[03:06]  * lfaraone waves at the world.
[05:01] <manusheel> lfaraone: Good morning Luke.
[05:01] <manusheel> Around?
[14:41] <neeraj> Hi lfaraone
[14:42] <neeraj> lfaraone, I have modified debian/rules file http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-record-activity.git;a=blobdiff;f=debian/rules;h=badf8048b872dd690623234d9c7a93df2eb188f4;hp=b532c92cc73ccbf5598d47bc08feeb370207ea85;hb=d11f968abe381615e4e58d955f2d667bf8bd863f;hpb=9ff82260216dd033e199d769f2adbd085548827e
[14:49] <neeraj> ankur, hi
[14:49] <ankur> hi neeraj
[14:49] <neeraj> can we remove any warning in this http://paste.ubuntu.com/469819/
[15:03] <ankur> lfaraone,  around?
[15:10] <ankur> Please ping me when you will be back
[15:14] <kandarpk> lfaraone: Hi.
[15:22] <ankur> kandarpk,  around?
[15:23] <ankur> can anybody tell me what role does exactly setup.py performes?
[15:23] <ankur> Bert suggested it's removal from the package
[15:23] <ankur> but without that it wont build
[15:27] <kandarpk> ankur: Hi
[15:53]  * lfaraone waves.
[15:54] <lfaraone> sugar-memorize-activity was sponsored and is now in the Debian NEW queue.
[15:54] <lfaraone> kandarpk: I did make some changes to your package before I uploaded it, please see the git repo. (pushing changes as we speak)
[15:55] <kandarpk> lfaraone: thanks a lot.
[15:55] <kandarpk> lfaraone: feels great to work with you.
[15:56] <lfaraone> kandarpk: same here.
[15:56] <kandarpk> lfaraone: :)
[16:05] <kandarpk> mukul: Hi.
[16:09] <kandarpk> lfaraone: I was trying to update read
[16:09] <kandarpk> after cloning Jonas' repo.
[16:09] <lfaraone> kandarpk: okay.
[16:09] <kandarpk> lfaraone: do I need to file a bug report ?
[16:10] <neeraj> lfaraone, kandarpk hi :)
[16:10] <kandarpk> neeraj: Hi.
[16:12] <ankur> hi kandarpk
[16:12] <ankur> hi lfaraone
[16:13] <neeraj> lfaraone, I have made changes in debian/rules file and added r? on Sugar/tasks. Please review them (record and write )whenever u get time.
[16:15] <lfaraone> neeraj: will do.
[16:15] <neeraj> lfaraone, thanks
[16:21] <lfaraone> neeraj / kandarpk : can you update the other package repositories by adding "${cdbs:Depends}" to the dependencies line as I did in http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-memorize-activity.git;a=commitdiff;h=85bade90159b116e8c769863d839128d8c466af3 , commit, regenerate control, and commit?
[16:21] <lfaraone> neeraj, kandarpk , this was preventing some of the dependencies we added in debian/rules from being reflected in the resulting package.
[16:21] <kandarpk> lfaraone: Ok. sure.
[16:22] <lfaraone> I'm prety sure it needs to be done to all repositories othe r than memorize and physics.
[16:22] <neeraj> lfaraone, I had to regenerate the control file for removing the error from the linitan output
[16:22] <lfaraone> neeraj: right.
[16:24] <lfaraone> neeraj, kandarpk , poke me when you've pushed up that change.
[16:25] <neeraj> *dinner will be back soom
[16:33] <ankur> sry i got dc
[16:33] <ankur> lfaraone,  around?
[16:35] <lfaraone> ankur: yes.
[16:36] <ankur> hi lfaraone ,
[16:36] <ankur> i was gettting some lintian warning which i was not able to solve on my self
[16:36] <lfaraone> ankur: okay.
[16:36] <kandarpk> lfaraone: made changes in poll and connect
[16:36] <ankur> and the arch-any warning was still showing while building package
[16:37] <ankur> but not when running lintian on deb package
[16:37] <ankur> i wanted to know, that if i run
[16:37] <ankur> lintian *.deb
[16:37] <ankur> by * here i mean package name
[16:37] <ankur> or
[16:37] <ankur> say
[16:37] <lfaraone> ankur: you should do "lintain -iIv path/to/package.changes"
[16:38] <lfaraone> kandarpk: coolio, I'll take a gander.
[16:38] <ankur> lfaraone,  i need to run lintian on .changes file?
[16:38] <ankur> i was running it on deb package :(
[16:38] <lfaraone> ankur: well, that'll cause it to check the deb package and the source, usually.
[16:38] <lfaraone> ankur: it's not a rpoblem to run it on the deb, it just doesn't catch everything.
[16:39] <ankur_> i got dc
[16:39] <ankur_> rain here causes havoc :(
[16:39] <lfaraone> ankur: it's not a problem to run it on the deb, it just doesn't catch everything.
[16:40]  * lfaraone is reviewing sugar-connect-a
[16:40] <ankur_> lfaraone,  okay , i will run the lintian on deb and will post changes here , in 1 min
[16:40] <ankur_> will you be around?
[16:40] <lfaraone> ankur_: yes.
[16:42]  * lfaraone will brb in 5, switching DEs.
[16:45] <neeraj> kandarpk, please tell in which activities are left? for addling cdbs in depends?
[16:45] <neeraj> s/in/me
[16:51] <kandarpk> neeraj: all activities that you have packaged
[16:52] <neeraj> kandarpk, ohk.. :)
[16:52] <ankur> kandarpk,  one question
[16:53] <kandarpk> ankur: yes
[16:54] <ankur> we edited our rules file to do away with the lintian warning regarding the architecture
[16:54] <ankur> the arch-any one
[16:54] <ankur> CDBS_BUILD_DEPENDS_class_python-sugar_python = python$(cdbs_python_nondefault_version)
[16:55] <ankur> you added this in your rules file of memorize
[16:55] <ankur> what is the difference between the above one and the one below
[16:55] <ankur> CDBS_BUILD_DEPENDS_class_python-autotools_python = python$(cdbs_python_nondefault_version)
[16:55] <ankur> what purpose do tehy solve
[16:55] <ankur> ?
[16:55] <ankur> any answer
[16:56] <ankur> and what are we supposed to add in our packages to rectify the warning
[16:57] <ankur> kandarpk, lfaraone  around?
[16:58] <kandarpk> ankur: 2 min
[17:00] <kandarpk> ankur: please see : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-olpc-devel/2010-July/002707.html
[17:01] <lfaraone> ankur: well, they override different things.
[17:02] <lfaraone> ankur: python-sugar.mk uses the CDBS_BUILD_DEPENDS_class_python-sugar_python one, which I found by looking at the source for python-sugar.mk
[17:03] <ankur> okay
[17:03] <ankur> and we uses it for ? as i do not have much understanding of working of code
[17:03] <ankur> and tehre dependence as of now
[17:03] <ankur> python-sugar.mk
[17:04] <ankur> is make file(script)?
[17:05] <ankur> more specifically , what should i use in cae of etoys?
[17:05] <ankur> sugar_python one?
[17:07] <lfaraone> ankur: yes, since it uses python-sugar, no?
[17:08] <lfaraone> ankur: by the way, when you talk of etoys, please be clear whether you're talking about "etoys" or "sugar-etoys-activity" because both are valid packages with different software.
[17:08] <ankur> well etoys-activity
[17:08] <ankur> and well i guess it will use python sugar
[17:09] <ankur> let me try
[17:09] <ankur> and python-sugar.mk was for?
[17:11] <lfaraone> ankur: it's a series of make rules which handle the building of sugar packages with CDBS>
[17:11] <ankur> lfaraone,  okay :)
[17:14] <neeraj> lfaraone, I have update s-write-a-0.86 and s-record-a by including cdbs and regenerating control file
[17:14] <lfaraone> neeraj: cool, thanks.
[17:15] <ankur> lfaraone,  can you have a look and tell me that if they are avoidable?
[17:15] <ankur> http://paste.ubuntu.com/469873/
[17:16] <lfaraone> ankur: Yes.
[17:16] <kandarpk> lfaraone: can I start working on speak ?
[17:16] <lfaraone> kandarpk: I don't see why not.
[17:16] <kandarpk> lfaraone: Ok.
[17:17] <kandarpk> lfaraone: package it fresh from tarball ?
[17:17] <lfaraone> kandarpk: sure.
[17:17] <kandarpk> lfaraone: Great.
[17:19] <ankur> lfaraone,  did you mean that they were avoidable or did you mean that you will ahve a look on them?
[17:19] <lfaraone> ankur: they are avoidable.
[17:20] <ankur> okay
[17:20] <ankur> lfaraone,  i got it :)
[17:20] <ankur> for what time will you be around?
[17:20] <lfaraone> ankur: 1:30, maybe 2pm EST.
[17:21] <lfaraone> ankur: I encountered a similar issue, I used http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-physics-activity.git;a=commitdiff;h=936d60df1769867471d0605b5b4d9c0d2ee7407e to solve it.
[17:21] <lfaraone> ankur: does waht I'm doing make sense to you?
[17:21] <ankur> lfaraone,  i just checked the mailing list
[17:21] <ankur> i had forgotten that i had posted it there as well
[17:22] <ankur> james suggested a similar solution
[17:22] <ankur> i am maing guesses
[17:22] <ankur> but i think you cahnged the executable permission of file
[17:22] <ankur> i think 1 is for execute?
[17:22] <ankur> sry
[17:22] <lfaraone> ankur: yeah, but I'm using symbolic notation.
[17:23] <ankur> a-x
[17:23] <kandarpk> lfaraone: do we need to include cdbs depends in all packages we package now on ?
[17:23] <ankur> okay 1 also is and a-x also
[17:23] <lfaraone> kandarpk: yes, although I'm working on updating the template.
[17:23] <ankur> if used chmod 6 then it would have meant same?
[17:23] <ankur> as i am not sure becasue i read this long time ago :(
[17:23] <lfaraone> ankur: "a" means "all users", "-" means "remove this bit", and "x" means "executable"
[17:23] <ankur> oh
[17:24] <lfaraone> ankur: "man chmod" is good bedtime reading :)
[17:24] <kandarpk> lfaraone: being proactive :)
[17:24] <ankur> lfaraone,  thanks :)
[17:24] <lfaraone> kandarpk: yep.
[17:27] <ankur> as i can make form above irc chat
[17:27] <ankur> do i have to add
[17:27] <ankur> ${cdbs:Depends}
[17:27] <ankur> in depends field?
[17:28] <lfaraone> ankur: yes.
[17:28] <ankur> lfaraone,  one more thing
[17:28] <ankur> as  i went through toolkit package to see right format for copyright file
[17:29] <ankur> i saw that the abbreviated text for license
[17:29] <ankur> was written at bottom of the file one after another .
[17:29] <ankur> i will post link to my file
[17:29] <ankur> please tell me if i need to edit it
[17:30] <ankur> http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-etoys-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/copyright;h=03dba6c7bf9239d09e317288c1dee132cbfe9f5d;hb=HEAD
[17:32] <ankur> lfaraone, and do in Depends , we add entry in alphabetical order?
[17:32] <lfaraone> ankur: usually.
[17:32] <ankur> okay
[17:32] <lfaraone> ankur: although it doesn't really matter with substitutions.
[17:32] <ankur> okay , i will go with the normal order :)
[17:33] <ankur> will add the entry in between
[17:33] <ankur> also did you get a chance to look at a link file i gave above ?
[17:36] <ankur> and does it seems right  ? : Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${python:Depends}, ${cdbs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, etoys
[17:38] <ankur> lfaraone,  around ?
[17:38]  * lfaraone is at lunc
[17:38] <neeraj> ankur, yes..
[17:39] <ankur> neeraj thanks :)
[17:42] <lfaraone> neeraj: either you or kandarpk should file a sync request when you have time for sugar-memorize-activity.
[17:46] <kandarpk> lfaraone: sure
[17:47] <lfaraone> kandarpk: it'll not be in the archive for another three hours.
[17:47] <lfaraone> kandarpk: packages are installed into the archive 4 times a day, counter is at http://ftp-master.debian.org/dinstall.html :)
[17:47] <lfaraone> kandarpk: so it's safe to leave that to the morning
[17:49] <kandarpk> lfaraone: ok.
[17:49] <kandarpk> dfarning: Hi
[17:49] <lfaraone> hey dfarning.
[17:49] <dfarning> kandarpk, hey how are you?
[17:50] <lfaraone> dfarning: earlier today the first SEETA-produced package was accpted in DEbian.
[17:50] <kandarpk> dfarning: I am good. How about you ?
[17:50] <kandarpk> lfaraone: and second is in process ?
[17:50] <lfaraone> I'm looking at connect, yes.
[17:50] <dfarning> lfaraone, I saw that! nearly peed my pants:)
[17:50] <kandarpk> I got the mail for connect moments ago
[17:51] <dfarning> kandarpk, great
[17:51] <kandarpk> dfarning: all credit to lfaraone
[17:51] <lfaraone> kandarpk: nah, I just reviewed and made some smallll changes.
[17:52] <lfaraone> kandarpk: the email you got said the package was uploaded to mentors, where I'll them submit it to my sponsor for final review.
[17:52] <lfaraone> kandarpk: its when you hear it's ACCEPTED that you're golden.
[17:52] <dfarning> lfaraone,  I am living on diet coke and coffee.  Need to be careful when I hear good news.
[17:53] <kandarpk> lfaraone: Ok.
[17:53] <dfarning> kandarpk, how is the over work plan - work flow going?
[17:53] <dfarning> overall
[17:53] <lfaraone> dfarning: I'd advise toning down a bit :)
[17:53] <kandarpk> dfarning: personally, I am getting more productive with each passing day.
[17:53] <lfaraone> dfarning: if you die young, whom am I to contract for? :P
[17:55] <dfarning> lfaraone, that is the good thing about corporations (the business structure) the organization doesn't die with the founder:)
[17:55] <lfaraone> dfarning: but not about sole proprietorships. if you're HBAB, we're toast. :D
[17:56] <lfaraone> kandarpk: in sugar-connect-activity, I'm still getting "W: sugar-connect-activity: extra-license-file usr/share/sugar/activities/Connect.activity/COPYING". Can you fix this?
[17:56] <kandarpk> lfaraone: Ok.
[17:57] <kandarpk> lfaraone,
[17:57] <kandarpk> install/sugar-connect-activity::
[17:57] <kandarpk> 	rm -f debian/sugar-connect-activity/usr/share/activities/Connect.activity/COPYING
[17:57] <kandarpk> lfaraone: will it be ok ?
[17:58] <lfaraone> kandarpk: looks good, I'll be back in 30 minutes.
[17:59] <ankur> lfaraone, will you be able to take a look at this and tell me if it is okay?
[17:59] <ankur> http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-etoys-activity.git;a=blob;f=debian/copyright;h=89f5e2388d2a5659e3287185866a733b912cde8f;hb=HEAD
[17:59] <dfarning> kandarpk, yes. I am noticing that.  how about the overall team production.  do we need to do a another round of planing/taskings soon?
[17:59] <kandarpk> dfarning: I think we haven't gained much momentum on collaboration
[18:00] <kandarpk> dfarning: I was thinking we should try an activity using telepathy first
[18:00] <neeraj> ^^ +1
[18:00] <kandarpk> dfarning: http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/hello-mesh
[18:01] <dfarning> kandarpk, can you package and debug that activity?
[18:01] <kandarpk> dfarning: I dont know
[18:01] <kandarpk> dfarning: I saw alsroot suggesting it to someone on #sugar
[18:02] <dfarning> kandarpk, +1 can you give it a shot?
[18:02] <kandarpk> dfarning: Sure, will try to work on it tomorrow
[18:03] <dfarning> kandarpk, can you send be a list of task the various team members are working on and will be working on over the next week.... or should I ask manu for that?
[18:03] <dfarning> send me
[18:03] <kandarpk> dfarning: manu sir will be having a better idea
[18:04] <dfarning> ok, I will ask him this evening.
[18:04] <kandarpk> dfarning: he'll be here soon.
[18:06] <dfarning> kandarpk, thanks.
[18:58] <lfaraone> kandarpk: did you have a chance to make that change to rules?
[18:59] <kandarpk> lfaraone: adding that rule didn't supress the warning
[19:00] <kandarpk> install/sugar-connect-activity::
[19:00] <kandarpk>   rm -f debian/sugar-connect-activity/usr/share/activities/Connect.activity/COPYING
[19:00] <lfaraone> kandarpk: you probably want to add a "sugar" in between "share" and "activities"
[19:01] <kandarpk> lfaraone: I thought about that.
[19:03] <lfaraone> kandarpk: yes, that's most likely the issue.
[19:04] <neeraj> lfaraone, when I build connect activity, then lintian gave this http://paste.ubuntu.com/469910/
[19:04] <neeraj> no warning for copying file..
[19:06] <neeraj> lfaraone, ok on going to the corresponding folder I found corrupt COPYING file which on opening gave this message "This link cannot be used, because its target "../../../common-licenses/GPL-2" doesn't exist."
[19:08] <lfaraone> neeraj: it's not just the fact that the COPYING file is corrupted, it's that during a debian package build rather than a symlink that file will just be included, whcih is a waste of space.
[19:09]  * lfaraone is running lintian after doing a build of the package in *debian*, and using debian's lintian.
[19:13] <kandarpk> lfaraone: done.
[19:14] <lfaraone> kandarpk:  cool. by the way, you don't need to do a commit when you build the package.
[19:14] <kandarpk> lfaraone: Ok.
[19:14] <lfaraone> kandarpk: since all those files are going to be removed in the clean rule anyway.
[20:34] <kandarpk> speak-16 packaged, fine tuning required
[20:35] <kandarpk> manusheel sir: ^^
[20:35] <manusheel> kandarp:
[20:36] <manusheel> Hi Kandarp.
[20:36] <manusheel> Great to hear.
[20:36] <kandarpk> manusheel sir: Hi.
[20:36] <manusheel> kandarpk: So, we submitted speak for review.
[20:36] <manusheel> ?*
[20:37] <kandarpk> manusheel sir: it is producing some warnings, and I haven't checked the copyright file
[20:37] <kandarpk> just copied the git repo. one
[20:37] <manusheel> kandarpk: Ok, you'll be sending it for review tomorrow, right?
[20:37] <kandarpk> will add it for review tomorrow
[20:37] <manusheel> kandarpk: Sure.
[20:37] <kandarpk> manusheel sir: yes sir
[20:40] <lfaraone> kandarpk: have you looked at log, btw?
[20:46] <kandarpk> lfaraone: log-activity ?
[20:46] <lfaraone> kandarpk: yes.
[20:47] <kandarpk> lfaraone: not yet
[20:48] <kandarpk> lfaraone: I wasn't sure if I really had to take a look
[20:48] <lfaraone> kandarpk: well, dip marked it "r?~kandarpk"
[20:48] <kandarpk> lfaraone: hmmm.
[20:50] <kandarpk> lfaraone: should I remove the speak repo. and create a new one ?
[20:50] <lfaraone> kandarpk: sure.
[20:51] <kandarpk> lfaraone: Ok, will do that tomorrow.
[20:51] <kandarpk> lfaraone, manusheel sir: good night.
[20:51] <lfaraone> kandarpk: see you in the morning.
[20:51] <kandarpk> lfaraone: you'll be there ?
[20:52] <lfaraone> kandarpk: this evening, (EST) probably not, tomorrow morning (EST), of course.
[20:52] <kandarpk> ok
[20:52] <kandarpk> good night