| === satellit__ is now known as satellit__afk | ||
| === satellit_ is now known as satellit_afk | ||
| * dipankar says hello to all | 03:26 | |
| dipankar | lfaraone, around? | 03:26 |
|---|---|---|
| lfaraone | dipankar: yessir. | 03:30 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, I got something in flipsticks activity | 03:30 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: oh? | 03:30 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, alsroot told that the toolkit dependency is missing | 03:30 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, he mentioned the following: | 03:31 |
| dipankar | " | 03:31 |
| dipankar | Looks like package does not contain toolkit dependency. | 03:31 |
| dipankar | Anyway toolkit is out-dated and will be replaced by polyol. For now, you | 03:31 |
| dipankar | can use "fully-bundled" brnach on | 03:31 |
| dipankar | " | 03:31 |
| lfaraone | alsroot: do you mean python-sugar-toolkit? | 03:32 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, meanwhile can you help me with this last lintian warning? | 03:42 |
| dipankar | http://paste.ubuntu.com/470501/ | 03:42 |
| dipankar | The package is Sugar Log Activity | 03:42 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: okay. did you declare DEB_SUGAR_BRANCHES in debian/rules and regen control? | 03:43 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, yup. here is the rules file: http://paste.ubuntu.com/470502/ | 03:44 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: you changed the name of the package in rules to sugar-log-activity-0.86 but didn't make the change to the control or changelog files. | 04:00 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, actually I had confusion over that. | 04:02 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, in the changelog: the first entry is of some other name | 04:03 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, shall I keep this too in the changelog: | 04:05 |
| dipankar | " | 04:05 |
| dipankar | sugar-log-activity (6-0ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low | 04:05 |
| dipankar | * Initial upload to Ubuntu | 04:05 |
| dipankar | -- Jani Monoses <jani@ubuntu.com> Sat, 08 Dec 2007 21:51:00 +0200 | 04:05 |
| dipankar | " | 04:05 |
| dipankar | I had the doubt that we are uploading the package to Debian, but this entry is for Ubuntu | 04:06 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, now I am having these warnings: | 04:11 |
| dipankar | " | 04:11 |
| dipankar | Now running lintian... | 04:11 |
| dipankar | W: sugar-log-activity-0.86 source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 5 | 04:11 |
| dipankar | W: sugar-log-activity-0.86: unknown-locale-code mvo | 04:11 |
| dipankar | W: sugar-log-activity-0.86: unknown-locale-code pis | 04:11 |
| dipankar | W: sugar-log-activity-0.86: unknown-locale-code tzo | 04:11 |
| dipankar | Finished running lintian. | 04:11 |
| dipankar | " | 04:11 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: wellm, the package is based off the Ubuntu version, right? | 04:12 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: so it's probably okay to leave the ubuntu changes in there. | 04:12 |
| dipankar | ok | 04:12 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: I think both those warnings have been discussed on the mailing list. | 04:12 |
| dipankar | ok, I will go through the mails | 04:13 |
| lfaraone | .dipankar: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.laptop.olpc.debian.devel/22 | 04:14 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: * rather, you want to read http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.laptop.olpc.debian.devel/226 | 04:14 |
| dipankar | thanks, I was looking for ankur's query only. | 04:15 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, Thanks for the link | 05:18 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: happy to help. | 05:19 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, I also found the mail in which you discussed about the first warning with Jonas | 05:19 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, i guess you would be going to bed now | 05:19 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: yep, let me know if you have any questions and I'll get to them in the morning. | 05:20 |
| dipankar | I will make changes in the package and add it for review then but evening (IST) | 05:20 |
| dipankar | See you soon | 05:20 |
| dipankar | :) | 05:20 |
| dipankar | Goodnight | 05:20 |
| dfarning | Manusheel, good morning | 12:01 |
| Manusheel | dfarning: Good morning. | 12:02 |
| Manusheel | dipankar: Hi Dipankar. | 13:26 |
| Manusheel | Around? | 13:26 |
| dipankar | Manusheel, Hello Sir | 13:27 |
| Manusheel | dipankar: Hello. Thanks for the e-mail to Luke. | 13:27 |
| Manusheel | Where do we have a confusion? | 13:28 |
| dipankar | Manusheel, Initially Luke told me to ask Neeraj what he did for the 0.86 & 0.88 compatibility | 13:28 |
| Manusheel | dipankar: Ok. | 13:29 |
| dipankar | when I asked him, he told me to change the .orig tar ball names | 13:29 |
| dipankar | in pristine tar branch | 13:29 |
| Manusheel | dipankar: Yes. | 13:29 |
| Manusheel | That needs to be renamed. | 13:29 |
| dipankar | I have done that | 13:29 |
| Manusheel | dipankar: Let me send you some documentation that Kandarp and Neeraj prepared. | 13:30 |
| Manusheel | I hope that helps. | 13:30 |
| dipankar | ok. That will be helpful. That might answer to my my question "Why we need to rename it there?" | 13:30 |
| lfaraone | afternoon. | 13:32 |
| Manusheel | lfaraone: Good afternoon. | 13:33 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: well, dpkg expects that there is a source tarball which matches the pattern <packaga name>_<version>.orig.tar.{gz, bz2, lzma} in the directory immediately above the unpacked package source. | 13:33 |
| dipankar | hey lfaraone, good morning | 13:33 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: and pristine-tar is happy to oblidge by generating such a tarball using the stored tarball information it carrys in the git pristine-tar branch. | 13:33 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: thanks. | 13:33 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: so when it notices that it can't find such a file, either because you haven't imported the tarball or becasue the tarball name does not match the package name, it errors out. | 13:34 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, if you could pull in my pristine branch of log activity: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar-log-activity.git;a=shortlog | 13:34 |
| dipankar | There are two different names in the pristine branch | 13:35 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, I am getting these in listing: | 13:36 |
| dipankar | " | 13:36 |
| dipankar | dipankar@dipankar-laptop:~/sugar-log-activity$ ls | 13:36 |
| dipankar | debian | 13:36 |
| dipankar | locale | 13:36 |
| dipankar | sugar-logviewer-activity_23.orig.tar.bz2.delta | 13:36 |
| dipankar | sugar-logviewer-activity_23.orig.tar.bz2.id | 13:36 |
| dipankar | sugar-logviewer-activity_6.orig.tar.gz.delta | 13:36 |
| dipankar | sugar-logviewer-activity_6.orig.tar.gz.id | 13:36 |
| dipankar | " | 13:36 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: right. why do you think there are two files each with each listed version? | 13:37 |
| lfaraone | or even two versions at all. | 13:38 |
| Manusheel | lfaraone: Will it be possible for you to review record, jigsaw puzzle and irc? | 13:38 |
| lfaraone | Manusheel: Yes. | 13:38 |
| Manusheel | lfaraone: Thank you. Appreciate your support. | 13:38 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, is it due to different extension? I am not sure though | 13:40 |
| dipankar | But that doesn't make sense | 13:40 |
| dipankar | :( | 13:40 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, is it due to the fact that I imported v23 in the existing v6 of the activity? | 13:40 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: yeah. | 13:41 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, Then I made some mistake in importing :( | 13:42 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: there's no real reason to remove the old versions, since they take up almost zero disk space as is. | 13:42 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: no, that's not a problem to have more than one. | 13:42 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, then they are supposed to be coming like this only? | 13:42 |
| dipankar | I mean when I further upgrade, they will keep on adding the tar balls? | 13:43 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: take a look at the pristine-tar branch of sugar-0.88 | 13:43 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/sugar.git;a=tree;h=refs/heads/pristine-tar;hb=pristine-tar | 13:44 |
| dipankar | * ohk I get it. | 13:44 |
| dipankar | HUGE list | 13:44 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: yeah. the reason you're getting an error is because there's no sugar-logviewer-activity-0.86_23.orig.tar.bz2.{delta,id}. | 13:45 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, shall I rename it then? | 13:45 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: so the easiest way is to git mv the files (only of the latest version, mind you, no real need to touch the other two) to the "proper" name. | 13:46 |
| dipankar | *I remember changing it though | 13:46 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: yes. I think there's a post by me that covers that on one of the lists. | 13:46 |
| Manusheel | lfaraone: Did you get a chance to look at https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-sugarteam/2010-July/002015.html? Is there a tutorial on syncing Debian packages to Ubuntu 10.10? | 13:47 |
| Manusheel | lfaraone: We would like to get started on it. | 13:47 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, Now I remember. I was having a confusion whether to put version number in the name! | 13:47 |
| lfaraone | Manusheel: I have not looked at it yet, but looking at it now, it's a very good example of a sync request. Granted, the explanation could be a bit more... explanaining, but c'est la vie. | 13:48 |
| Manusheel | lfaraone: Yes, it is indeed a good example of sync request. Some more explanation would be hellpful. | 13:49 |
| lfaraone | Manusheel: I talked to kandarpk about it yesterday, http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/07/28/%23ubuntu-sugarteam.html#t17:05 | 13:50 |
| lfaraone | Manusheel: but, in all honesty, 'requestsync' makes it so dead simple that there's not much space to mess up :) | 13:51 |
| Manusheel | lfaraone: Thank you. This is a very good starting point. | 13:51 |
| Manusheel | lfaraone: yes :-) Completely agree. | 13:52 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, just a question: The activity name was changed to Log from Logviewer. So, shouldn't I change it to : sugar-log-activity-0.86_23.orig.tar.bz2.{delta,id}. | 13:53 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: yes. | 13:53 |
| dipankar | ok | 13:53 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, how do I commit these changes? -- Return back to master branch and run " git commit -a"? | 13:55 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: no, you'll commit them in the pristine-tar branch. | 13:56 |
| dipankar | ok | 13:56 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: since it's a git mv command, the changes area automatically staged, so you don't need to use -a | 13:56 |
| dipankar | oops I missed git in git mv :( | 13:56 |
| dipankar | then I think I need to run git commit -a | 13:57 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, I have pushed the changes to git repo | 14:00 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: does the package build? | 14:00 |
| dipankar | just a sec | 14:01 |
| dipankar | oh no. It didnot work | 14:01 |
| === satellit__afk is now known as satellit__ | ||
| dipankar | lfaraone, here is the error: http://paste.ubuntu.com/470692/ | 14:03 |
| dipankar | I tried running "clean command" | 14:04 |
| dipankar | but also didn't work | 14:04 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: what does "git rm debian/sugar-log-activity -r" do for you? | 14:09 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, the o/p: http://paste.ubuntu.com/470695/ | 14:09 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: cool, somehow those files got added. git commit that and try building again. | 14:11 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, how come they were there? I ran "fakeroot debian/rules clean" :( | 14:12 |
| dipankar | before building package | 14:12 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: because those files are from an interrupted pacakage build, they should have been automatically removed. | 14:13 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, still the same: http://paste.ubuntu.com/470696/ | 14:14 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: no, it's different. | 14:14 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: in this case, the only real error is line 5. | 14:14 |
| dipankar | ok :) | 14:14 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: it's saying you have a binary file which shouldn't be there. | 14:14 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, there are two files in the tree source though | 14:15 |
| dipankar | http://paste.ubuntu.com/470699/ | 14:16 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, ^^ the {delta,id} files shouldn't be here I guess | 14:16 |
| dipankar | the were originally not there | 14:16 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: right. they're supposed to be in the pristine-tar only | 14:17 |
| dipankar | yeah | 14:17 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, shall I remove them then? | 14:17 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: yes. | 14:18 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, great! now it is running | 14:20 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, btw did you get a chance to check the e-mail I sent today? It was regarding the lintian warnings only | 14:21 |
| dipankar | i am still getting these: | 14:22 |
| dipankar | " | 14:22 |
| dipankar | Now running lintian... | 14:22 |
| dipankar | W: sugar-log-activity-0.86 source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 5 | 14:22 |
| dipankar | W: sugar-log-activity-0.86: unknown-locale-code mvo | 14:22 |
| dipankar | W: sugar-log-activity-0.86: unknown-locale-code pis | 14:22 |
| dipankar | W: sugar-log-activity-0.86: unknown-locale-code tzo | 14:22 |
| dipankar | Finished running lintian. | 14:22 |
| dipankar | " | 14:22 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, From the mails and links, I think I can safely ignore them. | 14:22 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: yes. | 14:22 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, shall I assume, the Log-activity is now properly packaged? | 14:24 |
| dipankar | :P | 14:24 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: you know what they say about when you assume... | 14:25 |
| lfaraone | :) | 14:25 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, ohk :) I have marked it for review on Sugar/tasks | 14:26 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, Now I should move to Flipsticks-activity | 14:30 |
| dipankar | alsroot, hi, you around? | 14:30 |
| alsroot | dipankar: yup | 14:31 |
| dipankar | alsroot, it would be great if you could explain you reply a bit more to the flipsticks startup problem query... | 14:32 |
| dipankar | " | 14:32 |
| dipankar | Looks like package does not contain toolkit dependency. | 14:32 |
| dipankar | Anyway toolkit is out-dated and will be replaced by polyol. For now, you | 14:32 |
| dipankar | can use "fully-bundled" brnach on | 14:32 |
| dipankar | " | 14:32 |
| dipankar | alsroot, lfaraone was asking about whether it is python-sugar-toolkit. | 14:33 |
| alsroot | dipankar: the thing is, I was experimenting w/ 0sugar e.g. tried to create "smart" bundles (they contained 0isntall implementations per arch etc.) and toolkit (not python-sugar-toolkit) dependency was bundled in such way | 14:34 |
| alsroot | ..for now, you can just use fully-bundled branch or tarball to follow regular packaging procedures (w/o any 0sugar) | 14:37 |
| dipankar | alsroot, I actually used the tarball, debianized the folder and then tried building the package | 14:37 |
| dipankar | the package builds properly | 14:38 |
| dipankar | but the activity after installation doesn't work | 14:38 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: right, because it depends on something that isn't packaged yet. | 14:39 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: so alsroot is suggesting to instead source your work from a branch which contains the something, embedded. | 14:39 |
| lfaraone | alsroot: is it infeasable to package the toolkit separately, not worth doing, or what? | 14:39 |
| alsroot | lfaraone: toolkit dependecy is obsolete and will be replaced by the same polyol | 14:40 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone, dfarning: Good morning | 14:40 |
| kandarpk | dipankar: hi | 14:40 |
| alsroot | kandarpk: so, for now, it will be easier to use just bundled version | 14:40 |
| alsroot | lfaraone: ^ | 14:40 |
| dipankar | kandarpk, hi :) | 14:40 |
| lfaraone | alsroot: right, makes sense. should we hold off on flipsticks until then, rather than embed a bundled version? | 14:41 |
| lfaraone | hey kandarpk . | 14:41 |
| kandarpk | alsroot: hi | 14:41 |
| * lfaraone thinks that might be the best route. | 14:41 | |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: have you updated the initial-debianization tarball ? | 14:42 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: no, I haven't. | 14:42 |
| lfaraone | kandarpk: personally, although the tarball is a good start, I usually like to begin from the debian/ of an existing package that does what I want already. | 14:42 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: Ok, but weren't you planning to update it ? | 14:43 |
| alsroot | lfaraone: the thing is, polyol, itself, is not yet released, and its python API is different, I was planing to support current API only in polyol-2 (i.e. not right tomorrow :) | 14:43 |
| kandarpk | lfaraone: I've to document the steps involved in packaging | 14:44 |
| lfaraone | alsroot: okay, well, no rush. | 14:44 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: rather than bundling toolkit, I think it might be a good idea just to hold off on flipsticvks. | 14:44 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, I guess that was for me ^^ | 14:45 |
| dipankar | :P | 14:45 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: thoughts? | 14:46 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: well, I'm asking dfarning whether he's okay with taht. | 14:46 |
| dipankar | ok | 14:46 |
| * dipankar is away: Be Right Back | 14:59 | |
| caroline_ | good morning | 14:59 |
| caroline_ | was someone looking for me? | 14:59 |
| * ankur_ says net connectivity is not good due to rains and might get disconnected | 15:02 | |
| ankur_ | hi lfaraone | 15:02 |
| ankur_ | around>? | 15:03 |
| lfaraone | alsroot: yes. | 15:03 |
| ankur_ | lfaraone, well i needed to do some changes to irc activity | 15:04 |
| lfaraone | ankur_: okay. | 15:04 |
| ankur_ | what i need to do is now to undo the change made | 15:05 |
| ankur_ | to | 15:05 |
| ankur_ | git | 15:05 |
| ankur_ | package | 15:05 |
| lfaraone | uh? | 15:05 |
| ankur_ | actually i did some changes to source code by changing execute bits of four file | 15:05 |
| lfaraone | ankur_: right, that's not terrible. you can undo it easily. | 15:07 |
| * dipankar is back (gone 00:10:51) | 15:09 | |
| * dipankar suggests ankur_ to get some other isp | 15:10 | |
| dipankar | lfaraone, so we have to halt on flipsticks? | 15:10 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: I guess so, for now. | 15:12 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, any other activity that needs attention? I can help in that. | 15:12 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, plus one to flipsticks | 15:17 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, plus one to flipsticks | 15:17 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: mk. | 15:20 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: I appreciate your enthusiasm, but I don't have anything for you at the moment :) | 15:20 |
| dipankar | ohk :) | 15:20 |
| * lfaraone is taking a 15 minute brunch. | 15:32 | |
| * lfaraone returned. | 15:38 | |
| dfarning | dipankar, are you out of things to work on? | 15:39 |
| dfarning | dipankar, are you out of things to work on? | 15:39 |
| dipankar | dfarning, I am helping ankur with paint-activity and also starting with documentation on packaging activities | 15:40 |
| dfarning | very weird I am using ubuntu 10.10 and xchat sometime douple posts things:) | 15:40 |
| dipankar | I thought ankur could use a helping hand | 15:40 |
| dipankar | :) | 15:40 |
| dipankar | dfarning, yeah, i was also observing that. Pretty weird | 15:41 |
| dfarning | dipankar, very nice as soon as possiable we should move the documentaion on packaging activities to the wiki | 15:41 |
| dipankar | sure | 15:42 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: re surf, surf depends on python-gi, but when python-gi is installed sugar-emulator crashes. | 15:42 |
| dfarning | dipankar, thanks we want every one to benifit from the documentation you guys are writing. | 15:43 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, what looks like the best way forward? | 15:43 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: file a bug against sugar and hope there's someone smart enough to know the solution :) | 15:44 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, +1 and can you ask rgs_ to look at it. he is on a hacker retreat so can dig into hard problems like this:) | 15:45 |
| lfaraone | will do. | 15:46 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, thanks | 15:46 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: bug reported, should be arriving in mailboxes soonish. | 15:49 |
| lfaraone | rgs_: poke. | 15:49 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, dfarning : Ankur's internet is giving trouble due to the heavy rains that took place here | 15:49 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: yeah, he told me. | 15:49 |
| dipankar | * He told me to convey this msg :) | 15:49 |
| dfarning | dipankar, thanks it will take a while to work out the kinks as people move and go mack to school. | 15:51 |
| lfaraone | dfarning: don't worry, you'll have me for another month | 15:51 |
| dfarning | lfaraone, thanks | 15:51 |
| dipankar | dfarning, yeah . lfaraone is here to handle the things :P | 15:51 |
| dipankar | just kidding | 15:51 |
| dipankar | We just need sometime to work things out | 15:52 |
| dipankar | :) | 15:52 |
| dipankar | Then we will back in full | 15:52 |
| dipankar | lfaraone, you mentioned shell.log attached in the mail in mailing list. But I didn't find any. | 15:54 |
| dipankar | do I need to open any link to get that shell.log? | 15:54 |
| lfaraone | dipankar: oops, thanks for the catch. | 15:54 |
| dipankar | np, glad I went through the mail | 15:55 |
| * lfaraone is off, talk to you in the PM. | 15:57 | |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Hi kandarp. | 16:08 |
| manusheel | Around | 16:08 |
| manusheel | ? | 16:08 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: yes sir. | 16:08 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Did you get a chance to talk to Dipankar and Neeraj on figuring out how to request for review at tasks page? | 16:09 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: Sir, I got it myself, just had to add some comment after making changes. | 16:11 |
| kandarpk | manusheel sir: I've added info. regarding speak there | 16:11 |
| manusheel | kandarpk: Great. | 16:13 |
| manusheel | That is neat. | 16:13 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Hi Luke. | 16:47 |
| manusheel | Around? | 16:47 |
| manusheel | neeraj: Hi Neeraj. | 16:48 |
| manusheel | Around? | 16:48 |
| neeraj | manusheel sir: yes | 16:53 |
| manusheel | neeraj: Did we test hello mesh package? | 16:53 |
| manusheel | What were the results? | 16:53 |
| neeraj | manusheel: I asked kandarp sir whether he knew how to connect our sugar and test the package.. | 16:55 |
| neeraj | dipankar: Do u have ny idea how can we do that? | 16:55 |
| manusheel | dipankar: around? | 16:57 |
| manusheel | neeraj: Send an e-mail to Tomeu about it. | 17:02 |
| manusheel | Copy Dipankar, me and Kandarp on it. | 17:02 |
| manusheel | neeraj: I would like you to get familiar with two things today - | 17:04 |
| manusheel | Ubuntu bug tracker. | 17:04 |
| manusheel | 2. v | 17:05 |
| manusheel | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess | 17:05 |
| dfarning | manusheel, please cc the sugar team mailing list. Tomeu would prefer to answer questions on public lists rather than private mails. | 17:05 |
| neeraj | manusheel sir: Ok.. I will leave for dinner now and look at the above two things.. | 17:06 |
| neeraj | brb in 10-15 min | 17:06 |
| === neeraj is now known as neeraj_afk | ||
| manusheel | dfarning: +1 | 17:08 |
| manusheel | Thank you for the pointer. | 17:08 |
| manusheel | Please let me know. | 17:11 |
| manusheel | lfaraone: Did you get a chance to review Record, jigsaw puzzle and IRC today? | 17:11 |
| rgs_ | lfaraone: interesting. will look into it later. | 17:13 |
| === neeraj_afk_ is now known as neeraj_afk | ||
| * dipankar is back from dinner | 17:34 | |
| dipankar | manusheel, Sir, I was off to have dinner | 17:34 |
| === neeraj_afk is now known as neeraj | ||
| dipankar | neeraj, you around | 17:35 |
| dipankar | ? | 17:35 |
| neeraj | dipankar: yes | 17:35 |
| dipankar | neeraj, what were you asking? | 17:36 |
| dipankar | regarding connecting the activity.. | 17:36 |
| neeraj | dipankar: I was saying that do u know how we can share activity online? | 17:37 |
| neeraj | activities running in our sugar-emulator | 17:37 |
| dipankar | neeraj, its the same with every activity | 17:37 |
| dipankar | : | 17:37 |
| dipankar | there will be a circle with one dot in it | 17:37 |
| dipankar | on the top menu | 17:37 |
| dipankar | in the activity | 17:37 |
| neeraj | dipankar: yes but if u share an activity | 17:38 |
| dipankar | click on it and check the neighbourhood option | 17:38 |
| dipankar | ok | 17:38 |
| neeraj | then how can I see it?.. we need to be connected to same server.. no? | 17:38 |
| dipankar | yup | 17:39 |
| neeraj | dipankar: lets try using this http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Community_Jabber_Servers | 17:40 |
| dipankar | for that we need to be on same server | 17:40 |
| dipankar | neeraj_, use the first one: | 17:41 |
| dipankar | jabber.laptop.org | 17:41 |
| dipankar | I am on the ^^ server through emulator. | 17:42 |
| neeraj_ | dipankar, I have also added this server | 17:44 |
| dipankar | but I see nobody! | 17:45 |
| dipankar | neeraj_, are you finding anybody online? | 17:45 |
| dfarning | manusheel, lets package exelearning for debain and ubutu it should be pretty straight forward. | 17:45 |
| dfarning | manusheel, the source is at http://exelearning.org/wiki | 17:46 |
| neeraj_ | dipankar, no.. | 17:59 |
| dipankar | neeraj_, I need to head to bed | 18:00 |
| * dipankar says good night and great day to all | 18:00 | |
| lfaraone | manusheel: I didn't review IRC because no review was requested. | 22:44 |
| dfarning_ | lfaraone can you take a look at EXE learning and see if it would be possiable to package? http://exelearning.org/wiki | 22:53 |
| * lfaraone looks. | 22:54 | |
| * lfaraone will be back, going on the rocks. | 22:54 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!