposed to die? [19:51] fta: forgot about PPA, it would be a real problem then [19:51] fta: Jaunty OCt 2010, Hardy/Karmic Apr 2011 [19:52] hm, still far then [19:52] fta: I guess you're right, we can't feasibly do this till next LTS [19:54] micahg, we should probably drop the transitioning packages in maverick (and if possible in lucid) to stop messing up with the bsu bugs [19:54] fta: lucid needs it for hardy upgrades [19:54] maverick we could drop it [19:56] or maybe it's possible to stop accepting bugs in lp for it [19:56] fta: can't due that until hardy is EOL [19:56] damn [19:56] then the source will have no stable packages using it [19:57] *releases === fta_ is now known as fta [20:14] dear ubuntuzilla, please stop breaking our firefox installs, thank you :) [20:15] heh [20:17] chrisccoulson_: looks like a post for identi.ca :) [20:19] chrisccoulson_, hi, added you to the drobotik watchers list for umd and ucd last week, hope you don't mind [20:20] and that you'll find some use to it at some point [20:20] fta: BTW, you can take me off of UMD watch since I am part of PPA now [20:20] unless it's tied to ucd [20:20] in which case, it's fine [20:20] the bot's email? [20:20] fta: no, the failures [20:21] unless it's all tied together [20:21] micahg, hm, do i redirect that to you? [20:21] yeah, for umd and ucd [20:22] * ^X-launchpad-ppa:\ .*-daily [20:22] * ^X-launchpad-build-state:\ (FAILEDTOBUILD|CHROOTWAIT) [20:22] so it's all that matches "-daily" [20:23] chrisccoulson_: if you get a chance, can you get the enigmail fix for Lucid uploaded to -proposed so that it can be ready for when 10.04.1 is released [20:23] fta: k, no worries, I have it filtered properly on my end [20:24] micahg, which one do you want to keep? ucd ? [20:24] or none? [20:25] fta: ucd, but since your filter is set like that, just leave it, I have the dupe umd filtering in the trash [20:26] changed it to * ^X-launchpad-ppa:\ .*chromium-daily [20:26] well, no, i can't, as it's also my own filter [20:28] micahg - yeah, will do that after dinner [20:30] fta: like I said don't worry, thanks [20:30] chrisccoulson_: thanks [20:34] hm.. i have a fix for python-pysnmp4 in lucid, i wonder if i should just upload it or add it to a bug.. [20:34] and wait [20:34] fta: fixes for Lucid require bugs with SRU info, then you can upload to -propsoed [20:50] micahg, like that? bug 610570 [20:50] Launchpad bug 610570 in python-pysnmp4 (Ubuntu) "python deprecation warnings for md5 and sha (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/610570 [20:50] hm, where is the debdiff.. [20:51] fta: debdiff isn't attached, subscribe ubuntu-sru (motu-sru is deprecated) and attach to bug and upload [20:51] fta: test case (what to expect before and after) is good [21:01] done [21:02] fta: BTW, it's suggested to modify the source directly rather than adding a patch system. Also, is this fixed in Maverick? [21:03] no, i tried to contact the DD, no answer [21:03] the package hasn't been touched recently [21:04] fta: you can upload the fix to maverick w/out going through Debian if there's no answer [21:05] yep, i know. my dev box is still using lucid, and that's where i needed the fix in the 1st place [21:07] but i assume no one will care, it's a pretty specialized package [21:09] fta: there's a new upstream 4.1.14a [21:09] i know [21:09] that one of my question to the DD [21:09] but it's not for lucid anyway, so i went for the fix [21:13] fta: right, you can update maverick to the latest version if you want === micahg changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team: | Mailing List: http://is.gd/83fnr | Firefox 3.6.8 in Hardy-Maverick | Thunderbird 3.1 Coming Soon to Maverick/PPA | Firefox 4.0 Beta PPA coming Mid August | Help test Mozilla prerelease updates http://is.gd/dsudW | Next Meeting: TBD