=== satellit_ is now known as satellit_afk [03:06] * lfaraone waves at the world. === satellit_afk is now known as satellit_ === satellit_ is now known as satellit_afk [05:01] lfaraone: Good morning Luke. [05:01] Around? === alsroot is now known as Guest14691 === satellit_ is now known as satellit_afk === satellit_afk is now known as satellit__ [14:41] Hi lfaraone [14:42] lfaraone, I have modified debian/rules file http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-record-activity.git;a=blobdiff;f=debian/rules;h=badf8048b872dd690623234d9c7a93df2eb188f4;hp=b532c92cc73ccbf5598d47bc08feeb370207ea85;hb=d11f968abe381615e4e58d955f2d667bf8bd863f;hpb=9ff82260216dd033e199d769f2adbd085548827e [14:49] ankur, hi [14:49] hi neeraj [14:49] can we remove any warning in this http://paste.ubuntu.com/469819/ [15:03] lfaraone, around? [15:10] Please ping me when you will be back [15:14] lfaraone: Hi. [15:22] kandarpk, around? [15:23] can anybody tell me what role does exactly setup.py performes? [15:23] Bert suggested it's removal from the package [15:23] but without that it wont build [15:27] ankur: Hi [15:53] * lfaraone waves. [15:54] sugar-memorize-activity was sponsored and is now in the Debian NEW queue. [15:54] kandarpk: I did make some changes to your package before I uploaded it, please see the git repo. (pushing changes as we speak) [15:55] lfaraone: thanks a lot. [15:55] lfaraone: feels great to work with you. [15:56] kandarpk: same here. [15:56] lfaraone: :) [16:05] mukul: Hi. === neeraj_gupta is now known as neeraj [16:09] lfaraone: I was trying to update read [16:09] after cloning Jonas' repo. [16:09] kandarpk: okay. [16:09] lfaraone: do I need to file a bug report ? [16:10] lfaraone, kandarpk hi :) [16:10] neeraj: Hi. [16:12] hi kandarpk [16:12] hi lfaraone [16:13] lfaraone, I have made changes in debian/rules file and added r? on Sugar/tasks. Please review them (record and write )whenever u get time. [16:15] neeraj: will do. [16:15] lfaraone, thanks [16:21] neeraj / kandarpk : can you update the other package repositories by adding "${cdbs:Depends}" to the dependencies line as I did in http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-memorize-activity.git;a=commitdiff;h=85bade90159b116e8c769863d839128d8c466af3 , commit, regenerate control, and commit? [16:21] neeraj, kandarpk , this was preventing some of the dependencies we added in debian/rules from being reflected in the resulting package. [16:21] lfaraone: Ok. sure. [16:22] I'm prety sure it needs to be done to all repositories othe r than memorize and physics. [16:22] lfaraone, I had to regenerate the control file for removing the error from the linitan output [16:22] neeraj: right. [16:24] neeraj, kandarpk , poke me when you've pushed up that change. [16:25] *dinner will be back soom [16:33] sry i got dc [16:33] lfaraone, around? [16:35] ankur: yes. [16:36] hi lfaraone , [16:36] i was gettting some lintian warning which i was not able to solve on my self [16:36] ankur: okay. [16:36] lfaraone: made changes in poll and connect [16:36] and the arch-any warning was still showing while building package [16:37] but not when running lintian on deb package [16:37] i wanted to know, that if i run [16:37] lintian *.deb [16:37] by * here i mean package name [16:37] or [16:37] say [16:37] ankur: you should do "lintain -iIv path/to/package.changes" [16:38] kandarpk: coolio, I'll take a gander. [16:38] lfaraone, i need to run lintian on .changes file? [16:38] i was running it on deb package :( [16:38] ankur: well, that'll cause it to check the deb package and the source, usually. [16:38] ankur: it's not a rpoblem to run it on the deb, it just doesn't catch everything. [16:39] i got dc [16:39] rain here causes havoc :( [16:39] ankur: it's not a problem to run it on the deb, it just doesn't catch everything. [16:40] * lfaraone is reviewing sugar-connect-a [16:40] lfaraone, okay , i will run the lintian on deb and will post changes here , in 1 min [16:40] will you be around? [16:40] ankur_: yes. [16:42] * lfaraone will brb in 5, switching DEs. === ankur_ is now known as ankur [16:45] kandarpk, please tell in which activities are left? for addling cdbs in depends? [16:45] s/in/me [16:51] neeraj: all activities that you have packaged [16:52] kandarpk, ohk.. :) [16:52] kandarpk, one question [16:53] ankur: yes [16:54] we edited our rules file to do away with the lintian warning regarding the architecture [16:54] the arch-any one [16:54] CDBS_BUILD_DEPENDS_class_python-sugar_python = python$(cdbs_python_nondefault_version) [16:55] you added this in your rules file of memorize [16:55] what is the difference between the above one and the one below [16:55] CDBS_BUILD_DEPENDS_class_python-autotools_python = python$(cdbs_python_nondefault_version) [16:55] what purpose do tehy solve [16:55] ? [16:55] any answer [16:56] and what are we supposed to add in our packages to rectify the warning [16:57] kandarpk, lfaraone around? [16:58] ankur: 2 min [17:00] ankur: please see : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/2010-July/002707.html [17:01] ankur: well, they override different things. [17:02] ankur: python-sugar.mk uses the CDBS_BUILD_DEPENDS_class_python-sugar_python one, which I found by looking at the source for python-sugar.mk [17:03] okay [17:03] and we uses it for ? as i do not have much understanding of working of code [17:03] and tehre dependence as of now [17:03] python-sugar.mk [17:04] is make file(script)? [17:05] more specifically , what should i use in cae of etoys? [17:05] sugar_python one? [17:07] ankur: yes, since it uses python-sugar, no? [17:08] ankur: by the way, when you talk of etoys, please be clear whether you're talking about "etoys" or "sugar-etoys-activity" because both are valid packages with different software. [17:08] well etoys-activity [17:08] and well i guess it will use python sugar [17:09] let me try [17:09] and python-sugar.mk was for? [17:11] ankur: it's a series of make rules which handle the building of sugar packages with CDBS> [17:11] lfaraone, okay :) [17:14] lfaraone, I have update s-write-a-0.86 and s-record-a by including cdbs and regenerating control file [17:14] neeraj: cool, thanks. [17:15] lfaraone, can you have a look and tell me that if they are avoidable? [17:15] http://paste.ubuntu.com/469873/ [17:16] ankur: Yes. [17:16] lfaraone: can I start working on speak ? [17:16] kandarpk: I don't see why not. [17:16] lfaraone: Ok. [17:17] lfaraone: package it fresh from tarball ? [17:17] kandarpk: sure. [17:17] lfaraone: Great. [17:19] lfaraone, did you mean that they were avoidable or did you mean that you will ahve a look on them? [17:19] ankur: they are avoidable. [17:20] okay [17:20] lfaraone, i got it :) [17:20] for what time will you be around? [17:20] ankur: 1:30, maybe 2pm EST. [17:21] ankur: I encountered a similar issue, I used http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-physics-activity.git;a=commitdiff;h=936d60df1769867471d0605b5b4d9c0d2ee7407e to solve it. [17:21] ankur: does waht I'm doing make sense to you? [17:21] lfaraone, i just checked the mailing list [17:21] i had forgotten that i had posted it there as well [17:22] james suggested a similar solution [17:22] i am maing guesses [17:22] but i think you cahnged the executable permission of file [17:22] i think 1 is for execute? [17:22] sry [17:22] ankur: yeah, but I'm using symbolic notation. [17:23] a-x [17:23] lfaraone: do we need to include cdbs depends in all packages we package now on ? [17:23] okay 1 also is and a-x also [17:23] kandarpk: yes, although I'm working on updating the template. [17:23] if used chmod 6 then it would have meant same? [17:23] as i am not sure becasue i read this long time ago :( [17:23] ankur: "a" means "all users", "-" means "remove this bit", and "x" means "executable" [17:23] oh [17:24] ankur: "man chmod" is good bedtime reading :) [17:24] lfaraone: being proactive :) [17:24] lfaraone, thanks :) [17:24] kandarpk: yep. [17:27] as i can make form above irc chat [17:27] do i have to add [17:27] ${cdbs:Depends} [17:27] in depends field? [17:28] ankur: yes. [17:28] lfaraone, one more thing [17:28] as i went through toolkit package to see right format for copyright file [17:29] i saw that the abbreviated text for license [17:29] was written at bottom of the file one after another . [17:29] i will post link to my file [17:29] please tell me if i need to edit it [17:30] http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-etoys-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/copyright;h=03dba6c7bf9239d09e317288c1dee132cbfe9f5d;hb=HEAD [17:32] lfaraone, and do in Depends , we add entry in alphabetical order? [17:32] ankur: usually. [17:32] okay [17:32] ankur: although it doesn't really matter with substitutions. [17:32] okay , i will go with the normal order :) [17:33] will add the entry in between [17:33] also did you get a chance to look at a link file i gave above ? === neeraj_gupta is now known as neeraj [17:36] and does it seems right ? : Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${python:Depends}, ${cdbs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, etoys [17:38] lfaraone, around ? [17:38] * lfaraone is at lunc [17:38] ankur, yes.. [17:39] neeraj thanks :) [17:42] neeraj: either you or kandarpk should file a sync request when you have time for sugar-memorize-activity. [17:46] lfaraone: sure [17:47] kandarpk: it'll not be in the archive for another three hours. [17:47] kandarpk: packages are installed into the archive 4 times a day, counter is at http://ftp-master.debian.org/dinstall.html :) [17:47] kandarpk: so it's safe to leave that to the morning [17:49] lfaraone: ok. [17:49] dfarning: Hi [17:49] hey dfarning. [17:49] kandarpk, hey how are you? [17:50] dfarning: earlier today the first SEETA-produced package was accpted in DEbian. [17:50] dfarning: I am good. How about you ? [17:50] lfaraone: and second is in process ? [17:50] I'm looking at connect, yes. [17:50] lfaraone, I saw that! nearly peed my pants:) [17:50] I got the mail for connect moments ago [17:51] kandarpk, great [17:51] dfarning: all credit to lfaraone [17:51] kandarpk: nah, I just reviewed and made some smallll changes. [17:52] kandarpk: the email you got said the package was uploaded to mentors, where I'll them submit it to my sponsor for final review. [17:52] kandarpk: its when you hear it's ACCEPTED that you're golden. [17:52] lfaraone, I am living on diet coke and coffee. Need to be careful when I hear good news. [17:53] lfaraone: Ok. [17:53] kandarpk, how is the over work plan - work flow going? [17:53] overall [17:53] dfarning: I'd advise toning down a bit :) [17:53] dfarning: personally, I am getting more productive with each passing day. [17:53] dfarning: if you die young, whom am I to contract for? :P [17:55] lfaraone, that is the good thing about corporations (the business structure) the organization doesn't die with the founder:) [17:55] dfarning: but not about sole proprietorships. if you're HBAB, we're toast. :D [17:56] kandarpk: in sugar-connect-activity, I'm still getting "W: sugar-connect-activity: extra-license-file usr/share/sugar/activities/Connect.activity/COPYING". Can you fix this? [17:56] lfaraone: Ok. [17:57] lfaraone, [17:57] install/sugar-connect-activity:: [17:57] rm -f debian/sugar-connect-activity/usr/share/activities/Connect.activity/COPYING [17:57] lfaraone: will it be ok ? [17:58] kandarpk: looks good, I'll be back in 30 minutes. [17:59] lfaraone, will you be able to take a look at this and tell me if it is okay? [17:59] http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-etoys-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/copyright;h=89f5e2388d2a5659e3287185866a733b912cde8f;hb=HEAD [17:59] kandarpk, yes. I am noticing that. how about the overall team production. do we need to do a another round of planing/taskings soon? [17:59] dfarning: I think we haven't gained much momentum on collaboration [18:00] dfarning: I was thinking we should try an activity using telepathy first [18:00] ^^ +1 [18:00] dfarning: http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/hello-mesh [18:01] kandarpk, can you package and debug that activity? [18:01] dfarning: I dont know [18:01] dfarning: I saw alsroot suggesting it to someone on #sugar [18:02] kandarpk, +1 can you give it a shot? [18:02] dfarning: Sure, will try to work on it tomorrow [18:03] kandarpk, can you send be a list of task the various team members are working on and will be working on over the next week.... or should I ask manu for that? [18:03] send me [18:03] dfarning: manu sir will be having a better idea [18:04] ok, I will ask him this evening. [18:04] dfarning: he'll be here soon. [18:06] kandarpk, thanks. [18:58] kandarpk: did you have a chance to make that change to rules? [18:59] lfaraone: adding that rule didn't supress the warning [19:00] install/sugar-connect-activity:: [19:00] rm -f debian/sugar-connect-activity/usr/share/activities/Connect.activity/COPYING [19:00] kandarpk: you probably want to add a "sugar" in between "share" and "activities" [19:01] lfaraone: I thought about that. [19:03] kandarpk: yes, that's most likely the issue. [19:04] lfaraone, when I build connect activity, then lintian gave this http://paste.ubuntu.com/469910/ [19:04] no warning for copying file.. [19:06] lfaraone, ok on going to the corresponding folder I found corrupt COPYING file which on opening gave this message "This link cannot be used, because its target "../../../common-licenses/GPL-2" doesn't exist." [19:08] neeraj: it's not just the fact that the COPYING file is corrupted, it's that during a debian package build rather than a symlink that file will just be included, whcih is a waste of space. [19:09] * lfaraone is running lintian after doing a build of the package in *debian*, and using debian's lintian. [19:13] lfaraone: done. [19:14] kandarpk: cool. by the way, you don't need to do a commit when you build the package. [19:14] lfaraone: Ok. [19:14] kandarpk: since all those files are going to be removed in the clean rule anyway. [20:34] speak-16 packaged, fine tuning required [20:35] manusheel sir: ^^ [20:35] kandarp: [20:36] Hi Kandarp. [20:36] Great to hear. [20:36] manusheel sir: Hi. [20:36] kandarpk: So, we submitted speak for review. [20:36] ?* [20:37] manusheel sir: it is producing some warnings, and I haven't checked the copyright file [20:37] just copied the git repo. one [20:37] kandarpk: Ok, you'll be sending it for review tomorrow, right? [20:37] will add it for review tomorrow [20:37] kandarpk: Sure. [20:37] manusheel sir: yes sir [20:40] kandarpk: have you looked at log, btw? [20:46] lfaraone: log-activity ? [20:46] kandarpk: yes. [20:47] lfaraone: not yet [20:48] lfaraone: I wasn't sure if I really had to take a look [20:48] kandarpk: well, dip marked it "r?~kandarpk" [20:48] lfaraone: hmmm. [20:50] lfaraone: should I remove the speak repo. and create a new one ? [20:50] kandarpk: sure. [20:51] lfaraone: Ok, will do that tomorrow. [20:51] lfaraone, manusheel sir: good night. [20:51] kandarpk: see you in the morning. [20:51] lfaraone: you'll be there ? [20:52] kandarpk: this evening, (EST) probably not, tomorrow morning (EST), of course. [20:52] ok [20:52] good night