/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/07/28/#ubuntu+1.txt

uRockFinally started testing 10.10 in a VBox and was happy that it installed without a hitch.00:09
DrHalanuRock: theres nothing to be happy aobut. Using maverick on my machine for a month without problems..00:12
uRockDrHalan, that takes the fun out of it00:13
DrHalanout of what?00:13
uRocktesting00:13
DrHalanalright :D00:13
* uRock Linkes being sarcastic =)00:14
uRockLikes00:14
DrHalando you know if there will be gtk3 in maverick00:16
DrHalanit doesn't seem like..00:16
uRockno clue00:16
uRockI haven't looked into much of anything yet00:17
DrHalani don't want to wait another rleease for it..00:17
uRockI mostly want to see the ayatana stuff for Netbooks will look00:18
DrHalanyou men indicator-appmenu?00:19
DrHalanor the new network-indicator?00:19
uRockall of the above00:19
uRockthe stuff that caused them to put the buttons on the left00:20
DrHalanoh the windicators?00:20
DrHalani don't know if that is really worked on00:20
DrHalanhttp://twitpic.com/27v3gq00:20
DrHalanthats how my desktop looks like00:20
uRockyup, those00:20
DrHalannotice i don't have a legacy statusmenu anymore00:21
DrHalanand the menu of my apps has moved in the upper panel similiar to OSX00:21
uRocklooks good00:21
DrHalanbut i don't know if the windicators really will make it into maverick as i don't see any pacakges for them yet00:23
uRockI hope so, but I won't be too broken hearted.00:24
DaekdroomThere'll be no GTK3 in maverick00:26
DaekdroomBecause it'd require to ship GTK2 AND GTK3 in a single CD, as they can't do such fast transition..00:26
DrHalan-.-00:27
DrHalani thought its normal that the releases after the LTS are a little broken00:28
kklimondawell, a little broken and unshippable are two different things00:30
DrHalanwell there is a gnome 3.0 release so all core apps should be compatible with gtk300:31
kklimondabut we ship much more then only core apps on cd00:31
DaekdroomDrHalan, https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-maverick-gnome00:31
DrHalanmh00:32
DrHalanback when kde 4.0 came out there was a "4.0 remix" beside the normal Kubuntu release00:32
DrHalanwill something like this happen?00:33
DanaGSay, how the heck do I point a vnc client at the SECOND head?00:42
DanaGI have :0.0 and :0.1, and can only seem to connect to :0.0.00:42
=== DanaG1 is now known as DanaG
BUGabundonite guys01:03
ChogyDananyone happen to know about a low latency kernel?01:16
DrHalanChogyDan: what for?01:36
ChogyDanDrHalan: well, it was referenced to me, but I don't know where to find it01:37
ChogyDanbasically, I want to look at how it is packaged01:39
bjsniderChogyDan, the low latency kernel is called -rt, for realtime01:58
ChogyDanah, ok01:58
bjsnider#ubuntu-kernel has the guys who package it if you want to ask them directly01:59
bjsniderthe kernel team in other words01:59
ChogyDanyeah, I should ask them, thanks02:00
=== luis_lopez is now known as `
=== ` is now known as luis_lopez
johnjohn101what's the version of freetype that will ship with 10.10?04:15
ZykoticK9johnjohn101, if you know the actual freetype package name, in this channel use "!info $PACKAGENAME"04:18
johnjohn101!info freetype04:19
ubottuPackage freetype does not exist in maverick04:19
johnjohn101!info mono04:20
ubottuPackage mono does not exist in maverick04:20
ZykoticK9johnjohn101, the reason i said the whole "if you know" part is cause i'd already tried "apt-cache policy freetype" and knew it didn't exist, sorry that wasn't clear.04:21
johnjohn101don't worry, I'll download alpha 3 in a few days04:23
=== Random833 is now known as Random832
yofel_huh? they moved the 'Reported by ...' line to the left on launchpad o.O (edge)12:34
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
yofeland the flames look kind of lost on that layout..12:34
yofelhttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtm/+bug/573785 for example12:34
ubottuLaunchpad bug 573785 in qtm (Ubuntu) "QTM crashes when a window is launched" [High,Fix released]12:34
yofelmeh, wrong #12:37
=== mrsun is now known as MrSunshine
gnomefreakdoes anyone notice that Ubuntu software center starts downloading when you choose a package instead of starting when you are finished?13:35
yofelgnomefreak: afaik that's intended, once you click on install it starts installing, so it already does something while you're looking at other packages13:52
gnomefreakit makes it hard to keep up with what you already installed, doing alot of packages13:53
Zeus__Hello! Am I going to have any problems if I have a fresh install of Ubuntu 10.10 on my laptop keeping the partition of the Home folder of 10.04 untouched?14:26
PiciZeus__: Probably not, but maybe.14:33
PiciZeus__: Actually, let me rephrase that.  You'll only potentially have issues if you are dual booting between 10.04 and 10.10 with a shared .home14:33
Picier /home14:33
Zeus__Pici, thank you :)14:34
gnomefreakalot of packages are haveing depends issues atm14:38
napsyHello. Are catalyst drivers working on 10.10?16:22
Machtinhey guys.. i'm a bit stuck:  pidgin: Depends: pidgin-data (< 1:2.7.1-z) but 1:2.7.2-1ubuntu1 is to be installed. <- any thoughts on that?16:56
MachtinShould I just wait or can i somehow fix that?16:57
Machtinnever mind, 'fixed' it.17:13
IdleOne!info sessioninstaller17:16
ubottusessioninstaller (source: sessioninstaller): APT based installer using PackgeKit's session DBus API. In component universe, is extra. Version 0.20-1 (maverick), package size 27 kB, installed size 252 kB17:16
=== DanaG1 is now known as DanaG
patdk-wkfun, another grub update17:58
jpdsHmm, food time.17:59
DaekdroomHa. Maverick wins. GNOME 3 delayed.18:22
charlie-tcaummm, I think that would be Maverick loses. Gnome 3 is not going to make into it, even for testing18:38
Daekdroomcharlie-tca, I always assumed it wouldn't make it into Maverick at all, except by, who knows, a PPA.18:39
rpiusDoes anyone have any idea on the progress of "windicators" for maverick? It's almost alpha3 now and still no sign of it.....19:03
DrHalanhey19:03
DrHalanwhere do debug libs normally go19:03
DrHalanit seems like every package does this differently19:04
DrHalansome are in /usr/lib/debug others are in /usr/debug/lib others are in /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib19:04
yofelDrHalan: at least here on amd64 all debug libs that are installed by dpkg are in /usr/lib/debug/*19:05
DrHalanyeah thats where i put mine..19:06
DrHalanjust wanted to see if do my packages right19:06
yofelif you're packaging something dh_strip should take care of that19:06
DrHalanstill waiting for a gui app to create my packages :D19:09
gnomefreakits faster and easier to learn the text way :)19:09
DrHalantook me ages and i don't do anything comples19:10
=== BUGabundo is now known as BUGa_Mad
=== BUGa_Mad is now known as BUGa_grumpy
DrHalani just put build a .so and put it into /usr/lib19:11
yofelwell, unless you strip the file you shouldn't need another debug file19:12
DrHalanstrip?19:18
yofelDrHalan: remove debug symbols from object / binary files19:18
yofelsee 'man strip' and 'man dh_strip'19:19
DrHalanmh i just have two targets in my makefile19:19
DrHalanone for release and one for debug19:19
DrHalanand they get placed at the specific directories..19:19
DrHalandebuild can do that for me?19:19
yofelyes, if you build with debug (-g usually) you'll get debug symbols in the binaries19:20
yofeldpkg always *discards* those unless you override dh_strip to create a -dbg package (and the official buildds always put them into a -dbgsym package)19:20
yofelso the packaged binaries never have debug symbols, you always have to install a debug package if you want the debug symbols19:22
yofel(like this the application packages are smaller)19:22
DrHalanmh if its like taht i don't know if my rules file is correct19:24
DrHalanhttp://pastebin.com/vwbwZLWQ19:24
yofelhm, looks ok to me, you won't get debug symbols in the package though since dh_strip will remove them (you *could* install 'pkg-create-dbgsym' so a -dbgsym package will automatically be created if you build locally, like on the official buildds)19:26
DrHalansothere is  dbg package withoutdebug symbols? lol19:29
DrHalancan is just remove the dh_strip thing?19:30
yofeltry it, I don't know19:31
* gnomefreak wonders what #ubuntu-motu is for :X19:32
yofelsry, we're finished I think19:32
yofelnow that I think about it, there's #ubuntu-packaging too19:32
DrHalanman says If the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS environment variable contains "nostrip",        nothing will be stripped19:32
DrHalanmh whats "DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS"?19:32
DrHalanor betterwhere is it19:33
DrHalanmh whatever g2g19:36
DrHalanthanks yofel :)19:36
gnomefreakyofel: was it you that told me that the password prompt was do to auto login?19:38
yofelI don't think so19:39
gnomefreakok19:40
* gnomefreak cant recall who but either way i asked for confirm in -bugs19:40
napsyHello. Are catalyst drivers working on latest 10.10?20:07
patdk-wkheh, another grub update, another boot failure :(20:07
patdk-wkheh, rebooting it after the first boot, seems to have fixed it20:10
calmdudei need help for "lucid & nvidia proprietary driver"?20:39
calmdudeanyone?20:39
gnomefreakcalmdude: join #ubuntu for Lucid support20:41
gnomefreakPlease read the topic of channel for more info20:41
* gnomefreak smoke20:42
calmdudeim already in there and nobody cares/knows20:43
gnomefreakcalmdude: it has alot of users in there please be patient and someone will answer you. if not you can try ubuntuforums.com20:47
gnomefreakthis is not an overflow channel for #ubuntu20:47
calmdudeoverflow channel?21:04
calmdudeu just invented the term by yourself, dont u?21:05
patdk-wkheh21:05
gnomefreakCardinalFang: you weroverflow was wrong word21:05
gnomefreaksince the channel is not full21:06
gnomefreakhes gone. sorry CardinalFang21:06
=== Mike_ is now known as Guest56089
Guest56089I'm searching for the feature that allows us to maintain several 10.10 computers for updates and whatever else this new feature offers21:55
Guest56089what is it called?21:55
VolkodavIf I need to install on btrfs I have to partition /boot and do that from alternate CD  right ?21:55
Volkodavand grub goes to /boot obviously21:56
Guest56089Volkodav, and I think /boot cannot be btrfs21:56
Volkodavright21:56
Guest56089I read there was something new with respect to maintaining several computer but don't know what it is called21:57
Guest56089*computers21:57
JontheEchidnaOneConf?21:59
Mike__that OneConf looks promising22:00
Mike__JontheEchidna, google says you are spot on!22:01
=== Andre_Gondim is now known as Andre_Gondim-afk
* theoctagon installs ubuntu maverick meercat on btrfs on a virtual box - waiting for installation to complete22:34
patdk-wkheh22:38
patdk-wkI just upgraded my lucid to maveric, then converted it to btrfs :)22:38
patdk-wkstupid flash drive keeps failing22:38
judgencould anyone check what version of AmiWM that is included in maverick?22:40
yofel!info amiwm22:42
ubottuamiwm (source: amiwm): The Amiga look alike window manager. In component multiverse, is optional. Version 0.20.48-8 (maverick), package size 92 kB, installed size 352 kB22:42
yofelsame version as in debian22:42
judgenthnks22:45
Volkodavanybody installed today from daily alternate CD? mine failed twice23:34
Volkodav /boot does not have to be sdx1 ? it can be any partition on a drive as long as it has bootable flag ?23:42

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!