[00:15] <BUGabundo> fta2: chromium is messing pages rendering
[00:15] <BUGabundo> some parts of divs/tables are getting shrinked
[11:08] <asac> bug 603022
[11:08] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 603022 in mlterm (Ubuntu) "[MIR] mlterm (affects: 4) (heat: 270)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/603022
[11:09] <asac> bug 603022
[15:02] <BUGabundo_remote> fta2: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=50517
[15:02] <BUGabundo_remote> daily is broken
[15:02] <BUGabundo_remote> won't even start
[15:30] <fishor> hallo all, can any one confirm a problem with uncontrollable flashplayer on firefox 4.0 pre
[15:30] <fishor> ?
[15:31] <fishor> i have it with some youtube and some other videos
[15:31] <fishor> for example here http://www.linux-magazin.de/content/view/full/52962
[15:33] <fishor> or here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bv0vXD16_lA
[15:34] <fishor> it cant depend on flash, or at least on only flash. for example with chromium it working just fine
[15:43] <gnomefreak> works fine on 32bit using flashplugin-installer
[15:43]  * gnomefreak not really here
[15:43] <gnomefreak> going for smaoke
[15:43] <gnomefreak> smoke
[16:26] <fishor> hmm... i use 64 bit maverik
[16:26] <fishor> even if i reset all setings i have this issue
[16:28] <micahg> fishor: are you using nspluginwrapper?
[16:29] <fishor> micahg: yes
[16:30] <micahg> fishor: do you only have one flash installed?
[16:32] <fishor> should be one, i'll check it now one more time
[16:39] <fishor> i just found one more /opt/Adobe\ AIR/Versions/1.0/Resources/libflashplayer.so, but removing it make no difference
[16:40] <micahg> chrisccoulson: :P re enigmail--locales :)
[16:40] <micahg> chrisccoulson: BTW, there's a lucid SRU for language-selector prepared
[16:40] <chrisccoulson> micahg - sorry about that, i thought it would work when pitti suggested it ;)
[16:40] <micahg> chrisccoulson: heh, ok, I'll try again next weekend then :)
[16:41] <micahg> chrisccoulson: do you want to SRU the language-selector fix?
[16:41] <chrisccoulson> thanks
[16:41] <chrisccoulson> i'll have a look at that
[16:41] <chrisccoulson> i don't think i can upload that though
[16:45] <fishor> micahg: what version of flash player do you have
[16:45] <fishor> ?
[16:46] <micahg> fishor: I have 10.1r53
[16:46]  * micahg tries flash in daily
[16:47] <micahg> fishor: flash wfm
[16:47] <vish> fishor: hi , you were working on the sound naming bug upstream right?
[16:48] <fishor> vish: no i was working on performance ubuntu bug
[16:48] <fishor> but now i just try get things work
[16:48] <fishor> micahg: i have 10,1,53,64
[16:48] <vish> fishor: the gnome-media bug iirc , or maybe that was another fishor.. nvm then ;)
[16:49] <fishor> vish: o, you mean gnome-record
[16:49] <micahg> fishor: you checked about:plugins?
[16:50] <vish> fishor: yay, its you then! maybe we should poke upstream to review the patch after guadec? ;)
[16:50] <fishor> micahg: yes i have only one plugin
[16:50] <micahg> hmmm, weird
[16:51] <fishor> vish: it will be great :D
[16:53] <fishor> micahg: more interesting is. there is two different players(frontend, or whatever) on youtube
[16:53] <fishor> with newest i do not have any problem
[16:53] <fishor> for example this one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jodVX7xBuYE&feature=sub&videos=S0YXRV2qqK8
[16:54] <micahg> fishor: wfm
[16:54] <shtylman> question about the xulrunner packaging: how come the libmozjs.so symlink no longer exists in /usr/lib ? I keep making it myself but everytime the xulrunner package updates it goes away. What is the proper way to handle linking against libmozjs? and can we bring the symlink back?
[16:55] <micahg> shtylman: it was part of xulrunner (1.8) which was dropped for Lucid
[16:55] <micahg> shtylman: there's already multiple requests for that
[16:55] <fishor> micahg: this work for me too
[16:55] <fishor> but other one not
[16:55] <shtylman> micahg: is there a bug open for it?
[16:55] <shtylman> will these requests be heard?
[16:56] <micahg> shtylman: bug 286906 is WRT the upstream issues
[16:56] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 286906 in xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "provide and support a top-level library package for libmozjs (Was: Unable to use libmozjs.so in an application, because of library path problem.) (affects: 6) (dups: 1) (heat: 47)" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/286906
[16:57] <micahg> shtylman: we've worked around it for most of the packages in teh archive
[16:57] <shtylman> micahg: how so?
[16:57] <micahg> shtylman: run time wrappers
[16:57] <shtylman> heh
[16:58] <shtylman> micahg: what type of runtime wrappers? setting the ld search path basically?
[16:58] <shtylman> I was thinking of adding something to ld.conf.so.d
[16:58] <micahg> shtylman: yes
[16:59] <micahg> shtylman: setting ld.conf.so.d is basically the same as putting it in /usr/include and we don't really want people using it until Mozilla provides a clean way to do it
[16:59] <micahg> or /usr/lib
[17:03] <fishor> micahg: hmm,.. i can reproduce it with ff-3.6.9pre
[17:03] <fishor> it should be some thing wrong with my setup
[17:03] <micahg> fishor: have you tried a clean profile
[17:04] <fishor> yep
[17:05] <micahg> fishor: what video card?
[17:06] <fishor> micahg: intel  g45
[17:06] <fishor> but i do not have any video artifacts
[17:06] <fishor> all seems to be clean
[17:06] <fishor> i'll be back soon
[17:27] <chrisccoulson> hmmm, there doesn't seem to be any way of finding the install location of an extension in FF4.0 :-/
[17:46] <fishor> micahg: here is demo video http://videobin.org/+1jl/1sr.html
[17:46] <fishor> i show here two video from youtube on ff-4.0
[17:46] <fishor> one can be controlled other not
[17:49] <micahg> fishor: weird, looks like bug 410407, but only sometimes
[17:49] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 410407 in nspluginwrapper (Fedora) (and 11 other projects) "Adobe Flash Player does not respond to mouse clicks [READ DESCRIPTION] (affects: 921) (dups: 52) (heat: 4074)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/410407
[17:52] <fishor> micahg: hmm... really interesting. disabling compiz do the trick
[17:53] <fishor> this is the bag
[18:41] <fishor> micahg: thank you for help. and how is the optimised xulrunner doing? :D
[19:08] <fta> micahg, as expected, no one cared about my pysnmp fix
[19:12] <BUGa_grumpy> or my chromium crash
[19:19] <asac> chrisccoulson: micahg: is latest daily on 4.0 building/working?
[19:20] <chrisccoulson> asac - seems to be, are you having issues?
[19:21] <asac> no ... just wondered if i could copy it and see if it builds on arm
[19:21] <asac> but that question was just answered as we figured that its indeed a compiler problem we are seeing there
[19:24] <chrisccoulson> asac - yeah, i think lool already tried building the latest spidermonkey from mozilla-central, and it had the same problem
[19:25] <asac> true
[19:26] <micahg> asac: just tried it seems to work
[19:26] <asac> kk
[19:26] <asac> thx
[19:26] <micahg> asac: aside from a building problem on hardy/jaunty due to symbols
[19:27] <micahg> asac: I'll be making it all-in-one next weekend most likely
[19:27]  * micahg will be back in about an hour
[19:28] <asac> k ttyl
[19:45] <gnomefreak> how do i change the icons themes in ff4 (the reload,back,forward,home ect...)
[19:55] <gnomefreak> seems no theme addons work with 4.0
[20:30] <gnomefreak> can anyone install this script into greasemonkey? it isnt working so well here http://userscripts.org/scripts/source/47591.user.js
[20:48] <asac> gnomefreak: well. chrome changed considerably in 4.0. so thats kind of expected i guess. can you change no theme at all? or just icons?
[20:49] <gnomefreak> asac: i can change the window boarder but that is it
[20:49] <gnomefreak> window boarder is controlled by gtk themes
[21:41] <chrisccoulson> grrrrr, appmenu